eye0h
"aggressively persue a multiplatform strategy"
- Pronouns
- He/Him
I'm a Latin tutor so lol
If this is a Tutor runs into their student situation I think my mind will breakoh no
I'm a Latin tutor so lol
If this is a Tutor runs into their student situation I think my mind will breakoh no
What this sounds like is that the Gen 2 portion is barely visible at a distance, with the '2' (the crucial detail) being outsized by the Switch logo above it.Add a red banner beneath it, the same width but only as tall as the "N" of "Nintendo", inside which is white text that says "Generation 2”.
Now your logo is also different by shape. The original is a square, Next Gen is slightly oblong. The gap between the banner and square being transparent - and both the banner AND square being transparent when on the back of the console, which just has a biiig Nintendo Switch logo with "Generation 2 " in plain text below it.
Well I tutor high school students so seems unlikelyIf this is a Tutor runs into their student situation I think my mind will break
I think the Series X naming is clunky but there is at least a clear flashy new logo that's used on boxes.
I'm strictly on an "as needed" basis with Latin. I know Homo Sapiens, don't need to know anything else right now.If this is a Tutor runs into their student situation I think my mind will break
Wonder if they would Roman numeral it. Switch II. The 'II' are joy cons.
I could actually see them doing something like this. Far better than just a usual "2" at the end.Wonder if they would Roman numeral it. Switch II. The 'II' are joy cons.
It is tiny, but still visible at a glance. Like the PS5 logo. Even with these boxarts I shrunk where you can barely read 'Xbox Series X' on the Sonic Frontiers box, the logo is still visible.The Series X logo is TINY on an Xbox game case, BUT, I do sort of like the idea of the 2 being bigger than the "generation" text.
However, if they go with a name like "Generation 2", then they don't WANT it to be distinct at a distance, they just want people to think "It's a Switch, that's a Switch game."
Isn't the "Switch" in "Everybody 1-2-Switch!" a similar font to the Super Nintendo logo?I could actually see them doing something like this. Far better than just a usual "2" at the end.
Though I'm still biased and prefer Super Nintendo Switch with the "Super" part using the same SNES font.
I don't think the launch date for Nintendo's new console has anything to do with the process node choice since I imagine Nintendo and Nvidia had to already make a final decision on which process node to choose to fabricate Drake by the time Drake's taped out. And based on some LinkedIn profiles (here and here), Drake's probably taped out back in 1H 2022.
Workable? Sure. Though I'd suspect MH6 would be a late port vs day & date release alongside the other versions.what do you think of the other 2 games (FC7 & MH6)?
even leaks aside, do they seem likely or at least workable?
Nintendo will hint 3D Mario, show at least a major third-party gameYes, and what gets announced alongside a system?
Still, I don't think we should take Henderson's words as gospel, but it is interesting.
Semi-related - I was building a spreadsheet (for personal use and reference) the timeline of T239's development (mixing both "things we feel pretty good about" and rumors that is difficult to confirm).They would have known by 2020/2021 even that by 2024, 4N (5nm) would be a mature node, I think if that is the node choice then it was made way back then.
They knew this stuff years in advance and if you look at 2020 it's also when Furukawa starts to sound off on the Switch 1 having an aytpically long product cycle ("only entering the mid-cycle of it's life span" or something to that effect). Probably they made the decision in 2020 to go with 4N/5nm and knew full well Switch 2 was not coming any time soon.
If there was any debate internally, the massive sales boom in 2020 thanks to Animal Crossing probably made it an easy choice for Nintendo. Probably initially they were thinking about spring 2023 as a launch (6 year normal product cycle), but I think that changed in 2020 once they realized the Switch 2 chip would be much better off on the 4N/5nm node and that the Switch was performing way beyond expectations that they weren't going to need a successor and could afford to wait.
I'm curious about this - I don't know what he was responding to (Brainchild has deleted the post but the content was still quoted by others, visible). Would this be more about shooting down the rumors of Switch Pro maybe? Anyway, if we were to believe this, this tells me Nintendo has not taped out Drake yet mid-2021. Making mid-2022 much more likely for the Drake tapeout.It's difficult talking about this without getting into specifics, but I'll try...
There isn't anything inherently wrong with the SoC (as far as I know). The issue had more to do with Nintendo's goals not being met in some way, and until those goals are met or compromises are made, all characteristics of the SoC cannot be locked down and taped out.
I still do not know if this has happened, btw, but given that we now know that Switch 4k isn't bound to SwOLED's timeline, Nintendo/NVIDIA's IC design team should have plenty of time to figure that out.
