MisterBono
Rattata
Nate did warn us. We chose not to believe
Who cares. Only the most hardcore of the hardcore will have finished totk by then.Will we seriously have a month of June with no first party game?
Nintendo should have no problem getting through this fiscal year. I expect Zelda and whatever they announce for the rest of the year to be enough to keep them afloat. I currently expect a late January/early Feb 2024 announcement for the new system with a May/June launch. 15 million units for your 7th year is great imo.
Warn us of what? He's as much in the dark as the rest of us. I think we're leaning too much towards his word again.Nate did warn us. We chose not to believe
Is there a difference between cheekiness and follyWhen the wise shows the timeline, the less wise focuses on the lack of E3. Or something like that.
I think that Nintendo will casually mention the console soon, around June or July.
The language does not strongly suggest anything. It is specifically constructed not to do so.Yeah, this forecast and the language they use really strongly suggests no Switch 2 this fiscal year.
A release in April to August 2024 is possible but it just really hasn't been done very much at all before. Every game console except two has originally launched between September and March. My expectations currently are "Between September 2024 and March 2025" right now though "Between September 2025 and November 2025" is possible.
(Also, I do think people need to seriously consider the possibility that Drake was just cancelled fairly late into development due to some issues that Nintendo considered a deal breaker and that we'll be looking at a very different chip for the Switch 2)
which one? the games being ready for late 2022?At least the original rumor from Nate lines up almost perfectly with the information we have about T239s production timeline (LinkedIn posts, linux drivers et ). May not be a coincidence.
One suspects that we'll hear about the Mario Kart 8 Deluxe Booster Course Pass (Wave 5) and Pokémon Scarlet & Violet DLC in June. Since the Switch's launch, Nintendo has released content at a rate of one publication per month (a rate of, not necessarily a publication in every month). A "fallow" month is possible because they might want LOZ: TOTK to have more time in the spotlight. The same was true for BOTW, as Mario Kart 8 Deluxe released around 8 weeks (closer to 2 months) after it. It isn't the big deal some think it is. In the second half of the year, we could have two publications drop in one month. There's no cause for panic.Will we seriously have a month of June with no first party game?
I can't find a direct quote from him anywhere about future hardware, just the nikkei article.One of the fellow members posted a translation that Furakawa said that they have no announcements at the moment
AMD claimed the AMD Z1 Extreme has up to 8.6 TFLOPS of performance, not ≥10 TFLOPS.I'm getting one for third party support reasons. Frankly, Switch 2 is already outdated and underpowered when it does release as it cannot match even the ROG Ally which is coming soon. The ROG Ally based on the Z1 Extreme is already a Switch 2.75 (I will say 3 when it can go above 10TFLOPS, though come to think of it Switch 3 could also somehow fall behind that too, I hope not) when going full power, battery draining? Yes but if you want to push it you have the option to, furthermore I have the option for upscaling and resolution adjustments. VRR is a game changer on a handheld device, I use VRR frequently for PS5 and games that I hear complaints over frame rate or stutter issues just do not affect me, VRR on my TV is so good that I have always had smooth frames and no judder.
That to me is what I was waiting for, the Steam Deck didn't convince me yet as I was waiting for the inevitable successors that would take what they did and make it more convenient (running on Windows) and affordable (leaked prices are definitely in my ball-park compared to all the others on the market) and more powerful (definitely a tick from everything I have seen run on it so far.)
Nintendo will always be for my exclusives though I am sad by how behind they really are when it comes to tech. This should've been out sooner frankly, they have dragged this out far too long and I know every argument out there is it's Nintendo, they make ridiculous money and no competitor will come close to their market share. That isn't the point. To me the point is there are handhelds evolving in this space at a rate that I feel Nintendo isn't bothering to match and making case studies in how fast this space is developing, which to me makes my interest in Switch diminish as a result because it no longer is this mind-blowing piece of tech I once saw it as, it is now archaic and even the Switch 2 is becoming something I'm losing excitement over the more it drags out and will only pick up for exclusives rather than a main console I was once considering back when the handheld space felt more limited.
