• Hey everyone, staff have documented a list of banned content and subject matter that we feel are not consistent with site values, and don't make sense to host discussion of on Famiboards. This list (and the relevant reasoning per item) is viewable here.
  • Do you have audio editing experience and want to help out with the Famiboards Discussion Club Podcast? If so, we're looking for help and would love to have you on the team! Just let us know in the Podcast Thread if you are interested!

StarTopic Future Nintendo Hardware & Technology Speculation & Discussion |ST| (Read the staff posts before commenting!)

To be fair this is the type of leak (if you can call it that) which we do occasionally find to be legit later on. The Switch Lite shell leak was also laughed off as being from some random Asian twitter account.

At least this guy is supposedly a retail buyer.
 
To be fair this is the type of leak (if you can call it that) which we do occasionally find to be legit later on. The Switch Lite shell leak was also laughed off as being from some random Asian twitter account.

At least this guy is supposedly a retail buyer.
But what's the leak?

"Nintendo is relentless" can mean anything from software production, leak security, etc...
 
It was reported when it was because supply chain partners began to have movement on orders. There is no meaningful evidence right now to point to end of the month beyond the Direct timing in relation to the meeting.

What could relation to the meeting possibly mean for the Direct though? All 6 Directors are up for re-election. The Directors for the Audit and Supervisory Committee are not related at all to anything in the Direct. Neither are stock grants and distribution of surplus. I mean, if you want to get a wild theory started...is a current member of the Board of Directors stepping down? And would it be announced during the Direct? lol


 
Quoted by: LiC
1
To be fair this is the type of leak (if you can call it that) which we do occasionally find to be legit later on. The Switch Lite shell leak was also laughed off as being from some random Asian twitter account.

At least this guy is supposedly a retail buyer.
I agree that the account is legit, but like Nate said, it hasn't said anything that deserves all the coverage, It's too vague to be worthwhile, and the account being a retail buyer, I don't think they'll ever release something that could give them trouble.
 
But what's the leak?

"Nintendo is relentless" can mean anything from software production, leak security, etc...

I agree that the account is legit, but like Nate said, it hasn't said anything that deserves all the coverage, It's too vague to be worthwhile, and the account being a retail buyer, I don't think they'll ever release something that could give them trouble.
There isn't really a leak, like I said. There seems to be some not so subtle hinting at Nintendo having something big to announce soon, but that could definitely just be referring to a Direct. But then again he also seems to make mention of not believing "it" will be at the Direct. So who the hell knows. It would be nice if a native speaker could clear any of this up.

But the reason it's interesting is because it's the type of thing we might be able to look back at after something is announced and realize that it is indeed what this guy was talking about.

I take it there’s minimal chance this releases in 2022?
Personally I'd say the chances of it releasing in 2022 have not changed between January 1st 2022 and today.
 
Will that thing be released?

Will it be announced that it is?

Nintendo must be able to afford it.

Xenoblade DE.
Xenoblade 2.
The screen resolution is so low in portable mode that it makes me feel depressed when I'm playing. I wonder if they can do it now.
So what's the context for why this account brings up Xenoblade performance? Feels out of the blue.

And Nintendo being 'able to afford it' - could they still be referring to a software release here? Or would it be the cost of manufacturing Drake?

That and the random invocation of Xenoblade is why I my mind wants to drift towards hardware. Of course, I'm reading this with the inherent bias of being aware of the Nvidia leak and devkits so I really don't have a clue.
 
0
Isn’t the real “leak” in that Twitter account that they allude to being able to play Xenoblade on better hardware? The references are oblique and who knows how mangled the translation is but in context, the “it” being referred to seems like a more powerful Switch.

Now, it could be complete nonsense. And everyone’s starved for news so they’re jumping on anything. But it’s the kind of random info that sometimes turns out to be legit down the line. I guess the “leak” would be that a more powerful Switch is out there and more people are hearing about it.
 
Shocked to see that random Japanese account is being used to fuel rumors on outlets this week.
Just wanted to reiterate that I shared those tweets to facilitate fun speculations on an internet forum. Are there any "outlets" actually reporting this?

On the flip side, there is a Japanese gaming blog randomly attributed a bunch of Drake specs to you, and other outlets regurgitated the same misinformation. Screenshot via Google translation (source):

n5xeI7G.png

Note that they took a screenshot of your unrelated post from April as a proof. Time is a flat circle.
 
