also not ideal, since the second is a prepared pokedex screen, not in game. But yeah, there was a step up, the problem is, its not a 15+ years step up for one of the biggest franchises there is.I mean this is probably a better comparison since it's both pokemon
Zangoose in a Gamecube game:
Zangoose in a Switch game:
...I mean it's kinda obvious they will keep selling Switch 1 for the first 2 years of the next gen (and yes still release games on both consoles simultaneously!)
Who ever thought they would retire the Switch 1 on Switch 2 launch ?
2 Fans could mean a better cooling system IN the switch (i don't think so), or in the dock... it doesn't necessary mean it gets warmer, having 2 fans running slower can just as well be there to reduce the stress on the internal fan for more longevity and less noise when docked.So if we speculate that Switch 2 will have a fan inbuilt to the dock, does that mean that they will have docked mode clocked higher than on Switch 1 and that is why they need a fan in the dock to cool down the system when its played in docked mode?
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
What if they use three 6 GB RAM chips?
Or they could use 2x 12GB chips.Don't be silly...
Obviously they'll use four for dual-channel. 24GB FTW
two fans? is this new info?
"Gimmick", if there is one, I imagine could be difficult to determine from the shipment data alone.I'm a bit shocked by these parts news, specifically, that it's sounding like it's really just straight up a stronger Switch with no new gimmick or feature spin? Could there be something missing that is gonna add the "New Play Pattern Idea" to the machine?
The joycon has the addition of three new buttons and a large number of magnets that may also design new gimmicks.I'm a bit shocked by these parts news, specifically, that it's sounding like it's really just straight up a stronger Switch with no new gimmick or feature spin? Could there be something missing that is gonna add the "New Play Pattern Idea" to the machine?
I'm curious how easy would it be for outlets to find this data and to then corroborate with other sources. This is all looking promising but it'd be nice to have additional reporting to further cements some of those findings.
I'd imagine between now and the actual reveal there will be more and more stuff leaking out despite nintendo best efforts.
The screenshot on the left represents nothing. It’s enough to turn on a random stream/video on twitch/youtube to see how awful Pokémon SW looks. In all honesty I’d choose Zelda graphics on the rightThey already look better than any GC game
$500? I'm reasonably confident Nintendo wouldn't go over $399. Or were you using Canadian dollars?The question now remains is - will they find a proposition so people want to spend around 500$ for this platform as well.
Not when we proved they will use 6 GB chips.Or they could use 2x 12GB chips.
could mean it's 8nm clocked low in portable and needs a lot of cooling to reach required speeds when docked.So if we speculate that Switch 2 will have a fan inbuilt to the dock, does that mean that they will have docked mode clocked higher than on Switch 1 and that is why they need a fan in the dock to cool down the system when its played in docked mode?
You might want to buy a game or two as well if you buy a Switch 2, so the actual consumer spend on new hardware is higher, usually something like factor 1.4 for Nintendo. I considered that.$500? I'm reasonably confident Nintendo wouldn't go over $399. Or were you using Canadian dollars?
Atleast 8 isn’t possible.Not when we proved they will use 6 GB chips.
It's 6,12.18.24 etch thats the theoretical possibilities.
Ah true. Thought that was referring to console price itself. I'd be surprised if Nintendo goes over $399 (don't think they would)You might want to buy a game or two as well if you buy a Switch 2, so the actual consumer spend on new hardware is higher, usually something like factor 1.4 for Nintendo. I considered that.
well, there is enough potential with say the magnets to have something fun and interesting. a new line of hardware gimicks that expand on the labo/ring idea but is more substantial could be a thing, using the magnets for force feedback if they are not connected to the switch (look at the triggers on PS5 controllers), maybe the gimmick is on the software side (some ai models on the console that provide games tracking information....brrr)I'm a bit shocked by these parts news, specifically, that it's sounding like it's really just straight up a stronger Switch with no new gimmick or feature spin? Could there be something missing that is gonna add the "New Play Pattern Idea" to the machine?
(unrealistic) worst case scenario: the ram and storage is for dev kits, and the real ones will have 8GB and 128GB...Overall you need to consider this is not a leak or rumor but a paper trail of things that are actually happening on the supply chain, so the information provided is undisputed. It will have 12 GB RAM, 256 GB memory, we have confirmation on CPU and GPU that matches the Nvidia breach, and we learned new information like the microphone. This is all actual components of the Switch Successor we have been made aware of, because there is and has to be actual confirmation in the shipping process between different countries. The paper trail can't lie.
if its all that was mentioned, then i would be impressed if they can manage that int an atractive well made case for <=400$500? I'm reasonably confident Nintendo wouldn't go over $399. Or were you using Canadian dollars?
