- Pronouns
- He/him
New PS+ service retroactively gives you PS4/5 versions of PS1/PSP games you’d already bought on PS3/PSP/Vita without even needing a sub
I feel is a little too late for that implementation at this point... (even though I'm sure our Nintendo accounts are able to at very least keep track of our Wii U and 3DS VC purchases.. poor Wii got left behind in this talk).. But I have no fear that NSO will carry forward for the next system.I’m very pleasantly surprised Sony will honor past PS1/PSP purchases on PS5 where possible without a subscription. It’s a small start, but hopefully some cool stuff crosses over and we’ll eventually get PS2, PS3, and Vita games.
Nintendo needs to step up now and bring back our Virtual Console purchases. No excuses.
Wii was left behind, but Wii U and 3DS shouldn’t be since the accounts can be linked. I’m not satisfied with locking classic games solely behind a subscription, there should always be a purchase option too.I feel is a little too late for that implementation at this point... (even though I'm sure our Nintendo accounts are able to at very least keep track of our Wii U and 3DS VC purchases.. poor Wii got left behind in this talk).. But I have no fear that NSO will carry forward for the next system.
It’s not too late at all. You can sub and get the whole collection, or buy outright which ones you want.I feel is a little too late for that implementation at this point... (even though I'm sure our Nintendo accounts are able to at very least keep track of our Wii U and 3DS VC purchases.. poor Wii got left behind in this talk).. But I have no fear that NSO will carry forward for the next system.
I'm almost convinced it will be free to play, but even if it isn't I'll spend the $40 or whatever to get it when it does launchMy biggest question is : will they go free-to-play or not ?
That’s just a selection, not the full list.Everything seems pretty good about the PS+ news except the actual selection of initial classic games. Would’ve thought they’d make the initial games more noteworthy ones.
Also obligatory reminder that Jim Ryan is still a piece of shit.
Most of them, but SVS is being positioned as a main line title and all of those gave been localizedHave they localize everyone game in the series? I know this game did not do well sales wise
monumentally huge dub for Sony hereNew PS+ service retroactively gives you PS4/5 versions of PS1/PSP games you’d already bought on PS3/PSP/Vita without even needing a sub
It’s not too late at all. You can sub and get the whole collection, or buy outright which ones you want.
Just like Sony is doing now.
…and also just like Nintendo is doing now with the DLC in the Expansion tier.
I meant that Nintendo won't look back on our Wii U and 3DS purchases now, especially with the eShop for those systems closing soon.. And besides, they'd need to get some kind of way to play the systems yet not represented on Switch (the Game Boy line is supposedly coming, but you'd still miss DS, Wii, TurboGrafx, MSX, Game Gear..). Ideally, some kind of upgrade path like this would be there from start.Wii was left behind, but Wii U and 3DS shouldn’t be since the accounts can be linked. I’m not satisfied with locking classic games solely behind a subscription, there should always be a purchase option too.
There’s still time to get it done since the Wii U and 3DS Nintendo accounts themselves will live on beyond the shop closures in March 2023 since they will still be open to let you redownload games just not purchase additional ones. It doesn’t have to be all at once either since Sony, like Microsoft BC before them, is doing a dripfeed of content.I meant that Nintendo won't look back on our Wii U and 3DS purchases now, especially with the eShop for those systems closing soon.. And besides, they'd need to get some kind of way to play the systems yet not represented on Switch (the Game Boy line is supposedly coming, but you'd still miss DS, Wii, TurboGrafx, MSX, Game Gear..). Ideally, some kind of upgrade path like this would be there from start.
But personally, I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt for the future systems.. All things considered, the Wii to Wii U, and DS to 3DS migration wasn't too bad. Is just that we really got that chain broken with the Switch..
There’s still time to get it done since the Wii U and 3DS Nintendo accounts themselves will live on beyond the shop closures in March 2023 since they will still be open to let you redownload games just not purchase additional ones. It doesn’t have to be all at once either since Sony, like Microsoft BC before them, is doing a dripfeed of content.
This is one of the best times we’ll get to speak up about this.
There is one big exception we saw in 3DS VC, the Pokemon games. The classic Pokemon games were a huge success for Nintendo and were always in the top 10 of eShop and they even made DL cards so they could be sold at retail. Even if I believe Pokemon will end up on NSO, there is the chance they prefer to do it by eShopNow you can make the argument that Nintendo should make individual VC games for sale. But I don't see that happening. The goal for these companies is for people to subscribe to their services. Individual classic games wasn't the money maker games assumed it would be.
