My point was that the 2016 Eurogamer report and 2023 VGC report are very similar and happened at the exact same time in the year. Eurogamer made a big splash because they were able to confirm the news about the Switch's form factor as a novel concept in 2016; because that's going to be carried over to the successor, there's no equivalent to that top-line piece of info. But the actual substantive contents of the articles are more or less the same: hybrid console, uses cartridges, coming soon. If anything the current VGC article has somewhat more details about the hardware itself.
The one thing Eurogamer's 2016 articles had which current reporting doesn't have is confirmation of the SoC.* But the reason for that assuredly doesn't have anything to do with closeness to launch. Devs have the hardware as confirmed by VGC, and it's simply the case that none them of them have volunteered that information yet this time. Additionally, early NX documentation outright said the SoC was "equivalent to Tegra X1 from Nvidia" and further listed the GPU specs which of course matched exactly with the TX1, so it was very easy to conclusively report on that.
After the July 2016 reporting, there were no updates until the reveal in October, a factory leak in November, and Eurogamer's reporting on clock speeds in December. Now, obviously VGC and Eurogamer have reported "second half of 2024" and "late 2024" respectively, so if you just want to take that at face value, that's one thing. But I don't see anything about the timeline diverging from the original Switch's in terms of "chatter." If anything, all this Gamescom stuff is significantly more chatter than we saw for NX after July.
*Although they said they think there's a possibility the Tegra X1 was non-final because it's just in devkits with "audible fan noise," and the Tegra X2 might ultimately be used instead... Most of the speculation and non-factual parts of their articles were wrong.