• Hey everyone, staff have documented a list of banned content and subject matter that we feel are not consistent with site values, and don't make sense to host discussion of on Famiboards. This list (and the relevant reasoning per item) is viewable here.

StarTopic Future Nintendo Hardware & Technology Speculation & Discussion |ST| (Read the staff posts before commenting!)

Only way i could see nintendo continuing to support the Switch beyond 2025 is if Drake flops. Part of why PS2 continued getting support was just how lackluster the PS3's initial launch was. PS4 kept getting support because the chip shortage limiting how many PS5's could be initially made pretty much forced Sony and AAA 3rd parties to keep making PS4 versions of games and now that the chip shortage is over we are seeing AAA 3rd parties quickly shift over to current gen exclusives.

If Drake sells at least as well as the Switch then Nintendo will very quickly move on from the switch. They'll obviously keep the switch e-shop up at least until 2030 but remasters, remakes, etc that weren't already being made for switch are just going to be made for Drake.
If Redacted launches late this year and performs as well as Switch, the best case scenario for end 2025 is still probably a userbase of 40 million and annual software sales slightly better than half of what Switch is doing now. As long as not all the people who haven't upgraded yet also haven't thrown away their old Switch, there should be a non-negligible market to cater to that will help Nintendo from taking such a big backslide from current numbers.
 
I’m on the side of it being 2024 so I’m not really expecting much in that regard.

It would be cool if they would confirm whether or not they have something planned for the summer in the absence of E3, though.
 
I cannot put enough "this"s in a sentence.

The Switch is too good to kill off now. I cans see 2-3 years of support after the Switch 2 launches, even if they're mostly less demanding titles and remasters. The Switch 2 literally only needs to be "stronger" as a selling point. Do that, and basically half the marketing writes itself.
They can give us one and a half years of crossgen support and the other one and a half years are simpler gamers like ports and remasters.

If Sony taught them anything, is that you can’t rush a transition. Especially if your newer console has an exceeding Demand vs Offer

I'd think Capcom stuff getting ported is a fair chance. It's Capcom, folks. They'd port Resi 4 Remake to a toaster if it was technically doable and enough people would own that certain toaster device.

RDR 2 though ... yeah, you might wanna check out some other consoles or invest in a decent PC that runs it.
Yeah, the people over at Rockstar must be busy between GTA6 and Online

My deadline for #team2023 is next week. If they don't, at least tell something about it, like "We will announce a new hardware soon", then I go to #Team1h2024
You’ll be in Team 2024 then haha. I doubt Nintendo will say anything in the Investors Meeting. It’ll most certainly be something vague or non direct

I think the most we'll get is "we will release new hardware this fiscal year" but even that seems unlikely idk. I'd love to be wrong but it'll probably be just another "uNcHaRtEd TeRrItOrY" statement
I doubt they’ll officially announce that they’re going to release a new hardware for this, or any, Fiscal Year. They did it with the Switch because of how floppy the Wii U was. With the Switch, they have little to no incentive. We will get anything official when the marketing campaign starts
 
I no longer followed the situation related to the chip shortage due to covid/war.

What is the situation now? If Drake were to come out between late 2023/early 2024, would it be slowed down by this situation?
 
I just don't understand what evidence people are looking at that are staying team 2024.
  • We're past the timeline of usual Nintendo console releases schedule (average being around 5 or 6 years) for a whole generation. We are now past 6 years.
  • The software release schedule is currently mind boggling. "Uncharted territory" indeed.
  • We have the leaks and know there are things in production on some level, if not ready for full scale production any minute...

This holiday makes the absolute most sense. It could be delayed of course but all my money is on them PLANNING at least for this holiday at this point.
 
I no longer followed the situation related to the chip shortage due to covid/war.

What is the situation now? If Drake were to come out between late 2023/early 2024, would it be slowed down by this situation?

Dunno if it's fully over, or if it as of now affects some production lines more or less, but the situation appears to have eased up enough that Sony can push out a lot of PS5's.
 