There is one big exception we saw in 3DS VC, the Pokemon games. The classic Pokemon games were a huge success for Nintendo and were always in the top 10 of eShop and they even made DL cards so they could be sold at retail. Even if I believe Pokemon will end up on NSO, there is the chance they prefer to do it by eShop
I’m mostly only interested in the classic virtual console games for this even though in a truly ideal world you’d get everything (I agree the unique dual screen/Wii U Game Pad hardware makes 3DS and Wii U first software too complicated). So currently that’s NES, SNES, and N64 games. I’m not sure what’s easier here or makes more sense, either separate releases that use the NSO emulators or if there’s a check in the NSO app that lets you play your old games inside the apps we already have when you don’t have an active subscription.For Wii U and 3DS games, Nintendo would need to develop an emulator for each system or port every single game to the Switch natively. Neither option is an easy task. It's especially difficult because some 3DS and Wii U games really utilize the two screens. For Virtual Console games, Nintendo does have emulators for NES, SNES, N64, and probably the Gameboy systems. But from Nintendo's perspective, there are no purchases to transfer. You cannot transfer your purchase of Zelda 1 because Zelda 1 is not for sale on the Switch. It's only available through NSO.
Now you can make the argument that Nintendo should make individual VC games for sale. But I don't see that happening. The goal for these companies is for people to subscribe to their services. Individual classic games wasn't the money maker games assumed it would be.
Hello all. I’m playing the first Xenoblade Chronicles for the first time ever (Definitive Edition on Switch), and man oh man, I can’t believe I slept on this game for so long. I love the characters so far, the story has lots of intrigue and the music is just otherworldly. Super amazing stuff so far and I’m glad I finally picked it up in the wake of my hype for 3. (I loooved 2.)
This will be nice if I ever eventually buy a PS5 as I have a lot of PlayStation classics. Will be nice to not have to subscribe to get them again.New PS+ service retroactively gives you PS4/5 versions of PS1/PSP games you’d already bought on PS3/PSP/Vita without even needing a sub
Please let your dreams be dreamsI had a dream that Metroid Prime 4 was given an official release date of 2027 and I just want to say that if that actually happens then I apologize to all of you.
Oh nice! Glad to see someone else did it in the same order haha. I just made it to Chapter 6, and am just absolutely loving it. I plan to play more today at some point for sure!Hey you did what I did! I also played 2 first and loved it. I really enjoyed 1, too. The story absolutely sucked me in. How far are you?
Sweeeet. Let me know how it goes?Oh nice! Glad to see someone else did it in the same order haha. I just made it to Chapter 6, and am just absolutely loving it. I plan to play more today at some point for sure!
I don’t know. Everyone should’ve expected a small line-up with very few heavy hitters. But of the marketing for these things is a rollout and surprise announcements. I’m interested to see where their service will be by one year after it launchesSony's PS+ classic line up makes the NSO Expansion Pak seem like an amazing deal. Big oooooooof on that one.
Sony's PS+ classic line up makes the NSO Expansion Pak seem like an amazing deal. Big oooooooof on that one.
It's not the full lineup, just a sample of it. AFAIK there should be about 700 games at launch; likely fewer, but similar to Game Pass numbers.I don’t know. Everyone should’ve expected a small line-up with very few heavy hitters. But of the marketing for these things is a rollout and surprise announcements. I’m interested to see where their service will be by one year after it launches
Whoa whoa whoa whoaHello all. I’m playing the first Xenoblade Chronicles for the first time ever (Definitive Edition on Switch), and man oh man, I can’t believe I slept on this game for so long. I love the characters so far, the story has lots of intrigue and the music is just otherworldly. Super amazing stuff so far and I’m glad I finally picked it up in the wake of my hype for 3. (I loooved 2.)
You mean, like some sort of "console" that'd be "virtual" ? I think you're onto something but really, don't be silly, Nintendo would never do such a consumer-friendly thingI feel like it'd be trivially easy to just make the games in the NSO apps "DLC" that can be bought separately. But it's clearly something Nintendo never intended to implement.
I did the same order as well. I didn't really enjoy the Wii version for some reason but after a slow start in XC2 I loved it. After that when DE came out and before that Torna I became Xenoblade fanOh nice! Glad to see someone else did it in the same order haha. I just made it to Chapter 6, and am just absolutely loving it. I plan to play more today at some point for sure!
Yeah, I thought something like this could happen (on a technical level, not actually happen because Nintendo). The app checks if you're subscribed on a regular basis - couldn't it just check account data to see which games you have a license for, and then unlock those games? A subscription obviously would unlock all games.I feel like it'd be trivially easy to just make the games in the NSO apps "DLC" that can be bought separately. But it's clearly something Nintendo never intended to implement.
I am frankly pretty baffled they don't offer a la carte purchases of their NSO games alongside the "all you can eat buffet" subscription. This is obviously an anecdotal situation, but I love the "All You Can Eat" Subscription because I'm the kind of person that would buy so many retro games that offering them as a subscription would save me money and provide a solid value. However, my girlfriend doesn't want to pay $65 a year to access the 2-3 N64 games she cares about, and would rather buy them a la carte and just have them on her console forever. So right now, while they're getting money out of me, they're getting zero dollars out of my girlfriend, where if they offered a la carte purchases of N64 games for, let's say $15 each, they could get a solid $45 bucks out of her right now for very little work. Forty Five Dollars is more than Zero Dollars, Nintendo! Money, Table, etc.I feel like it'd be trivially easy to just make the games in the NSO apps "DLC" that can be bought separately. But it's clearly something Nintendo never intended to implement.