NateDrake has also made other comments not related to the launch window that people find dubious. One example is that NateDrake seems to have implied that a mid-gen refresh that was planned by Nintendo, but is now cancelled, was planned to be equipped with Drake (see the original comment NateDrake made when Alovon11 responded), which I find dubious for the reasons Thraktor mentioned.Nate did warn us. We chose not to believe
If we're getting late 2024 or 2025-2026 or something then we're probably at least looking at a better node than expected.I'd be pretty happy if T239 was cancelled tbh and we got Switch 2 in like 2025 or 2026 but more powerful than anything the leaks pointed to.
If they talk so early about ReDraketed, they're not going to hit that forecast even with ReDraketed releasing at that timeframe.
I think you both are wrong. They can hit easy that forecast with a price cut of current switch + preorders start on holidays for the Next.Exactly
The language does not strongly suggest anything. It is specifically constructed not to do so.
Good points. Thanks for the clarification!One suspects that we'll hear about the Mario Kart 8 Deluxe Booster Course Pass (Wave 5) and Pokémon Scarlet & Violet DLC in June. Since the Switch's launch, Nintendo has released content at a rate of one publication per month (a rate of, not necessarily a publication in every month). A "fallow" month is possible because they might want LOZ: TOTK to have more time in the spotlight. The same was true for BOTW, as Mario Kart 8 Deluxe released around 8 weeks (closer to 2 months) after it. It isn't the big deal some think it is. In the second half of the year, we could have two publications drop in one month. There's no cause for panic.
Is it unprecedented for a chip to have been made, cancelled and then the company procures a new one?I'd be pretty happy if T239 was cancelled tbh and we got Switch 2 in like 2025 or 2026 but more powerful than anything the leaks pointed to.
If they had already announced it, sure. Nintendo doesn't usually talk about stuff that hasn't already been announced at these meetings, though.The language would be much more suggestive of anything if they were releasing a console this fiscal year.
(Also, I do think people need to seriously consider the possibility that Drake was just cancelled fairly late into development due to some issues that Nintendo considered a deal breaker and that we'll be looking at a very different chip for the Switch 2)
If they had already announced it, sure. Nintendo doesn't usually talk about stuff that hasn't already been announced at these meetings, though.
Release date between late 22 and H1 23.which one? the games being ready for late 2022?
i think if mid fresh hadn't been canceled then we'd just have a worse node, now TSMC 4nm is possible, i don't think they would use another SoC, next Tegra Thor would be in 2025AMD claimed the AMD Z1 Extreme has up to 8.6 TFLOPS of performance, not ≥10 TFLOPS.
But there are asterisks for the up to 8.6 TFLOPS of performance claim:
Anyway, I should hope Asus allows me to run the Asus ROG Ally at whatever configuration I choose since the Asus ROG Ally is a handheld PC.
- As mentioned, the up to 8.6 TFLOPS of performance claim is when the AMD Z1 Extreme is running at up to 30 W
- As Thraktor mentioned here and here, the up to 8.6 TFLOPS of performance claim is based on the RDNA 3 architecture being able to run two FP32 instructions at once (dual-issue), which is only used in specific scenarios and for a limited time. Hence I don't believe games are going to take advantage of RDNA 3's dual-issue feature. So basically, without dual-issue, the AMD Z1 Extreme can basically have up to 4.3 TFLOPS of performance, but with the asterisk of running at up to 30 W
Also, if the Steam Deck is any indication, I don't think any company that plans on releasing a hybrid console that's running on an OS other than Microsoft Windows is going to allow the SoC to run at a TDP >15 W for reasons related to thermals, battery life, and cost.
NateDrake has also made other comments not related to the launch window that people find dubious. One example is that NateDrake seems to have implied that a mid-gen refresh that was planned by Nintendo, but is now cancelled, was planned to be equipped with Drake (see the original comment NateDrake made when Alovon11 responded), which I find dubious for the reasons Thraktor mentioned.