I just don't understand what evidence people are looking at that are staying team 2024.
I’m #Team2023, but I’ll present counter-arguments for the sake of being critical:

We're past the timeline of usual Nintendo console releases schedule (average being around 5 or 6 years) for a whole generation. We are now past 6 years.
Granted, but the Switch is selling comfortably in hardware and sales. They could launch March 2024 with no problem

The software release schedule is currently mind boggling. "Uncharted territory" indeed.
All focus is on TOTK, their biggest video game. They can make a June Direct and reveal what they have in stock. Plus we already have some third party titles for the second half

We have the leaks and know there are things in production on some level, if not ready for full scale production any minute...
Production could start later, as in, later release
 
I can't see a H1 2024 release unless they really need more time for games. Switch 1 was meant to release in holidays 2016 from gigaleak's document (iirc).

So I believe holidays 2023/2024, leaning more toward 2023.
 
Hogwarts remains in active development and has been making fine progress on Switch.

Glad to hear it, I played a run on steamdeck but it was not a pleasant experience...

Dunno if it's fully over, or if it as of now affects some production lines more or less, but the situation appears to have eased up enough that Sony can push out a lot of PS5's.

I see. I hope the same applies to Nintendo
 
I just don't understand what evidence people are looking at that are staying team 2024.
  • We're past the timeline of usual Nintendo console releases schedule (average being around 5 or 6 years) for a whole generation. We are now past 6 years.
  • The software release schedule is currently mind boggling. "Uncharted territory" indeed.
  • We have the leaks and know there are things in production on some level, if not ready for full scale production any minute...

This holiday makes the absolute most sense. It could be delayed of course but all my money is on them PLANNING at least for this holiday at this point.
The issue is lack of strong leaks


We're also in a weird period where Nintendo hasn't said anything which makes it difficult to say. We have very little visibility on what is happening for them in H2, and that is very unusual and probably the strongest argument in favor of the hardware launch soon
 
I would put money on a few things surrounding the fiscal results meeting.

Nintendo reiterates they are in uncharted territory, doesn't elaborate any further.

Someone asks them directly about new hardware.

They state they are always looking into new gaming experiences in response.

They talk about the Success of the Mario movie and confirm their commitment to more Nintendo IP based media.

That's it, no drake news whatsoever.
 
I've always thought Nintendo's statement years ago of the Switch being supported for "7-10 years" meant "the Switch will be discontinued in 10 years, not replaced"

I'm tentatively #Team2023 right now for REDACTED launching but I think Nintendo could keep the original Switch alive until 2027, like how they kept the Wii and DS on the market for around a year or two after their successors.

Heck, given how the period of consoles getting its "last few" games seems to be getting longer and longer, I wouldn't be surprised if we see our last Switch games from indies or third-parties on the shelves in 2030.
Yea. Just think how 3DS eshop only stopped now and been out since 2011.
 
Nintendo reiterates they are in uncharted territory, doesn't elaborate any further.
They could maaaybe say they are nearing the Switch’s last years in the life cycle, but if directly asked about a successor, they’ll just say that they are always looking into new ways to build upon what the Switch adds to the consumers’ expectations.

They talk about the Success of the Mario movie and confirm their commitment to more Nintendo IP based media.
If asked about another Mario Movie or other IPs, they’ll just say they’re always interested in expanding the ways customers enjoy their products
 
I no longer followed the situation related to the chip shortage due to covid/war.

What is the situation now? If Drake were to come out between late 2023/early 2024, would it be slowed down by this situation?

The chip shortage is very much over, although the impact varies by sector. In terms of memory products we're seeing massive oversupply and a significant drop in prices (see here and here). In the leading edge foundry space (ie TSMC and Samsung Foundry) there was a big drop in revenues in Q1 with further drops expected in Q2 (see here). It's hard to say precisely what impact this has on pricing and availability, but with TSMC's 7nm/5nm revenues dropping by around 20% in a single quarter, that represents a significant drop in demand which should correspond to much better availability for customers.
 
I just don't understand what evidence people are looking at that are staying team 2024.
  • We're past the timeline of usual Nintendo console releases schedule (average being around 5 or 6 years) for a whole generation. We are now past 6 years.
  • The software release schedule is currently mind boggling. "Uncharted territory" indeed.
  • We have the leaks and know there are things in production on some level, if not ready for full scale production any minute...