They rejected me despite my straight 100s in Latin smh
Is this chart from 2018?They would have known by 2020/2021 even that by 2024, 4N (5nm) would be a mature node, I think if that is the node choice then it was made way back then.
They knew this stuff years in advance and if you look at 2020 it's also when Furukawa starts to sound off on the Switch 1 having an aytpically long product cycle ("only entering the mid-cycle of it's life span" or something to that effect). Probably they made the decision in 2020 to go with 4N/5nm and knew full well Switch 2 was not coming any time soon.
If there was any debate internally, the massive sales boom in 2020 thanks to Animal Crossing probably made it an easy choice for Nintendo. Probably initially they were thinking about spring 2023 as a launch (6 year normal product cycle), but I think that changed in 2020 once they realized the Switch 2 chip would be much better off on the 4N/5nm node and that the Switch was performing way beyond expectations that they weren't going to need a successor and could afford to wait.
When doing reverse image search on the chart, I clicked on a link that was dated 2021.Is this chart from 2018?
He has leaked a lot of Ubisoft/Sony/EA stuff (western companies in general), so he probably knows stuff these companies know. He is that one that leaked PS5 pro and PS Portal btwWould somebody like Tom Henderson have the sources to give an idea of the expected commercial release? Because that sounds like he's expecting Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft to all be shooting for autumn and winter of 2024
Yes, he would know these things. He has good inside sourcesWould somebody like Tom Henderson have the sources to give an idea of the expected commercial release? Because that sounds like he's expecting Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft to all be shooting for autumn and winter of 2024
I think the joy con are intended to fulfill the customization aspect but I wouldn't say no to official dock and backplate personalization options.Was looking at the Xbox Series 'Wraps'
Instead of Full on Special Editions how would you feel about Nintendo Brining back faceplates?
Personally I thought my 3DS feeling like wood was the coolest thing ever.
N4 is not the same as 4N, which is an Nvidia specific branch of 5nm and what Lovelace is on.When doing reverse image search on the chart, I clicked on a link that was dated 2021.
It's not the same chart but I noticed N4 was originally slated for late 2021.
I wonder if that explains some of the rumors in the past (successor or Switch Pro rumors that never manifested) because TSMC wasn't ready at the time
I hope it's called Nintendo 8I hope not but they sure could!
Right now my top three hopes are:
Super Nintendo Switch
Nintendo Switch (Generation 2)
Nintendo Switch 2 (stylised as superscript, as in "Squared".)
Where does it say 4N? The chart shared earlier says N4, and the chart I found from 2021 in reverse image search says N4. In my text I say N4 as well. Can you point out where it says 4N?N4 is not the same as 4N, which is an Nvidia specific branch of 5nm and what Lovelace is on.
nmI hope it's called Nintendo 8
When doing reverse image search on the chart, I clicked on a link that was dated 2021.
It's not the same chart but I noticed N4 was originally slated for late 2021.
I wonder if that explains some of the rumors in the past (successor or Switch Pro rumors that never manifested) because TSMC wasn't ready at the time
I don't know how I forgot about Joycons but a Joycon backplate combo would be so insane omgI think the joy con are intended to fulfill the customization aspect but I wouldn't say no to official dock and backplate personalization options.
It doesn't say 4N. I was just pointing out that 4N is not in the chart.Where does it say 4N? The chart shared earlier says N4, and the chart I found from 2021 in reverse image search says N4. In my text I say N4 as well. Can you point out where it says 4N?
I'm sorry, I'm still not following. haven't it always been the question of whether it is SEC8N, or TSMC N4?It doesn't say 4N. I was just pointing out that 4N is not in the chart.
This is indeed super confusing, but the question has always been about SEC8N or TSMC N4, which is an Nvidia specific branch of 5N and separate from 4N. @Dakhil did I get that right?I'm sorry, I'm still not following. haven't it always been the question of whether it is SEC8N, or TSMC N4?
yes, I'm aware TSMC N4 includes 5nm (optimized, rather). I'm not sure what you're getting at though.
I am not an expert in this area though, wanted to make sure I'm not overlooking something.
8 GB of RAM, 8nm, 8 MB of storageI hope it's called Nintendo 8
Did you mean to say TSMC 4N? lol. (I noticed you also say TSMC N4).This is indeed super confusing, but the question has always been about SEC8N or TSMC N4, which is an Nvidia specific branch of 5N and separate from 4N. @Dakhil did I get that right?
