Like you indicated, we don't know. It also depends on the process node used and the battery density they go with. We really can't say when any certainty at this point.A bit of a tricky question, but what would battery life be like? I know we don't have any figures on the battery capacity and SoC's clock speed (with Drake being the SoC). Will it stay roughly the same as the current Switch or be a lot better like 2x the playtime?
I’m just going to say that the industry and the way new products have rolled out has changed a lot since, like, 2006.“Nintendo wouldn’t possibly do the thing they done with their successful hardware over and over again one more time!” Hell, even Sony has engaged in this precise behaviour with the best-selling home console of all time, introducing PS3 at 2 consecutive E3s before its launch as PS2 was still selling 20mil a year and PS3 barely made a dent in its sales until the year the PS3 launched (and even then, sales only dropped to 15mil that year, give or take). So the entire industry regularly ignores this “concern” that generally doesn’t really exist (or at least not to the scope people fret about), not letting current success stop them from paving the way for their future hardware.
My hunch is that the OG Switch battery was sort of a one-time compromise Nintendo had to make in order to ship the Switch when they did, and their goal for future hardware is to target the battery life of Mariko Switch. But that’s just my hunch.Like you indicated, we don't know. It also depends on the process node used and the battery density they go with. We really can't say when any certainty at this point.
I'll guess that it'll be closer to og Switch battery but that's just a guess
There's so much we don't know that any remotely definitive statement would be pure speculation, but my personal expectation is that it'll be in the neighborhood of the 2017 Switch battery life, maybe a bit better by 30m-1h.A bit of a tricky question, but what would battery life be like? I know we don't have any figures on the battery capacity and SoC's clock speed (with Drake being the SoC). Will it stay roughly the same as the current Switch or be a lot better like 2x the playtime?
It's fine, I'm used to multiple experiences like that in web forums circa late 00's/early 10's.Mate, I'm afraid you seem to have misunderstood the purpose of your thread ban. It was less of a "hold that thought for a week, then feel free to go back and respond to old posts upon your return" nature, and more along the lines of a "take some time off, cool down, and let the old stuff go" type deal. We seriously just want everyone to chill out, and get along. If you'd like to dispute a moderator action, the appropriate feedback thread is located here. You may also submit a ticket, if you'd prefer to go that route, instead. Please refrain from further litigating these arguments in this thread.
PS5 was fully revealed in 2020, but not only Sony was talking about it and it's features in 2019, they even informed it's release date right before holidays 2019:The PlayStation 4 and PlayStation 5 were both announced the same year they came out in
because they'll also cover games past the mentioned time period. this is common for themIt's fine, I'm used to multiple experiences like that in web forums circa late 00's/early 10's.
-------
What tickles my mind is the whole "mostly" part of their post. Why specifically word it like that?
But we both know this argument isn't about time from announcement to release, and I've made my opinion quite plain that, yes, time from announcement to release is shortening with each successive presidential era at Nintendo.I’m just going to say that the industry and the way new products have rolled out has changed a lot since, like, 2006.
It used to be the norm to announce new hardware ~18 months ahead of time. The Wii was announced (as Project Revolution) in E3 2005. The Wii U was announced at E3 2011. But in the last decade, trends have been toward notably shorter announcement-to-release timeframes. The PlayStation 4 and PlayStation 5 were both announced the same year they came out in, unlike the PS2, PS3, and PSP. The Switch was announced six months before launch.
I’m not saying that, like, it’s completely impossible that Nintendo would announce the new Switch this year and ship it early next. I’m just saying that examples from over 15 years ago aren’t particularly relevant. Companies were more reliant on trade shows and consumers were still getting their news from game magazines; it was a very different world.
I personally don't like the idea of cloud gaming. And I don't know if four years is a sufficient amount of time to upgrade the internet infrastructure, especially outside of East Asia and Southeast Asia, to fully support cloud gaming. (I think a minimum of a least a decade is required.)⋮
If you were still in charge, what would the successor of the Nintendo Switch look like to you?
What's so provocative about that question is, again, Nintendo is a company that just believes in innovation and doing things fundamentally different and so in all likelihood, the successor is going to be something completely different. If I were, you know, the king of Nintendo for a day, I personally believe that we're almost at the point where a streamed gaming experience can be brought to bear.
Essentially, all we need today is better routers in our home and any game including fast twitch games, can be experienced through a cloud stream type of experience. What I would love to see is a cloud-based experience. So no platform in the home — everything is done through the cloud. This way, it truly becomes an experience where you've got new content, [and] you've got the best of all of the old content that's made available through some sort of subscription service. That's what I would do. But candidly, I don't think the router improvement is going to happen for another probably three to four years. So that's when I would bring the successor platform to bear.