8nm, 8GB, 8 yearswell, there is enough potential with say the magnets to have something fun and interesting. a new line of hardware gimicks that expand on the labo/ring idea but is more substantial could be a thing, using the magnets for force feedback if they are not connected to the switch (look at the triggers on PS5 controllers), maybe the gimmick is on the software side (some ai models on the console that provide games tracking information....brrr)
(unrealistic) worst case scenario: the ram and storage is for dev kits, and the real ones will have 8GB and 128GB...
if its all that was mentioned, then i would be impressed if they can manage that int an atractive well made case for <=400
I know? I'm just replying that you don't need to fit 4 chips to get 24GBNot when we proved they will use 6 GB chips.
It's 6,12.18.24 etch thats the theoretical possibilities.
The game doesn't look thaaat bad emulated, specially so in the DLC.They already look better than any GC game
This makes me really wonder if Gaming journalism is at the bottom of the totem pole of journalism. It seems like there's only one good journalist and that's Jason Schrier.There's no game journalism out there any more that would go through this level of investigation. They will just report on rumors based in this topic.
I know? I'm just replying that you don't need to fit 4 chips to get 24GB
First: there where theories that they would want a fast switch from 1 to 2 to make the whole production and distribution easier, same as sony did with the PS4->PS5 transition. (The Ps4 Pro was stopped, and was almost instantly when PS5 came out gone from stores).
Since backwards compatibility is a thing, there would from nintendos side be no reason if the new console is not that much more expensive to keep the whole switch family up and running.
But mostly: they had to push it back for a while. That means, they wont magically have more Switch 1 games in the pipeline, meaning if they planed for a 1-2 year transition period, and one of them is gone simply because of the delay, then they will only have games prepared for the rest (0-1 year).
They obviously can still sell the switch longer then they provide games... but its a big ask to keep the supply chain up and running for marginal sales.
Or do you think they can spin up a game production pipeline with a handfull of releases from zero to nothing to extend the cross gen time? I don't think so.
These specs aren't anything out of the ordinary. You get phones with these specs for the same price. And that's with the expensive stuff like modems and whatnotif its all that was mentioned, then i would be impressed if they can manage that int an atractive well made case for <=400
Resolution and IQ isn't pokemon's problems, it's the lack of cohesive lighting. Can't fix that with emulation. When you bring up the raw models, it's crazy how much detail is lost because of the (lack of) lighting. No point in all those normal maps if there's nothing to use it withThe game doesn't look thaaat bad emulated, specially so in the DLC.
I really hope they don't go back to the anime cell shading exclusively; I really like the material based texturing on the Pokémon.
Better texture resolution, good performance and better world geometry would do wonders to these games.
I know, but I'm impulsiveIt's funny because my post was clearly a joke of a joke, and I wasn't sure where you were going with that post... lmao
I can see the marketing tag.* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
This makes me really wonder if Gaming journalism is at the bottom of the totem pole of journalism. It seems like there's only one good journalist and that's Jason Schrier.
Eurogamer have Digital Foundry for their technical analysis. Places like IGN have a great value copy of digital Foundry and that's once in a blue moon. Kotaku seems to be notice more for their opinions more than their reviews. Which is cool, you can do that but what is something interesting about the games you can talk about. Although I do like their funny gaming clips.
GameInformer is a good one sometimes, they stay relevant with their interviews. I think the best form are certain youtubers. Did you know gaming is the best investigative gaming channel. They really check if rumors are true. They would find and translate missing interview from Japanese devs.
These specs aren't anything out of the ordinary. You get phones with these specs for the same price. And that's with the expensive stuff like modems and whatnot
Honestly yeah. Scarlet/Violet look... okay in pictures, but in motion is when things fall apart and you see how bad it is. It's a shame because, like with any Pokemon game, the art team does their homework. Just wish the technical side of things better supported it.The screenshot on the left represents nothing. It’s enough to turn on a random stream/video on twitch/youtube to see how awful Pokémon SW looks. In all honesty I’d choose Zelda graphics on the right
The removing magnet part is probably an anti-magnet or an antiferromagnet, a magnet with reversed direction. When placed near a magnet, they cancel each other out and thus the magnetic pull disappears. Maybe it works like Noise Cancelling headphones.* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
wer not talking about switching existing customers, or shutting down services, what are you talking about.You can't fast switch 150m of users, it will take some time and it's better like this
PS4 to PS5 transition wasn't a fast switch, like we had PS4 games till year 3 of PS5, not sure what you talking about
I know the ScarVio games are utterly broken, what I'm trying to say is that a new game with this artstyle and a budget higher than Famiboards server costs could look good.Do they?
I looked over recent shipment discussion - wondering what made us think it's 12GB, as opposed to say, 18GB? Just 12GB is more realistic scenario?6 is though.
But lets be real, its 12.
Yep.I looked over recent shipment discussion - wondering what made us think it's 12GB, as opposed to say, 18GB? Just 12GB is more realistic scenario?
Also now that we know Nintendo is going for 12 GB RAM/ 256 GB storage instead of the higher possible 16 GB RAM/ 512 GB storage it means that we know more of the price point Nintendo is aiming for.Ah true. Thought that was referring to console price itself. I'd be surprised if Nintendo goes over $399 (don't think they would)