Just wanted to reiterate that I shared those tweets to facilitate fun speculations on an internet forum. Are there any "outlets" actually reporting this?

On the flip side, there is a Japanese gaming blog randomly attributed a bunch of Drake specs to you, and other outlets regurgitated the same misinformation. Screenshot via Google translation (source):

n5xeI7G.png

Note that they took a screenshot of your unrelated post from April as a proof. Time is a flat circle.
I'm wondering how much of this misinformation is further fueled by the fact that his user name is Nate Drake
 
Nate was the Drake the whole time. The Nintendo "Drake" posted AI generated Nintendo leaks to hype the fanbase.
It even faked a Podcast and several Twitter accounts. AI is crazy nowadays.

Nate the literal Drake. We were so blind.
 
Nate was the Drake the whole time. The Nintendo "Drake" postet AI generated Nintendo leaks to hype the fanbase.
It even faked a Podcast and several Twitter accounts. AI is crazy nowadays.

Nate the literal Drake. We were so blind.
No wonder nobody has ever seen his face...
 
Just wanted to reiterate that I shared those tweets to facilitate fun speculations on an internet forum. Are there any "outlets" actually reporting this?

On the flip side, there is a Japanese gaming blog randomly attributed a bunch of Drake specs to you, and other outlets regurgitated the same misinformation. Screenshot via Google translation (source):

n5xeI7G.png

Note that they took a screenshot of your unrelated post from April as a proof. Time is a flat circle.

What the hell lol

Did anyone actually cover this?

It's been prime YT fodder.
 

Future Nintendo Hardware & Technology Speculation and Discussion |ST| Nintendo's Uncharted Drake: Nate's Misfortune

 
What could relation to the meeting possibly mean for the Direct though? All 6 Directors are up for re-election. The Directors for the Audit and Supervisory Committee are not related at all to anything in the Direct. Neither are stock grants and distribution of surplus. I mean, if you want to get a wild theory started...is a current member of the Board of Directors stepping down? And would it be announced during the Direct? lol

This again seems like a non sequitur. By law they have to do this meeting every year and let people with shares vote on executive positions and give comment. What is on the official schedule for this particular meeting has nothing to do with why people think it's significant. I don't personally think this will happen, but the point is that it's an opportunity to either announce or follow-up an announcement for new hardware, which they have in fact done at these meetings before, and the proximity to a Direct is also unusual leading to speculation about that.
 
This again seems like a non sequitur. By law they have to do this meeting every year and let people with shares vote on executive positions and give comment. What is on the official schedule for this particular meeting has nothing to do with why people think it's significant. I don't personally think this will happen, but the point is that it's an opportunity to either announce or follow-up an announcement for new hardware, which they have in fact done at these meetings before, and the proximity to a Direct is also unusual leading to speculation about that.
Ah man are you trying to convince me to read through a couple decades worth of pdf's? lol
 
Quoted by: LiC
1
Ah man are you trying to convince me to read through a couple decades worth of pdf's? lol
I mean, the Q&As can be good for a laugh because the shmucks with 1 share who get in there sometimes ask pretty ridiculous questions.

But no, again I personally don't think there's any significance re: hardware for the timing of the meeting/Direct and I don't believe the meeting is a good place to announce hardware. And the only historical precedent is like, following up on hardware plans and explaining things in the Q&A. Technically, announcements have happened (3DS XL or N3DS XL? I don't remember), but those weren't even at the annual meetings, just one of the quarterly ones.
 
I mean, the Q&As can be good for a laugh because the shmucks with 1 share who get in there sometimes ask pretty ridiculous questions.

But no, again I personally don't think there's any significance re: hardware for the timing of the meeting/Direct and I don't believe the meeting is a good place to announce hardware. And the only historical precedent is like, following up on hardware plans and explaining things in the Q&A. Technically, announcements have happened (3DS XL or N3DS XL? I don't remember), but those weren't even at the annual meetings, just one of the quarterly ones.
I was just browsing through one and someone took the time to complain that the location was a pain in the ass to get to lol
 
Well, Nate not knowing doesn't necessarily mean it isn't going to be shown this month, but it makes it less likely. I guess Nintendo could opt to show it in July (why not do it in this Direct though? It'd be jumping extra hoops for the same result), August or September, that's if they want to launch it this CY. I find it unlikely that they'll tease it before Black Friday and show it in January again though, as that could eat into their Switch sales, but I also find it unlikely they'd just reveal out of nowhere 3 months before it's released. It worked last time because the Wii U was dead so they had no sales to lose (and the 3DS was a handheld, while the Switch is marketed as a home console). We'll have to wait and see what they do, but at least we know when the Direct is, so we have something concrete to look forward to, even if it doesn't contain new hardware.
 
