• Hey everyone, staff have documented a list of banned content and subject matter that we feel are not consistent with site values, and don't make sense to host discussion of on Famiboards. This list (and the relevant reasoning per item) is viewable here.

StarTopic Future Nintendo Hardware & Technology Speculation & Discussion |ST| (New Staff Post, Please read)

Who knows what other cost-saving measures they chose to go for. I don't know enough to single out the next other component that could have been downgraded comapred to the original vision (cooling? battery size? wireless communication module?) but someone in the know could check the price evolution of key elements and make an educated guess off that.
Inflation definitely could have factored intor the decision to ditch oled.
 
I'm still in the position that if March 2024 isn't launch, the only other viable option is a event like the Switch January 2017 one.

Thirds, especially "smaller" ones and indies that were seemingly the main focus of the Gamescom presentation, would neither need to know when Nintendo will announce it via PR ("To whome it may concern" style) or an "announcement" video like the Switch ones in ... October or November 2016.

Why would they even need to know about these two options?

The PR will feature no word on games. And the video would mainly show off one or a couple of Nintendo games, and maybe one big third party game like Skyrim.
Plus, the funny thing is, even for the video, thirds wouldn't need to have software ready. A short gameplay video, captured on PC or literally any other platform would be enough, video editors don't need more to edit in.

Also, you can bet that big thirds are already in the know for longer and wouldn't need to attend a Gamescom presentation for this.

So yeah ... it's either launch, or a Switch January 2017 like event.

PR and "announcement video" will imo come before March 2024. But that doesn't necessarily mean one of them happen in 2023.

I'm Team Symmetry. I demand an October launch of a Mario game (2016 Color Splash/2023 Wonder), then the October Nintendo hardware reveal, coincidentally on the same day as a Rockstar sequel announcement (2016 RDR2/2023 GTA VI), then a live presentation from Tokyo in January (2017 Switch Presentation/2024 Nintendo Live), hardware launch in March with Zelda (2017 BotW launch/2024 BotW and TotK enhancement patches) among other things, Mario Kart in April (2017 MK8DX launch/2024 MK8DX enhancement patch), Metroid Prime 4 announcement in June (2017 teaser/2024 re-reveal), Splatoon in July (2017 S2 launch/2024 S3 enhancement patch), and 3D Mario in October (2017 Odyssey/2024 new 3D Mario).

george-lucas-its-like-poetry.gif


I'd commit atrocities for a Fire Emblem Awakening remaster

You will get that one, definitely.

Now the question WHEN you're going to get it ... hahahah that will be a couple of years of waiting. ^^
 
I'm Team Symmetry. I demand an October launch of a Mario game (2016 Color Splash/2023 Wonder), then the October Nintendo hardware reveal, coincidentally on the same day as a Rockstar sequel announcement (2016 RDR2/2023 GTA VI), then a live presentation from Tokyo in January (2017 Switch Presentation/2024 Nintendo Live), hardware launch in March with Zelda (2017 BotW launch/2024 BotW and TotK enhancement patches) among other things, Mario Kart in April (2017 MK8DX launch/2024 MK8DX enhancement patch), Metroid Prime 4 announcement in June (2017 teaser/2024 re-reveal), Splatoon in July (2017 S2 launch/2024 S3 enhancement patch), and 3D Mario in October (2017 Odyssey/2024 new 3D Mario).
Erik Killmonger Its Beautiful GIF - Erik Killmonger Its Beautiful Black  Panther - Discover & Share GIFs
 
this is purely speculation and completely impractical to say. tour was not designed as a regular mario kart experience like the others were, to the point nintendo literally can't name the next game mario kart 10 without raising confusion
edit: in case it's not obvious the point is that internally speaking tour may have been the ninth mario kart game like how smash for wii u is the fifth smash game, but that has no bearing on how consumers are going to see it
Consumers aren’t going to question the name lol. They’re going to see it and go, “oh new Mario kart!” And then buy 50 million copies like it’s nothing. I don’t know why you seem to think this matters lol
 
If Mario Kart X comes out (Switch 2 release title baby!) there will be no consumers going "WTF NINTENDO? WHERE IS 9?" Consumers will be like "Oooh new MK game, cool!"

