• Hey everyone, staff have documented a list of banned content and subject matter that we feel are not consistent with site values, and don't make sense to host discussion of on Famiboards. This list (and the relevant reasoning per item) is viewable here.
  • Do you have audio editing experience and want to help out with the Famiboards Discussion Club Podcast? If so, we're looking for help and would love to have you on the team! Just let us know in the Podcast Thread if you are interested!

StarTopic Future Nintendo Hardware & Technology Speculation & Discussion |ST| (Read the staff posts before commenting!)

RE: WTF SAMSUNG 7BLT???

I'm not gonna conjecture about node likelihood in this post, just laying out some info. We somewhat fall victim to node branding here again. Here is a quick table that might help

"Official" node names/node classesTSMC Node NamesSEC Node names
10nm10FF10LPE
10LPP
8LPP (Orin/Desktop Ampere )
8LPA
7nmN7 (Server Ampere, Xbox Series, Steam Deck7LPP
N6 (PS5 "Slim", Steam Deck OLED)6LPP
5nmN5 (Most RDNA 3)5LPE
4N (Lovelace)5LPP
4LPE
4LPP
3nmN3 (Blackwell? iPhone 15)3GAE

As you can see from the table, there is no "official" 8nm node. 8nm (8LPP, more specifically) is an advancement of the "10nm" class nodde that Samsung had already developed.

7nm is the next official class down. Moving to Samsungs 7nm class nodes would be a significant leap, not "just" a further refinement of 10nm.

What about 7LPH? It doesn't exist, at least as far as the public is concerned. Whether it is the name of some customized 7nm class node of Samsung's is conjecture outside my scope here.

But is it any good? Well, it's hard to know because we don't have a lot of data to compare. But if we conjecture that it's roughly equivalent to the TSMC N7, and compare desktop RTX 30 to the server version, we can ballpark that it's a 30% performance/power improvement. But that is a lot of conjecturing.

Would that be good enough? Thraktor's power numbers have been predictive of power numbers from various graphics card efficiency tests, so I tend to still believe them. The implication seemed to be that Nintendo needed a full 50% increase in performance/power

That assumes that Nvidia can't find additional savings for this specific use case, and that Nintendo chooses to keep power draw roughly the same. These are not hard and fast truths.
 
IMG-0314.jpg
 
Possibly, but if they were going to a "revision" syle update I would have expected it to be here by now. Alas.

Launching a (cross compatible) revision of it alongside the console makes a lot of sense, though my question there is, what to revise?
If they're updating the sticks, that. Maybe update the Bluetooth controller, too?

At that point I suppose it would be a brand new controller VS a revision, but still. They could very well keep the shell the same.
 
T239 Drake almost certainly even more likely now is TSMC 4N, size a bit bigger than Switch 1 tells everything because with Samsung 8nm we would have SD size, also is for sure not Samsung 7nm, is some big BS as this whole Korean article
I'm still on team 4N, but being a big chip clocked low has benefits of not needing as much cooling as the heat is spread over a larger area, making it easier to cool. it wouldn't need to be SD size, especially so given the size differences
 
Beat me to it lol

Here is the TLDR
  • Switch 2 is expected to launch as early as the second half of this year
  • Suppliers have reportedly reached a considerable degree of agreement for initial production contracts.
  • Samsung Foundry will fabricate the SoC on Samsung's 7LPH process node
  • Samsung will provide the NAND storage for both the cartridges and internal memory
  • Samsung has overcome competitors from China to be the display supplierring up a scenario more than once about Samsung supplying the majority of components to save costs for Nintendo
I brought up a potential scenario about Samsung supplying the majority of components of Switch 2 more than once before as a way to save costs for Nintendo. Specifically foundry node, storage, RAM, and screen. Makes sense with the carts too I now.

I didn't want this timeline I swear. Hopefully it's not true.
 
Hope it's OK to link to this Taki Udon video that just dropped.

Using a hardware mod and Ubuntu Linux, Taki shows the Switch OLED Edition + the OLED dock is wired for 4K@60Hz (and 1440p@120Hz) output.


Lol well damn you beat me to it.

I just finished watching it. So even in 4 GB the Switch can run low demanding games in 4K and surprise surprise! The Switch emulated the Switch. So I wonder if the Switch 2 will have emulation. Itself seeing as how we can at least run pokemon BDSP, Let's GO, and Super Mario RPG in 4K (very choppy because of a lack of vsync).

If that's the case does this mean that Switch could potentially beat out PS5 in 4K games? Assuming they go about this path.
 
It's amazing we got all this news today. Leaks will really start flowing the closer we get to the official reveal. That's gotta be sometime this Summer given the expected early 2025 release date.
 
RE: WTF SAMSUNG 7BLT???

I'm not gonna conjecture about node likelihood in this post, just laying out some info. We somewhat fall victim to node branding here again. Here is a quick table that might help

"Official" node names/node classesTSMC Node NamesSEC Node names
10nm10FF10LPE
10LPP
8LPP (Orin/Desktop Ampere )
8LPA
7nmN7 (Server Ampere, Xbox Series, Steam Deck7LPP
N6 (PS5 "Slim", Steam Deck OLED)6LPP
5nmN5 (Most RDNA 3)5LPE
4N (Lovelace)5LPP
4LPE
4LPP
3nmN3 (Blackwell? iPhone 15)3GAE

As you can see from the table, there is no "official" 8nm node. 8nm (8LPP, more specifically) is an advancement of the "10nm" class nodde that Samsung had already developed.

7nm is the next official class down. Moving to Samsungs 7nm class nodes would be a significant leap, not "just" a further refinement of 10nm.

What about 7LPH? It doesn't exist, at least as far as the public is concerned. Whether it is the name of some customized 7nm class node of Samsung's is conjecture outside my scope here.

But is it any good? Well, it's hard to know because we don't have a lot of data to compare. But if we conjecture that it's roughly equivalent to the TSMC N7, and compare desktop RTX 30 to the server version, we can ballpark that it's a 30% performance/power improvement. But that is a lot of conjecturing.

Would that be good enough? Thraktor's power numbers have been predictive of power numbers from various graphics card efficiency tests, so I tend to still believe them. The implication seemed to be that Nintendo needed a full 50% increase in performance/power

That assumes that Nvidia can't find additional savings for this specific use case, and that Nintendo chooses to keep power draw roughly the same. These are not hard and fast truths.
Blackwell is still 4nm family
 
That is if you believe Switch 2 being released as early as 2nd half of this year to be credible too. Which I think most of us don't find credible, when Nikkei has already reported March 2025 about 2 months ago.
I feel like this is 4N cope. If this is coming from industry talk (which it almost certainly would be) it could very well be fiscal year.
 
I feel like this is 4N cope. If this is coming from industry talk (which it almost certainly would be) it could very well be fiscal year.
Cope on whose part? LiC, Thraktor, and Necrolipe also don't find the blog post credible either. Thraktor pointed out 5-gen V-NAND mention isn't true.

If you want to gloss over multiple problems with Korean reporting, that sounds like cope to me.
 
Last edited:
Thank you!

----

* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
Hidden content is only available for registered users. Sharing it outside of Famiboards is subject to moderation.


* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
Hidden content is only available for registered users. Sharing it outside of Famiboards is subject to moderation.
 
Please read this staff post before posting.

Furthermore, according to this follow-up post, all off-topic chat will be moderated.
Last edited:


Back
Top Bottom