0
What the hell lol



It's been prime YT fodder.
I never made a video attributing any of that to Drake. That's not how Nate would handle things, it would be within the post like all the rest.

That being said, I did make a video on the tweets posted here because like the guy who posted it said - it's fun speculation, so why not? People sometimes take things a little too serious. I would never expect to see it posted at legit news areas as news...

but you know, tomorrow those tweets will magically make it to IGN.
 
And some updates from TSMC on their roadmap:

N2's offering a not-so-encouraging chip density (that is, mixed) improvement of at least 1.1x over N3E. N3E itself offers ~1.3x chip/mixed density improvement over N5. According to those articles, mixed should be defined as 50% logic/30% sram/20% analog. Referencing the five N3 processes article, N3E offers 1.6x logic density improvement over N5, while base N3 offers 1.7x logic density improvement against N5. Probably fair to infer that N2's offering logic density improvement in the neighborhood of 1.2-1.3x then?
Maybe TSMC's deliberately attempting only so much since N2 will be the first GAAFET node as well as first with new power delivery. Which would be fair; being overly ambitious in one shot is potentially disastrous (see Intel's adventures with 10nm). Still, that does extend the amount of time one needs to wait for big density gains given the pace.
...oh, I guess that's (partly?) why there's been such movement towards multi chip designs.

As far as relating this back to Nintendo goes, my concern is the impact on time and cost on a potential post-Drake mobile oriented device. Particularly, the GPU-side; how much you can theoretically further crank up the SM count and when you can do so while keeping die size within acceptable range. On the plus side, 8k resolution probably won't be taking off anytime soon, so the next raw-GPU-grunt threshold is really what, satisfying RT capability?
 
I've still got my fingers crossed that we see something soon.

Before news of the Direct’s atypical time - just before/around the shareholder meeting - would have assumed that they'd announce hardware in July after the Direct. The thinking here being that they'd want to distance talk of new hardware to avoid confusion around what system any games are for; They'll all be for 2017 Switch - no ambiguity.

If it does show up during the Direct, it could end up being a 'one-last-thing' tease for a future showcase to be set at a later date: “Here’s a sneak peak at the next product in the Switch family - take a look.” Followed by “Please look forward to when we share more news on _____ very soon.”

I’m sure somebody in here is going to say (or has already said) the shareholder meeting means nothing. I’m going to remain hopeful until the Direct passes or Nate brutally shuts us all down. >:-]
 
And some updates from TSMC on their roadmap:

N2's offering a not-so-encouraging chip density (that is, mixed) improvement of at least 1.1x over N3E. N3E itself offers ~1.3x chip/mixed density improvement over N5. According to those articles, mixed should be defined as 50% logic/30% sram/20% analog. Referencing the five N3 processes article, N3E offers 1.6x logic density improvement over N5, while base N3 offers 1.7x logic density improvement against N5. Probably fair to infer that N2's offering logic density improvement in the neighborhood of 1.2-1.3x then?
Maybe TSMC's deliberately attempting only so much since N2 will be the first GAAFET node as well as first with new power delivery. Which would be fair; being overly ambitious in one shot is potentially disastrous (see Intel's adventures with 10nm). Still, that does extend the amount of time one needs to wait for big density gains given the pace.
...oh, I guess that's (partly?) why there's been such movement towards multi chip designs.

As far as relating this back to Nintendo goes, my concern is the impact on time and cost on a potential post-Drake mobile oriented device. Particularly, the GPU-side; how much you can theoretically further crank up the SM count and when you can do so while keeping die size within acceptable range. On the plus side, 8k resolution probably won't be taking off anytime soon, so the next raw-GPU-grunt threshold is really what, satisfying RT capability?

This is going to be a problem for not only mobile chipset but even desktop Chipset. desktop parts are only going to get hungrier/thirstier and require more power and even if a multiple chiplet design might mitigate that, it will creep back up again.
 
0
Multi chip's purpose isn't really to address power (if anything, implementations so far have increased power draw when all else is equal*?). IIRC, the approach's main benefits is to evade the physical size limit of a single die as well as improve yields (it should be easier to accrue multiple smaller chips/tiles than it is to nail a big monolithic die).