Wasn't there a rumor back in 2020 that both Nintendo and Nvidia were testing a 7nm Tegra X1?NateDrake has also made other comments not related to the launch window that people find dubious. One example is that NateDrake seems to have implied that a mid-gen refresh that was planned by Nintendo, but is now cancelled, was planned to be equipped with Drake (see the original comment NateDrake made when Alovon11 responded), which I find dubious for the reasons Thraktor mentioned.
One aspect I didn't consider is that UFS 3+ should be more power efficient than UFS 2, as it operates at 2.5V/1.2V rather than 3.3V/1.8V. On Micron's UFS 3.1 page, in footnote 2, they specify active power draw at 960mW. On another page, which appears to be referring to UFS 2.1, they specify active power draw as being 70% lower than their 2450 SSD. The spec sheet for the 2450 lists a max active power draw of 5.5W, which would put their UFS 2.1 at 1.65W. Considering they're advertising 1,890MB/s for their UFS 3.1 modules, with UFS 2.1 maxing out at around 1,000MB/s, that's a very substantial increase in power efficiency, on the order of 3x improvement in bandwidth per W.Ooh, nice slide in prices.
For comparison, in early 2019, 256 GB of UFS 3.0 would've cost in the mid to high 20's USD (data point 1 and 2). So, fast forward through the pandemic hike and then the start of the post-pandemic slump, you get a minor version update and half the size for ~57-68% of the price. Not bad at all, considering that as you climb up in size, the price/GB should be going downward.
Yea, it's hard to find 32 GB eMMC in 2017. Last I looked, I saw ~$7 for 64 GB in the end of 2018, here. I don't remember whether 2017-2018 was in the downward trend or upward trend of the flash cycle though
I don't know if Nintendo can choose a significantly better Arm based SoC from Nvidia than T239 in 2025/2026 for the reasons I've explained below.I'd be pretty happy if T239 was cancelled tbh and we got Switch 2 in like 2025 or 2026 but more powerful than anything the leaks pointed to.
So far, based on Geekerwan's reviews (here and here), the Armv9 CPUs have worse performance per watt in comparison to the Cortex-A78 at lower watts.
And Ada Lovelace is practically not that different from Ampere from a GPU architecture standpoint. And Thor, the latest Arm based SoC from Nvidia, has a GPU based on Ada Lovelace, and is planned for release in 2025. So Drake's still the best Arm based SoC from Nvidia Nintendo could use in late 2024/early 2025.
I believe so. But that rumour came from a dubious source.Wasn't there a rumor back in 2020 that both Nintendo and Nvidia were testing a 7nm Tegra X1?
I need a new 2D Mario so bad. Almost as much as Prime 4. Some kind of reimagining of 2D Mario would be huge. Thinking something like Tropical Freeze, with creative set pieces, clever leveldesign, expressive character designs and variety of gameplay while still staying true to the core gameplay.Nintendo would be insane to expect to hit there 15m switch goal with metroid as there big holiday game, I'm expecting 2d mario to ride off the movie hype
Hasn’t he outright denied hardware revisions before, tho?but instead he dances around the question... yeah. I don't think anything happened last night to suggest one thing or another.
Don’t know about y’all but I’m quite excited by the prospect that the next 8-10 months of Switch could be kept going by remasters of GC and Wii classics!
If they were borderline-remakes a la Metroid Prime, then I'd be quite pleased.Don’t know about y’all but I’m quite excited by the prospect that the next 8-10 months of Switch could be kept going by remasters of GC and Wii classics!
