- Pronouns
- He/Him
EngardeHAVE AT THEE!
EngardeHAVE AT THEE!
The free-form display controller with the two rubber nubsticks still lives in my head rent free.it is time
Seems about right. I dunno why people think it would be shockingly huge.Here's my contribution... more rough (and 8" not 7.9.. oops)
I'm also a fan of the two SKU approach at launch. I think something like this would be ideal:I have a feeling that Nintendo might do multiple SKUs in this one like the PS5 Digital/Disc and the Series S/X (technically different consoles? but you know what i mean). Hopefully a more expensive OLED version, but i do think it's more likely for them to go the 256GB/512GB route for this.
Or, in a better example, how Sony did with the Vita having a 3G SKU and an OLED one [although i don't think it was ever marketed as an OLED version, they just put it on one of their revisions)
As someone who wants a 7 inch form factor and an OLED screen with 512GB.... this is a nightmare option select for meI'm also a fan of the two SKU approach at launch. I think something like this would be ideal:
Switch 2 - $399 - 7" LCD display, 256 GB storage
Switch 2 XL - $499 - 8" OLED display, 512 GB storage
That's not how the Vita launched. Both Vita SKUs had OLEDs, the difference was in their connectivity. One just had WiFi and the other also had 3G connectivity. Two years later, they released a revision that changed it to LCD, dropped the mobile data variant and also added a bunch of QoL features.Or, in a better example, how Sony did with the Vita having a 3G SKU and an OLED one [although i don't think it was ever marketed as an OLED version, they just put it on one of their revisions)
reliable?* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
I’d think that would be an awful idea & actively hamper consumer adoption of the system since they are diluting stock & wasting manufacturing lines trying to cater to everyone. It would also make selling later models harder later on; are people really gonna get excited for a revised Lite model.Wouldn’t it be crazy if, emboldened by the success of the switch, Nintendo went all in with their next generation ecosystem and had a lite, base model, and deluxe/plus/pro ready for launch.
I think the device needs to be a bit bigger because I don’t think this will be bezelless. At least a ~1/8th inch/0.31cm/31.8mm bezel all around since this is an LCD display, not an OLED one.Here's my contribution... more rough (and 8" not 7.9.. oops)
Current hardware just has encrypted data on the card, everything goes through an on-board ASIC/SoC for decryption/encryption (it's that HAC-labeled chip on the part of the board that sticks out next to the fan on side A).I'd say 75%. The current carts do this. In theory, Nintendo could just use the cart to store encrypted data, and put the decryption keys in the NG itself (using the Tegra Security Module to hide them from hackers). But I think Nintendo would also want to make the NAND unwritable, and that would likely require an ASIC around it anyway.
Because it still probably needs bezels.Seems about right. I dunno why people think it would be shockingly huge.
Which will make it another fraction of an inch bigger on each side. Still not huge.Because it still probably needs bezels.
I could see offering a half- or quarter- capacity storage model alongside the base as a more affordable option especially if Nate is estimating a €350+ starting point, it would just be a matter of making different the boxesWouldn’t it be crazy if, emboldened by the success of the switch, Nintendo went all in with their next generation ecosystem and had a lite, base model, and deluxe/plus/pro ready for launch.
Interesting. Macronix's documentation for XtraROM includes putting DRM on the ASIC, but perhaps that's a feature only the arcade machine version usesCurrent hardware just has encrypted data on the card, everything goes through an on-board ASIC/SoC for decryption/encryption (it's that HAC-labeled chip on the part of the board that sticks out next to the fan on side A).
Oh I agree, Nintendo has always been a company that, at least to start with, likes to have one defined unit that is the same for everyone so everyone has the same device and performance across the board.I’d think that would be an awful idea & actively hamper consumer adoption of the system since they are diluting stock & wasting manufacturing lines trying to cater to everyone. It would also make selling later models harder later on; are people really gonna get excited for a revised Lite model.
I think Nintendo should stick with one sku at launch. Keep it simple. If people are that enamored with the OLED they’ll have to wait if that is Nintendo’s plan going forward.