I feel this so much. Why don't you just let me buy OoT, MM, and F-Zero X, Nintendo?I am frankly pretty baffled they don't offer a la carte purchases of their NSO games alongside the "all you can eat buffet" subscription. This is obviously an anecdotal situation, but I love the "All You Can Eat" Subscription because I'm the kind of person that would buy so many retro games that offering them as a subscription would save me money and provide a solid value. However, my girlfriend doesn't want to pay $65 a year to access the 2-3 N64 games she cares about, and would rather buy them a la carte and just have them on her console forever. So right now, while they're getting money out of me, they're getting zero dollars out of my girlfriend, where if they offered a la carte purchases of N64 games for, let's say $15 each, they could get a solid $45 bucks out of her right now for very little work. Forty Five Dollars is more than Zero Dollars, Nintendo! Money, Table, etc.
Before anyone says the words "family plan" to me: she's involved in a base tier family plan with her family that'd be somewhat complicated to get involved in
Personally I suspect Nintendo know this sort of scenario occurs, but for them right now the priority is building a subscription business and locking these games into their subscription business gives them leverage to gradually build up the number of subscribers, as well as the amount subscribers are paying.I am frankly pretty baffled they don't offer a la carte purchases of their NSO games alongside the "all you can eat buffet" subscription. This is obviously an anecdotal situation, but I love the "All You Can Eat" Subscription because I'm the kind of person that would buy so many retro games that offering them as a subscription would save me money and provide a solid value. However, my girlfriend doesn't want to pay $65 a year to access the 2-3 N64 games she cares about, and would rather buy them a la carte and just have them on her console forever. So right now, while they're getting money out of me, they're getting zero dollars out of my girlfriend, where if they offered a la carte purchases of N64 games for, let's say $15 each, they could get a solid $45 bucks out of her right now for very little work. Forty Five Dollars is more than Zero Dollars, Nintendo! Money, Table, etc.
Before anyone says the words "family plan" to me: she's involved in a base tier family plan with her family that'd be somewhat complicated to get involved in
I think i only own Konami and Square titles, so i can't wait for them to not appear on the service everNew PS+ service retroactively gives you PS4/5 versions of PS1/PSP games you’d already bought on PS3/PSP/Vita without even needing a sub
I think you're definitely onto something here, though I think the thing that kinda makes me raise an eyebrow is: if they want to get people into the subscription and stay there, I feel like they maybe would have also locked the Mario Kart 8 Deluxe DLC behind the subscription? Maybe that'd be a little over the proverbial line for them.Personally I suspect Nintendo know this sort of scenario occurs, but for them right now the priority is building a subscription business and locking these games into their subscription business gives them leverage to gradually build up the number of subscribers, as well as the amount subscribers are paying.
Part of me thinks that, when Nintendo revamp the service in a few years, we may actually get the option to make stand-alone in-app purchases for retro games we want to keep. But I think Nintendo only do that when they're confident that tens of millions of people will stay subscribed, year-in, year-out; the retro games are there for now to sort of twist people's arms into subscribing by not giving them an alternative way of accessing that content. We can already see Nintendo experimenting with what content a subscription can offer; in a few years, it wouldn't surprise me if the price has gone up and 'budget' Nintendo games - download only things, for example, like Boxboy, Cadence of Hyrule - are available in the subscription and you get new Nindies titles in the sub too.
Once the subscription offers more reasons to stay subbed, and Nintendo are confident people will stay on, I think they might allow purchases of retro titles again. But I don't think we get to that point for a good 5 years or so. It was interesting that Nintendo wouldn't reveal NSO numbers when asked last week; "Since not all consumers renew their subscriptions after the expiration of their membership periods, we think it is important to continuously make the service more compelling through the addition of titles that utilize online gameplay and improvements to the service itself." So while new customers are joining, total subscription numbers are likely fluctuating because some people don't see the value in staying subscribed for the long-haul; so long as that's the case, I think retro content stays locked in there.
I am frankly pretty baffled they don't offer a la carte purchases of their NSO games alongside the "all you can eat buffet" subscription. This is obviously an anecdotal situation, but I love the "All You Can Eat" Subscription because I'm the kind of person that would buy so many retro games that offering them as a subscription would save me money and provide a solid value. However, my girlfriend doesn't want to pay $65 a year to access the 2-3 N64 games she cares about, and would rather buy them a la carte and just have them on her console forever. So right now, while they're getting money out of me, they're getting zero dollars out of my girlfriend, where if they offered a la carte purchases of N64 games for, let's say $15 each, they could get a solid $45 bucks out of her right now for very little work. Forty Five Dollars is more than Zero Dollars, Nintendo! Money, Table, etc.
Before anyone says the words "family plan" to me: she's involved in a base tier family plan with her family that'd be somewhat complicated to get involved in