Kaka
Shriekbat
I read this with an anxious voice in my head lolWhere’s Nate?
I read this with an anxious voice in my head lolWhere’s Nate?
Said it before but if Mario + Rabbids releases in (let’s say October), then I doubt we have any more surprises for this year in regards to first party. Nintendo probably views Splatoon 3 (sept), Mario + Rabbids (Oct) and Pokémon (nov) as a rock solid fal line up. Toss Advanced Wars out in December and Nintendo is set (from their point of view).
Honestly pretty killer. I'd be happy if it was just this.
- Persona
- Nier Automata
- M&R2
This is already shaping up to be legit, all things considered.
I thought it was going to be a whinny the Pooh joke based on that tweet with the rabbit, and now I am disappointed.Okay yall bear with me here
What if...
Ni3R
He's too busy sippin Henny to upload it right nowThen where’s Nate podcast
It's just an opinion of mine I'm stating, that I see a lot online as well. I understand and am happy for the people wanting lots of 3rd party games they've missed out on, but the people that really want those kinds of games.. I honestly expect those people to own a playstation/xbox or ''gaming'' pc by now. Nintendo is very late with 3rd party games, and almost always have the worst version of said games. I went on a negative spiral here lol, I am glad for people that use their switch for 3rd party games, above is just my opinion.I don't think anybody should feel bad for other people having different gaming preferences or valuing portability or the option to catch up on older games they missed in a convenient format.
I get it, your post isn't malicious; but it trends into a discourse where anybody who does get excited by the older titles coming into Switch deserves pity or scorn or is a source of bafflement. I've never got around to Nier Automata and Switch is my primary system. Why should that be a problem for another person?
Exactly what I expected. 3rd party ports from 4-6 years ago (with worse framerate for sure) lol. I feel bad for people that actually uses switch as their main console for 3rd party games, which i expect isn't a lot. And is why so many people aren't interested in these 3rd party directs lol
It's a first party game using a third party IP that they've licensed the same way Mario + Rabbids isn't actually a first party game.
Nintendo doesn't own the IP of Bayonetta like they do Mario, so that's not a good comparison. Sega owns the Bayonetta IP, Nintendo does not.It's a first party game using a third party IP that they've licensed the same way Mario + Rabbids isn't actually a first party game.
So, no speculation on Replicant then? I mean, it's obviously not the 2017-2018 game, but if they're bringing Nier, why not both? Wasn't that datamined or something?
nachoMoL said:2017-2018, it was released between that time depending on the version
Considering Switch sales in Japan at least 15m+ users dont own another console and that is just one country. Also that is just one of the annoucements most games are usually new gamesExactly what I expected. 3rd party ports from 4-6 years ago (with worse framerate for sure) lol. I feel bad for people that actually uses switch as their main console for 3rd party games, which i expect isn't a lot. And is why so many people aren't interested in these 3rd party directs lol
Thank you for this. I have a gaming PC with all the bells and whistles but most of my Switch library is third party games. Hybrid convenience remains a strong reason to purchase games on that device, so I'm always excited to see what comes. I'm genuinely interested for tomorrow's direct. Would be cool to see Persona and Skyrim Anniversary.I don't think anybody should feel bad for other people having different gaming preferences or valuing portability or the option to catch up on older games they missed in a convenient format.
I get it, your post isn't malicious; but it trends into a discourse where anybody who does get excited by the older titles coming into Switch deserves pity or scorn or is a source of bafflement. I've never got around to Nier Automata and Switch is my primary system. Why should that be a problem for another person?
Good thing that Nier Automata doesn't have license costs that could reach up to multiple million dollars. Platinum said before a port could be done, they probably did it in the end.Don’t get your hopes of for Nier Automata, people. The company that couldn’t be bothered to natively port PS3 HD remasters of PS2 games to Switch is not going to put meaningful work behind a Nier Automata port to Switch.