Personally I‘d like that even the Switch was smaller. Like about the size of the Switch Lite but with a 6" screen.Seems about right. I dunno why people think it would be shockingly huge.
SMT6 or DQ12 only to come out years laterHoping a third party game gets announced for the next system before Nintendo announces the system.
Where have I seen this story before…SMT6 or DQ12 only to come out years later
Macronix's XtraROM page on their website strongly suggests Switch carts are already using the ASIC (aka, customized) form of the tech. Not sure what exactly it does, but that's probably somehow involved in how the memory chips talk to the controller.With the idea of 3D and for cartridges, what's the chance of including a small ROM or other chip on the cartridge to handle some drm or encryption functions?
That is a technique for mitigating seek times. It doesn't have anywhere near as big an effect on solid state memory, like SD cards.I'm a little bit scared that, with the possibility of 512GB (edit: and 3D NAND/higher capacity catridges), it might mean that Nintendo's approach to fast load times might be using that technique that basically duplicates assets to make them load faster (I think CoD uses it) and the storage type might just be a faster-than average SD Card.
I'd say there's a non-zero chance they'll make a Switch 2 Lite along those lines.Personally I‘d like that even the Switch was smaller. Like about the size of the Switch Lite but with a 6" screen.
As far as we know that is still the case, yes.old time lurker here checking cause of the recent build up. Is our internal specs leak still the ampere 12(?)SM 1536 cuda cores?
I heard this in Bo Burnham's voiceJeffrey Bezels.
Dragon Quest 11Where have I seen this story before…
The OLED's was almost an entire inch larger and this larger screen was widely lauded, I'm in my thinking that a 8" screen won't even seem all that big when compared to the width of other handhelds out there, and particularly less so with controllers detachedThere's no way nintendo went in designing the Switch 2 wanting it to have a screen so big, so I have to assume that they picked the screen size due to the necessity of making the thing bigger than the switch. So assuming nintendo goes with a bigger battery and 8nm, what kind of performance would T239 likely do if handheld was 10-15W and Docked 20-30W?
I went and did some poking around. There's logic on the cards too which has its own set of commands and is involved w/ drm as well.Interesting. Macronix's documentation for XtraROM includes putting DRM on the ASIC, but perhaps that's a feature only the arcade machine version uses
Hidden content is only available for registered users. Sharing it outside of Famiboards is subject to moderation.
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
There’s no way they would design a device like that. The new joy cons would have to be bigger as well.Here's my contribution... more rough (and 8" not 7.9.. oops)
The new joy cons would have to be bigger as well. There’s no way they would design a device like that.
They haven't exactly caught on outside of a few highly specific contexts, which is one of the sources of anxiety about what format Nintendo will use.So either im really out of the tech loop but i didnt know there was something better than SD cards until catching up on this forum lol
Don't worry, same here.So either im really out of the tech loop but i didnt know there was something better than SD cards until catching up on this forum lol
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
In my opinion, this depends on what limits the clock frequencies of the SoC. If the heat development in docked mode is the limit, it could be more than the three hours of the Switch console from 2017, but if the battery capacity is the first limiting factor, we will see exactly the three hours we got back then. I think with such a big chip like the T239 and the efficiency curves already discussed here in the thread, it's more likely the battery capacity will be the limiting factor, but we can't know exactly yet. It will be for sure the battery capacity if they go for the Samsung 8nm process node.how much battery life can we expect for the Switch sucessor? is gonna be like Switch V1 or Switch V2/OLED in term of battey life?(i hoping for the latter, given that the console will problaby have ports of PS5, Xbox Series S/X in the future and will have upcalled 4K trough DSLL)
- Selling, general, and administrative expenses (SG&A expenses) rose by 15.3% year-on-year to 95.6 billion yen, due mainly to an increase in advertising and related expenses that accompanied the increase in net sales, as well as increases in research and development expenses and a rise in foreign currency expenses due to the depreciation of the yen. On the other hand, the ratio of SG&A expenses to sales decreased by 6.3 percentage points to 20.7%, due to the large year-on- year increase in net sales.