So.. it really doesn't matter if they "skip" 9. Consumers don't care. Only hardcore, such as yourself, are going to care lol.
I said the same thing, sorry catching up again 😂
 
0
I'm Team Symmetry. I demand an October launch of a Mario game (2016 Color Splash/2023 Wonder), then the October Nintendo hardware reveal, coincidentally on the same day as a Rockstar sequel announcement (2016 RDR2/2023 GTA VI), then a live presentation from Tokyo in January (2017 Switch Presentation/2024 Nintendo Live), hardware launch in March with Zelda (2017 BotW launch/2024 BotW and TotK enhancement patches) among other things, Mario Kart in April (2017 MK8DX launch/2024 MK8DX enhancement patch), Metroid Prime 4 announcement in June (2017 teaser/2024 re-reveal), Splatoon in July (2017 S2 launch/2024 S3 enhancement patch), and 3D Mario in October (2017 Odyssey/2024 new 3D Mario).
Do not manifest a Switch 2 year one without Mario Kart 9 :cry:
 
0
Ah I see now. You’re docking it, which while possible was never it’s primary purpose.

It’s like plugging in a smartphone to a TV in a way. Yeah, it can be done, and it’ll work well enough, but it might not be as seamless as a device like the Switch, which was designed from the ground up to do both.
I love my steamdeck, but it is absolutely jank in terms of its OS and how it handles certain things. I don’t dock mine, but SteamOS is so slow in my experience. It was also advertised, I believe in its announcement, as being a dockable PC. Maybe they didn’t design it that way, but it was definitely marketed as such. So one shouldn’t be criticized for being annoyed that a marketed feature doesn’t work well.
 
I'm still in the position that if March 2024 isn't launch, the only other viable option is a event like the Switch January 2017 one.

Thirds, especially "smaller" ones and indies that were seemingly the main focus of the Gamescom presentation, would neither need to know when Nintendo will announce it via PR ("To whome it may concern" style) or an "announcement" video like the Switch ones in ... October or November 2016.

Why would they even need to know about these two options?

The PR will feature no word on games. And the video would mainly show off one or a couple of Nintendo games, and maybe one big third party game like Skyrim.
Plus, the funny thing is, even for the video, thirds wouldn't need to have software ready. A short gameplay video, captured on PC or literally any other platform would be enough, video editors don't need more to edit in.

Also, you can bet that big thirds are already in the know for longer and wouldn't need to attend a Gamescom presentation for this.

So yeah ... it's either launch, or a Switch January 2017 like event.

PR and "announcement video" will imo come before March 2024. But that doesn't necessarily mean one of them happen in 2023.



george-lucas-its-like-poetry.gif




You will get that one, definitely.

Now the question WHEN you're going to get it ... hahahah that will be a couple of years of waiting. ^^
The other option which makes sense is that March contains the date by which games need to be submitted for certification if they plan to make the console launch (launch being in May for example).
 
Exactly. Thank you for the examples you provided.

Nintendo will make money off the successor's hardware, no question. Specifically, I presume Nintendo will want to keep the operating margin for the successor at the same level as the one they make off the current models.

But that might be a tough challenge because of inflation. Nintendo very likely know how much money they can ask for their next hardware, which puts a limit on what they will fit inside. Nintendo's own financial teams might have already rang an alarm when they saw the bill of materials, and they might have been the ones that proposed to axe the OLED screen in the unit in favour of an LCD one.

Who knows what other cost-saving measures they chose to go for. I don't know enough to single out the next other component that could have been downgraded comapred to the original vision (cooling? battery size? wireless communication module?) but someone in the know could check the price evolution of key elements and make an educated guess off that.

I doubt Nintendo will keep the current margin of Switch hardware with the new generation. I’m on mobile at the moment so can’t easily search for it, but I did an (admittedly rudimentary) analysis of the topic a while back which indicated they’re currently making a profit of around 30% on Switch hardware, which is similar to Apple’s hardware margins. Trying to launch a new games console at those margins would mean a huge price increase over the previous gen, which historically hasn’t gone down well.

What I do expect is that they’ll take the same approach to margins that they took with Switch, which is to launch at very slim margins, keep a constant price over the life of the hardware, and rely on reducing component costs to increase margins over time. It’s a low-risk strategy that’s been very successful for them, so I see little reason to change, either by taking a loss on hardware or trying to make a non-trivial margin at launch.
 
The other option which makes sense is that March contains the date by which games need to be submitted for certification if they plan to make the console launch (launch being in May for example).

Yeah, you're right, that's a good option, too.

And i also agree that this would also speak for a H1 release.
 
The other option which makes sense is that March contains the date by which games need to be submitted for certification if they plan to make the console launch (launch being in May for example).

