You know people want this for more than just 4K, right?Purchased mclassic. I will be fine for another 2 years.
You know people want this for more than just 4K, right?
Unfortunately, Drake's launch day likely was finalized in late 2021 in regards to the window, so no real ability for Nintendo to shimmy it out of wherever they placed it.Obviously it’s not a new Switch. But I’m not confident as you for a new console in the next 20 months. I live in Europe and I know what is coming economicly speaking.
Don’t worry, Nintendo will simply never sell you a switch 2 while the rest of the world gets to buy one oh magical crystal ball user.Obviously it’s not a new Switch. But I’m not confident as you for a new console in the next 20 months. I live in Europe and I know what is coming economicly speaking.
Aye, but my point is there's somethings more/faster RAM and an upgraded CPU/GPU can do that a dongle that merely affects display output can't.That and the mClassic only does up to 1440p
My V2 can already charge the joycon from the grip. The grip has a USB C socket. At least mine does. Not 100% sure though because my V2 is second hand but the grip is an official one.The problem with that is how would joycons charge then? The only answer I can think of is a joycon grip with a cable output that connects to the dock (in this case, the switch-tv console itself). Third party solutions already exist, but that would only add up to the total cost since nintendo wouldn't even be able to reutilize current joycon grips shipped with more expensive models.
They aren't entirely different products because software-wise, they are the same platform. And consoles are sold as software-first products*.
*Not only exclusives, but also the console software experience.
Someone who can afford a 50/75/100$ difference between a TV-only switch and the lite can be skewed towards the latter due to the built-in screen, speakers and portability.
Even if said person doesn't like handhelds, those benefits might be compelling.
Because essentially, there are two types of people who aren't into handhelds: the ones who don't care about the benefits and, the ones who specifically prefer playing on the couch/computer chair with a monitor/TV. While it is hard to sell the idea of a portable to the former, convincing the latter isn't as difficult.
In terms of benefits, other than being cheaper, the only actually great things about a tv-only switch are docked mode and being able to attach a capture card.
Considering that the switch already has a built-in, easy to use video capture solution (albeit limited), and the fact that switch users (mostly) don't care about graphics (specially considering how most first party games look great even when in handheld mode) I don't think said benefits would be that interesting (except for the price).
Even if OLED dies in Q1 next year, there will probably still be more of them than Wii U or most 3DS models.If they phase out the OLED model, does that mean the regular one and the two special edition ones are getting valuable collector items?
Hmmmm.
Unless you think they'll be giving a massive upgrade from OLED without any change in price, or that it will be over $500, that's pretty much what remains.I find difficult to believe that Nintendo will release a new Switch at $400-$500.
The person you bought it from bought an aftermarket grip with charging capabilities.Not 100% sure though because my V2 is second hand but the grip is an official one.
Pretty sure you can use local wireless even on a switch lite. On switch games, local wireless is enabled by hitting a button combination before/after? entering the room. In the case of splatoon it's "the shoal" in other games, well I don't know...Yeah, let's agree in disagree. They are completely different products. How are you going to play local multi-player with switch lite? Just one example.
For those who don't like handheld, you're paying more for a worse experience. If you could use the Lite on the TV, then I would agree. In a country like Brazil, the portability is only remotely interesting for those who want that from the start (and they'll get the hardware that offers that), because you won't see anyone playing with it outside (it's too dangerous lol)
My V2 can already charge the joycon from the grip. The grip has a USB C socket. At least mine does. Not 100% sure though because my V2 is second hand but the grip is an official one.
Pretty sure you can use local wireless even on a switch lite.
Nintendo has never released a device above the $400, so it would be quite shocking to see that happening. I mean... it's possible. But in my perspective, I'd rather buy a only TV Switch at $300-350 than a new Switch a $450-$500.Unless you think they'll be giving a massive upgrade from OLED without any change in price, or that it will be over $500, that's pretty much what remains.
The dock chipset is potentially not necessary at all, assuming the firmware can be made to work with that. The Nvidia shield TV obviously doesn't have a dock chipset.I'm late to the party, but I find the Switch TV console conversation fascinating. I see that there is some interest in such a device on this forum.
I used to think that having a TV only model would be damaging to the Switch brand; however, with 100M+ sales, viewing it as a PS Vita TV (or Wii Mini) like device that compliments the Switch Lite in driving long tail sales may not be too crazy.
I do however think anyone expecting such a device to be cheaper than the Switch Lite to be mistaken, at the very least the case would have to integrate the dock chipset inside a case with the Switch motherboard, if not outright making a different motherboard to accommodate the needs for TV output. Neither of which leads to a cheaper BOM. Yes, the screen isn't needed, but screen/integrated controller may be a wash or even cheaper than changes needed for TV output, JoyCons, and charging grip to create a complete package. I think that Joy-Con's and Charing grip may well make such a device a $250 device instead of a $200 one.
Maybe Nintendo sells such a device w/o a controller, but I'm not aware of Nintendo doing that before. . .