*main example I'm thinking of is chiplet Zen versus monolithic Zen. There is a noticable increase in uncore power consumption, and I'm not sure if that's 100% attributable to the IO die being made on an older node. Some of it's gotta be that infinity fabric, right? Especially since AM5 is still allocating +35% headroom for total package power and the IO die for that should be N6.
 
0
I've still got my fingers crossed that we see something soon.

Before news of the Direct’s atypical time - just before/around the shareholder meeting - would have assumed that they'd announce hardware in July after the Direct. The thinking here being that they'd want to distance talk of new hardware to avoid confusion around what system any games are for; They'll all be for 2017 Switch - no ambiguity.

If it does show up during the Direct, it could end up being a 'one-last-thing' tease for a future showcase to be set at a later date: “Here’s a sneak peak at the next product in the Switch family - take a look.” Followed by “Please look forward to when we share more news on _____ very soon.”

I’m sure somebody in here is going to say (or has already said) the shareholder meeting means nothing. I’m going to remain hopeful until the Direct passes or Nate brutally shuts us all down. >:-]
Teasing it at the end would cause everyone to flip a table, I think it'd be better to start with it lol
 
0
They're not going to "tease" anything. Believing hardware can be treated like a software title, either in terms of production or reveal/marketing, is one of the problems with a lot of speculation on the new model. Including, in my opinion, the idea that it's particularly likely/possible to be part of a Direct in the first place.
 
They're not going to "tease" anything. Believing hardware can be treated like a software title, either in terms of production or reveal/marketing, is one of the problems with a lot of speculation on the new model. Including, in my opinion, the idea that it's particularly likely/possible to be part of a Direct in the first place.
Only possible tease is them putting out a press report of them saying: new hardware is coming we will give more information in a future event. Which they have done before
 
Quoted by: LiC
1
I've still got my fingers crossed that we see something soon.

Before news of the Direct’s atypical time - just before/around the shareholder meeting - would have assumed that they'd announce hardware in July after the Direct. The thinking here being that they'd want to distance talk of new hardware to avoid confusion around what system any games are for; They'll all be for 2017 Switch - no ambiguity.

If it does show up during the Direct, it could end up being a 'one-last-thing' tease for a future showcase to be set at a later date: “Here’s a sneak peak at the next product in the Switch family - take a look.” Followed by “Please look forward to when we share more news on _____ very soon.”

I’m sure somebody in here is going to say (or has already said) the shareholder meeting means nothing. I’m going to remain hopeful until the Direct passes or Nate brutally shuts us all down. >:-]

When do you think it launches? If it's March 2023 then seeing it this early is not happening. We didn't see OG Switch until 6 months prior to release.
 
0
Only possible tease is them putting out a press report of them saying: new hardware is coming we will give more information in a future event. Which they have done before
I think the strategy of the 3DS era when that happened is well over and done with. There weren't even worldwide launches of the hardware back then.
 
And some updates from TSMC on their roadmap:

N2's offering a not-so-encouraging chip density (that is, mixed) improvement of at least 1.1x over N3E. N3E itself offers ~1.3x chip/mixed density improvement over N5. According to those articles, mixed should be defined as 50% logic/30% sram/20% analog. Referencing the five N3 processes article, N3E offers 1.6x logic density improvement over N5, while base N3 offers 1.7x logic density improvement against N5. Probably fair to infer that N2's offering logic density improvement in the neighborhood of 1.2-1.3x then?
Maybe TSMC's deliberately attempting only so much since N2 will be the first GAAFET node as well as first with new power delivery. Which would be fair; being overly ambitious in one shot is potentially disastrous (see Intel's adventures with 10nm). Still, that does extend the amount of time one needs to wait for big density gains given the pace.
...oh, I guess that's (partly?) why there's been such movement towards multi chip designs.

As far as relating this back to Nintendo goes, my concern is the impact on time and cost on a potential post-Drake mobile oriented device. Particularly, the GPU-side; how much you can theoretically further crank up the SM count and when you can do so while keeping die size within acceptable range. On the plus side, 8k resolution probably won't be taking off anytime soon, so the next raw-GPU-grunt threshold is really what, satisfying RT capability?
So the big takeaway from TSMC’s announcements are that the gains coming from node decreases are starting to diminish?

