Definitely fair. I'd hate to see baseless uncertainty cast on such important publications. Thank you for the replyI think it would be a bad thing for those vested in this type of early reporting to dismiss a Bloomberg report as a falsehood due to the an internal pivot and change of plan. Too many outlets/personalities have accused Mochi of being a liar. If the average person wants to stay on the speculative side of things and wait for official communication, then do so; but this situation shouldn't lead to people claiming Bloomberg, Nikkei, etc. as being unreliable.
I would agree wih u if Animal Crossing wasn't delayed. If Pikmin will not be out in 2023 then it will be the same situationthat was an Animal Crossing-like announcement. just a way to say something is coming in the next year or so
Mario Kart doesn't sell Hardware, it's Nintendo's best-selling franchise, but I don't know anyone who buys their consoles to play MK, it's usually a game that always comes together, an great addition, but not the main reason (which is usually Mario, Zelda, Pokémon or even Animal Crossing).
Can anyone give me an answer please?Sorry, I could not follow. Could you explain to me in which scenario we are?
A) Drake Switch was the "hardware refresh" scheduled for 2023 and then cancelled, and now we are waiting for a different hardware (maybe between 2024 and 2025).
B) Drake Switch will be out in several months (maybe between 2024 and 2025) and Nate got confused when he thought that the canceled refresh (overclocked Mariko?) was Drake.
C) Drake Switch was thought of as a refresh, but now it has become a real successor that will come out later (maybe between 2024 and 2025)
Can anyone give me an answer please?
I meant what scenario Nate's podcast throws us intoNobody knows lol, we're at the dooming phase
CI meant what scenario Nate's podcast throws us into
The definition of a system seller is in the name. All that "masterpiece," stuff is 1. Irrelevant to non-enthusiasts who want to play a fun game and 2. Just arbitrary meanings to somehow disregard the selling power of Mario kart.You are right that my experiences are limited and anecdotal but I still don't believe that sales numbers correlate to the status of system sellers.
In my eyes System Sellers are games that excite people to purchase new hardware by demonstrating hardware capability, innovation and are 'masterpieces'.
I do not think Mario Kart fulfills these statues. Instead I believe it to be more similar to a phone case.
You don't buy a phone for its case but you always buy a case for a phone.
.Smash runs
He mentioned in September that partners were being briefed as a response to Polygon, who said third parties were briefed on the Switch 2 strategy prior to September. I don't know what to make of it.Didn't Nate and others mention something about updated devkits around August 2022?
This would essentially be playing with the roadmaps and financials of several dozen companies for the sake of punishing a few bad actors. If I was a third-party developer, I would think long and hard before doing business with Nintendo again if they pulled this nonsense.Has it been theorised that, let’s say this information is real and devkits were pulled. What if it’s been a ploy from Nintendo where they removed them from select devs to try and weed out where the leaks are coming from?
Thank you.
Yeah, I think this is the likely situation.There is one thing I want to point out
The devkit which is being called back, is rumored to be delivered to 3rd party as early as 2021. But no foundry can manufacture a chip that has such good performance at such low power consumption as the nvn2 test script suggests.
I guess Nintendo is doing a devkit refresh, replace the old one with the ones have the final version of SoC inside. So instead of showing the hardware being delayed, this might actually be a move implying the retail hardware is finalized.
Therefor the announcement is happening soon, because when the devs have the new machines they will know what is going on.
all of this would be explained by another product using it firstYeah, I think this is the likely situation.
Nothing about a 2024/2025 gels with the actual hard facts we have about T239. This thing was fabricated last year. In all likelihood, dev kits are now equipped with.
All this pessimism is over speculation which while entertaining doesn't seem to have much basis in fact.
It doesn't change the fact that it costs money to store chips, there are opportunity costs to launching later than expected, and that this chip seems to have been manufactured already.
It's been nearly a year since this chip began fabrication.
I think we could be unknowingly about to dive into an announcement of some kind around the earning's report. To put it simply, there's nothing concrete to say we wouldn't, but there are things concrete to suggest we would.