While I too am intrigued by the idea of a Switch TV-only device, what I just realized that would make it a complete non-starter is the lack of save backup for certain games. If it's not inherently easy to ensure both consoles are up to date on save files (and even then only for NSO subscribers), or don't even offer it for games like Dark Souls/Pokemon/Splatoon 2, I can't see why anyone existing Switch Lite owner would be compelled to get a new TV-only Switch console when they can't use the same save file.I'm late to the party, but I find the Switch TV console conversation fascinating. I see that there is some interest in such a device on this forum.
I used to think that having a TV only model would be damaging to the Switch brand; however, with 100M+ sales, viewing it as a PS Vita TV (or Wii Mini) like device that compliments the Switch Lite in driving long tail sales may not be too crazy.
I do however think anyone expecting such a device to be cheaper than the Switch Lite to be mistaken, at the very least the case would have to integrate the dock chipset inside a case with the Switch motherboard, if not outright making a different motherboard to accommodate the needs for TV output. Neither of which leads to a cheaper BOM. Yes, the screen isn't needed, but screen/integrated controller may be a wash or even cheaper than changes needed for TV output, JoyCons, and charging grip to create a complete package. I think that Joy-Con's and Charing grip may well make such a device a $250 device instead of a $200 one.
Maybe Nintendo sells such a device w/o a controller, but I'm not aware of Nintendo doing that before. . .
While I too am intrigued by the idea of a Switch TV-only device, what I just realized that would make it a complete non-starter is the lack of save backup for certain games. If it's not inherently easy to ensure both consoles are up to date on save files (and even then only for NSO subscribers), or don't even offer it for games like Dark Souls/Pokemon/Splatoon 2, I can't see why anyone existing Switch Lite owner would be compelled to get a new TV-only Switch console when they can't use the same save file.
I don't have a switch lite, but can't lite owners just connect a joycon or pro controller to the console and play with friends like you can on a switch with tabletop mode?Sure. You just need more consoles for that, right lol
It’s less convenient to do that, as the system doesn’t really make tabletop mode… well, actually feasible in a sensible manner.I don't have a switch lite, but can't lite owners just connect a joycon or pro controller to the console and play with friends like you can on a switch with tabletop mode?
The Switch allows you to transfer individual save files, including games without backup support. Right now it takes a lot more steps than it should, but they can improve on that if they want to. That's not what would stop them.While I too am intrigued by the idea of a Switch TV-only device, what I just realized that would make it a complete non-starter is the lack of save backup for certain games. If it's not inherently easy to ensure both consoles are up to date on save files (and even then only for NSO subscribers), or don't even offer it for games like Dark Souls/Pokemon/Splatoon 2, I can't see why anyone existing Switch Lite owner would be compelled to get a new TV-only Switch console when they can't use the same save file.
I don't have a switch lite, but can't lite owners just connect a joycon or pro controller to the console and play with friends like you can on a switch with tabletop mode?
"At a glance" I just mean the general public Mr and Mrs Walmart. Obviously there's a huge leap between CGI and even modern real time visuals like Ratchet PS5.While Illumination is not the highest end CG studio, this is well beyond what a console is capable off. Maybe I’m misjudging what “at a glance” means, but those are path-traced shadows being generated by fabric rendering. His denim isn’t a well textured model, it’s fabric simulation.
But, on the other hand, Nintendo has spent 20 years developing an aesthetic that is consistent for Mario and scales across resolutions. By being faithful to that, you’re going to preserve some of those qualities. Uprezzed Galaxy/Sunshine still look good for a reason
Makes a really noticable difference for xenoblade 3 on my 1080p tv.Purchased mclassic. I will be fine for another 2 years.
Dedicated programmable audio processor | ARM Cortex A9 with NEON operating at up to 844MHz | 10-input/5-output 8-channel audio mixer | 4x Synchronous Sample Rate Converters
So I’ve been curious about this for a while now, and that’s the Audio aspect.
We focus on the main cores for games, those being the A57 cores of which the switch has 4 and only 3 for games and 1 for the OS.
However there seems to be a 5th core that’s simply dedicated to the audio functionality of the system:
For more information click here
Anyway, for the important part: will we see an improvement to this area of the SoC? What Core would be a good one to use for this?
Previously I thought including something like an A55 core as a dedicated audio would be good but I’m not sure.
Or maybe using a Cortex-A17 would be better fit here, yes it’s older but it offers 20% power reduction while performing 60% better or so they claim
Thoughts?
Edit: though…. Maybe reuse the A57 for audio work….
Ah that’s interesting! So Drake would remain the same in that regard.Orin NX seems to have the same core
Dedicated programmable audio processor | ARM Cortex A9 with NEON
Yeah probably that, It's an HAC-012 after checking the model number.The person you bought it from bought an aftermarket grip with charging capabilities.
Even the OLED uses the same plastic, no circuitry included grip from the v1 and v2 switches.
