It was almost 2 weeks after Gamescom(Aug 23rd-27th 2023) when all of the rumors started the last time I believe.I'm surprised we haven't gotten any GDC leaks yet; we need something to help, haha.
I'm surprised we haven't gotten any GDC leaks yet; we need something to help, haha.
* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
After this fiscal year ended in march, wee will see another drop in sales. The goal was 15, then they increased for 15.5 and certainly achieve this goal! What's come for next fiscal year? 12mi at max, I think. I know that the argument for early 25 for increase line up of softwares, but later 25 is no sense, a year of 5mi NSW sales...that's sort of how I am at the moment ... still seems like a possibility, though I'm not sure why I think that when up against the rumors and hints and inside info...
But to be honest rumors and hints and inside info have basically been wrong all these years anyway so I don't know why I'd rule out the possibility of still being announced and launched this year.
A more realistic based point of view- I think a reveal is still possible this year at least.
I wouldn't bet on Nvidia fucking ip the security again.This is a very random thought but if finances allow, I probably will buy 2 Switch 2s so that I can keep the 2nd one on launch firmware so that it's ready for homebrew down the line![]()
I wouldn’t either, but people will find a way in regardless, even if it's way too late for people to care.I wouldn't bet on Nvidia fucking ip the security again.
Say you didn't play Monster Hunter Rise without saying you didn't play Monster Hunter RiseDid any third party actually push the Switch to it's max? Legit question. I can really only think of Nintendo game pushing the system.
Somehow I doubt they'd abandon an extremely beneficial contract on the basis of a security flaw, given the legacy of high profile security holes in Nintendo hardware that predates nVidia. At least I hope Nintendo wouldn't make such a grievous error in the pursuit of piracy and user modification, which will continue to be facts of life for any company who pursues a hardware strategy that demands control of their own platform.I would imagine nVidia fucking up again this hard with the ReDraketed SoC would definitely lead Nintendo to strongly reconsider that long-term contract between them.
I wouldn't bet on Nvidia fucking ip the security again.
Honestly i'm struggling to see where those 3 games mentioned by @Steve are starting to show their age. If Nintendo games will look like that in 2025 and upwards, i am perfectly fine with that. If they release a new open world Zelda that looks like Ghost of Tsushima (in terms of graphical fidelity, not artstyle), i will be blown away by it very likely.I get what you all mean with those examples, but those three games (or anything PS4 really) are a low bar if you ask me... They're still last gen titles made around traditional shaders and rasterization techniques, very high budget and fantastically well made for sure but their backbone is already showing its age. I'd be disappointed if Nintendo first party didn't push beyond them with relative ease, now that they took an eternity to develop the tools and delayed the games & system multiple times.
Especially when said rumors reached all the way to a press question to FurukawaDevils advocate, but Nintendo probably wasn’t OK with the leaks that happened last year. Expecting them to happen again implies they’ve done nothing with respect to security.
I’m not holding my breath until Nintendo themselves acknowledges the device.
Correct. People should understand that Nintendo make public facing statements relating to future hardware not because "the fanbase is getting aggro about it", which is a fundamental misunderstanding of the magnitude of "people who have bought a Nintendo Switch and will potentially buy its successor" versus "people who speculate online about Nintendo". Public statements will be either:Especially when said rumors reached all the way to a press question to Furukawa
@necrolipe Was this rumour you had heard in March a false flag, or do you think it's credible? If so, when do you think it can be shared with the public?This tweet have a credibility judging by the bit of info that I have, yes
I have more informed things around this, but will not share for now publicy
tbh I believe that this will be soon available for y'all by news sites, etc.
This is exactly why it's the place for it, lol. Way more relevant than a public trade show. But really, there's no separation since they're both massive gatherings of industry.Re: Potential info from GDC
My impression is that GDC isn't a type of conference that new games and hardware are released or discussed. It's just a regular old industry conference as I understand it, at which developers are showing of new techniques and practices to others in the industry.
Sure, there are lots of industry people around and some chatter might occur, but I would expect 99,9% of people being quite precious of their jobs (especially these days..) and being professional enough to not discuss things under NDAs.