It's really very simple: I value portability and the software mix on Switch over immediate access to big budget games. Being interested in a late port of a title doesn't mean I'm somehow deprived of games all the time.It's just an opinion of mine I'm stating, that I see a lot online as well. I understand and am happy for the people wanting lots of 3rd party games they've missed out on, but the people that really want those kinds of games.. I honestly expect those people to own a playstation/xbox or ''gaming'' pc by now. Nintendo is very late with 3rd party games, and almost always have the worst version of said games. I went on a negative spiral here lol, I am glad for people that use their switch for 3rd party games, above is just my opinion.
When Mario rabbids gets 10 minutes then 15 is about right.Looking forward to it! 25 minutes is longer than I'd expect.
This is the one where Atlus will announce Persona 3 and 4 on Switch right?
Wrong
Nintendo doesn't own the studio making it nor the IP. I don't get how you can consider it first party in any way.
It doesn't matter that Sega owns Bayonetta the IP, at least not to Nintendo. Whether it's featured in a Partner Direct is a different discussion entirely.Nintendo doesn't own the IP of Bayonetta like they do Mario, so that's not a good comparison. Sega owns Bayonetta.
If Cadence of Hyrule can be in a Partner Direct then so can Bayonetta 3.
Drinking HennyWhere’s Nate?
If M+R is getting its own presentation/ gameplay segment tomorrow then I doubt it'll take up 10 minutes hereWhen Mario rabbids gets 10 minutes then 15 is about right.
Nintendo considers Bayo 3 1st party and that is what matters , Sony did the same with Spiderman when it made by a 3rd party studio (at the moment) and used a 3rd party IPNintendo doesn't own the studio making it nor the IP. I don't get how you can consider it first party in any way.
I’m completely oblivious to this stuff, but why would licensing costs for native ports vs. cloud ports be different?Good thing that Nier Automata doesn't have license costs that could reach up to multiple million dollars. Platinum said before a port could be done, they probably did it in the end.
I read that a possible reason those are cloud only (assuming you're talking about Kingdom Hearts remasters) was because they were so heavy with prerendered cutscenes that the filesize was around.. actually lemme googleDon’t get your hopes of for Nier Automata, people. The company that couldn’t be bothered to natively port PS3 HD remasters of PS2 games to Switch is not going to put meaningful work behind a Nier Automata port to Switch.
I’m exactly the same. I only use portables. Any game that gets a portable version may as well be a new one to me. If it’s a few years or even a generation later, as the tech catches up or whatever, I really don’t mind. I play games I haven’t played before that are 20+ years old all the time. I’ve only got time to play through a dozen or so games a year, they are longer than ever, I’m not sitting around lamenting third party games on home consoles and computers I don’t have when I wouldn’t have time to play them if I did.It's really very simple: I value portability and the software mix on Switch over immediate access to big budget games. Being interested in a late port of a title doesn't mean I'm somehow deprived of games all the time.
There is an old saying…. “be careful what you ask/wish for, you just might get it.”I welcome any and all 3rd party ports to the Switch.
At this point it may as well be with Nintendo owning 2/3 games in the franchise so far. And, all signs point to those games not coming to other systems & Nintendo wanting to potentially do more. It’s as close to being 1st party as a 3rd party IP can be.Nintendo doesn't own the IP of Bayonetta like they do Mario, so that's not a good comparison. Sega owns the Bayonetta IP, Nintendo does not.
If Cadence of Hyrule can be in a Partner Direct then so can Bayonetta 3.
I think we‘ll see Bayonetta 3 in the Partners or at least get some infos soon.
We will seeIf M+R is getting its own presentation/ gameplay segment tomorrow then I doubt it'll take up 10 minutes here
As a parent, I have rediscovered a ton of games I dropped on home consoles because I just didn't have the proper TV time to fully invest in 40+ hour game experiences unless it's a 10/10 like Elden Ring (which took me months).
DQXIS and Dragon's Dogma are recent examples of games that have shined for me on Switch. So I welcome P5 and Nier Automata with open arms, and look forward to their announcements.
sooooooooooooo business as usual?The internet is fuming hahaha. You love to see it
Yeah, cloud versions don't get rated for the new platform, they're basically PC games streamed elsewhere. Square probably expected Nintendo to foot the bill like MS and Epic did, when they refused they picked the cheapest route.I’m completely oblivious to this stuff, but why would licensing costs for native ports vs. cloud ports be different?