This holiday makes the absolute most sense. It could be delayed of course but all my money is on them PLANNING at least for this holiday at this point.

We've been piecing together tiny bits of info/"evidence" (some of which has turned out to be unrelated) into guesses that have "made sense" for years now.

ie."They'll date TotK and then we'll have our release date" - now that that didn't happen, that never made sense and we were foolish to think so. But hey, it made sense at the time and turns out I was a fool.

For whatever teams are worth, I'm still on Team 2023. But I definitely negotiated a player option in my contract this time. I see no point in being too committed to anything right now when the portion of the full picture we're seeing is so much smaller than we realize/want to accept.
 
I just don't understand what evidence people are looking at that are staying team 2024.
It's because it's a short marketing cycle, there aren't any 3rd party related leaks, while insiders are continuing to talk about unannounced Switch titles.

In October of 2015, the WSJ did initial reporting on the NX's hybrid nature. That report speculated a lot and inaccurately, but the core claim was "devs working with devkits say they're having to support some sort of handheld mode" which was accurate. This was a year in advance of Nintendo's planned launch, and was a clear indication that Nintendo had started to line up launch and post-launch support.

Nothing of the kind has emerged in the last six months. I've often said that "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence." But extraordinary claims also require extraordinary proof. "Uncharted territory", the short marketing timeline, and known/reliably rumored future Switch releases don't rule out a 2023 launch, but they do make a 2023 launch extraordinary.

The Official Oldpuck Prediction(tm) is, jokingly, leap day next year. Unofficially, I'll say that Nintendo is clearly in Uncharted Territory, objectively speaking, and so I don't trust Patterns, and I don't think there is enough Data to speculate.
 
The chip shortage is very much over, although the impact varies by sector. In terms of memory products we're seeing massive oversupply and a significant drop in prices (see here and here). In the leading edge foundry space (ie TSMC and Samsung Foundry) there was a big drop in revenues in Q1 with further drops expected in Q2 (see here). It's hard to say precisely what impact this has on pricing and availability, but with TSMC's 7nm/5nm revenues dropping by around 20% in a single quarter, that represents a significant drop in demand which should correspond to much better availability for customers.
Great news (not for TSMC/Samsung of course).

So the 'chosen' node could still affect the initial availability to a small extent, while with memory there should be no problem.

I hope that screen, battery and other little things won't cause any problems in this respect.
 
I just don't understand what evidence people are looking at that are staying team 2024.
  • We're past the timeline of usual Nintendo console releases schedule (average being around 5 or 6 years) for a whole generation. We are now past 6 years.
  • The software release schedule is currently mind boggling. "Uncharted territory" indeed.
  • We have the leaks and know there are things in production on some level, if not ready for full scale production any minute...

This holiday makes the absolute most sense. It could be delayed of course but all my money is on them PLANNING at least for this holiday at this point.
Well it's May, and there's been no real indication that anything is happening on the hardware front. So either you believe that Nintendo has kept an amazing lid on all of this, which is almost impossible to believe at this point as dev kits would have been with 3rd parties and lower level devs for a long time now. Similarly launch games should be in some level of QA at this point, which should also be a typical point of leaks.

The FY briefing should help confirm what is going on, but at this point I feel much safer assuming that hardware more than 12 months out. I mean we were able to get leaks about the Lite and OLED models in their respective years by now, and those were just minor refreshes that required no dev kits to be sent out, and anything else that would be happening in conjunction with a new gen console. I'm personally leaving a small window open for a first half 24 launch, but I'll be closing that if nothing meaningful is said before/at the FY briefing.
 
The chip shortage is very much over, although the impact varies by sector. In terms of memory products we're seeing massive oversupply and a significant drop in prices (see here and here). In the leading edge foundry space (ie TSMC and Samsung Foundry) there was a big drop in revenues in Q1 with further drops expected in Q2 (see here). It's hard to say precisely what impact this has on pricing and availability, but with TSMC's 7nm/5nm revenues dropping by around 20% in a single quarter, that represents a significant drop in demand which should correspond to much better availability for customers.
There are rumors that AMD may be moving some production to SEC 4nm because TSMC 5nm is "full", but I do not find these reports at all credible. Which is not to say I don't believe AMD will use SEC 4nm, but I doubt a lack of 5nm TSMC capacity is the reason.
 