⋮
I was wondering when this thread would get sticky. Anyways i assume the "mostly" part they are referring to would mean fall-winter, as in Oct, Nov, DEC? and future games would be Dec-April?
spoiler:
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
What does this mean?spoiler:
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
What does this mean?
Reggie Fils-Aimé Talks Diversity, What a Switch Successor Could Look Like
Former head of Nintendo of America talks about the importance of diversity in the games industry, and how he'd envision a Switch successor.www.fanbyte.com
I personally don't like the idea of cloud gaming. And I don't know if four years is a sufficient amount of time to upgrade the internet infrastructure, especially outside of East Asia and Southeast Asia, to fully support cloud gaming. (I think a minimum of a least a decade is required.)
I'd definitely say OG Switch if the leaked specs we're discussing is 100% legitimate. Considering Steam Deck gets to 1.5 to 2 hours running high end games at 480p then upscaled, it completely depends on if Nintendo uses a better 5nm node + a bigger battery. If not, expect your AAA games to last 2.5 hours before going flat.Like you indicated, we don't know. It also depends on the process node used and the battery density they go with. We really can't say when any certainty at this point.
I'll guess that it'll be closer to og Switch battery but that's just a guess
While cloud gaming imo is a very cool concept that has grounds to exist. We aren't at the point where it can take priority. The compression algorithms need to become much better and more efficient than they are now, input latency needs to decrease dramatically and routers need to evolve to reduce packet loss which I believe is what Reggie is talking about.Reggie Fils-Aimé Talks Diversity, What a Switch Successor Could Look Like
Former head of Nintendo of America talks about the importance of diversity in the games industry, and how he'd envision a Switch successor.www.fanbyte.com
I personally don't like the idea of cloud gaming. And I don't know if four years is a sufficient amount of time to upgrade the internet infrastructure, especially outside of East Asia and Southeast Asia, to fully support cloud gaming. (I think a minimum of a least a decade is required.)
Probably a Mario Movie Trailer ?What tickles my mind is the whole "mostly" part of their post. Why specifically word it like that?
General Directs near universally have titles that fall outside their stated date range, so it doesn't really say much by itself.What tickles my mind is the whole "mostly" part of their post. Why specifically word it like that?
Excatly.While cloud gaming imo is a very cool concept that has grounds to exist. We aren't at the point where it can take priority.
Exactly. I personally believe physical game collecting will go the way of Vinyls and Blu-Rays. People who really love the medium will still purchase physical products, however due to advancements in technology such as streaming and AI fixing of streams such as improving colour depth and upscaling/low latency interpolation, cloud gaming will be good enough that anybody can just buy a smart tv or monitor to stream their games on.Excatly.
Cloud Gaming is going to be for the Super-Casuals, and just like Movies and Music, there will still be real Hardware for enthusiastics
Cloud gaming is going to be for corporations who want eShop-like distribution without the consistent at-will accessibility of a title sold through digital distribution or the constraint of hardware requirements. It's to make companies more money with less effort and less upfront cost; if there are any consumer benefits, they're entirely incidental.Excatly.
Cloud Gaming is going to be for the Super-Casuals, and just like Movies and Music, there will still be real Hardware for enthusiastics
I think anyone selling a home console might, but I don’t think Nintendo will go cloud-only given how much portables are the most reliable part of their business. They might eventually make everything available as a cloud service in addition, but a huge chunk of their business is making their games playable on their hardware, anywhere. Cloud-gaming-only effectively rules out commuters and holidaymakers playing on portables while travelling.I think developers would welcome a huge transition towards cloud gaming: no more piracy & no more datamining. With games becoming more and more digital I don't think Cloud gaming will be just for "Super casuals" Platform holders like Sony/MS/Nintendo might eventually opt for Cloud-only in favor of the developers.
Even with broadband mobile (4G/5G/+) becoming more common and eventually cheaper? I don't see it happening within 5 years or with the next Nintendo generation, but I feel like it is only a matter of time before we have internet everywhere, always. Nintendo might join that trend.I think anyone selling a home console might, but I don’t think Nintendo will go cloud-only given how much portables are the most reliable part of their business. They might eventually make everything available as a cloud service in addition, but a huge chunk of their business is making their games playable on their hardware, anywhere. Cloud-gaming-only effectively rules out commuters and holidaymakers playing on portables while travelling.
Hmm, I’m thinking of stuff like the underground rail networks, aircraft. I mean, sure, if we’re talking 2 generations out I’m not gonna claim I have any idea where Nintendo (or any other part of the industry) is going, but I think Nintendo would always make sure that if you’ve got a device and a game, you’re good. That’s why I think, if they did implement cloud play for everything, they’d still sell physical versions of some games just for kids and collectors, and probably for much longer than MS/Sony would. Even if it’s just a generation longer. As they are just that bit closer to being a toy company. At that point we’re looking at 10+ years out and it’s hard to predict that far ahead.Even with broadband mobile (4G/5G/+) becoming more common and eventually cheaper? I don't see it happening within 5 years or with the next Nintendo generation, but I feel like it is only a matter of time before we have internet everywhere, always. Nintendo might join that trend.
