Darknut85
#TeamRemake
Just ignore him.its the second time you are trying to push this, nobody agrees.
Just ignore him.its the second time you are trying to push this, nobody agrees.
Refuting common talking points can still be for the benefit of the reader. Rage bait or not, these are common viewpoints that Nintendo cheaps out on hardware or has a poor history with backwards compatibility.It also takes some self-control to not get baited by it.
Imagine the battery life with no battery!Because Nintendo is notorious for saving money on their components, I believe that the Switch 2 will cut costs by not having a CPU, GPU, RAM, storage, screen, battery, or controllers.
Exactly, ignore button is your friend.It also takes some self-control to not get baited by it.
I mean if you keep up with what's being said here, you'd know it really isn't realistic. Tell us, why do you find the specs of 8gb RAM, 64gb storage, etc likely? Leave out insider knowledge, act like it doesn't exist. I bet your response is going to be something like "Because Nintendo historically releases weak systems compared to competitors."wow so this is what we're calling realistic expectations from now on huh?
i know you're being sarcastic but you're not wrong, not to mention if switch taught us a lesson is that studios/companies can learn how to adapt the weak consoles and be able to port impossible gamesI mean if you keep up with what's being said here, you'd know it really isn't realistic. Tell us, why do you find the specs of 8gb RAM, 64gb storage, etc likely? Leave out insider knowledge, act like it doesn't exist. I bet your response is going to be something like "Because Nintendo historically releases weak systems compared to competitors."
"because nintendo" amirite?now that the Direct leaks are proven wrong, it's time to admit that Nate, Necro & every other nintendo leaker (aside from pyoro) who backed up the rumor are now considered not trusty anymore
which by extension everything they said about switch 2 is wrong, we're now back to point zero which is 8gb ram, 64-128gb storage & possibly no BC
now that the Direct leaks are proven wrong, it's time to admit that Nate, Necro & every other nintendo leaker (aside from pyoro) who backed up the rumor are now considered not trusty anymore
which by extension everything they said about switch 2 is wrong, we're now back to point zero which is 8gb ram, 64-128gb storage & possibly no BC
Now that it's raining when the forecast called for a partly sunny day, it is time to burn down the National Weather Service.now that the Direct leaks are proven wrong, it's time to admit that Nate, Necro & every other nintendo leaker (aside from pyoro) who backed up the rumor are now considered not trusty anymore
which by extension everything they said about switch 2 is wrong, we're now back to point zero which is 8gb ram, 64-128gb storage & possibly no BC
perfect description of gaming fandom twitter and gaming fandom youtubeBack Seat Criticiser:
- Always Right
- Tells that they knew it always better soon after we found out someone is wrong
- Is mad that Insider tell Rumors, but only when they are wrong or have bad news. Otherwise there is no complains and what everyone only ever does is asking for more Info.
- Accuses others that they hyped themselves too much
State of Unreal is March 20th at GDC. I'm expecting some things including Lumen for Mobile to be shown off in near production state. possibly with Fortnite. would be telling of how Epic gets ray tracing to scale across a broader spectrum (and how devs can possibly scale their games to as low as Drake)
em, 4 gb is 8 times 512 gb. 360 had 30mb for OS, Switch has a bit less than 1gb.The existence of the Switch 1 already refutes assumptions about Nintendo hardware. They went with a very competitive mobile SoC. They had 8-16 times the RAM of the previous gen, comparable storage and RAM capacity to contemporary smartphones. The screen was a 720p IPS display out of the gate, double the PPI and triple the resolution of the 3DS. A 20 nm process like the Shield TV instead of the 28 nm of all desktop Maxwell GPUs.
