Realistically yes. But fingers crossed for this year.the only reason 2024 is coming up is probably because the manufacturing timeline hasn't changed since the 'delay' so it things may be kicking off early and that's confusing people. so mass production is about to begin in the next month or two max and everything will be announced around this timeframe. we're often told there's significant costs in delaying this so they'll use the extra months to create more of a stock for launch.
the main thing is the software - if first parties needed more time they've got till January instead of September~ish before going gold. this is the big thing methinks.
A important note is that the Switch userbase are more willing to try and play obscure games.You know that's where I have been short sighted. When it comes to performance I would only think of Dock mode and you're thinking of both portable and dock, you're right.
I think it all depends on what lesson Nintendo learned.
I think it is the former. Monster Hunter Rise sold millions and half of their software sells are third party. Not to mention that the Switch is the first gen where games tool it up a big notch also had one of the worst performance from their system (excluding 64, they were just starting out). I think their dev want more power so they can do what they want without sacrificing performance. That's including gamefreak.
- They learned they can garner third party support so they work on giving the performance they need.
- They keep the same " take it or leave it approach. We work on something we think is ok enough for us, if you want to make game for us, cool. If not, we don't care.
We have been in a drought for months, News is news, even if it's questionable.are all things that were found and/or discussed here months ago. Maybe I've been following speculation too long but this doesn't strike me as "flood gates are open," it strikes me like fake 4chan Direct leaks where they post a bunch of plausible stuff that's been discussed for a while and then add a couple extra things (like more buttons) so it doesn't sound like they're just listing the same old rumors.
- Slightly bigger, slightly rounder
- Magnetic joycon rails
- 1080p screen
- Backwards compatible game card slot
Some users were literally busting out "lisan al gaib" yesterday which kinda blows my mind. We knew this stuff already yall, what gives?
seemed like they were already messing third parties around by pushing it to early 2025, i can't imagine it's going to be moved forward if ambitious first party software was driving the delay.Realistically yes. But fingers crossed for this year.
Yeah, my hope would be that the initial rumor ends up not true is what I mean.sounds like they are already messing third parties around by pushing it to early 2025, i can't imagine it's going to be moved forward if ambitious first party software was driving the delay.
hey third parties surprise it's now 2024 again. the only good thing is it's sounding more and more certain that March 2025 is pretty damn firm. which is great because honestly when they said 2025 it's sounding like it still could have slipped till the following FY or god-forbid late 2025/2026.
Complaining for the sake of complaining.Some people on the other forum is complaining about having a 1080p screen somehow being worse than a 720p screen. Is there any logic to that argument? They point to modern games not being able to reach 1080p resolutions in handhelds like steam deck.
But i think the logic is that Nintendo knows that most of their own internally developed games will reach 1080p resolution in handheld, the fact that third party AAA games won't reach that number on Switch 2 is not something Nintendo will care much about.
Nintendo:
From what i have gathered is that the manufacturing of the Switch 2 will start in 2024, meanwhile the console will release in early 2025.sounds like they are already messing third parties around by pushing it to early 2025, i can't imagine it's going to be moved forward if ambitious first party software was driving the delay.
hey third parties surprise it's now 2024 again. the only good thing is it's sounding more and more certain that March 2025 is pretty damn firm. which is great because honestly when they said 2025 it's sounding like it still could have slipped till the following FY or god-forbid late 2025/2026.
I think it has to do with people going stir crazy with the lack of news & not following this thread, or developments, religiously.are all things that were found and/or discussed here months ago. Maybe I've been following speculation too long but this doesn't strike me as "flood gates are open," it strikes me like fake 4chan Direct leaks where they post a bunch of plausible stuff that's been discussed for a while and then add a couple extra things (like more buttons) so it doesn't sound like they're just listing the same old rumors.
- Slightly bigger, slightly rounder
- Magnetic joycon rails
- 1080p screen
- Backwards compatible game card slot
Some users were literally busting out "lisan al gaib" yesterday which kinda blows my mind. We knew this stuff already yall, what gives?
Yeah, brought up earlier. I'm assuming you're following the same thread I am there now - several people have already shot that theory down (battery life concerns). things like console having optimization that handheld PCs would not have (like having CPU & GPU combined into a SoC)Some people on the other forum is complaining about having a 1080p screen somehow being worse than a 720p screen. Is there any logic to that argument? They point to modern games not being able to reach 1080p resolutions in handhelds like steam deck.
But i think the logic is that Nintendo knows that most of their own internally developed games will reach 1080p resolution in handheld, the fact that third party AAA games won't reach that number on Switch 2 is not something Nintendo will care much about.
i mean who the hell wants to be the first one to leak what they hear about the switch 2 at this point? I would not and I think this post is a good reason why.The protocol stipulates that at this point our illustrious insiders will now come to confirm, telling us that they have known for some time but needed confirmation to be able to write
Sure but once you begin leaking things correctly people start hitting up your dms whether it is other leakers or even potential sources for leaks. I wouldn't say this suggests he has a source for hardware necessarily.I could be mistaken but I’ve never known Pyoro to be someone who leaks or knows stuff about hardware - only software (games)
Nintendo complaints consist ofComplaining for the sake of complaining.
