- Pronouns
- She/Her
"Good developer is making a remake of a good game and this is TERRIBLE"
Hmm. Did you hear if it was coming this fiscal year?Since I've been asked about it on Twitter, I'll answer here: No, I cannot back this rumor.
I'm aware of an F-Zero project, was told it was an F-Zero Remaster, & have expressed as much since last yr. I have nothing new to add to the conversation.
Since I've been asked about it on Twitter, I'll answer here: No, I cannot back this rumor.
I'm aware of an F-Zero project, was told it was an F-Zero Remaster, & have expressed as much since last yr. I have nothing new to add to the conversation.
I think it gets announced this year -- at minimum, as it seemed intent to announce was set for last yr until a late change of plan.Hmm. Did you hear if it was coming this fiscal year?
If they do it it’s because they asked. It’s not some impossibility. Them and Retro like to work on established nintendo IPs and it’s just a remaster.I do think an F Zero GX remaster is more or less gonna happen at this point. But I don't know if NLG would do it (why them???), and also, even if it does happen, I am pretty sure whatever Nintendo Prime heard was BS lol.
I'm not debunking anything. I don't have enough information to support nor deconfirm the claim made.How to debunk rumor speedrun by NateDrake any%
He never debunked anything though. All he said is he can’t back the rumor. He’s not saying it’s incorrectHow to debunk rumor speedrun by NateDrake any%
And another developer known for racing games (Monster Games) made Xenoblade Chronicles 3D.Saying a developer can't make a certain game is silly, considering right this moment a developer known for making racing games only (Playground Games) is making a fucking Fable game, lmao.
The example I prefer is Respawn and the Star Wars Jedi games, which I think some people here would say shouldn't exist and Respawn should stick to FPS games. Because it seems like Playground's lack of experience with RPG games is actually causing some problems for Fable given that it is MIA since 2020...Saying a developer can't make a certain game is silly, considering right this moment a developer known for making racing games only (Playground Games) is making a fucking Fable game, lmao.
Seriously. Some of these dudes be clueless when you see this all around. Look at Guerilla Games or Retro. Examples are all over the place lmaoSaying a developer can't make a certain game is silly, considering right this moment a developer known for making racing games only (Playground Games) is making a fucking Fable game, lmao.
Lol. "Fire Emblem is third party, right?"Isn't this guy basically another "Zippo"?
Good ole Eternal Darkness. One day my friend one day.Look, im sure that if NLG really REALLY bothered nintendo enough for this they would be allowed to but for i dont believe it.
I would have said the same thing if someone told me Retro was making DK in 2009 so its all a matter of "no background"
I would be thrilled if NLG was moving from being a Mario factory, although id prefer if instead of a remaster it was a new game and instead of FZERO it was an Eternal Darkness spiritual sequel.
If it is... somehow... real then im happy for GX fans and i hope it is a success (enough for a new game)
Saying a developer can't make a certain game is silly, considering right this moment a developer known for making racing games only (Playground Games) is making a fucking Fable game, lmao.
A remaster of the GX code wouldn't use NLG's engine.A GX remaster wouldn't seem to require much racing game knowledge unless this was more of a remake and they were massively changing how the multiplayer worked to make it more appealing.
Not sure how well Next Level Games' engine streams assets quickly though.
They probably could do a graphical remake, but it would be kind of weird and pointless compared to hiring an actual port studio.
Yeah. Zippo if he was a right wing gamergate asshole.Isn't this guy basically another "Zippo"?
A remaster of the GX code wouldn't use NLG's engine.
Well this is news to meYeah. Zippo if he was a right wing gamergate asshole.
The rumor was specifically saying it's a remaster, i.e., using the original code.?
1. I don't even know if Nintendo legally has GX's code, but
2. Obviously the graphical engine would be completely different in a remake
If this is just an HD up-port, then there's like...... Almost no work to be done in general and it doesn't really matter who the studio is.
If Nintendo doesn't own F-Zero GX's code or if the code is gone or this is a full graphical remake, then they would likely have to use Next Level's graphical engine or a new graphical engine made by Next Level if Next Level made the game.
If they do it it’s because they asked. It’s not some impossibility. Them and Retro like to work on established nintendo IPs and it’s just a remaster.
Hell who knows their grand plan could be is they want to take over the F-Zero franchise to make new games for the future, but they need experience. Nintendo will gauge sales of this remaster of course.
Let me catch you up on some lore, inadvertently caused by yours truly:Well this is news to me
The rumor was specifically saying it's a remaster, i.e., using the original code.
Saying a developer can't make a certain game is silly, considering right this moment a developer known for making racing games only (Playground Games) is making a fucking Fable game, lmao.
?
1. I don't even know if Nintendo legally has GX's code, but
2. Obviously the graphical engine would be completely different in a remake
If this is just an HD up-port, then there's like...... Almost no work to be done in general and it doesn't really matter who the studio is.
If Nintendo doesn't own F-Zero GX's code or if the code is gone or this is a full graphical remake, then they would likely have to use Next Level's graphical engine or a new graphical engine made by Next Level if Next Level made the game.
And you seem to be projecting your desire for a Luigi's Mansion 4 into this fanatical anger for NLG to do nothing else besides Luigi's Mansion games.You appear to be confused as to whether someone can do something means they should.
And you seem to be projecting your desire for a Luigi's Mansion 4 into this fanatical anger for NLG to do nothing else besides Luigi's Mansion games.
What Activision calls a remaster in marketing and what Nintendo calls a remaster in both practice and marketing are two different things.Crash N'Sane Trilogy is called a remaster and contains literally zero of the original code (the source code was lost)
Yes, except racist, demonstrated here on Famiboards. But apparently we keep giving him an audience.Isn't this guy basically another "Zippo"?
I mean he did serve his time with his ban sentence lol. I don't really care one way or the other but I thought it was hilarious when I made that post about Republican voters and I keep getting quotes from people saying "actually my family are the Good Republicans."Can we, I don't know, stop giving attention to this ghoul ?
Nintendo Direct: The Super Mario Bros. Movie | 10/6 1:05 p.m. PT
don't forget Jack black is part of that autism speaks oh for fuck’s sakefamiboards.com
If Nintendo is not using the original code (which belongs to Sega), then this remaster becomes more or less a full blown remake, completely going against the point of a remaster. Might as well make a new game then.?
1. I don't even know if Nintendo legally has GX's code, but
2. Obviously the graphical engine would be completely different in a remake
If this is just an HD up-port, then there's like...... Almost no work to be done in general and it doesn't really matter who the studio is.
If Nintendo doesn't own F-Zero GX's code or if the code is gone or this is a full graphical remake, then they would likely have to use Next Level's graphical engine or a new graphical engine made by Next Level if Next Level made the game.
A remaster of the GX code wouldn't use NLG's engine.
It's not like putting a new coat of paint on GX would take equivalent time and effort to one of those multi-million sellers.Not sure why Nintendo would give an F-Zero remaster to an internal studio that has several multi million sellers under their belt. But I guess weird resource allocation is part of NLG’s game.
Super Mario All-Stars is a port of the NES Super Mario Bros. games with higher quality assets. Being a port of a GameCube game doesn't stop them from replacing models/textures/whatever with versions that aren't twenty years old. EDIT: Even emulated games replace those things, sometimes.1. I don't even know if Nintendo legally has GX's code, but
2. Obviously the graphical engine would be completely different in a remake
If this is just an HD up-port, then there's like...... Almost no work to be done in general and it doesn't really matter who the studio is.
What Activision calls a remaster in marketing and what Nintendo calls a remaster in both practice and marketing are two different things.