Pair that with Nintendo likely to be in full lock down mode with the lawyers on constant stand by I would not expect anything noteworthy to come out from GDC, unfortunately.
Be happy that you don't follow german media...Although I'm glad no-one said anything yesterday on April fools day, because that would've been annoying to sift through...
Nintendo outright denies information that has been said by higher ups at the company, even from Satoru Iwata one time. Controlling their own destiny is common with them. However, it's probably fair to say that Nintendo has been far more... well either more determined or more successful in hiding details about the upcoming system this time around. If the Nvidia leak didn't happen, we'd outright have no credible or useful information. Considering how many leaks have happened with almost every other company in the last year, Nintendo avoiding internal leaks is honestly impressive... or embarrassing for the rest of the industry, idk.Come to think of it, we didn't get any information at all with the Tokyo Game Show closed show they did, but I think the common assumption is it was the same thing they went over at Gamescom. That's mine at least.
That said, Nintendo has, as other users mentioned, historically been very controlling of flow of information, with the related company, The Pokemon Company (specifically their international branch) going as far to seek legal procedures against leaks in the past...
Why not both?Nintendo outright denies information that has been said by higher ups at the company, even from Satoru Iwata one time. Controlling their own destiny is common with them. However, it's probably fair to say that Nintendo has been far more... well either more determined or more successful in hiding details about the upcoming system this time around. If the Nvidia leak didn't happen, we'd outright have no credible or useful information. Considering how many leaks have happened with almost every other company in the last year, Nintendo avoiding internal leaks is honestly impressive... or embarrassing for the rest of the industry, idk.
They still went to GDC thoSo the most likely response to the Gamescom leak has been to withdraw from future events for the sake of the few remaining months before announcement.
Yeah, it’s amazing how we know far more about Xbox and PS machine than the Switch 2, especially how the Switch is due a successor.Why not both?
Wow, it’s actually insane the only company that has given us a slight hint of the switch 2 is Nvidia. Meanwhile Nintendo has been annoyingly quiet.Nintendo outright denies information that has been said by higher ups at the company, even from Satoru Iwata one time. Controlling their own destiny is common with them. However, it's probably fair to say that Nintendo has been far more... well either more determined or more successful in hiding details about the upcoming system this time around. If the Nvidia leak didn't happen, we'd outright have no credible or useful information. Considering how many leaks have happened with almost every other company in the last year, Nintendo avoiding internal leaks is honestly impressive... or embarrassing for the rest of the industry, idk.
Wow, it’s actually insane the only company that has given us a slight hint of the switch 2 is Nvidia.
Information is information, even if it’s unvoluntarilyUnvoluntarily.
A 7.4-magnitude earthquake struck Taiwan in the early hours of the morning, causing significant damage to infrastructure and disrupting operations at several TSMC key manufacturing sites. Sources familiar with TSMC's operations said that the company's N3 fab in Tainan suffered structural damage, with beams and columns broken, leading to an outright halt in production. EUV machines, essential for manufacturing processes below 7nm, have stopped, and research and development labs have been subject to significant damage, such as cracked walls. Another fab in Hsinchu reported broken pipelines and extensive damage to wafers, necessitating a halt in production.
The issue with launch Switches was a hardware vulnerability that couldn't be fixed in software.Nothing will be 100% secure, thats the first Cybersecurity principle. You just work to make it harder to crack
They could make a bugbounty program like Sony and many others have, the ps5 got compromissed months after launch but they got paid for reporting the exploit.
If they make the system more secure Someone will just make a smarter hacker lolI wouldn't bet on Nvidia fucking ip the security again.
I get why they would from a practicality standpoint, but goodness the callousness of reporting this on Macrumors really ruffles my feathers.