It's not. 2024 just comes from that poorly written/sourced Korean blog report that has been mostly dismissed at least around here.I thought every insider said it’s coming in 2025. Why is 2024 a discussion?
Switch 1's 720p screen already looks quite good at 7", and sticking to that resolution on a much more capable device means portable mode has a lot more overhead for performance. I imagine a lot of games will manage 1080p native with the help of DLSS, but probably at the cost of asset quality and/or frame-rate.Some people on the other forum is complaining about having a 1080p screen somehow being worse than a 720p screen. Is there any logic to that argument? They point to modern games not being able to reach 1080p resolutions in handhelds like steam deck.
But i think the logic is that Nintendo knows that most of their own internally developed games will reach 1080p resolution in handheld, the fact that third party AAA games won't reach that number on Switch 2 is not something Nintendo will care much about.
It's an electromagnet. They can detect when it has contact on both the top and the bottom and only then activate it.If this really is true and the new Joy-Con attach to the system via magnets…I wonder how Nintendo has designed it to prevent people from getting their skin pinched between the magnets. That seems like a serious problem that would need to be addressed.
Also, there’s no way in hell that they’re dropping the “Nintendo Switch” branding with this, especially if the form factor is as similar as this new alleged leak suggests. It’s gonna be called “Nintendo Switch [something]”, not “Nintendo [something]”—count on it.
Hmm I haven’t seen it. I’m far behind reading in the latest news lolIt's not. 2024 just comes from that poorly written/sourced Korean blog report that has been mostly dismissed at least around here.
Ah, so would that even prevent any pinching from happening if, say, the magnets only made contact with each other on an edge? Like, imagine a Joy-Con put up against the side of the system and touching the system side magnets but tilted at an angle so there’s enough room to fit part of a finger or something between the magnets while both sides are still touching at the edge—would it be able to detect skin between the magnets in that case even if the skin and magnets both came into the described position at the same exact time?It's an electromagnet. They can detect when it has contact on both the top and the bottom and only then activate it.
I still vividly remember how many people complained about current Switch resolution before its release: "It's 2017 and Nintendo still uses 720p screen while my $250 phone is 4K lol".Some people on the other forum is complaining about having a 1080p screen somehow being worse than a 720p screen. Is there any logic to that argument? They point to modern games not being able to reach 1080p resolutions in handhelds like steam deck.
But i think the logic is that Nintendo knows that most of their own internally developed games will reach 1080p resolution in handheld, the fact that third party AAA games won't reach that number on Switch 2 is not something Nintendo will care much about.
Maybe more credence to the "Attach" thing.If this really is true and the new Joy-Con attach to the system via magnets…I wonder how Nintendo has designed it to prevent people from getting their skin pinched between the magnets. That seems like a serious problem that would need to be addressed.
Also, there’s no way in hell that they’re dropping the “Nintendo Switch” branding with this, especially if the form factor is as similar as this new alleged leak suggests. It’s gonna be called “Nintendo Switch [something]”, not “Nintendo [something]”—count on it.
Yup, I’ve still been on the Nintendo Switch Attach train, lol.Maybe more credence to the "Attach" thing.
Ah, so would that even prevent any pinching from happening if, say, the magnets made contact with each other on an edge—like, imagine a Joy-Con put up against the side of the system and touching the system side magnets but tilted at an angle so there’s enough room to fit part of a finger or something between the magnets while both sides are still touching at the edge?
Is that what was being claimed with the "SL/SR are magnetically activated" thing? That's really hard to believe. It would continuously drain power from the Joy-cons, system, or both, just to hold them on there, even if the console was powered off.It's an electromagnet. They can detect when it has contact on both the top and the bottom and only then activate it.
They‘ll just render at whatever resolution fits (from 360p to 900p) and upscale to 1080p. With that logic we‘d have a 240p screen for Switch. And if DLSS is too heavy (which I don’t think is likely to be the case for handheld) they still can use other spatial or temporal upscaling methods, or just render at a lower resolution. More options are always better, and ppi wouldn’t be particularly good at 720p on a 8“ screen.Switch 1's 720p screen already looks quite good at 7", and sticking to that resolution on a much more capable device means portable mode has a lot more overhead for performance. I imagine a lot of games will manage 1080p native with the help of DLSS, but probably at the cost of asset quality and/or frame-rate.
