* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
Hidden content is only available for registered users. Sharing it outside of Famiboards is subject to moderation.
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
Are we talking about THAT game?* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
Like I said, I think what they publicly show isn't the main reason to attend Gamescom.
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
They are going with the DLCs of Mario Kart, Splatoon and Pokémon.New hardware or not, Nintendo is going to Gamescom with something to show and it wont just be remasters. That's not to say the remasters wont/couldn't happen, but they wont be the meat and potatoes of what Nintendo brings. I am personally hopeful F-Zero GX does get remastered for all those fans who have been neglected for so many years. A new DKC or 2D Mario alongside Prime 4 with a few other titles would be adequate to make an appearance at Gamescom meaningful, but there needs to be that one or two titles that really get peoples attention.
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
i believe Nintendo will go to Gamescom 2023 to show the finalized version of Switch sucessor devkit, and maybe Metroid Prime 4 and a brand new 2D Mario/Donkey KongFor everyone that is Team 2024, what is it exactly that you expect Nintendo to show up with at Gamescom? Nintendo hasn't gone to this show in years and it would have been easy for them to pass on it again this year, but they are going this year. Nintendo doesn't not currently have a game dated that wont already be out by the time Gamescom takes place. Are we really to believe Nintendo is going to make the investment to attend this show with a lineup of GameCube remasters and some new DLC? That sounds more like Twitter drop material to me. Even if your confident in no new hardware this year, can we at least agree that it is very odd for Nintendo to decide to return to Gamescom in Switch's seventh year on the market with (currently) no announced and dated games. Until this all changes, I will leave the door open for a late 2023 release
Yep, and its obvious that Nintendo is committed to a smooth transition to their next hardware, and ditching BC would be very foolish. Phil Spencer has gone on record saying that Microsoft is no longer in a position to overtake Sony or Microsoft because gamers became invested in their digital libraries on their preferred consoles during the PS4/Xone generation. He's right too, its harder to migrate to a different platform when you have a large library of games on a different platform. Prior to digital consumers were more accepting of a hard reset with console generations, but in the modern digital world its basically unacceptable. Imagine if Apple locked all your software purchases to the phone that you downloaded them on originally, but Android allowed you to redownload your purchased apps on any device you purchase in the future. This favor Android in a monumental way. Nintendo has a strong history of offering BC on all of its portable devices throughout history and a few of their home consoles supported it as well. Its not just that its important to consumers, its expected.
I feel confident that if a solution for BC wasn't possible with the move to Ampere, Drake would have stuck with Maxwell. A custom SOC using 1024-1536 Maxwell cores matches with 8 A78 CPU cores would still be very capable. Since they have moved to Ampere, it only makes logical sense that Nvidia has solved this problem.
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
And simply not trueThat sounds arbitrary.
You misundertood, the Wii was not the mistake, the time gap between the Wii and Wii U was the mistake. (Switch softwares is carrying this gen for now)The Wii sold 103 million units...
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
It is not arbitrary; it is to maintain momentum.That sounds arbitrary.
Zelda by itself isn't going to move momentum for 10 months.It is not arbitrary; it is to maintain momentum.
There is also Pikmin 4.Zelda by itself isn't going to move momentum for 10 months.
no* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
While I think that it'll be the best selling in the franchise, Pikmin is still one of Nintendo's more niche series, so that's still not enough.There is also Pikmin 4.
NSO remaining games and DLCs.While I think that it'll be the best selling in the franchise, Pikmin is still one of Nintendo's more niche series, so that's still not enough.
NSO does not move hardware units and DLCs even less so.NSO remaining games and DLCs.
that doesn't even affect momentumNSO remaining games and DLCs.
Nintendo was always a strong supporter of the Gamescom and only skipped before 2012. 2022 was the only other one they skipped, 2020 and 2021 were non existing.Maybe, but Nintendo has not been attending Gamescom for quite a few years now. Do you really make your return with a mediocre lineup of games to show off?
They might have a point tbh
Context:
They might have a point tbh
Context:
I don't think it will. it's a very late game that already made the lion's share of its sales. people who didn't have a system for it probably got one with the initial release and the second. the third is just for people who already have a switch wanting to play it thereHL will sell many Switches.
True. I don't know what other game besides TotK will sell many Switches.I don't think it will. it's a very late game that already made the lion's share of its sales. people who didn't have a system for it probably got one with the initial release and the second. the third is just for people who already have a switch wanting to play it there
Isn’t this the guy that started the “Nintendo has nothing after TOTK” discourse?
This is literally not even true.People on the 2023 team don't understand that there is at least 1 year gap between the last Zelda and the release of a new Nintendo console.
Welcome back to the shadow realm.* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
whoThere is also Pikmin 4.
Nah.HL will sell many Switches.
It is entirely arbitrary and unnecessary.That sounds arbitrary.
I do genuinely think the new engine was built with scalability in mind. Maybe nothing pointing to a new console, but more as a core design philosophy, an engine you can use for a game that makes it easy to scale across multiple hardware configurations (or indeed, generations). This approach bears fruit regardless of new hardware soon or later. It means the engine can take advantage, at least partially, of any new hardware going forward, and presumably also has some level of integration with the "Switching" part of Nintendo Switch, which hasn't always been an easy thing to develop around.Switch Sports was the first game to ship on the new EPD engine, and that game is done.
