Is there anything that can be gleaned about Sharp being involved at the R&D stage?
I'd been long convinced the Sharp display thing was the Portal, as
@Dakhil was, so I only investigated Sharp display tech in depth today since
@Hartmann convinced me otherwise. I haven't found anything interesting yet, except that none of their off-the-shelf modules are a good match
Would other companies have been able to state the same thing about their involvement with Switch (1)? eg. Japan Display Inc, Innolux, etc.
JDI, probably? Just guessing, but I would bet that JDI was involved in the initial development of the screen, including pixel density, size, powerdraw, connector configuration, and touchpanel integration. Then Innolux had to simply match the spec developed at JDI, at least on formfactor.
I honestly have issues with all these comparisons.
The question I was responding to "has there ever been such a downgrade in console history?" The
reason for such a downgrade wasn't the point
X1X was $499, XSS is $299, so downgrades are expected - I highly doubt the Switch 2 will be cheaper than the OLED Model. If it actually was then I'd understand.
Yes, this is my exact point. If you go from the Xbox One to it's successors - either the Series S or the Series X - it is across the board an upgrade, no matter what. Adding the Pro models confuses the matter.
Why these downgrades happen is a separate issue, which is why I made a separate post about. One of the things I said in that post is that we don't know the price, or the complete feature set of the device, so I have no way of telling if the package is a good value or not.
By saying "I doubt the Switch 2 will be cheap enough for LCD to make sense" you are literally saying "I have chosen a price in my head that doesn't make sense." You are welcome to do that, but I'm going to say that getting upset about it is silly.
The PS4 Pro to PS5 comparison has a problem - the PS5 SSD isn't just "an SSD". It has that lower storage because it's insanely fast and cutting-edge for a 2020 SSD.
Yes, it has lower storage because it is more expensive per gigabyte than HDD. That was my only point. The degree is kind of irrelevant. Obviously Sony and Microsoft sell their consoles at a loss and so price to performance has less to do with how much the parts cost and more to do with how vicious the competition is between the two at the moment in time.
For the Switch 2's 2024 LCD to be equivalent it would need to be a HDR2000 QLED screen, if not microLED. The Switch 2 using LCD feels more like if the XSX had also had 825GB of storage but with the much slower speed it currently has.
If it were possible to make QLED screens as cost effectively now as an LCD from 7 years ago, then Samsung, the premier manufacturer of Android phones and premier screen manufacturer would have put a QLED screen in a phone. There isn't a QLED screen manufactured by
anyone with a pixel density even
approaching that of a Switch screen.
Comparing that to Sony's "off the shelf but with custom firmware" SSD is silly and inaccurate.
The OLED a lot of people want isn't something crazy, it's just a screen type that's been in gaming handhelds for 13 years now. I'll be buying the Switch 2 either way, and my hope is that it'll be decent quality (it really has no excuse not to at least match the PS Portal screen), but it's still a shame.
I didn't say it was crazy! I agree that it's a shame! You don't have to argue with me on things we agree on. My points, as bullets
- A 1080p OLED screen in Switch 2 probably costs more than the 720p LCD in Switch 1
- If we hadn't gotten an OLED Switch, a 1080p HDR VRR LCD wouldn't be percieved as a downgrade
- Pro consoles can't upgrade the things that a successor can
- Successors will generally prioritize the unique things that can only be changed during the launch of a next gen system
- We don't know the price of the Switch 2
- We don't know the Switch 2 feature set
- I would personally pay more money for an OLED
- I would personally sacrifice lots of storage for an OLED
- I would prefer to keep shitty drifting sticks if it meant I got my OLED
- I would would take OLED over better battery life
- I would take an OLED over a camera
- Or microphones
- Or in Joy-Con speakers
- Or two screen streaming
- or or or
- But I'm not sure that is the best choice for Nintendo's launch product
- And I might take a good combination of those things together over OLED by itself
Additional points I'll add to that
- Sony and Microsoft lose money on their hardware
- They also spend giant AAA budgets on their games
- Which mean those games have to be mass appeal 20 million selling "core gamer" titles
- I like Kirby. And Another Code. And Wario Ware. And Advance Wars. And Metroid. And Clubhouse Games. And...
- Those games are only possible when the games themselves aren't carrying the burden of making the hardware profitable.
- The moment MS believed they had won the war, they put out the shittiest hardware imaginable, the Xbone
- Watch Sony do the same as MS removes themselves from the console wars.