Cannot believe I had to go like 10 pages before I finally found the initial mention of it here lol Here you goHmm I haven’t seen it. I’m far behind reading in the latest news lol
I think it's half the excitement of hearing something from insider sources, and half the stuff we figured out being backed up. We figured out all this stuff, either through napkin math, digging through shipment data, etc, but I'd be lying if I said that that it wasn't nice to hear people outside of this thread say this stuff. The gaming community at large still doesn't believe the Switch 2 will be equivalent to the Steam Deck, so slowly but surely this stuff may change the discussion and make it a little more bearable.are all things that were found and/or discussed here months ago. Maybe I've been following speculation too long but this doesn't strike me as "flood gates are open," it strikes me like fake 4chan Direct leaks where they post a bunch of plausible stuff that's been discussed for a while and then add a couple extra things (like more buttons) so it doesn't sound like they're just listing the same old rumors.
- Slightly bigger, slightly rounder
- Magnetic joycon rails
- 1080p screen
- Backwards compatible game card slot
Some users were literally busting out "lisan al gaib" yesterday which kinda blows my mind. We knew this stuff already yall, what gives?
Ahh... a simpler time... 24 hours and 45 minutes ago.Cannot believe I had to go like 10 pages before I finally found the initial mention of it here lol Here you go
Future Nintendo Hardware & Technology Speculation & Discussion |ST| (Read the staff posts before commenting!)
Dunno if i can believe that (at least going by shitty Chrome auto-translate). Having the new Joy-Cons connect to the console simply by a magnet mechanism, without anything to lock them to the console like the rails on Switch 1 did, sounds extremely prone for failure, especially in the hands of...famiboards.com
I actually don't know. Given what Pyoro is suggesting, I think this might be it until the investor meeting with the context in mind that this was shared around a small bit ago. Then again we've got around a week before the financial briefing so the odds are in our favor ig. Observe how tomorrow has a tidbit, leak or rumor.Remember as the saying goes, these things usually come in 3s. Wouldn't be surprised if we saw another leak in the next week or so.
At this point 1080p screens must be cheaper than 720p. I'm sure Nintendo thought about the impact on battery and performance, but after all this time 1080p has gotta be cheaper to make.1080p is not good news. Not many games will reach that level and they won't look good. 720p should have been much better, less burden on the processor, more games to be native res and save on the battery life. It's difficult to tell 1080p from 720p on mobile devices anyway.
Switch 1's 720p screen already looks quite good at 7", and sticking to that resolution on a much more capable device means portable mode has a lot more overhead for performance. I imagine a lot of games will manage 1080p native with the help of DLSS, but probably at the cost of asset quality and/or frame-rate.
1080p is not good news. Not many games will reach that level and they won't look good. 720p should have been much better, less burden on the processor, more games to be native res and save on the battery life. It's difficult to tell 1080p from 720p on mobile devices anyway.
1080p is not good news. Not many games will reach that level and they won't look good. 720p should have been much better, less burden on the processor, more games to be native res and save on the battery life. It's difficult to tell 1080p from 720p on mobile devices anyway.
I don't think it being 1080p screen necessarily means it drains more than 720p screen does, if the game is rendered in 720p.1080p is not good news. Not many games will reach that level and they won't look good. 720p should have been much better, less burden on the processor, more games to be native res and save on the battery life. It's difficult to tell 1080p from 720p on mobile devices anyway.
1080p means worse battery life compared to if they went a 720p screen. That + no OLED and an even larger form factor. It’s fair criticism.Some people on the other forum is complaining about having a 1080p screen somehow being worse than a 720p screen. Is there any logic to that argument? They point to modern games not being able to reach 1080p resolutions in handhelds like steam deck.
But i think the logic is that Nintendo knows that most of their own internally developed games will reach 1080p resolution in handheld, the fact that third party AAA games won't reach that number on Switch 2 is not something Nintendo will care much about.
We have been in a drought for months, News is news, even if it's questionable.
More confirmation on 1080 screen, backward compatibility and a rounder design is like finding water in the desert.
Oh if it's legit confirmation from inside then I'd understand the hype, but my point was: are these actually insiders or are they randos regurgitating stuff they pulled from this very thread?I think it's half the excitement of hearing something from insider sources, and half the stuff we figured out being backed up. We figured out all this stuff, either through napkin math, digging through shipment data, etc, but I'd be lying if I said that that it wasn't nice to hear people outside of this thread say this stuff. The gaming community at large still doesn't believe the Switch 2 will be equivalent to the Steam Deck, so slowly but surely this stuff may change the discussion and make it a little more bearable.
They fail to take into account DLSS.Some people on the other forum is complaining about having a 1080p screen somehow being worse than a 720p screen. Is there any logic to that argument? They point to modern games not being able to reach 1080p resolutions in handhelds like steam deck.
But i think the logic is that Nintendo knows that most of their own internally developed games will reach 1080p resolution in handheld, the fact that third party AAA games won't reach that number on Switch 2 is not something Nintendo will care much about.
The leak came from a Chinese accessory vendor, and pyoro feels it was leaked because the accessory vendor had the information.Oh if it's legit confirmation from inside then I'd understand the hype, but my point was: are these actually insiders or are they randos regurgitating stuff they pulled from this very thread?