• Hey everyone, staff have documented a list of banned content and subject matter that we feel are not consistent with site values, and don't make sense to host discussion of on Famiboards. This list (and the relevant reasoning per item) is viewable here.

StarTopic Future Nintendo Hardware & Technology Speculation & Discussion |ST| (Read the staff posts before commenting!)

Reader mode
P4bl0 said:
Apparently NX 2 shows as an option on Nintendo Developer Portal

AhcpaaJ.png
Click to expand...
Its happening
 
This console has more names than FINAL FANTASY XV versions:
• Drake (I know it’s the chip)
• Redacted
• Nintendo Switch NG
• NX2
• ReDrakted
• Switch 2
• Switch^2
• Super Nintendo Switch
• Nintendo Switch Advance
 
eye0h said:
NWplayer123 apparently. If it's them I'd bet money it's real. They don't BS
Click to expand...
Who’s saying it was them? Doesn’t look like they posted in days. I checked their @ to see if anyone recently replied to anything they deleted…nothing


Edit: nvm lol
 
0
Cuzizkool said:
But what could portable be? I don’t recall seeing much discussion on that. What is the theory if it’s LPDDR5? And 5X? Would it make any difference?
Click to expand...
Nintendo's probably going to reduce the RAM frequency in handheld mode for Nintendo's new hardware for battery life reasons, similar to the Nintendo Switch.

If Nintendo's going to use LPDDR5, I speculate the RAM bandwidth's going to be in the range of 68 - 88 GB/s in handheld mode. (I don't know what Nintendo's going to choose.)

As for LPDDR5X-7500 and LPDDR5X-8533, I don't know. My guess is that 102.4 GB/s is going to be the lowest in terms of RAM bandwidth in handheld mode if LPDDR5X-7500 or LPDDR5X-8533 is used.
 
Yeah I'm calling bullshit on this lol. No source given at all. Gonna guess it's a hard troll. No chance bro didn't at least check their history to find the twitter they found it from. And there's no way they posted the image without scrolling through the OP's account to see if they posted anything else.
 
I saw that screenshot last night somewhere on 4chan, I didn't post it because there's no way to prove that it's real without signing up on the dev site. Reeks of fake though.
 
Smile said:
I saw that screenshot last night somewhere on 4chan, I didn't post it because there's no way to prove that it's real without signing up on the dev site. Reeks of fake though.
Click to expand...

Do you have the 4chan link ? Could be the twitter source
 
Come on guys do you really believe it? the photo is fake, as fake as the 3d renders of Nintendo NX before the reveal on October 20, 2016.
 
Why is this Pablo person allowed to post fake stuff. They have an issue with wanting a system to come out this year. We get it and there’s nothing wrong with that. But they post all kinds of things and might post things that aren’t real. Not everything you see you have to post.
 
Last edited:
Dark Cloud said:
Why is this Pablo person allowed to post fake stuff. They have an issue with wanting a system to come out that they post all kinds of things and might post things that aren’t real.
Click to expand...

Who said it was fake ? Don't draw quick conclusions without proof
 
Dakhil said:
But Nintendo was involved in the development of the Tegra X1 very early in some way or another despite the Tegra X1 not being designed specifically for Nintendo.
Click to expand...

Honestly I don't see any evidence of Nintendo actually working on the x1 in those LinkedIn posts. Considering it sure, testing it/ porting demos to it also. But the first tegra x1 product launched in may 2015, it's reasonable to assume it taped out say a year before that. Nintendo was testing/ porting demos to it earliest September 2014. To late for them to have input in the design.
 
P4bl0 said:
That would mean a developer would go all the way into his developer portal to make a fake ? Doesn't sound right to me

Not real nor fake till proved otherwise
Click to expand...
No, that's not what that would mean. For one, I'd imagine you'd be breaking some serious NDA by doing that. Two, as you've posted a gif of it, it is known publicly what the dev portal looks like, meaning someone could easily photoshop it to say 'NX 2.'
 
This wouldn't even be a high effort fake. Assume bull until real corroboration occurs. Also, what would Ninty gain by using such a telling code name? May as well yell switch 2 out into the streets.
 
P4bl0 said:
That would mean a developer would go all the way into his developer portal to make a fake ? Doesn't sound right to me

Not real nor fake till proved otherwise
Click to expand...
I don't know if you've seen the eshop before but just because someone is a 'developer' doesn't mean they're a developer lol. There are like a thousand shovelware devs that do not give a fuuuuck and would probably do this for a bit of fun.
 
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.
Please read this staff post before posting.

Furthermore, according to this follow-up post, all off-topic chat will be moderated.
Last edited:


Back
Top Bottom