Kartina
theprocessbroke
- Pronouns
- He/him
I did, it was pretty funny. Nintendo is still doomed on reseteraDon’t read Era on this topic today. They’re so pathetic. “This can never happen”. So much negative responses
I did, it was pretty funny. Nintendo is still doomed on reseteraDon’t read Era on this topic today. They’re so pathetic. “This can never happen”. So much negative responses
Yeah that's true. I am just surprised that there hasn't any leaks like the ones we just got if it were to release in March.Nobody is claiming that they just started showing it off. In fact multiple rumors have been ongoing that devkits have been out for a while.
I'm not sure where this idea that this is the initial showing has come from. This is just the first showing big enough to leak this much.
That's the first mistake: opening up Era.Don’t read Era on this topic today.
No way imo. Nintendo promised it on Switch, so it will at least be cross gen.Lots of good news from Nate there. March 2024 sure is interesting. Certainly will be keeping an eye on dates for announced titles at the Direct this week - and if MP4 doesn’t show up I think we’re getting it natively on Switch 2.
There have been leaks, they've just been a lot quieter.Yeah that's true. I am just surprised that there hasn't any leaks like the ones we just got if it were to release in March.
Simple answer is they don’t want it to happen.Don’t read Era on this topic today. They’re so pathetic. “This can never happen”. So much negative responses
The second mistake is actually trying to participate in that discussion. (Someone save me.)That's the first mistake: opening up Era.
Are people say micro SDs won't be used?
Yeah, even if MP4 doesn't show in the next direct I would still assume it to be cross-gen, but they'll probably want to showcase it primarily with next generation hardware if they're holding off that long on showing actual footage.No way imo. Nintendo promised it on Switch, so it will at least be cross gen.
Pokemon leaker never losesif drake is revealed for March release, then that pokemon leak would be vindicated
Wait, so are there UFS cards? I guess I've never heard of them.UFS 3.1 and 4.0 are massively faster than SD cards and can easily hit 1 GB/s.
If Nintendo requires installs on internal storage that uses UFS 3.1 or UFS 4.0, it would not be possible to run games off SD cards.
This is the main point of speculation here.
They also mentioned 4K60 for the BotW demoSomething interesting from Digital Foundry?
true, famiboards wouldnt be the same without natewe are so lucky that we have someone like Nate in our community
Pretty much.if drake is revealed for March release, then that pokemon leak would be vindicated
Which Pokémon leak ?if drake is revealed for March release, then that pokemon leak would be vindicated
Wait, so are there UFS cards? I guess I've never heard of them.
wish I could yeah a post more than onceThat's the first mistake: opening up Era.
Our mate named Nate.true, famiboards wouldnt be the same without nate
Ah so, since they don't have them, Nintendo would be selling their own?There are not currently!
Which is the main issue as Nintendo selling these are storage expansion would likely be very expensive for a long time as they would be custom designed.
Current save data transfer is wireless.I'm just wondering how saves will transfer if the new system has no micro sd
They really should change their name.Don’t read Era on this topic today. They’re so pathetic. “This can never happen”. So much negative responses
No way imo. Nintendo promised it on Switch, so it will at least be cross gen.
A 4chan leak by supposed programmer for an outsourced company hired by gamefreak to work on a graphic patch for the switch 2 version of SVWhich Pokémon leak ?
Nintendo Switch doesn't store saves on MicroSD, they'd just move over with system transfer, just like they do now.I'm just wondering how saves will transfer if the new system has no micro sd
I remember lurking there to follow this discussion, thanks god for famiboards!That's the first mistake: opening up Era.
Prediction for the storage? They have to have at least 128 GB+ of SSD storage right?
Well, 30 seconds (or 30 seconds less than before) doesn't say 2GB/s, but like, 1GB, +/-500MB/s?How would developers know about the reveal date? That seems like something only Nintendo would know.
If a bunch of devs were talking about "March 2024", that to me sounds like a launch date.
And if the Switch 2 is running BotW with zero load times, that would suggest I/O speeds of 2+ GB/s, right?
Okay thanks. It looks like usual fake leaks including what people exactly want so I don't believe in it, even though it would be very cool, obviously.A 4chan leak by supposed programmer for an outsourced company hired by gamefreak to work on a graphic patch for the switch 2 version of SV
Basically what I've been reading on Era in spurts. Good thing that there are some people there who still know what they're talking about.You lot haven't tempered your expectations enough. It's not realistic to expect Nintendo and Nvidia to outperform 10 year old consoles with weak CPUS (even though they did with Switch 1), it's unfathomable to imagine them using upscaling tech to boost the system's visuals (even when they've been using upsampling techniques in their own games). They don't care about multiplatform ports (even though that's been a major boon to the Switch's library). Nintendo will go out of their way to design a weaker system even if it's more expensive to supply, because they hate you and love 24 hours of battery life. Ignore everything else suggesting otherwise.
What an absolute coincidence that I joined just hours before this whole thing got its lid blew off.
512GB of UFS storage, methinks.Prediction for the storage? They have to have at least 128 GB+ of SSD storage right?
Yes, yes it is, LongDrake.What an absolute coincidence that I joined just hours before this whole thing got its lid blew off.
That's the craziest thing, they got basically everything right before the pokemon present except for this small thing at the end so people doesn't know how to make of it, is it real to help them seem more credible or fake as a prank or to let the people in charge off their scent.Okay thanks. It looks like usual fake leaks including what people exactly want so I don't believe in it, even though it would be very cool, obviously.
Well, 30 seconds (or 30 seconds less than before) doesn't say 2GB/s, but like, 1GB, +/-500MB/s?
That would be a backwards twist.Here's the twist:
It has no RAM. Instead the carts will each come with their own RAM. Ultrafast, Unprecedented, 0 loading time.
This, it'll be called Ultra Switch.
Yes. Early March is still Winterif drake is revealed for March release, then that pokemon leak would be vindicated
How would developers know about the reveal date? That seems like something only Nintendo would know.
Yes. Early March is still Winter
I thought it was here, too.Nintendo is still doomed on resetera
New system has a lot more RAM than 3.5GB, and the specific statement was, I think, 30 second load times from opening it to the open world... or 30 seconds less ("minus 30") than it is now. Which isn't instant. But it is fast.It should be faster right? The Switch has 3.5 GB of usable RAM by devs, so if the Switch is reading data off the drive at ~120 MB/s, that comes out roughly to about 3.5 GB after 30 seconds.
If Switch 2 is doing essentially an instant fade with no noticeable load time, it's loading in that 3.5 GB of data in like 1 to 1.5 seconds (over 2 GB/s read speed).