I'm genuinely wondering if this lack of leaks (try saying that three times fast) even matter when discussing Drake's release timing. Besides, don't these big leaks tend to happen when an announcement is imminent? Has this been the case with Sony and Microsoft?
 
I'm genuinely wondering if this lack of leaks (try saying that three times fast) even matter when discussing Drake's release timing. Besides, don't these big leaks tend to happen when an announcement is imminent? Has this been the case with Sony and Microsoft?
I'm convinced there's a strong possibility that the lack of leaks is due to Nintendo tightening the hell up after the Gigaleak and the Nvidia hack and the Mochi article and and and...
 
We are learning about a PS5 Pro that is releasing a whole year later from reporters and journalists moreso then the "Switch 2." By this logic, either Nintendo is doing everything to prevent leaks and talks or this device is further out then anyone is expecting....
 
We are learning about a PS5 Pro that is releasing a whole year later from reporters and journalists moreso then the "Switch 2." By this logic, either Nintendo is doing everything to prevent leaks and talks or this device is further out then anyone is expecting....
Has Sony ever bothered to shut down leaks?
 
We are learning about a PS5 Pro that is releasing a whole year later from reporters and journalists moreso then the "Switch 2." By this logic, either Nintendo is doing everything to prevent leaks and talks or this device is further out then anyone is expecting....
I used to think we wouldn't see this device until 2025, so if the lack of leaks right now are any indication........

I'm still #Team2023, but let's stop for a moment and entertain the idea that, while everything we've gathered thus far is indeed for the successor, it might be farther away than even 2H 2024 and we instead get that fabled Switch Pro this year that is more powerful than the base model, but a far cry from Drake, what then? Would that make Nintendo riding out the Switch worthwhile? Would it curb the Switch's dwindling sales numbers? Will this thread reach to page 2000 or dare I say: 3000 before we even get a whiff of official information??? That's not even getting to the fact that Drake will be outdated by then.

Edit: Weren't there talks about a Pro model being cancelled? What if that was just wrong? What if we mostly off about this whole thing?
 
Going back to the Jetson Orin Nano, GCN and Wii NSO will be superb for it.
Storage is the problem, GCN games can be like 3.5GB, Wii games can be roughly 7GB, if Drake has 512GB of onboard storage I can see them doing GCN but not Wii, if it has at least 1TB, then I can see them doing both... but I expect it to have 256GB at best, Nintendo has always been stingy with onboard storage.

I used to think we wouldn't see this device until 2025, so if the lack of leaks right now are any indication........

I'm still #Team2023, but let's stop for a moment and entertain the idea that, while everything we've gathered thus far is indeed for the successor, it might be farther away than even 2H 2024 and we instead get that fabled Switch Pro this year that is more powerful than the base model, but a far cry from Drake, what then? Would that make Nintendo riding out the Switch worthwhile? Would it curb the Switch's dwindling sales numbers? Will this thread reach to page 2000 or dare I say: 3000 before we even get a whiff of official information??? That's not even getting to the fact that Drake will be outdated by then.

Edit: Weren't there talks about a Pro model being cancelled? What if that was just wrong? What if we mostly off about this whole thing?
Let's not forget the fact that ALL Switch models leaked in it's FW literally YEARS before they released, even the OLED, so a Switch Pro, this year, would be impossible, it'd either be coming late 2025 or later or not at all. So whether Drake releases this, next, on 2025 or even after or not, there is no Switch Pro coming anytime soon.
 
"Lack of leaks"

You guys we've had more leaks than ever. What are you people talking about?

Nintendo has crazy NDA's and is very lawsuit happy with this stuff. On top of that they are super secretive and don't tell people what their doing, even other big partners.
Alright so what leaks point to this holiday rather than, say, early next year?
 
Alright so what leaks point to this holiday rather than, say, early next year?
We've had the factory leaks where they are working on production. We've had the Nvidia leak that shows that they should have a chip ready for production. We've had multiple insiders allude to new hardware coming soon.
 
