LukasManak22
who the fuck is that
Just a heads up the last time we saw Aonuma was on March 29th 2022 with a new haircut. Good opportunity to do something around that time and reveal new haircut.
IIRC it was the Switch news channel's postings of the trailers that seemed to not have near the compression artefacts that YouTube has. People were able to make out more details in the underground and night shots because of that.EDIT: I also remember there being talk here of which of the Nintendo channels had the highest quality trailer. Does anyone remember which one it was?
If they do a Direct where he shows up I beg to any deity who is listening to have him say "like my new haircut?" before anything else.Just a heads up the last time we saw Aonuma was on March 29th 2022 with a new haircut. Good opportunity to do something around that time and reveal new haircut.
The reason the announcement is taking so long is because it’s actually a super cut of Aunoma with each shot set three months apart, speaking one sentence each time with a different haircut. It’s meant to represent the Zelda series’ connection to time travelJust a heads up the last time we saw Aonuma was on March 29th 2022 with a new haircut. Good opportunity to do something around that time and reveal new haircut.
I think it's mostly "they're not showing anything because the game is bad" kind of concerns.What I'm curious about this whole "marketing concerns" is what is the end game for this concerns?
What's the big problem?
Are people concerned that the game will be bad? Or that it will fail?
If the game comes out and it's a commercial failure (let's say it sells 10mil lifetime) while still being a masterpiece because of the bad marketing would it even be a problem?
Pretty much? Like, maybe not outright bad, but a disappointing sequel. What am I supposed to judge except what we know. They haven’t really convinced me so far.What I'm curious about this whole "marketing concerns" is what is the end game for this concerns?
What's the big problem?
Are people concerned that the game will be bad? Or that it will fail?
If the game comes out and it's a commercial failure (let's say it sells 10mil lifetime) while still being a masterpiece because of the bad marketing would it even be a problem?
I bet he will say it. I think the "am sure a lot of you saw me and thought you might be getting news on BOTW2" in Feb2021 Direct was his idea.If they do a Direct where he shows up I beg to any deity who is listening to have him say "like my new haircut?" before anything else.
In that case they should just say "the game looks bad and more like a dlc than a sequel and the zelda team dropped the ball with this one" and move on, there's nothing wrong with criticising the game and if they're wrong it happens, they admit they were wrong and just move onI think it's mostly "they're not showing anything because the game is bad" kind of concerns.
Which obviously I find very silly given their pedigree.
That's the point, if you think the game doesn't look that great you can just say that; it's when people talk about "bad marketing" and "arrogant Nintendo" that it doesn't make sense.Pretty much? Like, maybe not outright bad, but a disappointing sequel. What am I supposed to judge except what we know. They haven’t really convinced me so far.
Would love to see him with long hair, unkempt, beard to his knees, green toga. Shamone.Just a heads up the last time we saw Aonuma was on March 29th 2022 with a new haircut. Good opportunity to do something around that time and reveal new haircut.
Who are you to tell others to do this? If I think the game looks bad pre-release I’m going to say it.In that case they should just say "the game looks bad and more like a dlc than a sequel and the zelda team dropped the ball with this one" and move on, there's nothing wrong with criticising the game and if they're wrong it happens, they admit they were wrong and just move on
Marketing is typically supposed to make you excited for a product and the current TotK marketing isn’t doing that, therefore I think it’s bad. Not complicated.That's the point, if you think the game doesn't look that great you can just say that; it's when people talk about "bad marketing" and "arrogant Nintendo" that it doesn't make sense.
I'm also underwhelmed by the footage but it feels like some people talk about the game like Nintendo is sabotaging it pre release for some reason instead of just saying the game doesn't look so hot right now.
I probably explained myself badly because I agree with what you're saying here.Who are you to tell others to do this? If I think the game looks bad pre-release I’m going to say it.
It’s just ridiculous because if that was the case… Nintendo would just delay the game lolI think it's mostly "they're not showing anything because the game is bad" kind of concerns.
Which obviously I find very silly given their pedigree.
The worst part about this game’s marketing is the conversations it’s created here lol
I wanna hype with y’all![]()
100% the latterWhat do you guys think would generate more talk/meltdowns on the internet: If Tears of the Kingdom got a 97, or if Tears of the Kingdom was the first 3D original Zelda game to get below a 90?
