Nothing set in stone, but nothing to imply it wouldn't. 4K model speculation comes from data mines suggesting the OS can switch to a 4K output from the USB port, but all the screen controller parts have gone unchanged since support was added for the Aula screen (OLED Model).
I think that’s the point. And all the Hidden text
Well, it's not meant to be a wiki, it's a thread. Info is posted, then discussed, then opinions are shared, jokes are made, etc. It's a human way of communicating. But yes, I do believe there was talk about the backplate being bigger than the OLED, the same way the OLED was bigger than the original, so maybe, I would speculate... 0.6cm longer than the original, from Joy-Con rail to Joy-Con Rail.
... but random, useless translations and pages of nothing is hell to navigate for a single bit of information.
I dunno. Just people's speculation in response to the suggestion that the screen (and therefore probably the whole unit) would be bigger?
Personally I have not seen any claims sourced from either of those forums suggesting the joycon was different.
That was a while back, it led to brief speculation that the kickstand might be changing on Drake in order to make room for an overall deeper shell. I'll look for it.
it was, from my understanding at least, an extrapolation from said translation
Pretty sure the Joy-Con being diferent was just speculation on the basis of a larger chassis, like, one that's taller from the intake to the exhaust.
given that it was horseshit, I'm not sure if that's any skin off his back lol
I think the fundamental difference here is that you think a 9 year console generation is a good business decision while I don't.
Who am I insulting? I'm not insulting anymore who did the translation work. It was even stated in this thread that not every post needs to be translated and posted here.
I'm assuming one of the reasons Drake is a huge leap is because they intend to run with the hardware for a very long time, into the 2030s. I'd like to think they invested the R&D to properly fit it into something the size of a Switch, and save costs by reusing the OLED display.
Chill. The issue is too many posts with multiple unreadable machine translations that may not be relevant, not the work of the people doing non-machine translation. They're great and no one is insulting them.
I don't know about that. Like, the "bigger" I expect would be the same way the OLED is bigger than the V2. A touch wider- less than a centimetre wider than the OLED Model. That'd be fine, I think.
wider is fine, I guess territory but I still won't like it
Thanks. These are the ones I wanted to take a look at further.
I think it would be a mistake to assume that interest in IPs and games are as heavily linked to their respective "generation" as you seem to be suggesting. Are you under the impression that if a new Zelda or Mario comes out in a few years on a system that's still called "Switch," regardless of its horsepower, people will be bored simply because of the name of the system rather than being thrilled to play a new Zelda or Mario?
I'd definitely contribute some cash your way! But, if you're wanting a little practice...
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
And some commentary from fwb-bwd:
Interest in a console and its games naturally drops over time. You can see this with google trends
I've seen the rumor of the claim mentioned.
Oh nice
"Asinine" lol. Come on. You've got to be kidding.
Where is this "slapping on" coming from? Is that your impression of my understanding of how technology works?
Repeating the 2017 strategy wouldn't be a terrible idea, if they've been thinking about this for years. Launch around or, perhaps before, a new open world Zelda game, then have a new 3D Mario in the launch window. At least, something from the 3D Mario team. I would KILL for a Bowser's Fury 2 with a bigger world that can keep a stable framerate and above 1080 res in TV mode, that'd sell me on it... if it weren't for the fact I'm already sold on it.