Certainly if they know a developer has been leaking, they might withhold devkits, but doing that to try to figure that out seems a bit extreme.Has it been theorised that, let’s say this information is real and devkits were pulled. What if it’s been a ploy from Nintendo where they removed them from select devs to try and weed out where the leaks are coming from?
Sony's makin' a new portable. Door closed, window opened, mission accomplishedokay, I'm fully convinced the missing piece is another product repurposing drake
once we have that we can all go home
Sony's makin' a new portable. Door closed, window opened, mission accomplished
Can anyone give me an answer please?
Almost certainly so.A) Drake Switch was the "hardware refresh" scheduled for 2023
According to Nate, yes.and then cancelled, and now we are waiting for a different hardware (maybe between 2024 and 2025).
Leaked data would imply this, but it goes against what's being claimed.B) Drake Switch will be out in several months
Drake being used in a 2025 device doesn't make sense. A 2025 device that uses a brand new chip after cancelling Drake in 2022 also doesn't make sense.that will come out later (maybe between 2024 and 2025)
They're not...? Like, I've played all those franchises and love them since the Wii era, but they're not big in a console where every 1st party that is actually big reaches 20 million units in a regular basis. Those games literally aren't big in comparison, when the leakers mean "no big games", they mean juggernauts that can actually reach those numbers. Aka, no more Pokemon, Mario, Smash, Zelda, MK, whatever definition you have of a big release is incredibly subjective and completely ignores what it actually matters to companies in the end, sales.So Paper Mario and Metroid Dread aren't big games. Got it
(Some) Nintendo fans are quite something to satisfy...
There's much more than sales to define what a big game is. Metroid rarely sold a lot, yet it's absolutely a big deal in general. So much that Nintendo made a logo reveal which was talked about for month, and went as far as to make a すみません video to announce the reboot. Focusing on sales only is extremely shortsighted, and it's a good thing that Nintendo agrees with me and isn't doing that when promoting games.
Yeah, which is why we were watching CES so hard this month. But no new products with it were revealed.all of this would be explained by another product using it first
I was actually thinking this myselfIf I had to guess, I'd say Nintendo didn't like all those rumours about devkits being spread around and feeding Bloomberg/Nikkei reports (looking at you Zynga). They recalled the devkits and told developers the hardware was cancelled.
Then they gave a few select trusted partners new final devkits within a stricter NDA framework.
H1 2023 until Late Feb.So are we now Team 2024 or Team 2025? Sound off below!
...nice. can i have that? (except the BotW/TotK DLC bundle, would be tooo expensive =P)Just for fun, since the thread has turned a bit down beat, I'd just throw out these guesses for the next-hardware
- Summer (July/August) 2024 release, ideal because it doesn't interfere with holiday 2023 and lets them unveil in Feb/March without much fuss, early adopters get their units and then allows Nintendo to get a full restock in for the holiday 2024 sales.
- The name is Super Switch or Super Nintendo Switch.
- Drake 5nm, clocked pretty high, full generation hardware leap over the existing Switch, maybe some hardcore tech heads won't be happy because it's not absolutely bleeding edge, but it pumps out gorgeous visuals and more than good enough for Nintendo content and with DLSS a bunch of 3rd party content too.
- Mario Kart 9 + Zelda: BOTW + TOTK 4K Edition are launch titles, the Zelda dual pack has new gameplay DLC content. Metroid Prime 4 a few months post launch.
- Smash will be the holiday 2024, game will be a GaaS type title that adds content as time goes on but will still have a ton of characters to start and even a new 3rd party character or two to start. Game is loosely built upon the previous Smash game but new upgraded graphics, gameplay tweaks, new stages.
- Affordable VR is the new "gimmick" as a separate accessory. Nintendo put a lot into Labo VR, the new Switch will have its own VR headset which will be more of a cheaper experience than something like the PS5VR, but still good enough to get a good VR experience across (maybe PS4 VR quality). Mario Kart 9, Metroid Prime 4, and Zelda: BOTW/TOTK will have new VR modes, so will a new Pilotwings game. Headset is cheap (sub $189 with a game included). Nintendo reccomends shorter play sessions for VR (30-60 minutes).