One possibility is that March is when developers can start announcing games and talking about the new console. This doesn’t necessarily mean an initial announcement in March, as developers weren’t able to announce games until the January presentation for Switch (even Bethesda weren’t able to officially confirm Skyrim for the console despite it being a key part of the reveal). An initial announcement in January, bigger presentation in March, then release in April/May would line up with this.
 
There hasn't been a game console released in Q2 in over 20 years.

It's possible, but I am doubtful as no company intentionally aims for Q2 and Nintendo clearly did not intend for the Switch 2 to release this Q4 going by their lineup this holiday (which is both great and terrible for a console launch)
 
0
To be clear, I could see Nintendo telling their investors that they’ll release the Switch’s successor in the upcoming fiscal year this November. But the actual reveal of the Switch 2 (I.E. similar to the Switch 1 reveal video we got in October 2016) likely won’t be until March 2024. As such, the Switch 2 mention to investors in this scenario wouldn’t be substantial enough to upend Switch 1 holiday sales.
i dont ever believe Nintendo would hint/talk about it next console on the next fiscal report in novembre, they will hint/talk about it next hardware next year on the first fiscal report of 2024 or wait untill all games revealed on the 2023 septembre Direct is out.
 
It's probably asked many times here, but which launch titles would like to have on the new system?

I would love to see and begin with a whole new Mario Kart, MK8D is a 2017 port from a 2014 game. Sure, it got de BCP with returning tracks and characters, but I really want something fresh to begin with on the new system and series. I hope Ninty sees the series as a potential launch title, due to the sales of MK8D.

A 2nd game I'd love to see is Red Dead Redemption II, with RDR1 being on Switch, a port of the second game as a Launch title that is also a great open world game, would be very nice. Although I have played it on PC, I would buy it again, just to play as Arthur Morgan on the go. I really can imagine a vacation trip to the rocky's while playing this around a campfire.

When I think of Launch games, I think of Wii Sports and 1-2-Switch, to show the gimmicks, and that's great and all, but I barely see the gimmicks in the future being a thing. That's why I would love to have a Mario Party as a Launch title, instead of Wii Sports or 1-2-Switch. Mario Party is mostly enjoyed in a group, as is Wii Sports, but having the Mario brand in there would attract more people I assume. A title you can enjoi with others, while you can play Mario Kart in your alone time. (or even with a group aswell)

I really think it's time to bring a modern Street Fighter onto Nintendo platforms, and I would like to see Street Fighter 6 being on there. The game is already out on other consoles, in which I think porting it over to the NG would cause no problems. I don't like to see Street Fighter II again, tho.

As my last pick, I would like to see Phasmophobia being a launch title. It made me very curious why it was skipped in the consoles trailer, and wondered if it would be better to go on the NG instead. Phasmo is the only horror game I really like, and having it on the go would be very cool. Another title I would be playing with on vacation in a hotel or so.
next 3D Mario(launch title), Metroid Prime 4(cross-gen and launch window game), a game that showcase Switch sucessor main concepth/gimmick, a new IP or sequel to a dormant/dead Nintendo franchise, some third party ports(Elden Ring, something for Capcom/Square Enix), a major multiplayer game/franchise.
 
0
It won't be THAT significant. Everybody knows a successor is coming.
we all know Switch sucessor is coming, we dont know if the console launch in the first or second half of 2024, and what games is gonna be it launch titles beside a brand new 3D Mario
 
I don't think anyone has ever said Nintendo would take a loss on hardware, but selling at cost is entirely within reality if need be.
 
Well while discord is down, anyone looking forward to FSR3?

Honestly if Swtch 2 can access Tensor Mixed Precision, it may be able to run it (Depending on how well Steam Deck can do it, which I will test when it comes to a game that I own/if Forspoken's Demo gets it)
 
(Apologies if the following Nikkei article had been shared. Nowadays I can’t check this thread as often as I could.)

It was brought up more than a few times that Nintendo may price the Switch NG at or below cost, and make money from software sales. IMHO, however, Nintendo is rather unlikely to release a loss leader after the 3DS and Wii U debacles, and certainly not when the very pricing strategy has put a sizable dent on Sony’s earnings.

According to Nikkei Asia’s article today, Sony Group exec is taking over SIE in a bid to improve its financial performance (reading between the lines, I wonder if Jim Ryan’s retirement is completely voluntary):


The situation is similarly appalling at Microsoft. From their infamous FTC leak, MS projected to lose $1.5B on XBox hardware in FY21 alone:


Some also brought up the pricing of Quest headsets, and wondered if the Switch NG would compete as a VR device. Let’s not ignore the fact that Meta lost $21.3B since 2022 on Reality Labs/Quest. The company even warned that the losses will continue “to increase meaningfully year-over-year”.