"Lack of leaks"

You guys we've had more leaks than ever. What are you people talking about?
Like what? We had an Nvidia hack, and then Digital Foundry(and Nate after) telling us something was cancelled. It's otherwise been dead quiet. No journalists have corroborated anything we think we know. Nate completely backed off his own hardware rumors at the end of last year when Digital Foundry did their reporting. The few journalists that have even spoken on the idea of new hardware have been indicating it's further out.

Not exactly a lot left to hang your hat on at this point. We have a couple forum posters sort of insisting that Drake must be ready, and therefore it wouldn't make sense to sit on it, and a few vague uncorroborated translations from Chinese forums. There's a lot of assumptions involved in the above though.
 
The only thing i can see, if the Switch 2 is launching 2023, that only Nintendo has Dev Kits at the moment.
And that the Dev Kits go out when the mass production starts, lets say in July and then we get the announcement?^^
 
Nintendo typically doesn't do hardware releases early in the year unless something goes wrong.
Not the point???

We've had the factory leaks where they are working on production. We've had the Nvidia leak that shows that they should have a chip ready for production. We've had multiple insiders allude to new hardware coming soon.
Okay so the same things that led to people thinking it was coming earlier this year. These leaks lack standing now because of how quiet it has been(essentially what Instro is saying) and based on what those "multiple insiders" have said. There's not really anything substantial (yet) that is convincingly pointing to the end of this year. It's very much up in the air. But we aren't far away from getting something substantial if in fact it is coming this holiday.
 
Not the point???


Okay so the same things that led to people thinking it was coming earlier this year. These leaks lack standing now because of how quiet it has been(essentially what Instro is saying) and based on what those "multiple insiders" have said. There's not really anything substantial (yet) that is convincingly pointing to the end of this year. It's very much up in the air. But we aren't far away from getting something substantial if in fact it is coming this holiday.
This logic does not compute to me. It’s quiet now so things we heard before are now invalid?

No.

It’s always darkest before the dawn, baby!

My point is we pretty much KNOW it’s coming soon. Either this year or next year, right? I’m hearing “no reason to believe it’s this year!” But my reply is that there’s no reason to believe it’s next year. Sure, it’s in the air. But why choose pessimism instead of optimism? It seems to make more sense that it’s this year to me, and I don’t see any reason provided that debunks that.
 
"Lack of leaks"

You guys we've had more leaks than ever. What are you people talking about?

Nintendo has crazy NDA's and is very lawsuit happy with this stuff. On top of that they are super secretive and don't tell people what their doing, even other big partners.

This.
After the Bloomberg fiasco with so many developers with a big mouth, I'm pretty sure Nintendo closed the lid on third-parties.
"Yeah, don't bother about it, it's cancelled".

All it takes is 1 or 2 trusted publishing partners, probably Japanese since they are culturally more loyal than us bunch of western dickheads. 2-3 good games in the first 6 months, 2-3 good games the following 6, and next-gen patches for existing titles is all it takes a for successful launch.

Third-parties at large would get the devkits when the console is announced. It would give time for launch titles, from Nintendo and its close partners, to sell well and have a high attach rate, instead of sales being diluted by a myriad of ports being shoveled into the system.

IMO, the lack of devkit leaks is more indicative of Nintendo having a tight circle of trust.
 
Are you possibly referring to this?
If you walk the daisy chain of "sloppy reporting based on another sloppy outlet's reporting" it all comes back to a chip leaker who this thread actively performed a debunking operation on, by sending them a false leak and watching them post it immediately. OreXda, the "leaker" in question seems to publish literally anything sent to them, with no verification, and regardless of source.

But even worse, OreXda didn't make the claim that it was due to 5nm capacity issues. That was added by another reporter, simply speculating, which got picked up by other outlets as the rationale. The whole reporting chain comes down to this contextless tweet from a known unreliable source.
"Lack of leaks"

You guys we've had more leaks than ever. What are you people talking about?
You're talking about hardware related leaks, and hacks. We're referring to devkit related leaks. The difference matters.

Suppose I am known for making cakes. And right before I announce my Surprise Cake, it's pretty common for folks to say "hey, OldPuck is making a cake." So when Cake Rumors start, you know Cake is probably incoming.

