- Pronouns
- He/Him
Legitimately I don't think we should take Andy Robinson's 'no games' to be literal - it's either a joke or a way of saying he thinks Nintendo don't have much to share this year. For context's sake consider the following:
Of course a narrative of 'not much to show' is setting in. I assume that when Christopher Dring first put out the idea that there wasn't much due after Zelda, he'd heard about Nintendo pulling out of E3 before IGN - he did say that Nintendo hadn't booked much event space for 2023, after all. (edit - I should point out here that I don't agree with journalists reaching this conclusion; it's only February, after all, Nintendo are pretty damn secretive, E3 isn't the be all and end all it used to be, and I doubt they let 90% of the next fiscal year slide by with only Zelda and Pikmin 4 as releases, obviously)
For argument's sake, right now this might be true. We might well get a February Direct that concentrates on showing more of Kirby, Bayonetta Origins, and Zelda; which dates Advance Wars; reveals a Mario sports game for June and a 'small' game for July; skips mentioning Metroid Prime 4 or Pikmin 4; doesn't reveal any blockbuster releases (like 2D Mario). Perhaps there's emphasis on DLC for Splatoon 3, Mario Kart, Xenoblade, and Fire Emblem. From the conventional standpoint of Big Games - and Big Games are often what matters in gaming media - there's not much there besides Zelda.
Right now it may well look like Nintendo don't have much planned this year, but it doesn't literally mean there aren't any games to show at all. Personally I do think the E3 pull-out might have wrongfooted journalists; and I wonder if we might all be slightly wrongfooted by a February Direct which only lifts the lid on one or two relatively small releases for summer, only for Nintendo to do their own thing outside of E3 and announce more titles in the summer.
Good news is we shouldn't need to wait too much longer to get a slightly firmer idea of what the year ahead holds.
- Nintendo have nothing major dated after Zelda
- Switch is turning 6
- Nintendo have pulled out of E3
Of course a narrative of 'not much to show' is setting in. I assume that when Christopher Dring first put out the idea that there wasn't much due after Zelda, he'd heard about Nintendo pulling out of E3 before IGN - he did say that Nintendo hadn't booked much event space for 2023, after all. (edit - I should point out here that I don't agree with journalists reaching this conclusion; it's only February, after all, Nintendo are pretty damn secretive, E3 isn't the be all and end all it used to be, and I doubt they let 90% of the next fiscal year slide by with only Zelda and Pikmin 4 as releases, obviously)
For argument's sake, right now this might be true. We might well get a February Direct that concentrates on showing more of Kirby, Bayonetta Origins, and Zelda; which dates Advance Wars; reveals a Mario sports game for June and a 'small' game for July; skips mentioning Metroid Prime 4 or Pikmin 4; doesn't reveal any blockbuster releases (like 2D Mario). Perhaps there's emphasis on DLC for Splatoon 3, Mario Kart, Xenoblade, and Fire Emblem. From the conventional standpoint of Big Games - and Big Games are often what matters in gaming media - there's not much there besides Zelda.
Right now it may well look like Nintendo don't have much planned this year, but it doesn't literally mean there aren't any games to show at all. Personally I do think the E3 pull-out might have wrongfooted journalists; and I wonder if we might all be slightly wrongfooted by a February Direct which only lifts the lid on one or two relatively small releases for summer, only for Nintendo to do their own thing outside of E3 and announce more titles in the summer.
Good news is we shouldn't need to wait too much longer to get a slightly firmer idea of what the year ahead holds.