It today’s fiercely competitive gaming market, loss leader pricing is a losing strategy. I’d venture to say that Furukawa and the Nintendo management are smart enough not to go down that path.

Poor Sony. Only $1.8 Billion in profit.

295894.jpg
 
Well while discord is down, anyone looking forward to FSR3?

Honestly if Swtch 2 can access Tensor Mixed Precision, it may be able to run it (Depending on how well Steam Deck can do it, which I will test when it comes to a game that I own/if Forspoken's Demo gets it)

It's only useful if a game has a lot of GPU cycles left over and is CPU limited at ~60 FPS.

This is common in some open-world or simulation heavy PC games (or if you don't have a good CPU), but most console devs will just use up the remaining GPU cycles on higher resolutions or better effects instead of trying to go from 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Especially as games that are so CPU demanding often benefit least from framerates higher than 60.

Frame generation will be super useful when it can do 30 FPS to 60 FPS. 60 FPS to 120 is not super helpful currently.

(Or if frame generation becomes super cheap in the future due to game systems just becoming way more powerful)
 
It's only useful if a game has a lot of GPU cycles left over and is CPU limited at ~60 FPS.

This is common in some open-world or simulation heavy PC games (or if you don't have a good CPU), but most console devs will just use up the remaining GPU cycles on higher resolutions or better effects instead of trying to go from 60 FPS to 120 FPS. Especially as games that are so CPU demanding often benefit least from framerates higher than 60.

Frame generation will be super useful when it can do 30 FPS to 60 FPS. 60 FPS to 120 is not super helpful currently.

(Or if frame generation becomes super cheap in the future due to game systems just becoming way more powerful)
Well Fluid Motion (The precursor to AMD Fluid Motion Frames) does produce pretty impressive results <30fps



Soap Opera tolerance aside, it is impressive how clear the image is between frames, considering this is 24-30 fps (Not sure what the source FPS is)
 
0
Ah I see now. You’re docking it, which while possible was never it’s primary purpose.

It’s like plugging in a smartphone to a TV in a way. Yeah, it can be done, and it’ll work well enough, but it might not be as seamless as a device like the Switch, which was designed from the ground up to do both.
I've had issues with SteamOS itself in handheld, like logging me out randomly and verified games freezing on me. External display usage is advertised as one of its extra features on its store page, with an upcoming update specifically highlighting HDR/VRR use in docked mode, it's not something I'm trying to 'force' on the device. I don't really mind the lack of seamlessness and changing graphics settings, but if they support docking, then they should probably fix the home button not working since the last update.

I'm aware of what the Steam Deck is. I've PC gamed and used Proton on Linux for years before it came out. I expect a level of jank. I love this thing and it's still the most convenient and comfortable gaming PC I've used. It's one of my favorite devices ever. But the reason it came up in this conversation is as a comparison point to Switch i.e. 'why would people buy a Switch/Switch 2 instead of a Steam Deck for portable third-party games'? The same reason one would buy a PS5 instead of a gaming PC that stomps it. Optimized native ports and less tinkering.
 
IF Switch 2 is scheduled for H2 2024 I wonder what first-party titles they have in the pipeline for Switch.
They may have put several remakes/remasters on hold to get through to September, Fire Emblem and Metroid come to mind at the moment, surely there are others... will they be enough? maybe yes
 
0
Your reflexes would definitely notice. Latency can be as much as half a second or more. You can literally nudge the stick, put down the controller and hold your hands up in the time it takes the stick input to be acknowledged on screen.
That's unfortunate. The OLED issue doesn't really impact me, but I was hoping there was something that would mitigate it for the people it does affect.
 
At 128GB max, this isn't gonna be useful for Drake. Those third party games will chew through that amount. If you have CoD, it'll probably be the only game on there until the first update. Then you'll be forced to use an SD card
Honestly I'm secretly hoping for CFe Type A that slots in parallel to and behind the Game Card, like how 2DSXL had a microSD card reader beside its Game Card slot.

Though I do hope that, like how Xbox allows external HDD for game storage, last gen games and captures, the NG Swotch will still have a microSD card reader so I can carry over my captures and install backwards compatible games to it without taking up precious high speed storage.
 
