robertman2
Chain Chomp
- Pronouns
- He/him
Well, they are British.This and the guardian review are unhinged (they seem to me more like cries for attention than anything else).
Well, they are British.This and the guardian review are unhinged (they seem to me more like cries for attention than anything else).
Second rate CGI? Oh come on. Even the negative reviews say that this movie LOOKS great.
This and the guardian review are unhinged (they seem to me more like cries for attention than anything else).
Well, they are British.
If Yutaka Nakamura doesn't animate your whole movie from start to finish, why even bother?If this is bad animation, what counts as good?
I normally agree with this, but saying this movie LOOKS bad is absolutely ridiculous. The phrase "second rate CGI" got a giant eye roll out of me.We're only on page 2. Can we wait a little until this thread devolves into "this review has a different opinion than what I expect to, so the reviewer must be an idiot"
No, it's not, it's their opinionI normally agree with this, but saying this movie LOOKS bad is absolutely ridiculous.
It's a ridiculous opinion then, and we're allowed to disagree with it. I'm not calling them an idiot though.No, it's not, it's their opinion
Reviewing worse than the sonic movies. How is that even possible lol?
There is a difference between critique and sensationalism.We're only on page 2. Can we wait a little until this thread devolves into "this review has a different opinion than what I expect to, so the reviewer must be an idiot"
Reviewing worse than a pair of movies that reviewed decently well isnāt exactly a big surprise.Reviewing worse than the sonic movies. How is that even possible lol?
Think you just have to search "Mario" on RT since that typically updates before the actual page for whatever reason.Where are the RT reviews? It's not showing up for me.
Sonic had charm this looked off since the first trailer.Reviewing worse than the sonic movies. How is that even possible lol?
RIP. Cinemascore and WOM are gonna carry.Where are the RT reviews? It's not showing up for me.
How in the world is the CG bad, what? Just from the trailers, itās the best thing illumination has ever animated. One of their best looking movies if not the absolute best. I see plenty of squash and stretch which are sorely missing from Pixar and Disney 3D films.
Gaming outlets arenāt counted toward RT I presume, and theyāre way way more positive on itDamn, that RT score. Isn't the RT score usually way higher than the MC score? What happend here?
Damn, that RT score. Isn't the RT score usually way higher than the MC score? What happend here?
RT is a lot easier to sway towards either end. If everyone gives a movie a 4/10, then itās gonna go down as a 0%. The RT score is generally more āextremeā.Damn, that RT score. Isn't the RT score usually way higher than the MC score? What happend here?
And just like Nintendo games regardless of their quality this will make bank either way.I know it's not nice to see a movie is getting dragged by reviewers, but let's be deathly honest, there is no one in this world that should be surprised an Illumination movie is a bad movie, and much less call into question the sanity of someone who did not like it. This was always the most likely scenario.
Now you're being melodramatic.And just like Nintendo games regardless of their quality this will make bank either way.
For metacritic that's not horrible. The RT score is pretty bad though.
What relevance does that have? This is the review thread. We're talking about the reviewsAnd just like Nintendo games regardless of their quality this will make bank either way.
The Metacritic score on par for Illumination.For metacritic that's not horrible. The RT score is pretty bad though.