Microsoft: *takes "Direct" name from Nintendo and applies it to their own presentations*
Unreal: Hold my Mountain Dew
never forget that nintendo tends to use the cheapest parts possible (ram, storage, etc...) and considering how switch 1 had the least expensive parts, why would they start going all out with switch 2? especially since switch 1 sold well regardless of how "weak" it was
PS3 has 256 MB, I wrapped up both consoles in 'last gen' and compared approximate total RAM. The intent is not to be super precise, but to show the sheer gap between generations in contrast to the common refrain that the Switch is equivalent to those consoles.em, 4 8gb is 8 times 512 gb. 360 had 30mb for OS, Switch has a bit less than 1gb.
So I would say 6-7 (if you only count the game reserved ram). Not sure how you get to 16x.
When the Spin-Off gets a Spin-OffMicrosoft: *takes "Direct" name from Nintendo and applies it to their own presentations*
Unreal: Hold my Mountain Dew
SubscribeNow that it's raining when the forecast called for a partly sunny day, it is time to burn down the National Weather Service.
Microsoft: *takes "Direct" name from Nintendo and applies it to their own presentations*
Unreal: Hold my Mountain Dew
Lol.
Nintendo Direct - Xbox Digital Direct
PlayStation State of Play - Epic's State of Unreal
That is funny.
Valve's Direct of Play
Nintendo Switch was the successor to Nintendo 3DS - 4GB vs 128MB, that's 32X. Vs. New Nintendo 3DS' 256MB, it's 16X. Vs. Wii U's 2GB, it's 2X.Not sure how you get to 16x.
PS3 had a spit ram setup, which added to how much it already sucked to program for. But technically it had 512 mb.PS3 has 256 MB, I wrapped up both consoles in 'last gen' and compared approximate total RAM. The intent is not to be super precise, but to show the sheer gap between generations in contrast to the common refrain that the Switch is equivalent to those consoles.
Edit: I'm wrong about the PS3 RAM, editing. That's what I get for rapid Googling.
windows 2000 installed and microsoft solitaire's the only stable gameThe fact there is no Direct announcement means Switch 2 will have 256MB RAM and an Intel Pentium CPU.
why would Nintendo anounce Switch sucessor in march?way before it may shareholders meetingThe whole direct thing not occurring today just makes it more likely that march will be the reveal month imo
So, what do you guys think are the chances of getting a higher hz display? Kinda like the deck oled with 90 for example.
Zero chances or just slim?
all of you can keep believing in these "leakers" as much as you want & keep raising your expectations, we'll see who's gonna be right in the end
Okay so Nate was wrong when he leaked that the Fire Emblem Engage protagonist would have a mix of blue and red hair before any of the leaks revealed this was the case, or he was also wrong when he knew about Everybody 1-2 Switch before everyone else, or even more recently, when E3 was cancelled in 2023 and Nate said there was a direct coming in June? Of course, though, this one time he may have been wrong on a partner direct, when he was at least certain there was no general direct, absolutely means that he 100% can't be trusted, never mind he has been right 8/9 times out of 10, of course...now that the Direct leaks are proven wrong, it's time to admit that Nate, Necro & every other nintendo leaker (aside from pyoro) who backed up the rumor are now considered not trusty anymore
which by extension everything they said about switch 2 is wrong, we're now back to point zero which is 8gb ram, 64-128gb storage & possibly no BC
2 big reasons: Nate has been teasing March for awhile. And March is just at the end of the fiscal quarter, right before the start of the next fiscal year. Announcing in March allows Nintendo to talk to investors about the system and their plans at the fiscal year's first meeting.why would Nintendo anounce Switch sucessor in march?way before it may shareholders meeting
GDC as well. If the announcement happens beforehand, developers will be able to openly talk about their Switch 2 projects.
i see2 big reasons: Nate has been teasing March for awhile. And March is just at the end of the fiscal quarter, right before the start of the next fiscal year. Announcing in March allows Nintendo to talk to investors about the system and their plans at the fiscal year's first meeting.
GDC as well. If the announcement happens beforehand, developers will be able to openly talk about their Switch 2 projects.2 big reasons: Nate has been teasing March for awhile. And March is just at the end of the fiscal quarter, right before the start of the next fiscal year. Announcing in March allows Nintendo to talk to investors about the system and their plans at the fiscal year's first meeting.