0
Consumers aren’t going to question the name lol. They’re going to see it and go, “oh new Mario kart!” And then buy 50 million copies like it’s nothing. I don’t know why you seem to think this matters lol
I don't know how much the rest of you know about Mario Kart culture (I'm an expert), but...
 
I doubt Nintendo will keep the current margin of Switch hardware with the new generation. I’m on mobile at the moment so can’t easily search for it, but I did an (admittedly rudimentary) analysis of the topic a while back which indicated they’re currently making a profit of around 30% on Switch hardware, which is similar to Apple’s hardware margins. Trying to launch a new games console at those margins would mean a huge price increase over the previous gen, which historically hasn’t gone down well.

What I do expect is that they’ll take the same approach to margins that they took with Switch, which is to launch at very slim margins, keep a constant price over the life of the hardware, and rely on reducing component costs to increase margins over time. It’s a low-risk strategy that’s been very successful for them, so I see little reason to change, either by taking a loss on hardware or trying to make a non-trivial margin at launch.
Luckily for Nintendo they made a boatload of money during this switch generation, way more than they likely expected. It's worth taking a slight loss at launch or just breaking even if it means the prices aren't too high potentially squandering the goodwill they have. You don't want to do what Sony did going from PS2 to PS3 and get too cocky and price people out, then have to spend the rest of the generation trying to claw your way back up. Sony was able to come back from the initial PS3 blunders but they essential gave Microsoft, and Nintendo a layup that generation to gain market share, and then Microsoft and Nintendo gave it right back to them lol (Wii U, Xbox One).
 
I wouldn’t get too hung up about the March 2024 date to be honest. It’s come from Nate, a good source, but a lone one, and wasn’t at all mentioned by VGC or Eurogamer/Digital Foundry.

I find it a bit odd to be honest that this date was apparently said so often but with zero indication as to what it related to. I’ve mentioned it previously but were people walking around like Psyduck going ‘March, March, March?’. I don’t know. I wasn’t there.

Personally I remain confident in a reveal/announcement in early-ish 2024.
 
I wouldn’t get too hung up about the March 2024 date to be honest. It’s come from Nate, a good source, but a lone one, and wasn’t at all mentioned by VGC or Eurogamer/Digital Foundry.

I find it a bit odd to be honest that this date was apparently said so often but with zero indication as to what it related to. I’ve mentioned it previously but were people walking around like Psyduck going ‘March, March, March?’. I don’t know. I wasn’t there.

Personally I remain confident in a reveal/announcement in early-ish 2024.
My guess was it was a "we will see more about this system in march" kind of deal most likely pointing to a reveal. I don't think they would have said "this system is coming out in march" and if they did nate would've said that. So im guessing a more is coming in march weather that be a reveal or the devs see more of it from nintendo from another trade show or something
 
I love my steamdeck, but it is absolutely jank in terms of its OS and how it handles certain things. I don’t dock mine, but SteamOS is so slow in my experience. It was also advertised, I believe in its announcement, as being a dockable PC. Maybe they didn’t design it that way, but it was definitely marketed as such. So one shouldn’t be criticized for being annoyed that a marketed feature doesn’t work well.

I've had issues with SteamOS itself in handheld, like logging me out randomly and verified games freezing on me. External display usage is advertised as one of its extra features on its store page, with an upcoming update specifically highlighting HDR/VRR use in docked mode, it's not something I'm trying to 'force' on the device. I don't really mind the lack of seamlessness and changing graphics settings, but if they support docking, then they should probably fix the home button not working since the last update.

I'm aware of what the Steam Deck is. I've PC gamed and used Proton on Linux for years before it came out. I expect a level of jank. I love this thing and it's still the most convenient and comfortable gaming PC I've used. It's one of my favorite devices ever. But the reason it came up in this conversation is as a comparison point to Switch i.e. 'why would people buy a Switch/Switch 2 instead of a Steam Deck for portable third-party games'? The same reason one would buy a PS5 instead of a gaming PC that stomps it. Optimized native ports and less tinkering.

Fair points!

I must be a lucky one because I’ve never had issues with it logging me off, and I haven’t really seen the UI, or the OS itself to be that jank, but everyone’s experience is different in that regard. Unless the game could not load because of compatibility reasons, I’ve had zero issues booting up titles.

For me, you turn on the system, it automatically opens up Steam so you can right to playing your games.

It is not entirely like a proper console experience that we’ve seen for what the Switch can do, but it by far has been a much easier experience to boot up games compared to my Gaming PC.

I’ve been saying for years now that Consoles are becoming more PC-like, and Gaming PCs are becoming more console-like.

