@Dardan Sandiego I don’t think “acquisition-averse” is the correct framing. They engage in conditional acquisitions, which is important for the reasons they engage in them.
For Nintendo, M&As aren’t about IPs or patents or even technologies. They’re about talent and expertise. So when you engage in M&As for those reasons, you have to be able to keep the whole reason to acquire. That means quality talent that wants to work with Nintendo and is eager for acquisition.
This is why NLG was acquired, ownership was ready to sell and NLG had already decided to only take contracts with Nintendo as far back as 2014(?), so the talent was eager, obviously capable and the opportunity arose.
So long as conditions are met, no M&A is out of bounds, but those conditions are not always easy to meet. When they are, though? Yeah, they do it with little to no second thought.
And there’s nothing stopping them from building new studios outside Kyoto, either, albeit carefully.