I saw the videos last night, That earthquake was so destructive it looked like cgi from a disaster movie or something. I feel so bad for Taiwan. That would be so scary to go through
It's not about how they look, it's about the techniques and hardware paradigms they were made with. They're old, these games didn't even utilize rapid packed math since they were made before the Pro in mind. You said it yourself, your standards are old and by the way you're expressing them, I assume you haven't been paying attention to what's officially being said at GDC or is currently due for next year as an example. Artstyles, "looks good", "holds up" and whatever are fair statements, but a game shipped by 2029 around the Ampere architecture should absolutely demolish those examples, regardless of how high or low your personal standards are... So yes, it would be extremely disappointing if it wasn't the case.Honestly i'm struggling to see where those 3 games mentioned by @Steve are starting to show their age. If Nintendo games will look like that in 2025 and upwards, i am perfectly fine with that. If they release a new open world Zelda that looks like Ghost of Tsushima (in terms of graphical fidelity, not artstyle), i will be blown away by it very likely.
Maybe i am just used to the low fidelity of Nintendo games since the Wii, which makes it easier for me to get excited over this, but i dunno, later PS4 games hold up very well still. If there's a generation that starts to show its age it's the PS360 gen no doubt. Rasterization can still look great and with the current consoles even struggling with that i think rasterization is here to stay and won't be replaced with full-on RT effects in the coming years. (By that i mean no hybrid RT+raster solution, i mean RT enabled on anything it can be used on)
If they make the system more secure Someone will just make a smarter hacker lol
Never said my standards are old, just that MAYBE i am just used to Nintendo games being low-fidelity compared to others, hence why i get excited when i will finally see their games match PS4 level visuals. In my opinion it doesn't matter what tech a game uses, if it looks good, it looks good. End of story.It's not about how they look, it's about the techniques and hardware paradigms they were made with. They're old, these games didn't even utilize rapid packed math since they were made before the Pro in mind. You said it yourself, your standards are old and by the way you're expressing them, I assume you haven't been paying attention to what's officially being said at GDC or is currently due for next year as an example. Artstyles, "looks good", "holds up" and whatever are fair statements, but a game shipped by 2029 around the Ampere architecture should absolutely demolish those examples, regardless of how high or low your personal standards are... So yes, it would be extremely disappointing if it wasn't the case.
Look I get I'm the exception but jumping from Pikmin 3 Deluxe to Forza Horizon 5 (on Series X!) and back, or Astro's Playroom to Animal Crossing New Horizons, yeah there's a difference but it's perceptually tiny. I've seen less improvements in the move from Xbox 360/PS3 through Series X/PS5 than the jump from Wii to Wii U, which was the last jump that "wowed" me.Never said my standards are old, just that MAYBE i am just used to Nintendo games being low-fidelity compared to others, hence why i get excited when i will finally see their games match PS4 level visuals. In my opinion it doesn't matter what tech a game uses, if it looks good, it looks good. End of story.
Re: Potential info from GDC
My impression is that GDC isn't a type of conference that new games and hardware are released or discussed. It's just a regular old industry conference as I understand it, at which developers are showing of new techniques and practices to others in the industry.
Sure, there are lots of industry people around and some chatter might occur, but I would expect 99,9% of people being quite precious of their jobs (especially these days..) and being professional enough to not discuss things under NDAs.
Pair that with Nintendo likely to be in full lock down mode with the lawyers on constant stand by I would not expect anything noteworthy to come out from GDC, unfortunately.
They're not low fidelity, they look as good as they possibly could for the devices they're on. The base (docked) Switch is literally four times and a half under PS4's theoretical performance only and got a 7th of the memory bandwidth... Everything is on the context, and the numbers.Never said my standards are old, just that MAYBE i am just used to Nintendo games being low-fidelity compared to others, hence why i get excited when i will finally see their games match PS4 level visuals. In my opinion it doesn't matter what tech a game uses, if it looks good, it looks good. End of story.
I also believe there would have been more leaks without the Nvidia leak. When so much of the hardware has been known already for years, there's less new stuff to leak.Leaks potentially wouldn't come from any Nintendo presentations but devs in possession of devkits taking about it at gatherings / parties. But it seems no one is willing / drunk enough to break NDAs yet.
Also any chatter like that needs cross checking and verification before publishing y which can take a lot of time if checked against multiple sources.
