I'm curious what everyone's thoughts are about a gimmick or the seemingly lack-there-of. Does there 'need' to be one? will casual fans really care for DLSS and all the Nvidia goodies? how exactly is Nintendo planning on selling this thing?
Nintendo will sell this hardware the way they've sold every other piece of hardware they've made - with play. If customers want to play
that and play
that way then they'll want the hardware.
Nintendo doesn't need customers to understand why something looks good in order to use graphics to sell a game. See all the people who couldn't believe
Prime 4 (or Pikmin 4 before it, or Tears of the Kingdom before that) was on Switch. They saw something they wanted, and couldn't believe it
wasn't new technology. Imagine what Nintendo could do
with new technology.
Nintendo will definitely explore new control schemes and gameplay types with this hardware. They always have. Labo, and
Super Mario Party both show that there is potential in the existing hardware that's not explored. If Nintendo had featured the
linking Switches from Super Mario Party in the January event for Switch, we'd be calling that the "gimmick". And Nintendo could certainly make a half dozen more games using those ideas.
Of course, we
do have ideas about new inputs on the new hardware. And we know that Nintendo builds games in tandem with their hardware, and tries to make the games feature the hardware's function, and tries to make the hardware's function support new gameplay. So it's likely that those new inputs will be used in launch games. Whether that qualifies as a gimmick or not will be in the eyes of the audience, not Nintendo. Remember how many people were upset about Nintendo charging them money for HD Rumble, as a "bad gimmick"?