Pretty sure you can use local wireless even on a switch lite. On switch games, local wireless is enabled by hitting a button combination before/after? entering the room. In the case of splatoon it's "the shoal" in other games, well I don't know...
Weirdly it has the same model number, but, isn't identical but a revision. BUT, V2 Switches still have the version 1 Joy-Con grip.Yeah probably that, It's an HAC-012 after checking the model number.
I thought about that but I'm afraid it might lead to unnecessary confusion for customers.If it uses the same dock as the OLED, I could see them having a dockless SKU for 50$ less. That would save the HDMI cable, the dock and maybe even the charging block ?
Would target OLED owners and to a lower extent, portable Switch Lite/v2 players.
I can see a dockless SKU happen but the price gap wouldnt be just 50 bucks, dont think Nintendo would bother with a separate SKU at launch if the price difference is this small. 100 USD sounds more likely, especially when you consider what the Dock is sold on its own.If it uses the same dock as the OLED, I could see them having a dockless SKU for 50$ less. That would save the HDMI cable, the dock and maybe even the charging block ?
Would target OLED owners and to a lower extent, portable Switch Lite/v2 players.
A hacked switch v1/v2/OLED (or even the lite) can already stream it's video feed to a PC, but the latency and image quality aren't that great or consistent.Just to entertain the idea... What are the chances of a $100 cheaper Drake Lite which could cast (handheld profile) to a docked OG Switch or a dongle sold separately?
I imagine keeping latency low with any router would require it to connect directly to the OG Switch while being connected to a router for online functionality. Would that require a custom/expensive wifi chip?
They did do this onceA hacked switch v1/v2/OLED (or even the lite) can already stream it's video feed to a PC, but the latency and image quality aren't that great or consistent.
I don't see why the hell nintendo would get into the trouble of developing such a convoluted solution that would require two devices.
And before anyone mentions the splatoon headset: no, even though that was dumb and did in fact require two devices, it at the very least was a solution to a problem that didn't make another product by the same company unnecessary.
If nintendo were to make a switch lite with video output, even if the solution was bad or mediocre, they would still lose customers for the more expensive (and probably more profitable) platform as people would just buy the switch lite (drake) and stream the video to a television/monitor or, buy a dock and HDMI cable separately.
But that was a single product, two devices (tablet + console). I don't think nintendo would make a convoluted streaming solution involving two different products/devices.They did do this once
The wii u....yeah
Nvidia doc links expire after a time, so yours is the sameAh that’s interesting! So Drake would remain the same in that regard.
Edit: the link you posted didn’t seem to work right.
For anyone else here’s a link.
In that configuration? Zero.Just to entertain the idea... What are the chances of a $100 cheaper Drake Lite which could cast (handheld profile) to a docked OG Switch or a dongle sold separately?
I imagine keeping latency low with any router would require it to connect directly to the OG Switch while being connected to a router for online functionality. Would that require a custom/expensive wifi chip?
Which is why I made the second question.A hacked switch v1/v2/OLED (or even the lite) can already stream it's video feed to a PC, but the latency and image quality aren't that great or consistent.
It doesn't requires 2 devices, OG would be just an option if you have one and want to have multiple Switches in the household (one of the reasons they made a lower entry point).I don't see why the hell nintendo would get into the trouble of developing such a convoluted solution that would require two devices.
Their most profitable is the V2 and even knowing that, they released the Lite and OLED which for sure got some customers who would have bought V2 otherwise but also people who wouldn't. and they likely profited more from the extra sales than they lost from the cannibalisation.If nintendo were to make a switch lite with video output, even if the solution was bad or mediocre, they would still lose customers for the more expensive (and probably more profitable) platform as people would just buy the switch lite (drake) and stream the video to a television/monitor or, buy a dock and HDMI cable separately.
that's my point, it was a failure and an expensive one at that. keeping the latency down to stream from the master to the slave device had nintendo and broadcom make a new setup for that. the idea was tested and failedBut that was a single product, two devices (tablet + console). I don't think nintendo would make a convoluted streaming solution involving two different products/devices.
It also doesn't make sense to stream it to a tegra X1 switch when they could just sell you a dock for the lite model and have a simple hardware solution instead of relying on a more complicated (and inferior) software one.
I'm not talking about Asymmetric gameplay at all. I'm asking the viability (in tech and whether it increases too much the price) of a Drake Lite which streams locally to a device which can already play cloud games in ideal network setups.In that configuration? Zero.
Maybe a future dock will have Miracast like functionality to simulate Wii U asymmetric gameplay, but that’s a lot of work for software that has to run on the handheld profile.
I would love the succesor to bring the Assymetric gameplay as a low key gimmick/feature for the console. Kind of miss that from the Wii U, and problaly with the new success developers could bring new ideas.Maybe a future dock will have Miracast like functionality to simulate Wii U asymmetric gameplay, but that’s a lot of work for software that has to run on the handheld profile.