www.semianalysis.com
I think that should have further examination.
This was an amusing thing to read while literally sitting in my Tacoma, which I do call a TacoI think it's not. Unofficially, Toyota Tacoma owners refer to their vehicles as Tacos, but I don't see a lawyer present, nor any trademarking.
He's just nostalgic for the western version of the NES, is allSakurai is chaos
Hear that Noah...
If I weren't so dead-set on atomic purple or SNES colors for the next Switch I'd totally reskin the dock with this design.Speaking from the heart, needs more Jazz
I think the majority of folks have abandoned team January, but I'm in a firm "Team February" right now. Got a lot of hopium rn.
The brilliance about Switch is that the modular design allows for Nintendo to add in the quirkiness through software and peripherals like Ring Fit and Labo. Instead of force feeding everyone down the road of having a high concept gaming system (as in the Wii).
Intel GenAI For Yield, TSMC CFET & 3D Stacking, AMD 3D Device Modeling, Applied Materials Material Innovation, SK Hynix HBM 4, Micron 3D DRAM & FeRAM, Hybrid Bonding vs TCB - IEDM 2023
China’s CXMT Sanctions Violation, Samsung 1000-layer Vertical NAND (VNAND), Kioxia highest density CMOS bonded to array (CBA) NAND, Micron non-volatile FeRAM with competitive density and performance
I'm Team January, yeah. After the release of Another Code, I assume there will be an announcement the week after.
I'm not a joiner, but if I were to predict now, acknowledgment of the new console in April, trailer in July, release in November.
I think the only lead we had on a January reveal was Zuby_Tech on Twitter. No one else came out with anything similar and today they mentioned they haven't heard anything since. Sorry for the prime jumpscare.
Quoting myself because I forgot to mention in the post - this was implemented for things like conventions, where simply doing a local wireless scan could result in an unreasonably large list of users. Infrared, by nature of being direct line of sight, would easily communicate with just the desired partner - but it didn't actually do the battle/trade over it, it just paired the two systems for communicating over local wireless instead. This way, you could easily connect to the device you wanted, but you were still able to properly hold the system and break line of sight throughout the actual battle (or trade).
hmm I'll try
I mean, even if you have a white OLED Taco, then all you need is a high quality vinyl sticker to slap on that bad boy...and by Jove I think I know what I'm gonna try to order online tonight!
Let's hope we will soon go over to the "We actually have something substantial to discuss about Switch 2" Season.
For which, I want to bring up a topic that'll probably annoy people.
Nintendo is already a direct retailer in many regions, what I think could damage their relationship is keeping console shipments exclusively for themselves, which only they can sell, which they will only sell to their customers.
It's been three days...
I swear X and Y had an IR only option, unless I'm remembering very poorly, I remember battling and the game telling us to bring our consoles together after EVERY TURN so the IR transceivers could see each other.
goalposts
This isn't. Terribly true, though?
I don't think I suggested keeping them exclusive to themselves. I suggested they hold back a percentage of them. I don't think I specified what percentage, because I didn't want to play in that detail, but I was thinking 30%.
Oh I get that. Though to be fair it's not impossible for Nintendo who sometimes have at least a small to medium sized news the past 5 years in January. Like when they bought Next Level, announced the Metroid Prime Delay or that Mini Direct. This year they even wanted to have a full on Convention in Japan. It isn't necessarily a pattern, but I always felt like if Nintendo wants to get something out of their way fast, they'll do it usually at the beginning of the year.
I'm not referring to "WE JUST GOT HERE AND WE SHOULD ABANDON ALL HOPE BECAUSE IT HASN'T HAPPENED IN THOSE THREE DAYS!!", I'm just talking about people thinking about "when is most likely" and January doesn't make sense for a lot of people. Production will likely start alongside the reveal, and the reveal likely won't happened before the Lunar New Year. It's not impossible, it just isn't likely.
For all intents and purposes, you're right. Hell, I'm one of the weird people that believes in a potential Nintendo Direct Mini either this or early next month. I'm just saying that, on the whole, January isn't the most active month. I do want to point out that, barring the Switch Presentation and a Nintendo Direct Mini in 2018, not many events of significant weight have happened in January for Nintendo since the Switch was revealed, and I'm saying that a reveal in January is just... very unlikely on the whole.
Yeah I didn’t figure it out until I was messing around with it while it was off. Pretty impressive stuff.
Frostbite has been mobile compatible since 2015
I'm sorry to wheel this out on you, but.
Mid to late February. Shortly after the first Direct.
I never said keeping the console exclusive itself to their store, I said keeping shipments exclusive to their store, not distributing them beyond themselves, which is the sort of thing this would require.
Regarding the DLSS cost discussions, one thing that is often brought up is how it's a fixed cost and it will be very heavy to do 4k upscaling with the limited amount of tensor cores that would be available in a Switch 2. But I almost never see any mention of DLSS concurrency which Nvidia introduced with Ampere. See this video where Nvidia goes through some changes from Pascal to Turing to Ampere:
You can see here how, by running DLSS concurrently with the RT and shader cores, the frame-time can be reduced by 0.7ms. Now this is obviously not a very significant boost, but this is a 3080 so this is pretty much the time it takes to do DLSS upscaling on such a powerful card, but the slower the DLSS calculation the bigger the potential gain. There will obviously be a latency cost from this, as DLSS is calculated on the previous frame while the current frame is being rendered, but while something like 10ms would be a significant chunk of your frame-time budget, it's would be a barely noticeable increase in input latency.
Is there a reason this isn't talked about? I don't know if it's ever implemented on PC games, I think most non-Turing cards capable of DLSS would upscale so quickly it might not be worth bothering with it but Nvidia clearly states that Ampere is capable of this type of concurrency. Turing on the other hand is not, so using a 20xx series card as a benchmark for Switch 2 DLSS performance seems like it could be quite misleading.
I want to point out before going further that I am not claiming to be a realist nor a pessimist. I personally think those words harm speculation on the whole because they bring an artificial layer of "feeling" based on a claim into the mix instead of perspective based on personal analysis, which I believe the majority of people in this thread are doing. While you may see my claim as one of either, it is not the same as me saying I am one.
i'm in love with this logo. we're planning a may wedding.
where is my battlefield 4 on the ipad
