Yeah, Token Ranbu is pretty much locked at 30, the only reason it's not at the top it's because it has a lower enemy count on the battleflied than SW5 or FEW3HTouken Ranbu musou on Switch is also running well overall from my experience. AoC definitely was more of an exception, not the rule, yes.
Yeah. Arval sounds off.I really like F!Shez, but I don't care for Arval at all. Their voice acting bothers me, it sounds like a kid doing a grown-up voice impression.
Done two levels on handheld with no performance issues yet!
I have to say it's funny to see the reactions regarding the performance as it tell's me mostly people have only played HWAoC and not the rest of the warriors avaliable on switch, incluiding FEW which has the best perfomance (which makes sense as Zelda is more popular than the other warriors franchise). Considering all the games, AoC has the second worst performance on switch (it was the worst untill DW9 Empires came) but the rest of their releases have been decent and getting better optimization with the time (SW5 and this one being at the top)
KT games in general have come a really long way since the 2017/early 2018 releases, they may be the most consistent 3rd party on delivering games that perform great on the Switch especially Gust that probably delivers the best ports in the JP industry nowadays (which is crazy to think when the first ones were horrible)I have to say it's funny to see the reactions regarding the performance as it tell's me mostly people have only played HWAoC and not the rest of the warriors avaliable on switch, incluiding FEW which has the best perfomance (which makes sense as Zelda is more popular than the other warriors franchise). Considering all the games, AoC has the second worst performance on switch (it was the worst untill DW9 Empires came) but the rest of their releases have been decent and getting better optimization with the time (SW5 and this one being at the top)
Yeah the most important thing is that Omega Force finally learned to do it in house. As mentioned the first FEW is the best perfoming, but because they had the help of Team Ninja . Once they were left alone it noticed they didn't have that much experience (WO4 being rougher than the other musou games) but with that experiencie it's been uphill (with AoC being the exception because simply their engine was not ready for all the physics from BoW)KT games in general have come a really long way since the 2017/early 2018 releases, they may be the most consistent 3rd party on delivering games that perform great on the Switch especially Gust that probably delivers the best ports in the JP industry nowadays (which is crazy to think when the first ones were horrible)
I guess it was expected with KT embracing the Switch platform and working on so many Switch only projects
Play 3H.I have FE 3H on my switch and have yet to begin it
yet I want to download this and play it
aghhhh
Soon!Play 3H.
UI/Menus are 60fps, battles mostly 30fps but some dips here and there when so much is going on. Unfortunately there's still a lot of pop in but ultimately it's a massive improvement over AoC in terms of fps judging from the first 4 chapters.So perfornance is good? I found AoC unplayable so was concerned about this being the same.
UI/Menus are 60fps, battles mostly 30fps but some dips here and there when so much is going on. Unfortunately there's still a lot of pop in but ultimately it's a massive improvement over AoC in terms of fps judging from the first 4 chapters.
Technically this could refer to either gamePlay 3H.
Hm not sure on the gameplay here. Despite the better performance, it feels less...smooth? Than Age of Calamity. Basically the movesets don't feel like they flow as well. The more classical Musou perspective may play into that though for me, since Age of Calamity was the only game in the genre I've played.
Also not super sure about how it rushes the pre-timeskip so much. They're really assuming you've played Three Houses since there's basically no explanation for anything that's going on at any point. I guess the game is meant to take place in this mid-timeskip era so everything else is just setup, but it's still a bit weird to me honestly. I liked Three Houses initial slower pace.
That being said, the game is pretty fun still. Enjoying the story (went Blue Lions). Shez and especially Arval are great. But as it stands the demo's making me lean towards Sunbreak as my June title instead of this.
Going off the trailers mostly, but the game's advertising and all focuses on a period in the middle of when the timeskip happens in Three Houses. That being said, the initial setup is pretty different from that game so it's not quite as clear cut as thatIs the bolded confirmed? I was still confused about the time setup of this spinoff
Going off the trailers mostly, but the game's advertising and all focuses on a period in the middle of when the timeskip happens in Three Houses. That being said, the initial setup is pretty different from that game so it's not quite as clear cut as that
The game starts at the beginning of Three Houses, diverges basically immediately and drastically from the plot of that game, and the Prologue chapters take you to sometime during that year. Then a 2-year timeskip happens where presumably the rest of the game will take place