Happy new thread-mas, everybody!
I would like to take this opportunity to bring up a discussion which started at the end of the previous thread: the new Direct Speculation thread. To briefly summarize,
@Raccoon has expressed interest in posting a new thread on May 15th, and
@LukasManak22 suggested that perhaps it should rotate like these General Discussion threads do.
I definitely appreciate Lukas' point here; rotating the general discussion threads and having new OPs is great, and it allows each thread to kind of have its own little twist and personality. To be honest, we could probably do more to encourage new people to have a go with these threads -- there are plenty of regular users I'd love to see have a go -- and actually in my opinion we should only really be allowing repeat hosts when the well of fresh blood has truly dried up.
However, I see the Direct Speculation threads differently. To be blunt, I don't think most people would make for a good speculation thread host. You have to be pretty invested in the speculation game, while at the same time not taking it too seriously. You'd ideally be up to date with the latest rumors and insider whisperings, but you can't take them as gospel, and nor can you dismiss them out of hand. You need to find some way to differentiate the thread from the General Discussion thread, but the thread's identity can't
just be people asking when the next Direct will be. I know I'd be bad at this. So bad. Please never let me host a Direct thread.
So while I'm certainly not opposed to Lukas' suggestion, I don't think this should be a case of "whoever volunteers first who is not Raccoon or Lukas gets it". Maybe we want to allow a couple of days for others (if there are others) to volunteer, then if there are candidates other than Raccoon, we can vote as a community? Just one suggestion of course.