I expect upgrades to be more like Xbox Series X
It would be a waste of resources and a convoluted method that brings with it technical debt that has to be paid in heavy interest down the line in which it reduces the possibility of FC long-term for future hardware. That debt would be eaten by the company (sold at a loss) or passed on to the consumers (sold at a higher than desired price).
Typically if a patent of theirs is published before the product is announced then it's actually not something they'll use. So it's actually very unlikely to see any of those patented scrollder concepts on Drake.
They have said before they don’t really want those two to have any connection like that. Plus it would be pretty difficult and strict. Major game movies didn’t really have the game accompany the movie most of the time. They were completely Async from each other.
I’m still not sure how anyone could get that Nintendo is not gonna do bc with Q5. I guess confirmation bias is a helluva drug.
Man why do people love eating crow so much! Must be the seasoning
You just need to make your own head canon about Nintendo execs doing dumb decisions because Nintendo. It's easy, look:
Nintendo..with their finger on the pulse of the youth of today
I imagine he's being facetious lol
Truly the pinnacle of marketing
I agree with everything, and that's probably what they'll do.
This conversation has frustrated me. Switch 2 will be BC and I'm willing to bet my account on it. Outside of this forum, speculation about this aspect in particular has thrown reason out the window.
Source?
Literally, what I ask for is the source
The identity of the foundry is one big unknown currently. Where did you hear/see about a final choice, let alone the fact that the chip was in production?
Did you see someone who claimed that and you want confirmation, or are you just wondering?
no one heard anything and probably not something most leakers have access to. gotta wait for leaks out of china for that
what games and what kind of bugs?
I want to confirm this because it was not a very reliable source.
Yikes, no way are we expecting 2/3rd of a 3050. Drake is 12 SMs, probably organized as one GPC. RTX 3050 has 20 SMs organized in 2 GPCs. The max Drake clock is likely 1.3Ghz, the base 3050 clock is 1.5 Ghz
Nobody has shared anything recent that indicates this, no. Would you be able to share your non reliable source?
I assume you've talked to a private source. The only public source I see for this information is your own YouTube channel. Mi español es muy malo, así que no estoy seguro but I'm pretty sure you've misinterpreted a press release about the gaming GPUs for PCs as referring to T239.
Well the RTX 3050 and the GTX 1660 Ti have very similar performance the major difference between these two GPUs is the 3050 comes with DLSS and ray tracing while the 1660 Ti doesn't have either of those features.
I believe the NuSwitch will still be a hybrid like the switch, it will be a new generation for Nintendo while following the same hybrid nature of the switch and maybe add in an additional "gimmick" like game online as you go with 5g...really hard to say what gimmick can they really add to the NuSwitch.
If anything, he said BC is easier to implement than ever.
there is no consensus. we just know the hardware that powers it
If it was a mistake on our part, we have removed the video.
Across arch comparisons are tricky, but Ampere is not 100% faster than Turing, and it would have to be for Drake to keep up with a 1660 ti.
No game in particular.
depends on how the game is made. but they all need to be patched to be change anyway. some games might have the settings stuck in too deep
MVG and DF were talking hypotheticals, much like we are. until some one tests it, it's all maybes and possiblies. it's why you see "99% compatible" thrown around because not everything will make it. even PS5 and Series has some XBO and PS4 games play funky, but no one owuld have known that before hand.
Xenoblades 1-3 have graphics patches for softmodded Switches that directly access a graphics config file (through some conversion from binary and back) to edit values like blur and anti-aliasing. Due to the way the game's contents are packaged I'm guessing they couldn't easily access other settings like draw distance.
no, well yes, but actually no.
Didn't help GameCube games on Wii or Wii games on Wii U or DS games on 3DS, because that's just not how it was set up to work.
If it's a patch that actually makes games run in full Drake mode, the sky is the limit. View distance or level of detail changes, the sort of things that would simply be controlled by a slider on settings of a PC game, would probably be very easy in some cases. I might guess it might be more trouble for some Switch exclusives, since it was never brethren to higher detail versions and so it's hard to say where some cut corners might be firmly coded in there. But even then I'd really expect a lot of things like that were malleable during development and final values set based on how well frame rate/whatever was working.
After we have seen how shockingly bad the industry is in general about preserving their code/history. It’s not always a given.
If they lost the source, they're not making a patch.
