• Hey everyone, staff have documented a list of banned content and subject matter that we feel are not consistent with site values, and don't make sense to host discussion of on Famiboards. This list (and the relevant reasoning per item) is viewable here.
  • Do you have audio editing experience and want to help out with the Famiboards Discussion Club Podcast? If so, we're looking for help and would love to have you on the team! Just let us know in the Podcast Thread if you are interested!

Reviews Xenoblade Chronicles 3 | Review Thread (see staff post)

More surprised Torna is only 80, that’s potentially the least divisive one of the lot.
Same. Possibly because it's an expansion sold as a stand-alone, and so tightly integrated into the lore of XC2? Most folks I talk to seem to think it's the best execution of the concepts introduced in that game.
 
0
More surprised Torna is only 80, that’s potentially the least divisive one of the lot.

I guess it's the sidequest thing, people seem to REALLY hate being forced to do stuff like that

the completionist in me will never agree with that since I pretty much do them all anyways but it is what it is
 
Quite interesting for someone to throw out the word 'dumb', in a Metacritic thread, in defence of a series where the first entry scored 92 and the second scored 83 — a 9 point drop.

Metacritic can often be meaningless. XC Definitve Edition I would consider superior to the Wii version in every way and it scored in the 80's.

XC2 is like only 6 points beneath. So using your Metacritic score logic, I think you mean you hope the series stays "on track."

That is if we think these sites that average review scores have any bearing on how games like this land with their core audience in the first place.
 
Reading reviews is fun, but let’s not take them too seriously. How this game lands with its core audience is more important than what 100ish people think.

it always strikes me as a bit silly when people get super serious about whether an aggregate score will end up in the low 80s versus the mid 80s or high 80s

I am looking forward to reading some impressions of the game though
 
Tbf about torna, having to do boring sidequests to progress the story is a horrible design decision that I can see annoying quite a few people.
Yeah, especially if you're a reviewer under a timeline who's probably avoiding most side quests up till that point and is further punished for ignoring them.
 
Metacritic can often be meaningless. XC Definitve Edition I would consider superior to the Wii version in every way and it scored in the 80's.

XC2 is like only 6 points beneath. So using your Metacritic score logic, I think you mean you hope the series stays "on track."

That is if we think these sites that average review scores have any bearing on how games like this land with their core audience in the first place.

Yes, metacritic scores are meaningless for remakes, which are usually penalised temporally because story moments do not hit as hard or because state-of-the-art features have since become the status quo. Take also into account games such as Tropical Freeze, rightly given average scores by big publications (Edge, 7; Eurogamer, 7) on launch, but, in Eurogamer's case, were pressured by the fans to 'correct' their original opinion, lest face the wrath of the community (not that it saved TF in the end, mind).

To pretend that the 9 point drop from 92 to 83 isn't a fall from grace is ludicrous — that is two points greater difference between the 7 points dropped between Halo 3 and 4, and we've all seen the state the Halo series is in now.

If BotW 2 scored in the mid/low 80s, Anouma would be chased down the street.
 
Quite interesting for someone to throw out the word 'dumb', in a Metacritic thread, in defence of a series where the first entry scored 92 and the second scored 83 — a 9 point drop.

How will Xenoblade survive now that the third entry has a smaller meaningless number, it will surely stop having fans :cry:

If he was still alive trains would arrive on time Xenoblade would be a 92 MC only franchise…
 
0
Yes, metacritic scores are meaningless for remakes, which are usually penalised temporally because story moments do not hit as hard or because state-of-the-art features have since become the status quo. Take also into account games such as Tropical Freeze, rightly given average scores by big publications (Edge, 7; Eurogamer, 7) on launch, but, in Eurogamer's case, were pressured by the fans to 'correct' their original opinion, lest face the wrath of the community.

To pretend that the 9 point drop from 92 to 83 isn't a fall from grace is ludicrous — that is two points greater difference between the 7 points dropped between Halo 3 and 4, and we've all seen the state the Halo series is in now.

If BotW 2 scored in the mid/low 80s, Anouma would be chased down the street.
This is why # review scores need to be abolished and replaced with no tl;dr summary or a general "recommend or don't recommend".
 
There's no way this will score below 2, it just wouldn't make sense. Reviews are obviously not going to prevent fans of the series from enjoying the game obviously but scoring worse than 2 would bring the trolls out in full force.
 
Yes, metacritic scores are meaningless for remakes, which are usually penalised temporally because story moments do not hit as hard or because state-of-the-art features have since become the status quo. Take also into account games such as Tropical Freeze, rightly given average scores by big publications (Edge, 7; Eurogamer, 7) on launch, but, in Eurogamer's case, were pressured by the fans to 'correct' their original opinion, lest face the wrath of the community (not that it saved TF in the end, mind).

To pretend that the 9 point drop from 92 to 83 isn't a fall from grace is ludicrous — that is two points greater difference between the 7 points dropped between Halo 3 and 4, and we've all seen the state the Halo series is in now.