- Street Fighter VI, Call of Duty, Final Fantasy VII Remake, Elden Ring port, RE4 Remake, Madden NFL are notable early wave 3rd party games.
my answer to that question:So are we now Team 2024 or Team 2025? Sound off below!
A) The original refresh or Switch Pro was the "Dane" chip that was replaced with DrakeSorry, I could not follow. Could you explain to me in which scenario we are?
A) Drake Switch was the "hardware refresh" scheduled for 2023 and then cancelled, and now we are waiting for a different hardware (maybe between 2024 and 2025).
B) Drake Switch will be out in several months (maybe between 2024 and 2025) and Nate got confused when he thought that the canceled refresh (overclocked Mariko?) was Drake.
C) Drake Switch was thought of as a refresh, but now it has become a real successor that will come out later (maybe between 2024 and 2025)
Count me in too!LiC and I are still Team 2023 because facts
2023 baybeeeeSo are we now Team 2024 or Team 2025? Sound off below!
Q4 2024 at the absolute latest I have to think, but almost certainly not H1 2023.So are we now Team 2024 or Team 2025? Sound off below!
The obvious answer to this is that devs were told to make the games cross-gen, so work on the games in question has continued for the original Switch with the higher-spec version either put on hold, or in continued development for a patch / re-release on the next Switch down the road.My only problem with the podcast, is that the past two years of speculation by the parties involved were heavily weighted by talks of devs with games developed for the new hardware targeting 2022 releases. If these are the sources being used, I would think there would be a lot more chatter about how they had to completely trash their plans/work. If they are holding off on the games they were developing and had plan to release last year…why would they do this if Nintendo came in, told them to disregard the devkits cause it’s not happening, and gave them no idea if/when a new model target will ever exist?
The story is what these devs have said, which I’m hearing too little of (unless I completely missed it and can be corrected on)
I'm pretty sure Nate himself claimed devs were porting exclusive titles not capable of running on the original Switch.The obvious answer to this is that devs were told to make the games cross-gen, so work on the games in question has continued for the original Switch with the higher-spec version either put on hold, or in continued development for a patch / re-release on the next Switch down the road.
Nothing has had to be cancelled per se.
Yeah, and the 2019 Nvidia Shield with the Tegra X1+ was unveiled after Nintendo released the Lite and v2 Switch. It's possible there's some kind of agreement between Nvidia and Nintendo regarding release timing.Yeah, which is why we were watching CES so hard this month. But no new products with it were revealed.
There were reports of Switch 2 exclusives iircThe obvious answer to this is that devs were told to make the games cross-gen, so work on the games in question has continued for the original Switch with the higher-spec version either put on hold, or in continued development for a patch / re-release on the next Switch down the road.
Nothing has had to be cancelled per se.
So you don’t want people to speculate on this site? Or is speculation only accepted if it’s positive?We go through this routine every year. Making broad declarations about Nintendo's upcoming games before the first Direct of the year is folly.
Yes I can lol.There is no way you can have a game that sells 30+ million units and claim it’s NOT a system seller lol
Yes I can lol.
My friends and I all LOVE Mario Kart, and even everyone has a copy of the game, but we all bought the Switch either because of Zelda, or Mario, or Pokemon, or the full suite of Nintendo games.
If you do the math, the best-selling game among us is Mario Kart, and in a way it did influence the acquisition of a Switch (and other Nintendo consoles), but the main reason for none of us was Mario Kart.
I know this is not a very scientific parameter, but the same MK8 which is the Switch's best selling game, was originally released on the Wii U which is just the most failed console in Nintendo's history.
Mario Kart in my opinion is the game that everyone who owns a Nintendo console buys, but it is not the main motivator for most of these people.
Not all of it, nor does that product exist, that we know of. That seems a little like grasping at straws.all of this would be explained by another product using it first