Then why not link it here, back your evidence up if you're so confident in it hmm?
Yo, dog - chill a little bit. As you said, other folks have seen this data, and those who have will step in to confirm or disconfirm. No need to be hostile, or try to do that on your own account when you yourself don't have the data to confirm or disconfirm.
Can we please assume that new users are decent people until proven otherwise? And can we ourselves act like decent people when they first meet us?
This is a great community, but outside of here, Fami tends to get associated with this thread, and in some circles that association is
not positive. And it's because we've got 1600 pages of hardware speculation, and we tend to treat any new user like they have to get caught up on all that (or "read the OP" which is a fantastic resource but not exactly
succinct) or they're not allowed to participate.
But just as bad, to me, is some of us go into
other communities, and then present our
conclusions without providing the
data, and present it as fact. And also as if Fami is a monolith who have One Correct Conclusion.
I can't control what folks post elsewhere, as long as it's inside the Fami rules, but when someone comes into the community, bearing
legitimate and accurate info that you yourself don't have the knowledge to confirm or disconfirm, can we not
increase that reputation for being insular know-it-alls?
I realize this is coming off a bit strong - I've got nothing against you, hell, I like you. But your enthusiasm can come off as antagonistic.
And as for
@imw, welcome