For me, the Steam Deck is the closest we’ve come to that imo.
 
0
Sony is really aggressively hiring at all of their GAAS studios for machine learning engineers to try to be able to produce the ridiculous amount of content these games need.


Will be very curious if this works. This is the third or fourth Sony GAAS studio to hire for machine learning engineers for content creation.
 
Quoted by: TLZ
1
Poor Sony. Only $1.8 Billion in profit.

295894.jpg
I mean i don't think they are that happy to every year make about half of Nintendo in profits while they every year have more revenue coming into Playstation compared to Nintendo. That means that every year Nintendo Switch is much more effective vs Playstation in generating profit. But unless they scale down AAA games and make more smaller budget titles such as Nintendo do there is no quick fix to the profit dilemma for them.
 
My guess was it was a "we will see more about this system in march" kind of deal most likely pointing to a reveal. I don't think they would have said "this system is coming out in march" and if they did nate would've said that. So im guessing a more is coming in march weather that be a reveal or the devs see more of it from nintendo from another trade show or something

If this machine was out in March it would be all over the place right now. All major outlets would have sources reporting on it since they wouldn’t be able to keep it quiet.
 
Don't worry, since i'm about to have a 4 day weekend and will not regularly be here until next wednesday, and given that most things happen when i'm not here, you're bound to get something next monday or tuesday.

You're welcome. ;D
 

I guess this is one of the reason why VR gaming will never really take off, hopefully Nintendo don't invest too much in that.
Yeah. If Nintendo wouldn’t release the Wii Vitality Sensor with a 90% working rate, it won’t release a major VR component with those percentages. Back to the Lab(o).
 
If this machine was out in March it would be all over the place right now. All major outlets would have sources reporting on it since they wouldn’t be able to keep it quiet.
I'm not so sure about that. I'd give it about 6 weeks before making that assertion even if I think a March release is unlikely.
 

I guess this is one of the reason why VR gaming will never really take off, hopefully Nintendo don't invest too much in that.

The 30-60% (that in itself is such a massive discrepancy that it calls the surveying into question) of people who don't have any issue with VR is still a huge market to tap into, and the projected growth rate for VR over the next decade is nothing to write off either - especially with tens of millions of headsets selling in just the last few years alone, it would be a mistake for them not to at least invest a decent amount in the research because the interest is very clearly there
 

I guess this is one of the reason why VR gaming will never really take off, hopefully Nintendo don't invest too much in that.
until Nintendo or any developers find a way to make VR viable, in a way that when you use VR you dont feel ill/sick, VR will not be the future of gaming
 
The 30-60% (that in itself is such a massive discrepancy that it calls the surveying into question) of people who don't have any issue with VR is still a huge market to tap into, and the projected growth rate for VR over the next decade is nothing to write off either - especially with tens of millions of headsets selling in just the last few years alone, it would be a mistake for them not to at least invest a decent amount in the research because the interest is very clearly there
VR is the hardcore gamer market that Nintendo don't focus that much on, not the casual audience that Nintendo usually prices their consoles towards. Hardcore gamers focus on graphics, VR etc, while Nintendo usually wants to sell consoles that are good value but not cutting edge in any way.
 
The 30-60% (that in itself is such a massive discrepancy that it calls the surveying into question) of people who don't have any issue with VR is still a huge market to tap into, and the projected growth rate for VR over the next decade is nothing to write off either - especially with tens of millions of headsets selling in just the last few years alone, it would be a mistake for them not to at least invest a decent amount in the research because the interest is very clearly there
I mean, I'm in the 40+% of people it does make sick, and I STILL want VR!

The more you use it the less sick it makes you, too.
 
Last edited:
Wow this thread really died down. How's everyone's Friday so far? To make it hardware related, what is one feature on the next Nintendo system you DON'T want Nintendo to incorporate and why?

Busy Friday, I'll be working late tonight. :(

Not much I don't want, as long as it's optional. I heavily dislike motion controls, e.g., due to my dyspraxia, and never use them, but it's perfectly fine if they're not forced. Great for those who like them etc. I guess if I had to pick something else from the line-up of old Nintendo features that I don't want to return, the (3)DS sensor that created the "having to blow into a microphone" gameplay feature in some games can be kept way back in the archives as far as I'm concerned. :D
 
Please read this new, consolidated staff post before posting.

Furthermore, according to this follow-up post, all off-topic chat will be moderated.
Last edited by a moderator:


Back
Top Bottom