And yes, I know something like an 89 is not a bad score, but that's not how some people perceive it![]()
A huge amount of islands in various strange shapes and formations in the sky, free-form crafting mechanics, and new underground biomes: BrokeZelda: Tears of the Kingdom will almost certainly be a fantastic game. I preordered the game as I have no concerns that the game won't be at least a solid to great time. It could be BOTW with just some new quests/story thrown in and still be a great time. I think my only concern is how different the world will be and what's actually "new" in the game in terms of gameplay, story, characters, towns, abilities, etc. Like it would be cool to be able to go explore underwater, go out on a boat with a fishing pole (think Twilight Princess) and other cool things like this to discover. So far we haven't really seen anything new beyond vehicle/weapon crafting and small sky/underground shots. So I'm still in the phase of wanting to know what's really going to set this game apart from Breath of the Wild and so far even after reading the artbook, I'm still not really entirely sure how different this game will be from BOTW six years ago.
Don't worry, we'll get our answer may 9th? when the game get's the classic 89 score on metacriticWhat do you guys think would generate more talk/meltdowns on the internet: If Tears of the Kingdom got a 97, or if Tears of the Kingdom was the first 3D original Zelda game to get below a 90?
And yes, I know something like an 89 is not a bad score, but that's not how some people perceive it![]()
but what if the game get's a bad metacritic score because you can't build an ingame catapult?Everyone in here arguing about the metacritic score meanwhile I'm trying to figure out how to build an ingame catapult.
but what if the game get's a bad metacritic score because you can't build an ingame catapult?
I still want the game to be good, but recent comments about stuff like pedigree or how "RE4 feels like Capcom hired the top engineers at Nintendo to make a game" definitely give me enough PTSD that I agree, lolI actually think it would be hilarious if TOTK was an Other M-level disaster
This is how #TeamConcern can still win
That's my secret captain, I'm always thinking Metroid is better than ZeldaI wonder if we'll finally get the "metroid is better than zelda" thread
You did not explain yourself badly, it was a very reasonable post.I probably explained myself badly because I agree with what you're saying here.
Yeah it's pretty wild to assume Nintendo of all companies in their current state would put out a bad game just because we haven't seen much of it. To me this type of marketing oozes confidence. If they were showing tons of details every week then I'd start to worry, that shows you kinda NEED to heavily market the game because you don't believe it can stand on its own.It’s just ridiculous because if that was the case… Nintendo would just delay the game lol
Like in what world is a May release date in the last year or two of a console life cycle something they absolutely need to hit. And even then, Nintendo is more in the habit of delaying games from optimal release dates in order to ensure quality (like AC)
If they weren’t confident in the game, we wouldn’t have a solid, two-months-away release date.
Wait what"RE4 feels like Capcom hired the top engineers at Nintendo to make a game"
I actually think it would be hilarious if TOTK was an Other M-level disaster
This is how #TeamConcern can still win
I still want the game to be good, but recent comments about stuff like pedigree or how "RE4 feels like Capcom hired the top engineers at Nintendo to make a game" definitely give me enough PTSD that I agree, lol
Skyward Sword and BotW feel like Nintendo hired the top engineer at capcom to make a game
I'll try to find it, it was pretty funnyWait what
Not me, I would NEVER stoop so low as to be a January truther.I bet Team Concern and Team January is the same people
if you want to see a bit more just flip through the artbook one time, it's not that spoilery and it will satisfy you.
I’ve always thought it, but when TOTK gets 93 while MPR has a 94, I’ll finally have empirical proof!I wonder if we'll finally get the "metroid is better than zelda" thread
Lol they should stop being silly then, the game is only 2 months awayA bunch of the people who're concerning over here were pretty active in the artbook thread
Team January is built on hope, not despairI bet Team Concern and Team January is the same people
Don't worry, come may12th you can say that unlike the 3d Zelda series metroid prime mainline games never went below the 90 markI’ve always thought it, but when TOTK gets 93 while MPR has a 94, I’ll finally have empirical proof!
I don't know why but even though your name is PhenDrift and even though you've been active in Metroid threads, this is still quite the plot twist to me, lolI’ve always thought it, but when TOTK gets 93 while MPR has a 94, I’ll finally have empirical proof!
Ok but imagine if Metroid Prime 4 also was disappointing. That'd be quite the world. After Bayonetta 3 was received as great but a bit underwhelming compared to 1 and 2, it would be funny if TOTK and Prime 4 completed it ... almost like some kind of ... triforceDon't worry, come may12th you can say that unlike the 3d Zelda series metroid prime mainline games never went below the 90 mark
Realistically I don't think it's that farfetched, between the original MP4 cancellation and the years and years of anticipation, it feels a bit like a Twilight Princess situation where everyone imagines it to be the most awesome game ever, and no matter how good it is, it will have a hard time living up to that.Ok but imagine if Metroid Prime 4 also was disappointing.
sucks serif is gone. They really drove alot of the theory crafting here