Now suppose someone breaks into my house and sees butter, eggs, flour, sugar, chocolate on my shopping list. "Oh shit, cake is coming! And it's chocolate this time!"

And of course cake is coming, but not any time soon. The Cake Rumors in the past were based on people who live beside me smelling my cake. Just because you know the flavor this time doesn't change the fact that the information comes from a different source (someone breaking into my house), and so you can't extrapolate timing from this new rumor.

If devkit related info is leaking, that means 1) that 3rd parties have devkits and 2) enough of them have devkits that someone who might not be super vetted has access, and 3) that enough people have devkits that folks feel like they can talk without being hunted down. Which is what has happened with the Switch 17 months before launch, the 3DS a year before the launch, it happened to the Wii a year before launch. It did not happen with the New 3DS - because there was almost no 3rd party support for the New 3DS at launch, or over its lifetime.

I don't know any credible insiders reporting that a release is imminent, and the manufacturing leaks imply that Nintendo is "dilly dallying." I have my own reasons for believing that Nintendo's hardware production is well ahead of their software lineup.
 
The only thing i can see, if the Switch 2 is launching 2023, that only Nintendo has Dev Kits at the moment.
And that the Dev Kits go out when the mass production starts, lets say in July and then we get the announcement?^^

Probably. Maybe a few trusted developers within Japan, but I doubt any western developers have dev kits yet, outside of Retro Studios of course. I think once the new hardware is announced, dev kits will start shipping in mass. People have to remember that most third party titles will just be ports of PS4 games. With the specs Drake has, porting PS4 games to Redacted will take months not years. The library of games doesn't need to be very big at launch, they will sell out of the first 3-5 million units even if there isn't a single third party titles available at launch.
 
If you walk the daisy chain of "sloppy reporting based on another sloppy outlet's reporting" it all comes back to a chip leaker who this thread actively performed a debunking operation on, by sending them a false leak and watching them post it immediately. OreXda, the "leaker" in question seems to publish literally anything sent to them, with no verification, and regardless of source.

But even worse, OreXda didn't make the claim that it was due to 5nm capacity issues. That was added by another reporter, simply speculating, which got picked up by other outlets as the rationale. The whole reporting chain comes down to this contextless tweet from a known unreliable source.

You're talking about hardware related leaks, and hacks. We're referring to devkit related leaks. The difference matters.

Suppose I am known for making cakes. And right before I announce my Surprise Cake, it's pretty common for folks to say "hey, OldPuck is making a cake." So when Cake Rumors start, you know Cake is probably incoming.

Now suppose someone breaks into my house and sees butter, eggs, flour, sugar, chocolate on my shopping list. "Oh shit, cake is coming! And it's chocolate this time!"

And of course cake is coming, but not any time soon. The Cake Rumors in the past were based on people who live beside me smelling my cake. Just because you know the flavor this time doesn't change the fact that the information comes from a different source (someone breaking into my house), and so you can't extrapolate timing from this new rumor.

If devkit related info is leaking, that means 1) that 3rd parties have devkits and 2) enough of them have devkits that someone who might not be super vetted has access, and 3) that enough people have devkits that folks feel like they can talk without being hunted down. Which is what has happened with the Switch 17 months before launch, the 3DS a year before the launch, it happened to the Wii a year before launch. It did not happen with the New 3DS - because there was almost no 3rd party support for the New 3DS at launch, or over its lifetime.

I don't know any credible insiders reporting that a release is imminent, and the manufacturing leaks imply that Nintendo is "dilly dallying." I have my own reasons for believing that Nintendo's hardware production is well ahead of their software lineup.
The cake is a lie. 2023 isn’t.
 
Storage is the problem, GCN games can be like 3.5GB, Wii games can be roughly 7GB, if Drake has 512GB of onboard storage I can see them doing GCN but not Wii, if it has at least 1TB, then I can see them doing both... but I expect it to have 256GB at best, Nintendo has always been stingy with onboard storage.
?
Aren’t GCN games like 1.2GB at most? And Wii games being at most 5-7GB?

GCN games were limited by those discs that couldn’t store much.
 
