Big news everyone
I hope! If Nintendo doesn't give us something this week, then me thinks we won't get anything until after the Mario movie premieres.Sunday will mark the final 60 days, 2 months, before the game's release.
From there Nintendo is probably gonna start being more aggressive with the marketing.
Absolutely. People are sleeping on the sky islands because when you factor in that...Idk, those things go up pretty damn high from what we've seen
If the underworld goes that deep I'm not sure how you even handle a world of that size
Well at least they keep saying MAY 12TH MAY 12TH MAY 12TH so at least chances are big it's actually coming out then. Otherwise I wouldn't be so sure.
This level of secrecy is a little silly though .
Well at least they keep saying MAY 12TH MAY 12TH MAY 12TH so at least chances are big it's actually coming out then. Otherwise I wouldn't be so sure.
This level of secrecy is a little silly though .
IN TWO DAYS!?!11They're not saying May 12th, they're saying it MAY come out on the 12th.
/s
do it, more copies for other peoplenintendo marketing made me want to cancel the pre-order. I'm disappointed and don't trust them.
It’s only a matter of days until Link shows up on the Joe Rogan podcast.Smh cancel culture strikes again
Yes it will be an exciting time. Ill be watching the movie early-mid April and then impatiently wait for TOTK the last month. Kind of wish the game released right at May 1stApril through March will be a huge time for Nintendo. Mario movie blitz right into TOTK blowout.
I do think it’ll be quite funny to look back on complaints about the marketing in like a month.
But yeah, I’m ready for a fun 2 months of Nintendo in the general public spotlight will be a neat time to be a fan
Ok, maybe this is in the art book, but the strange patterns we see everywhere on the ToTK website seem to all be stone patterns. The 2nd trailer shows a hut with a floor that has ripples in its stone, the 3rd trailer shows these squares on either side of the ground, in the hallway behind the large door Link pushes open, and the word symbols that make an almost make like pattern seem to be literally in the sky islands ground (see the symbols right beneath Link in the cover art).
Man
I really hope that they show a trailer this month or the next that'll help me understand why it's more than just BotW2
Also if Zelda is relegated to a minor role again I'm defo gonna be a hater
I'm more pessimistic, she's gonna get Bionic CommandoedI'm feeling 90% certain that she's gonna fall down a hole, give Link a magic arm, and need to be rescued from Ganondorf at the end of the game.
I'm more pessimistic, she's gonna get Bionic Commandoed
They wouldn't even let Zelda age in Breath of the Wild over the course of 100 years,
Not vibing with the pessimistic takes. Don't see the point of Zelda holding the Sheikah Switch in new artwork without more involvement on that front. BotW artwork depicted her with the slate because she had those in flashbacks, I don't think this is the case here. This iteration of Zelda is the curious researcher of ancient artifacts and it is a waste to not leverage that character in a game featuring a previously unknown ancient civilization. This is a good opportunity as a direct sequel to explore this more. If I look stupid for having a little faith, then whatever.
Sorry for not vibing, but I don't think it's unwarranted!
In my opinion, pessimism, and a new mainline Zelda, are complete opposites.
I'm afraid to ask, but what does "Bionic Commando" mean in this contextI'm more pessimistic, she's gonna get Bionic Commandoed
It's weird that suddenly Zelda is an unimpeachable series like it hasn't had multiple polarizing titles over the years. It's a great series, but also has had some serious missteps to say the least, and as you touch on even the better games are often prone to having issues. I definitely have zero confidence Zelda will get any notable agency in these games anytime soon.Hardly! Not every mainline Zelda has turned out good, for one. But more importantly, a mainline Zelda can be great in some aspects but lacking in others. BotW was fun to play, it had a wonderful open world with lots of fun things to do, and creative ways to approach problems. But it also had Zelda as a damsel yet again, and a pretty pathetic transphobic gag.
I'm sure TotK will have many fun, silly things for me to do! But I am not confident the team has learned the right lessons in terms of some of the biggest flaws of BotW. At least from what we have seen so far, nothing has lead me to believe that Zelda will be anything but a damsel in distress. I'd love to be proven wrong! But do Aonuma and others on the team even care?
Zelda is one of the most consistently high-quality gaming series that exists imo. Of course it has had some missteps, but overall it’s been WAY more good then bad.I'm afraid to ask, but what does "Bionic Commando" mean in this context
It's weird that suddenly Zelda is an unimpeachable series like it hasn't had multiple polarizing titles over the years. It's a great series, but also has had some serious missteps to say the least, and as you touch on even the better games are often prone to having issues. I definitely have zero confidence Zelda will get any notable agency in these games anytime soon.
Bionic Commando 2009, the big plot twist is that the protagonist's wife is in his armI'm afraid to ask, but what does "Bionic Commando" mean in this context
It's weird that suddenly Zelda is an unimpeachable series like it hasn't had multiple polarizing titles over the years. It's a great series, but also has had some serious missteps to say the least, and as you touch on even the better games are often prone to having issues. I definitely have zero confidence Zelda will get any notable agency in these games anytime soon.