Sharp and Innolux were never integrated as this article suggested. That was an analyst opinion that didn’t pan out. IMHO it was a weird prediction from the start. Sharp has many lines of business outside of displays and TVs, such as home appliances and office automations (including this little robot), therefore Innolux would be ill-equipped to integrate with Sharp. If an integration actually occurred, there would’ve been a lot of news coverage, especially on the Japan side. Actually the recent Japanese reports alledged a frosty relationship between Sharp and Hon Hai (Foxconn); some believed that Sharp was saddled with a money-losing subsidiary due to Hon Hai founder’s dirty dealing.I still think its the Switch 2. Sharp and Innolux are basically the same company when it comes to displays, and sources indicate it will have an innolux display,
Sharp and Innolux to integrate their display business - with a focus on IGZO and OLEDs | OLED Info
A few weeks after Sharp agreed to sell a two-thirds stake to Foxconn (Hon Hai Precision) for $3.5 billion, the Taiwanese company is starting to integrate Sharp's display business with Innolux, Foxconn Taiwanese display arm.Innolux AMOLED prototype, 2012Today we hear a report from Taiwan that...www.oled-info.com
Unfortunately there are very clear technical reasons this wouldn't be possible.
Was looking at the Xbox Series 'Wraps'
Instead of Full on Special Editions how would you feel about Nintendo Brining back faceplates?
Personally I thought my 3DS feeling like wood was the coolest thing ever.
Tom is not talking about launch games but games being announced in the future that might be announced with a Switch 2 version. That's a good sign but the timing he gave is more about when those games are announced and less about the switch 2's launch timing.
Early this year. April, to be more specific. TSMC basically confirming that N4/N5 family will be mainstream/cheaper nodes starting from next year. AKA: They expect N5 family to be used for more commodity devices rather than premium ones due to failing wafer prices and node maturity.Is this chart from 2018?
BG3 is very likelyI also want to see past big 3rd party games that the Switch already missed out on come to the Switch 2.
Elden Ring, Baldur's Gate 3, Armored Core VI, Cyberpunk, RE 4 Remake, etc.
The article only suggested they would integrate their display business. Here is another article quotingSharp and Innolux were never integrated as this article suggested. That was an analyst opinion that didn’t pan out. IMHO it was a weird prediction from the start. Sharp has many lines of business outside of displays and TVs, such as home appliances and office automations (including this little robot), therefore Innolux would be ill-equipped to integrate with Sharp. If an integration actually occurred, there would’ve been a lot of news coverage, especially on the Japan side. Actually the recent Japanese reports alledged a frosty relationship between Sharp and Hon Hai (Foxconn); some believed that Sharp was saddled with a money-losing subsidiary due to Hon Hai founder’s dirty dealing.
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
There are rumours about Nintendo starting mass production in late 2023 (here, here, and here). So a 1H 2024 launch is still possible.Even early 2024 would probably require production to begin in late 2023 ... don't think Nintendo would want to cut it that close.
kopite7kimi mentioned that TSMC's 4N process node is based on TSMC's N5P process node.This is indeed super confusing, but the question has always been about SEC8N or TSMC N4, which is an Nvidia specific branch of 5N and separate from 4N. @Dakhil did I get that right?
oh c'mon, at least 8 GB of storage!8 GB of RAM, 8nm, 8 MB of storage
I mean, the question is what Nintendo knew in 2019 when they started working on Drake.Early this year. April, to be more specific. TSMC basically confirming that N4/N5 family will be mainstream/cheaper nodes starting from next year. AKA: They expect N5 family to be used for more commodity devices rather than premium ones due to failing wafer prices and node maturity.
That's the kind of bravery I respect.BG3 is very likely
Most likely, given who they are and who they work with.I mean, the question is what Nintendo knew in 2019 when they started working on Drake.
I think this is the most likely outcome. Put Mario first, then give Metroid the spotlight immediately after.September the Nintendo Switch 2 will launch with open world 3D Mario. October Metroid Prime 4 will release and Pokémon in November. Mario Kart X will release Half 1 of 2025. Tons of third party will sprinkle through.
I also want to see past big 3rd party games that the Switch already missed out on come to the Switch 2.
Elden Ring, Baldur's Gate 3, Armored Core VI, Cyberpunk, RE 4 Remake, etc.
A high price and less appealing design could dampen that, but let's hope!I expect those games, and many, many, many more.
It might be a wild prediction, but the Switch NG could become the best-selling platform yet. Amazing first-party and third-party games, with a huge world-wide audience. Nintendo has a winner on their hands I think.
TSMC gives guidance for this every year and Nvidia would be keenly aware of their roadmap. If Nintendo was always targetting a 2024 launch, they would have know that N5 family would be cheap by then. Would make sense for them to make such a big chip if it was supposed to be fabbed on a very dense and power efficient node from start.I mean, the question is what Nintendo knew in 2019 when they started working on Drake.
Made a quick mock-up:Wonder if they would Roman numeral it. Switch II. The 'II' are joy cons.