The only Nintendo console that didn't update the control scheme in some way was the GameBoy color. So while there is no evidence of new inputs, I wouldn't say that's the most likely scenario.
www.dsogaming.com
The dock is already 4K capable and the device from what we know appears to fall within the power delivery envelope of the existing AC Adaptor. While I think new Joy-Con are possible, and perhaps a little likely, I wouldn't expect major changes. Certainly none that would interfere with compatibility.
It's one thing to not offer a specific GPU vendor feature. Another to refuse to use all the hardware in a console, especially when that console is otherwise underperforming.I feel rather unsettled with the news about Boundary devs removing raytracing from their game, and not using DLSS in favor of FSR & XeSS.
Boundary will no longer feature Ray Tracing, ditches DLSS over FSR & XeSS
Even though Surgical Scalpels showcased some really GPU-heavy RT effects for Boundary, the game will not feature any of them at launch.
DLSS is going to be a main advantage with Drake, so the thought that a dev won't use it because of a similar situation more or less forcing "exclusion" is unsettling.
Sure, and charge them with well-wishes and fairy dust.
Surely THIS time!Not that I disagree, but weren't we saying this about the base game months ago
I chalk this up to Nvidia co-marketing long since pass because of delays and AMD swooped in and gave them money for no dlss or RTI feel rather unsettled with the news about Boundary devs removing raytracing from their game, and not using DLSS in favor of FSR & XeSS.
Boundary will no longer feature Ray Tracing, ditches DLSS over FSR & XeSS
Even though Surgical Scalpels showcased some really GPU-heavy RT effects for Boundary, the game will not feature any of them at launch.
DLSS is going to be a main advantage with Drake, so the thought that a dev won't use it because of a similar situation more or less forcing "exclusion" is unsettling.
They’re getting paid to shitpost, yes.
Well, we assume it’ll be a switch in the same vein as how the 3DS is a DS2 in all but name.
They’re getting paid to shitpost, yes.
I’d love a job like that
If it's an enhanced port rather than a simple patch I will eat my own slippers.
No one knows for certain. There are compelling arguments for both.
We don't know.
I wouldn't say it's a shoe in at all, I'm desperately hoping for it but there is no guarantee at all.
I like the implication of "As for XeSS? Yea, sure, do whatever you want, Intel isn't relevant here"
So, if they try to port the 120 Fps Ori 2 with DLSS to 4K, can the current dock handle that?
They'd be singing a different tune when Intel gets ARC into their apus
Isn't that pretty CPU intensive? Such that even some games that use it other platforms don't for the Switch version. I don't think Smash not using it should be taken as much more meaningful than it not supporting 4K or 120fps. Smash is already one of the games preventing video capture so it can suck in that extra bit of system resources.
Not 4K120, nor would the system handle that all that well considering Series S doesn't, but 4K60, yes.
I think so too. That would be the most logical thing.
Given the kind of game smash is, doing rollback for 8 characters is just out of the cards. There's no optimization that can solve that outside of new hardware
Watch Intel omit XMX from Intel's iGPU's Xe cores, and have Intel's iGPU run XeSS via DP4a.
Many of the existing peripherals will likely remain compatible (though not necessarily in full capacity), but I think the safe bet is definitely that Nintendo will produce new ones to go with the new hardware. Nintendo is not known to start a new generation without making some sort of change to their controllers.
Err...don't several games use AMD FSR though? I don't think there isn't anything in the clause that says "you can't use this tech on Nintneod consoles" i.e. Sony moneyhat style.
How does the competition handle this? Zelda TotK is at $70 because the competition set that precedent. If Sony and Microsoft were still at $60, TotK would have been $60. So if you buy a game on PS4 and then get a PS5, has Sony been doing free patches? Microsoft?
Not red paint, so sadly, no. Everyone knows the red ones go faster.
I thought Sakurai responded to that and it might've been either "everyone is here" or Rollback netcode. They didn't have the scope to do both.
TotK's price most likely has more to do with regional parity than anything Sony and Microsoft are doing. Nintendo has had a higher price tier in non-US regions for some time now.
Only because this piqued my curiousity, what kind of new hardware would be required to offer the kind of optimization Smash Ultimate needs? Is it something as simple as higher CPU clocks, better/dedicated servers, a combination of the above or something else entirely?
Idk, smash is a party game but it also seems like it’s a core oriented game. So I don’t think it’s as insignificant
Better cpu. More cores, more clock, etc. There's a good bit the cpu has to keep track of and the more things to keep track of, the more cpu you need
Yeah i worded myself crudely but basically i meant how the pre-OLED docks aren't capable of processing 4K so it wouldn't work well with a 4K capable Switch Redacted.
So the consensus i'm getting is it's more likely that nintendo will make "2.0" joycons that are very similar to the switch joycons but with some minor changes/improvements/added-features specifically for the Switch Redacted then.
i must have missed the part about the Orin originally having camera hardware. I had camera on the list mainly because I was thinking about features that the WiiU/3DS had that seem like they could very easily be added back as well as some ways that the joycons desperately could use some improvement.
John Dvorak was getting paid to shitpost the 80s.They’re getting paid to shitpost, yes.
I’d love a job like that
