Lol would be hilarious if he hijacked it to make the announcement himself.
Thank you for pointing that out as well, in the end I was just trying to speculate based on another poster talking about a special VIP visiting Nintendo. It would make sense based on timing that it would be someone from Nvidia but it could be anyone at this point.
Absolutely no chance on a camera outside of the existing IR motion camera. They dipped their toes in AR with 3DS and I don't think anyone cared.
You missed a number on the second option, I assume it was 2x6GB?
He left us in our weakest moment. Our darkest hour.
it would be cheaper, but it would be a weird chip. Drake is based on Orin, Orin has 2048 cuda cores. The cut there is very small, and actually requires some extra redesign of the GPC. If Nintendo were making a home only console - not worrying about power and heat - they could get a better performing device for less R&D.
It was, updated! Thanks
Funnily enough it’s just a desktop GPC.
Like what? Not even Nvidia shown the benefits of tensor cores for AI yet. There are other uses for it, but nothing that one needed hardware
From Cappy to Clippy in one generation, wow
Yes
Yes
They said "a" raccoon was cancelled, we don't know if it's the same raccoon we've been following in this threadIt was revealed by Digital Foundry that the Raccoon was canceled.
I mean would it be weaker than a series s if it's a home console only? 1536 cuda cores vs the Series S at 1280 stream processors both consoles will have 128 bit bit bus and we will be seeing 12gb ram vs 8gb ram from series S. I would say Nintendo would probably have the advantage in terms of Ram and GPU power but fall behind in CPU power. If this was meant to be a home console I can imagine this Nintendo console as having higher clocks that what is speculated due to a better form factor in terms of cooling and size.
I want transparent colour options, like with the Nintendo 64.
Theoretically speaking, depends on how close the performance of Drake's Optical Flow Accelerators (OFA) is compared to the OFA on Ada Lovelace GPUs.
It would require a significant ovehaul of the chip replacing old cores with the new cores of ada etc
Ah damn. Thought so. Thanks for the info!
i mean, i put them as i want them, but i do have my own prediction which one are realistic.
they wouldn't dare. Then again, the X1 was already HDR capable as far as i remember ...From your mouth to God's ears, but I am dubious about HDR
are there any devices, available or announced, that have micro SD express?
Yeah, same. 1080p even with sub native would be fine for me.
Yeah unfortunately What really makes DLSS3 have its special sauce is features not found in Ampere. DLSS3 will work on Switch. Its just not going to have the frame generating tech that makes crazy stuff possible
It sounds like very Nintendo, like when Wii came out being a GameCube+ and the competitors were already working with HD.
Well, they could reuse the same chip in the future in an hybrid form factor. I mean, we could have first the only home console and a few years later the hybrid version of it with a better price (a more realistic price for Nintendo).
I thought DLSS 3 was only really useful for framerates over 60fps.
Nah. It would be other reasons. Moving to a new node in the couple of quarters is unrealistic
I would assume the decision was made last year
Only if Nintendo's new hardware equipped with Drake is going to be released in holiday 2024. Otherwise, not enough time to secure enough process node capacity.
omg did the tweets from 10 years ago surface about him shitting on Nintendo? Tsk, tsk.It was revealed by Digital Foundry that the Raccoon was canceled.
the issue with moving to a new node is that would probably be made earlier than a year, I would think. it's not like Nvidia doesn't know the characteristics of available node. 4nm would have been an option earlier than 2022, same with samsung 5nm. these aren't unknown nodes in 2021
It could well be I just had a silly thought of targeting 30 to hit 60 or even targeting 15 to hit 30 if you really wanted to push visuals
This is an unnecessarily accusatory comment. He's taking a break from the site.
that would be horrific. the input latency would only be as fast as your original frame time, at bestIt could well be I just had a silly thought of targeting 30 to hit 60 or even targeting 15 to hit 30 if you really wanted to push visuals
I’m sure like DLSS 1&2 they will improve it over time or people will customise it (like using 240p up to 1080p in the famous DLSS video). On PC at least obviously.
Sorry about that, I'll be more careful choosing my words in the future.
Many people here are going to be disappointed.
No, they can't. It won't work. If they release a TV only version first, then the handheld version has to either 1) run the same as the TV only version while in handheld mode or 2) not be able to run games that were made before the handheld version came out.
I don’t agree at all that there’s “absolutely no chance” at a new camera (or two!). It’s actually one of the things I can most easily see happening. If the question is “what new gameplay-enabling features can Nintendo add to this new Switch to differentiate it from the original,” a new camera/mic array is honestly the lowest-hanging fruit IMO. It’s not a terribly expensive set of features to add that enables new types of interaction, which is hard to do. It was sort of a surprising omission from the original Switch, to be honest. I’m guessing they were just really trying to hit that $299 price point.
Was the bolded really necessary? This feels like a really dickish way of “wishing someone well”
I believe the one we saw was European, so, hmm. Can't be sure it's in Europe yet.
I have not idea how it got bolded as I did not format my text any particular way, I will try to edit it now
Isn't DLSS 3 reliant on the Optical Flow Accelerators (OFA), which seems to be completely separate hardware from CUDA cores, Tensor cores, etc. (p. 15)?
Phone screens got bigger and bigger until suddenly they didn’t any more. Basically all the big phones top out at around 6.7 or 6.8 inches now, with the standard size phones generally bring around 6.1 inches, and it’s been that way for a few years now.
Now this one is good.
If Nintendo really wanted to future proof the console...it would be a no brainer.
That would make sense, I stand corrected lol
I'm more open to so-so image interpolation than most (and am interested in how low the requirements might be for FSR3), but I think that's a bad idea. Everything we've seen about frame interpolation says it gets worse the fewer frames you start out with. I think for some slower paced content you could still get away with 30->60, where visual anomalies wouldn't matter as much and quick reaction time isn't important. I liked using my TVs built-in smoothing for Great Ace Attorney. I could see it for a Dragon Quest or a Fire Emblem, maybe Animal Crossing. But a fast-paced action game like Mario? It's gotta be better.
Alex Battaglia from Digital Foundry mentioned that DLSS 3 only starts to become beneficial when the game runs at ~80 fps (I assume the game has to run at ~40 fps before taking into account DLSS 3).