Certainly, Zelda and Splatoon are being built to accommodate still in development patches and DLC, and changes in their overall strategy or philosophy are likely to be reflected in the engine to some degree (it's not nothing that one of the biggest "gimmie them pixels raw" developers is starting to toy around with image reconstruction), but overall it seems likely this new engine primarily represents a consolidation of EPD's communal tech that's probably been in the works for a while. It's probably not wise to read too much specific intent into the choice of engine beyond "it was at an early enough stage of development at EPD when the engine was considered production ready".
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
I didn't hear of them losing access to the kits until late spring/early summer 2022 -- May thru July window.I agree with Prime 4 likely being the big dog at the show. With or without new hardware later this year, Prime 4 is positioned to get more press attention than a 2D Mario game would, even though a 2D Mario game would sell better. It could be both though. A new 2D Mario and Prime 4 for later this year would have make a lot of various Nintendo gamers very happy.
Maybe, but Nintendo has not been attending Gamescom for quite a few years now. Do you really make your return with a mediocre lineup of games to show off?
It is similar to E3 but held over in Europe, I believe Germany.
When someone says a product was canceled, to me this means canceled and no longer exist. Making changes to a product, no matter how significant is very different from a canceled project. Especially for hardware that hasn't even been officially announced. I'm sure hardware goes through countless revisions during its design process, but we do not consider those cancelations. So we know that developers were in possession of 4K development kits from Nintendo and they were recalled, but when were they recalled? @NateDrake were you given any indication of when in 2022 Nintendo called back these kits?
Out of curiosity, did those dev kits have a similar form factor to the SDEV or EDEV units the Switch has?I didn't hear of them losing access to the kits until late spring/early summer 2022 -- May thru July window.
Nintendo is stretching out their GBA NSO releases to less than 1 new game per month which does suggest how far they are expecting people to wait until the switch successor, but i still say the thing that Nintendo will do to reach their switch hardware sales projection is a $50 price drop.NSO remaining games and DLCs.
NSO game additions is entirely irrelevant to the timing of the new generation with the exception, maybe, of it coinciding with GCN NSO. Possibly.Nintendo is stretching out their GBA NSO releases to less than 1 new game per month which does suggest how far they are expecting people to wait until the switch successor, but i still say the thing that Nintendo will do to reach their switch hardware sales projection is a $50 price drop.
I'm totally fine if they don't address AA. I have classic mcable for that :-)It is precisely for all these reasons that 2D Mario or 2D DK is the most logical choice for the end of 2023. This is exactly the kind of game that does not need the new resources and will not be used to highlight them, unlike 3D Mario, Metroid Prime 4, the next Mario kart, Animal Crossing or Smash Bros among others.
This is the ideal compromise to continue to feed the release calendar with a title that will excite people thanks to the movie without depriving the next hardware of titles that will motivate the public to buy it.
I really don’t understand that so many people continue to trust a vague tweet that explains that Nintendo will stop releasing games and become an NBA franchise rather than Nintendo’s own financial report that explains counting on the future release of games on the current switch to reach its target of 15 million units sold.
On the subject of digital foundry, I’m a little worried that they have tackled completely secondary topics such as the release date of the console or the power of it instead of insisting heavily on the most important point: Nintendo should really use anti-aliasing.
Yeah I'm kinda (50%) expecting a $50 p rice drop too.Like I said, I think any “crossgen” from Nintendo will mainly be that they continue to release a few more sub60-FPS Switch games that run 60FPS/1440p on REDACTED.
My guess is that they will have to drop the price of the Switch by $50 and that the price drop plus one more major first party switch game and a bunch of DLC will be enough to reach their hardware and software projections. So long as they have a good enough 2023 holiday season and are releasing their next console before 2025 then that will likely be enough.
Isn’t this the guy that started the “Nintendo has nothing after TOTK” discourse?
I listed 3 possible scenarios a few pages back. That's one of them (imo). It wouldn't hurt to have that Mario game on Drake as well, whether Drake comes out this fall or not. It's easy money for them. But in case Drake doesn't come out this holiday season, Mario+ a price drop could help it get close to 15 million total this year.Why would it be multiplat? The idea is that it releases only in the switch to help it hit that 15M number, not take it away.
There's several Zelda games that contradict this.. Notably two Zelda cross gen that came out within 3 months of each other (TP Wii/GC and Botw Wii U/Switch comes to mind). Someone mentioned Minish Cap as well.People on the 2023 team don't understand that there is at least 1 year gap between the last Zelda and the release of a new Nintendo console.
I dunno. I think it will be more than likely we'll get DLC for TOTK, considering the trend with the last two Zelda games (AOC a spin off though). It's easy money for them as well. We'll probably here about it month or by the end of summer.Something that come to my mind recently; maybe there is no TOTK DLC so Zelda EPD team focuses in developing ASAP its next mainline title.
So there can be a first teaser at E3 (or whatever june event) 2025, 2 years after TOTK just its first teaser was revealed at E3 2019, more or less 2 years after BOTW launch. Then have the game ready by early 2027. Be it much smaller scale than TOTK (like BOTW) but with (thanks to new HW) much better graphic quality and dense world.
Well, we know the CPU/GPU for the SoC thanks to the NVIDIA hack.No sense in tons of compute performance if memory bandwidth will be the limiting factor.
I don't see a connection. Whether Redacted releases this month or 2025, they're still in the same position of wanting to stretch out their retro releases as long as they can get away with, being a pretty finite resource.Nintendo is stretching out their GBA NSO releases to less than 1 new game per month which does suggest how far they are expecting people to wait until the switch successor
I feel like I am so bad at video games
Yeah I'm kinda (50%) expecting a $50 p rice drop too.