Ikr, the expanded moveset in the patent already looks so fun to play around with, Nintendo still trying to hide the aerial combat scene from trailers makes it even more exciting.I think we'll be able to phase into the ground and then start freefalling into an underground area. But we'll be impacted by wind - or lack thereof. Link's expanded moveset is going to be so fun to play around with. BotW is one of the most tactile games I've ever played. This is one of my favorite game engines ever.
I'm not saying that the entire underworld goes that deep, just like not every sky island goes as high as the highest one. I'm just saying that "some areas" of the underworld may go that deep allowing players to fully utilize new game mechanics such as flying vehicles and skydiving with aerial combat moveset.Idk, those things go up pretty damn high from what we've seen
If the underworld goes that deep I'm not sure how you even handle a world of that size
Maybe this topic has been beaten to death but what people expecting in regards to further promotions for TotK?
Originally I thought they’d do a big Zelda Direct in March or April before previews and then reviews came out by media at the start of May.
But now, I’m thinking they might not do a Direct since this is the sequel to one of the best selling and highest reviewed games of this generation. Plus, it’s already got enough hype as the most anticipated game this year. They don’t really need to reveal anything else to convince people to buy it.
So, now I’m thinking they’ll get review codes out by beginning of April, we’ll see some limited previews late April, reviews in May, and then release and that’s it. YouTube, social, and media outlets will do all the promo and hype for Nintendo. No Direct needed.
Yeah, maybe I'm just easy to please but I've loved every single Zelda game, only with some nitpicks here and there. It's possibly the only long-running series I can say that about, the only others that come to mind are Metroid (but that has stuff like Federation Force and Other M, which I haven't played to judge) and Final Fantasy, which I could maybe say that about before FF15 happened.Zelda is one of the most consistently high-quality gaming series that exists imo. Of course it has had some missteps, but overall it’s been WAY more good then bad.
Zelda is a game that really don’t need reviews too.
Because it is a sequel to the most critically acclaimed game in the modern age, and the Sequel to one of the best selling games of all time. Breath of the Wild definitely needed reviews because it was a massive shakeup on a new console. However, everything about TotK is kind of a known entity.Huh? I don't even read game reviews, but I can't say I understand this perspective at all. It seems to me that any given Zelda game can have plenty of different elements that could be talked about in a review, perhaps influencing people on the fence one way or the other. Why wouldn't Zelda games need reviews?
Because it is a sequel to the most critically acclaimed game in the modern age, and the Sequel to one of the best selling games of all time. Breath of the Wild definitely needed reviews because it was a massive shakeup on a new console. However, everything about TotK is kind of a known entity.
I can’t say I’ve LOVED every game in any series, especially one with well over a dozen core entries. And definitely not one with games like Wind Waker or Phantom Hourglass.Yeah, maybe I'm just easy to please but I've loved every single Zelda game, only with some nitpicks here and there. It's possibly the only long-running series I can say that about, the only others that come to mind are Metroid (but that has stuff like Federation Force and Other M, which I haven't played to judge) and Final Fantasy, which I could maybe say that about before FF15 happened.
I definitely have some worries about it, given what we've seen (mostly due to marketing and what kind of game it might be based on that marketing shown), so I'm not saying that we should just brush aside our worries and lean on 'well it'll be great by default because it's Zelda/the sequel to BOTW'. It's absolutely okay to have those thoughts and concerns.I can’t say I’ve LOVED every game in any series, especially one with well over a dozen core entries. And definitely not one with games like Wind Waker or Phantom Hourglass.
Regardless, I just think it’s weird to be like “well it’s Zelda, of course it’ll be great” when we had games like Skyward Sword which was such a misfire they completely rethought the way they make Zelda games (and I say this as someone who likes the game).
Honestly I think the 3D Mario team is the most reliable team at Nintendo, but that’s neither here or there. I just find a lot of discussion weird about this game how it’s basically “it’s the sequel to the Best Game Ever” and that’s all we need to get hyped. And I thought BOTW was great but there’s a lot that can go wrong in a game, even when it’s a world class dev like EPD (and a lot of issues that a sequel needs to address since it isn’t the first time around anymore.”
The reason why companies do early reviews is for exposure, it’s not out of the goodness of their hearts. Basically to get people to play a game. But honestly, with the original Breath of the Wild, it was so heavily talked about, and dominated gaming discussion for 6 years, they don’t need reviewers to advertise for them. If TotK is even half the game that BotW, it probably is better to not do reviews for that natural sense of discovery. Thats probably way better marketing than the old way.I don't think any of that means that it doesn't need a review. And if it truly doesn't, that doesn't speak well in its favor! You might as well be saying "Well, it's just Breath of the Wild again". Surely there's more to the game than what we've seen?