Thraktor found some pretty compelling evidence that Nintendo could have initially planned to release the OLED model as a mid-gen refresh. And the OLED model still uses the Tegra X1+ for the SoC.i think if mid fresh hadn't been canceled then we'd just have a worse node, now TSMC 4nm is possible, i don't think they would use another SoC, next Tegra Thor would be in 2025
I'd rather have a 3D Donkey Kong...I need a new 2D Mario so bad. Almost as much as Prime 4. Some kind of reimagining of 2D Mario would be huge. Thinking something like Tropical Freeze, with creative set pieces, clever leveldesign, expressive character designs and variety of gameplay while still staying true to the core gameplay.
Also, please add online.
I don't know if Nintendo can choose a significantly better Arm based SoC from Nvidia than T239 in 2025/2026 for the reasons I've explained below.
I believe so. But that rumour came from a dubious source.
I think a post earlier adressed this somewhatIs there concern of the tech of this device being quite old if it comes late 2024? Or will modern features like DLSS mean negate that somewhat?
For first Dakhil explain that, for second next tegra called Thor will be relased sometimes in 2025, T239 Drake its the best and only one option, thanks to potential Late 2024/Early 2025 window TSMC 4nm its very possible and that can give us good clocksIs there concern of the tech of this device being quite old if it comes late 2024? Or will modern features like DLSS mean negate that somewhat?
That's what it seems like, should be clearer with the transcripts.Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the only bit of information that we got from Nintendo, that was even related to new hardware, is that new/upgraded hardware was not factored into their fiscal year forecast. I've seen various people and media outlets running with that and saying that they're saying that means no new hardware this fiscal year, and that's definitely not what was said. Nintendo words things very carefully, they always have.
Nothing regarding future hardware was really confirmed, as far as we know. It's mostly been hearsay from insiders. Many people are pointing to Nintendo's high sales forecast as indication for a hardware release next year, but I personally don't think it holds any water. It should also be noted that earnings reports aren't typically the best place to look for future announcements; rumblings maybe, but they're not as definitive as people seem to think. I was guilty of falling for it too, so I can't talk too much.welp, that sucks. holiday 23 seemed to make the most sense so this is...interesting. a little worrying? maybe, but I'll stay optimistic. just praying that 3D Mario doesn't get revealed in the next 12 months for Switch 1 I need that bad boy on Switch 2 with glorious RTX
also, did Nintendo also say they had no new hardware planned in 2019 and 2021 when Lite and OLED were surprisingly revealed? maybe we could get another revision this year like a TV-only model, OLED lite, etc.
If it's not factored into the fiscal briefing and forecast already, then it's pretty unlikely that they would update the forecast to add millions of units of hardware, along with changing their cash flow forecasts, mid fiscal year. That would be a very significant change. That's likely why analysts are saying what they are saying, and perhaps they have their own sources as well, based on that other article referencing a "source close to Nintendo" from Nikkei.The only prediction that can be accurately assessed at this point is the prediction that today was going to be chaos.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the only bit of information that we got from Nintendo, that was even related to new hardware, is that new/upgraded hardware was not factored into their fiscal year forecast. I've seen various people and media outlets running with that and saying that they're saying that means no new hardware this fiscal year, and that's definitely not what was said. Nintendo words things very carefully, they always have.
Fiscal year results are not the place to announce a new console, and there's almost nothing we can really say. We got some new rumors from Nikkei, but remember that Nikkei wasn't exactly on the money about Switch revisions in years previous either.
Until the second half of this year is revealed, anything is still up in the air. Until we details about things through the rest of the fiscal year, nothing is ruled out for the fiscal year. Everyone just needs to calm down a little bit. Panic Button does not need to be developing this thread.
Yeah, and the extremely strong Switch projection (despite the Switch OLED being the main sales driver and this being obviously massively affected if the Switch 2 releases this fiscal year) also doesn't mean anything, sure, whatever.
Chaos, which was predicted since it was also predicted by the folks who folks should trust that nothing of note relating to [Redacted] would be covered in Nintendo's financial reports. Which it wasn't. Nothing new has ever been announced by Nintendo via a shareholder communication, nor would you, its terrible marketing.What the #### Is going on here?