I say it's 6GB RAM and 32GB Storage again, they'll let us expand with MicroSDs again. No BC and just x2 the power, so a Switch Pro. It's over guys.now that the Direct leaks are proven wrong, it's time to admit that Nate, Necro & every other nintendo leaker (aside from pyoro) who backed up the rumor are now considered not trusty anymore
which by extension everything they said about switch 2 is wrong, we're now back to point zero which is 8gb ram, 64-128gb storage & possibly no BC
you clearly just have a bone to pick with them, you are being wilfully ignorant.all of you can keep believing in these "leakers" as much as you want & keep raising your expectations, we'll see who's gonna be right in the end
You think people just plainly believe these "leakers?"all of you can keep believing in these "leakers" as much as you want & keep raising your expectations, we'll see who's gonna be right in the end
It is not a question about right or wrong. I am partially on this site because I think it is interesting to read different speculations based on info that might has some truth in it and to share my own (amateurish) theories here and there.all of you can keep believing in these "leakers" as much as you want & keep raising your expectations, we'll see who's gonna be right in the end
It is not a question about right or wrong. I am partially on this site because I think it is interesting to read different speculations based on info that might has some truth in it and to share my own (amateurish) theories here and there.
Of course I am a bit disappointed when something dosenβt turn out like a rumor suggested but so what? That is part of this game and thatβs way you shouldnβt take it too seriously.
If you canβt understand that most people here actually are able to manage their expectations, I canβt help you.
You already made this post yesterday.now that the Direct leaks are proven wrong, it's time to admit that Nate, Necro & every other nintendo leaker (aside from pyoro) who backed up the rumor are now considered not trusty anymore
which by extension everything they said about switch 2 is wrong, we're now back to point zero which is 8gb ram, 64-128gb storage & possibly no BC
There's literally a staff post pinned to this thread because of multiple times where the thread descended into groups of users dogpiling and trash-talking insiders and anyone who entertained their rumors, to the point the thread was becoming a toxic mess to keep up with. You really, really don't need to preach to this thread (or this site overall, really) about taking insider stuff with a grain of salt. It's not at all like this place just blindly believes in them, quite the opposite actually.all of you can keep believing in these "leakers" as much as you want & keep raising your expectations, we'll see who's gonna be right in the end
At least quote yourself. . .now that the Direct leaks are proven wrong, it's time to admit that Nate, Necro & every other nintendo leaker (aside from pyoro) who backed up the rumor are now considered not trusty anymore
which by extension everything they said about switch 2 is wrong, we're now back to point zero which is 8gb ram, 64-128gb storage & possibly no BC
so now that 15th february direct has now been debunked, does that mean Nate & Necro are false which by extension their info on anything switch 2 related is false?
To dogpile: nah, thanks bro. I can make my own decisions without you being condescending.now that the Direct leaks are proven wrong, it's time to admit that Nate, Necro & every other nintendo leaker (aside from pyoro) who backed up the rumor are now considered not trusty anymore
which by extension everything they said about switch 2 is wrong, we're now back to point zero which is 8gb ram, 64-128gb storage & possibly no BC
At least quote yourself. . .
regarding the 64gb storage, 8gb ram & 120hz screen leak, considering how realistic it sounds, can we consider that to be our very first strong leak regarding switch 2's specs? also it didn't mention Backwards compat so that's something else out of the table
There must be some kind of memory hole or mind virus re: Nintendo and backwards compatibility because the discussion around it has generated some of the most mindboggling takes even from people who aren't trolls.i'm convinced he works for the Taiwanese Economic Forum
I'm getting flashbacks to MVG daring to a video about the technical issues Nintendo faces to do BC whilst also going through options of how to make it work...There must be some kind of memory hole or mind virus re: Nintendo and backwards compatibility because the discussion around it has generated some of the most mindboggling takes even from people who aren't trolls.