If BotW 2 scored in the mid/low 80s, Anouma would be chased down the street.
I think you could argue that XC2 significantly outselling every other Xeno-title is probably the only validation it needs.

There's no way this will score below 2, it just wouldn't make sense. Reviews are obviously not going to prevent fans of the series from enjoying the game obviously but scoring worse than 2 would bring the trolls out in full force.
I agree that a 1 or 0 Metascore would be very disappointing.
 
0
Yes, metacritic scores are meaningless for remakes, which are usually penalised temporally because story moments do not hit as hard or because state-of-the-art features have since become the status quo. Take also into account games such as Tropical Freeze, rightly given average scores by big publications (Edge, 7; Eurogamer, 7) on launch, but, in Eurogamer's case, were pressured by the fans to 'correct' their original opinion, lest face the wrath of the community (not that it saved TF in the end, mind).
Wish I had had a drink so I could have choked on it (before reading this post, that is).
 
Take also into account games such as Tropical Freeze, rightly given average scores by big publications (Edge, 7; Eurogamer, 7) on launch

rovakook.gif
 
Take also into account games such as Tropical Freeze, rightly given average scores by big publications (Edge, 7; Eurogamer, 7) on launch, but, in Eurogamer's case, were pressured by the fans to 'correct' their original opinion, lest face the wrath of the community (not that it saved TF in the end, mind).
…Tropical Freeze is widely regarded as one of the best platformers ever made.
 
I don't know, this is why I love them. You get posts like the one you quoted lmao
I didn't even process the post I quoted fully when it said "tropical freeze deserved average 7/10 review scores" or I would have posted the same gif mighty poo did.
 
Yes, metacritic scores are meaningless for remakes, which are usually penalised temporally because story moments do not hit as hard or because state-of-the-art features have since become the status quo. Take also into account games such as Tropical Freeze, rightly given average scores by big publications (Edge, 7; Eurogamer, 7) on launch, but, in Eurogamer's case, were pressured by the fans to 'correct' their original opinion, lest face the wrath of the community (not that it saved TF in the end, mind).

To pretend that the 9 point drop from 92 to 83 isn't a fall from grace is ludicrous — that is two points greater difference between the 7 points dropped between Halo 3 and 4, and we've all seen the state the Halo series is in now.

If BotW 2 scored in the mid/low 80s, Anouma would be chased down the street.

Oh, Metacritic scores are meaningless for remakes. Got it. I didn't realize that. Anything else I should arbitrarily ignore?

Also, a less than ten-point drop being considered a "fall from grace" just made my day. Thank you!
 
Oh, Metacritic scores are meaningless for remakes. Got it. I didn't realize that. Anything else I should arbitrarily ignore?

Also, a less than ten-point drop being considered a "fall from grace" just made my day. Thank you!

So if the second remake of TLOU is panned because of its high price point and short time since the last remake, then that makes the original TLOU a terrible game?

lol?

But, of course, that is an arbitrary criteria apparently, and yet the difference between 10 points and 9 points somehow isn't...
 
0
Take also into account games such as Tropical Freeze, rightly given average scores by big publications (Edge, 7; Eurogamer, 7) on launch, but, in Eurogamer's case, were pressured by the fans to 'correct' their original opinion, lest face the wrath of the community (not that it saved TF in the end, mind).
What are you even on about? A different member of staff reviewed the Switch version of the game 5 years later and had a different opinion to a different person from 5 years ago, who played the game in a different context on different hardware.

Xenoblade threads bring out the worst takes without even being pure Xenoblade discourse.
 
Hoping this does well and people are happy with the game. This has been a weird but understated and solid year for the Switch and adding another quality game to the year would be great to see.

It inspired the "best jrpg of all time" Xenoblade 3
Ok I LOLed
 
What are you even on about? A different member of staff reviewed the Switch version of the game 5 years later and had a different opinion to a different person from 5 years ago, who played the game in a different context on different hardware.

Xenoblade threads bring out the worst takes without even being pure Xenoblade discourse.
Here let me throw out some more fun hot takes just to get them in the thread

Xenoblade 2 would have scored better if it toned down the anime tiddy

Xenoblade 2 only scored as well as it did due to anime tiddy

There now everyone is upset
 
i sense that were getting way too off-topic here. let's bring the discussion back to reviews of xenoblade 3 which will be out in a few minutes.
 
Here let me throw out some more fun hot takes just to get them in the thread

Xenoblade 2 would have scored better if it toned down the anime tiddy

Xenoblade 2 only scored as well as it did due to anime tiddy

There now everyone is upset
Xenoblade 3 only scored as well as it did because it rejected everything about Xenoblade 2 and returned to the principles of the first game

Xenoblade 3 only scored as well as it did because it rejected everything about Xenoblade 1 and returned to the principles of Xenoblade 2

Xenoblade 3 only scored as well as it did because the series finally acknowledged Xenoblade X

now all the bases are covered
 
Please see the threadmarked staff post. Thank you.


Back
Top Bottom