To be fair the leak most likely was from that negotiation since it was only in the talking stages with no contract signed yet. Most likely higher-ups at Netflix trying to pressure Nintendo into inking a deal. If I were them I would’ve stopped all talks too because you can’t trust the company on that project anymore.This is a company that was willing to pull the plug on a Zelda media adaptation on the basis that someone, somewhere at their partner company leaked ahead of time. Between that and establishing the format of Nintendo Directs, it's clear that they seek to control public messaging on their own terms as much as possible. So the most likely response to the Gamescom leak has been to withdraw from future events for the sake of the few remaining months before announcement.
Re: Potential info from GDC
My impression is that GDC isn't a type of conference that new games and hardware are released or discussed. It's just a regular old industry conference as I understand it, at which developers are showing of new techniques and practices to others in the industry.
Sure, there are lots of industry people around and some chatter might occur, but I would expect 99,9% of people being quite precious of their jobs (especially these days..) and being professional enough to not discuss things under NDAs.
Pair that with Nintendo likely to be in full lock down mode with the lawyers on constant stand by I would not expect anything noteworthy to come out from GDC, unfortunately.
This is exactly why it's the place for it, lol. Way more relevant than a public trade show. But really, there's no separation since they're both massive gatherings of industry.
Oh I can imagine, which is why I had a media black-out on April fools day...Be happy that you don't follow german media...
![]()
Nintendo Switch 2 ist offiziell: Samsung kauft Nintendo und stellt Switch Galaxy vor
Der koreanische Tech-Riese kauft den japanischen Videospielgiganten und bringt ein totgeglaubtes Handheld-Design zurück.www.gamestar.de
April Fools headline: "Samsung buys Nintendo and annouces Switch Galaxy".
Look I get I'm the exception but jumping from Pikmin 3 Deluxe to Forza Horizon 5 and back, or Astro's Playroom to Animal Crossing New Horizons, yeah there's a difference but it's perceptually tiny. I've seen less improvements in the move from Xbox 360/PS3 through Series X/PS5 than the jump from Wii to Wii U, which was the last jump that "wowed" me.
T239 seems well suited to blast through Gen8 games no problem, and manage with well optimised Gen9 games where devs are willing to put in the effort, but the returns so diminished means it'll probably have an even longer lifespan of third party support than the original, procided it's successful.
What multiplat in 2030 wouldn't be headed to Xbox Series X|S and PS5? And at that point, it's probably worth looking into CPU optimisation and DLSS implementation to squeeze out s port for NG Switch. There's a long road ahead of us.
Digital Foundry is still on the left side.Differences continue to get smaller every generation now.
What we see now (Left) vs. what we used to see (Right) :
![]()
Digital Foundry is still on the left side.
I honestly think that PS4 graphics are good enough. I don't expect another huge and visible jump after that.Honestly i'm struggling to see where those 3 games mentioned by @Steve are starting to show their age. If Nintendo games will look like that in 2025 and upwards, i am perfectly fine with that. If they release a new open world Zelda that looks like Ghost of Tsushima (in terms of graphical fidelity, not artstyle), i will be blown away by it very likely.
Maybe i am just used to the low fidelity of Nintendo games since the Wii, which makes it easier for me to get excited over this, but i dunno, later PS4 games hold up very well still. If there's a generation that starts to show its age it's the PS360 gen no doubt. Rasterization can still look great and with the current consoles even struggling with that i think rasterization is here to stay and won't be replaced with full-on RT effects in the coming years. (By that i mean no hybrid RT+raster solution, i mean RT enabled on anything it can be used on)
That's a plain remaster, though? Ronin is from a japanese developer not exactly known for the technical departments of their games, Ghost was always going to look ages better. I'd say we wait until May (emphasis on May) and beyond before making those statements, a lot has changed since last year with pipelines internally.I
I honestly think that PS4 graphics are good enough. I don't expect another huge and visible jump after that.
Last of US 2 remaster is not convinced visually enough that need to exist at this point and seeing comparations between Ronin and Ghost of Tsushima, I can see many best visual solutions in this last.