Third-parties at large would get the devkits when the console is announced. It would give time for launch titles, from Nintendo and its close partners, to sell well and have a high attach rate, instead of sales being diluted by a myriad of ports being shoveled into the system.
This is what I fully expect
 
The point is it's a pretty odd prompt. You're kind of assuming a delay.
I'm literally asking the dude to just defend his position with examples. Like what are you even on about lol.
This logic does not compute to me. It’s quiet now so things we heard before are now invalid?

No.

It’s always darkest before the dawn, baby!

My point is we pretty much KNOW it’s coming soon. Either this year or next year, right? I’m hearing “no reason to believe it’s this year!” But my reply is that there’s no reason to believe it’s next year. Sure, it’s in the air. But why choose pessimism instead of optimism? It seems to make more sense that it’s this year to me, and I don’t see any reason provided that debunks that.
Yeah yeah I want to be clear I'm not saying you are wrong to think this year is possible. It becomes more unlikely as time passes but we've yet to pass the line of it being impossible. My point was kinda what you're saying too haha.
 
The whole "AMD goes to Samsung" thing is kinda funny considering how in the last MLID podcast they talk about the privileged relationship between AMD and TSMC and why it's important for AMD.

There is no way AMD goes to Samsung in the near future.
 
?
Aren’t GCN games like 1.2GB at most? And Wii games being at most 5-7GB?

GCN games were limited by those discs that couldn’t store much.
Ah right, I misremembered the GCN game disks size. In any case, those are the ones that have the least problems because their smaller size and amount of games. As for Wii games, I was checking and disks were either 4.7GB or 8.5GB, so maybe we could get both NSO if we get 256GB of storage... I am not sure if most Wii games could be compressed to use less than 4.7GB, if they can, maybe we could get up to 25 of them in less than 100GB of storage, though it'd still be quite a lot of required space. Ideally Nintendo will give us 512GB of storage, that'd fix any issue and allow for both consoles on the service, but who knows? They may cut costs there and give us 128GB, though at least it should allow us to have the GCN NSO I think.
 
maybe we could get up to 25 of them in less
I mean, it’s not like Nintendo gives us all the NES, SNES, N64, GB/C, GBA games right now anyway 😛


They are captain drip feed after all.

Though I wonder if they can do some kind of serious compression for those games and decompress it when loading it in to reduce the file size all the time.
 
This.
After the Bloomberg fiasco with so many developers with a big mouth, I'm pretty sure Nintendo closed the lid on third-parties.
"Yeah, don't bother about it, it's cancelled".

All it takes is 1 or 2 trusted publishing partners, probably Japanese since they are culturally more loyal than us bunch of western dickheads. 2-3 good games in the first 6 months, 2-3 good games the following 6, and next-gen patches for existing titles is all it takes a for successful launch.

Third-parties at large would get the devkits when the console is announced. It would give time for launch titles, from Nintendo and its close partners, to sell well and have a high attach rate, instead of sales being diluted by a myriad of ports being shoveled into the system.

IMO, the lack of devkit leaks is more indicative of Nintendo having a tight circle of trust.
Nintendo isn't going to cut off western devs from the closest circle. Most of the best support come out of the west after all
 
Probably. Maybe a few trusted developers within Japan, but I doubt any western developers have dev kits yet, outside of Retro Studios of course. I think once the new hardware is announced, dev kits will start shipping in mass. People have to remember that most third party titles will just be ports of PS4 games. With the specs Drake has, porting PS4 games to Redacted will take months not years. The library of games doesn't need to be very big at launch, they will sell out of the first 3-5 million units even if there isn't a single third party titles available at launch.
And Next Level, since both are Nintendo owned studios.
 
Nintendo isn't going to cut off western devs from the closest circle. Most of the best support come out of the west after all

Im not convinced. Leaks almost always come from western developers. Again, with Drake specs, how long do we really think it would take Ubisoft or 2K to port a few PS4 games? If they were to do the ports in house with a decent size team, maybe a few months?
 
Please read this staff post before posting.

Furthermore, according to this follow-up post, all off-topic chat will be moderated.
Last edited:


Back
Top Bottom