What would this mean for Drake?
I think the marginal density, performance, and power efficiency improvements from TSMC's N3 process node family and TSMC's N2 process node in comparison to TSMC's N5 process node family is an indication that nobody should expect huge performance and power efficiency gains for hardware going forward without also expecting large price increases. In other words, after Nintendo releases a hybrid console equipped with Drake, don't expect any more than marginal performance and power efficiency improvements without having to pay more money. I think Arm's CPU peak performance chart from Arm Vision Day 2021 is a good visual indication of what to expect in terms of performance and power efficiency gains, realistically speaking (after the Cortex-A78).
Peter_4.png
 
They're not going to "tease" anything. Believing hardware can be treated like a software title, either in terms of production or reveal/marketing, is one of the problems with a lot of speculation on the new model. Including, in my opinion, the idea that it's particularly likely/possible to be part of a Direct in the first place.

I shouldn't have used the word "tease", and instead called it a short reveal trailer. The point I was making was that they'd show more about the device in the coming weeks, including hands on impressions from journalists.
 
0
I've still got my fingers crossed that we see something soon.

Before news of the Direct’s atypical time - just before/around the shareholder meeting - would have assumed that they'd announce hardware in July after the Direct. The thinking here being that they'd want to distance talk of new hardware to avoid confusion around what system any games are for; They'll all be for 2017 Switch - no ambiguity.

If it does show up during the Direct, it could end up being a 'one-last-thing' tease for a future showcase to be set at a later date: “Here’s a sneak peak at the next product in the Switch family - take a look.” Followed by “Please look forward to when we share more news on _____ very soon.”

I’m sure somebody in here is going to say (or has already said) the shareholder meeting means nothing. I’m going to remain hopeful until the Direct passes or Nate brutally shuts us all down. >:-]

That would be the greatest "one last thing" since the 2018 Smash Bros reveal.
 
That would be the greatest "one last thing" since the 2018 Smash Bros reveal.

I mean, no matter how Nintendo announces the device, it's going to be one of the best announcements in recent memory - that's how much I want an upgrade lol

Twitter seems too unceremonious for it to me. At the same time, opening a Direct that's largely a pitch for existing Switch titles seems like confusing messaging. A capstone to the Direct sounds just right...

...but what do I know. Please get this Direct over with Nintendo so I can stop daydreaming :-[
 
0
I think Nintendo will drop a video just like the Switch Lite when it was announced.

It's certainly possible - I think that's what they did for the OLED as well. They have a bit more to explain about this one than those two I'm sure, but nothing that couldn't actually fit into a couple minute trailer.
 
So the big takeaway from TSMC’s announcements are that the gains coming from node decreases are starting to diminish?

What would this mean for Drake?
Primarily it's the density gains that look like they're starting to diminish with today's announcements.
Note: N2 is expected to start volume production in 2H of 2025; so products probably won't be expected until 2026. So this is mainly a post-Drake concern.
Energy efficiency gains/Dennard scaling actually broke down on us back in the 2000's, I hear? Anyway, N3->N2's -25-30% power actually lines up with N5->N3. And in turn, they're not too far off of N7->N5's -30% power. So energy efficiency improvement is still...uh, stable for the time being.
Going back to density, this is kind of startling. To recap for the readers, generally, the foundry charges you a price by the wafer, right? So effectively, you're paying by area. And wafer costs climb along with the R&D costs that go into each successive node. But if the rate at which transistor density improves slows down significantly, that really screws with the transistor/$ proposition going forward.

By the way folks, what's something that historically scaled very well by lobbing more transistors at them? Graphics processing

Should be noted that MCM has no real place in the console Space anymore or anytime soon, the cost of it is massive and just not worth it for the target that consoles aim for.
True! And given that priority...
Going forward, how do traditional consoles continue to offer the expected 'generational' improvements in an economically viable manner? Perf/transistor (or perf/area, whichever you prefer) needs to see massive gains. In the high end productions, boom, native rendering dies, the age of advanced upscaling techniques being required begins.
 
Actually, with the insane amounts of DMCAs and lack of info might be a hood thing. It means Nintendo has the info locked down tight for an announcement. I mean what would they do with this hardware, they can't wait another year, they have to take advantage of the amount of the games they are releasing! They also DMCAed a Nintendo Switch 4k game upscaler days ago that got annouced in April lol.
 
Please read this staff post before posting.

Furthermore, according to this follow-up post, all off-topic chat will be moderated.
Last edited:


Back
Top Bottom