Nintendo will always be a Toy Company AFAIK. They never claimed to be a video game company. That's why you have amiibos, labo, and other "toy" stuffs. It's only Nintendo that does this. That's why I firmly believe that physical games for Nintendo consoles won't be going away anytime soon.Hmm, I’m thinking of stuff like the underground rail networks, aircraft. I mean, sure, if we’re talking 2 generations out I’m not gonna claim I have any idea where Nintendo (or any other part of the industry) is going, but I think Nintendo would always make sure that if you’ve got a device and a game, you’re good. That’s why I think, if they did implement cloud play for everything, they’d still sell physical versions of some games just for kids and collectors, and probably for much longer than MS/Sony would. Even if it’s just a generation longer. As they are just that bit closer to being a toy company. At that point we’re looking at 10+ years out and it’s hard to predict that far ahead.
Word..but Nintendo is a video game company as well. They can be more than one thingNintendo will always be a Toy Company AFAIK. They never claimed to be a video game company. That's why you have amiibos, labo, and other "toy" stuffs. It's only Nintendo that does this. That's why I firmly believe that physical games for Nintendo consoles won't be going away anytime soon.
I've always felt the same until a few weeks ago I subbed to the top tier PS5 Online service. I played Miles Morales just to try it and I swear it felt like it was a native experience and although it was a tad soft image quality it looked well above 1080p with good AA and overall very nice IQ and most importantly it felt very, very responsive. This was hardwired to a PS4 Pro on a 100mb down / 20mb up connection mind you.Reggie Fils-Aimé Talks Diversity, What a Switch Successor Could Look Like
Former head of Nintendo of America talks about the importance of diversity in the games industry, and how he'd envision a Switch successor.www.fanbyte.com
I personally don't like the idea of cloud gaming. And I don't know if four years is a sufficient amount of time to upgrade the internet infrastructure, especially outside of East Asia and Southeast Asia, to fully support cloud gaming. (I think a minimum of a least a decade is required.)
I kind of expect an announcement of the Drake announcement too. Dunno if it would be in the direct but feels like a missed opportunity if it wasn’t. New hardware, especially hardware that is this impressive, should be given a big hype show. I’d love to see another live event like they did with the Switch.The only thing hardware related I could see them doing, although it would be a first iirc, is teasing an announcement during the Direct itself.
Like "This presentation is over, but we still got some information regarding the future of the Switch systems family to share with you.
Check out our dedicated presentation on [...] at [...]", of course with a tweet at the same time.
It'd be a nice way to keep the hype even further imo.
Maybe that's where the 9/25 date from that uncle comes in. Could it work if it was Saturday 9/24 for Americas and Europe and midnight 9/25 for Asia?I kind of expect an announcement of the Drake announcement too. Dunno if it would be in the direct but feels like a missed opportunity if it wasn’t. New hardware, especially hardware that is this impressive, should be given a big hype show. I’d love to see another live event like they did with the Switch.
Charitably, "9.25" could refer to the week of the 25th of September, going by Nintendo's history of when Nintendo does announcements, especially hardware announcements.Maybe that's where the 9/25 date from that uncle comes in. Could it work if it was Saturday 9/24 for Americas and Europe and midnight 9/25 for Asia?
I'd be very surprised if they announce it in a Direct, as it would take too much attention away from the games (and vice versa). I'm expecting pretty much the same thing as the original Switch; a short video uploaded to YouTube to reveal the device, then a more in-depth look and game showcase at a later date.I kind of expect an announcement of the Drake announcement too. Dunno if it would be in the direct but feels like a missed opportunity if it wasn’t. New hardware, especially hardware that is this impressive, should be given a big hype show. I’d love to see another live event like they did with the Switch.
Charitably, "9.25" could refer to the week of the 25th of September, going by Nintendo's history of when Nintendo does announcements, especially hardware announcements.
I personally don't think there's going to be any announcement on the 24th/25th of September, nor am I optimistic for any announcement on the week of the 25th of September.
Or actual ownership of the media you buy, palpable collectables like art and manuals* (that can be digitized into scans for preservation anyways), etc...Who needs media preservation, anyway
That makes sense but it's also a new generation Switch they can choose, for some reason, to present as a "'simple upgrade' so in any case, it's not totally comparable to the first Switch's launch. They also teased the NX announcement on the official site in Europe (with that famous Mario behind a curtain), prior to the actual reveal trailer.I'd be very surprised if they announce it in a Direct, as it would take too much attention away from the games (and vice versa). I'm expecting pretty much the same thing as the original Switch; a short video uploaded to YouTube to reveal the device, then a more in-depth look and game showcase at a later date.