kvetcha
hoopy frood
- Pronouns
- he/him
Unless, of course, that number includes a new model
Unless, of course, that number includes a new model
It would have included switch sales for the month of March, but the point is that the Switch was a known quantity for a period of that year of sales so should have had some impact on sales volumes. I would expect that Drake being released much earlier in switches 7th fiscal sales year would hurt OG switch sales more, but if its a premium priced product and Nintendo does in fact provide an option that's compelling and cheaper than the lite using tx1 then it could have the opposite effect. All depends on marketing of both products.Correct me if I’m wrong but those 2017 sales were for the period between March 2016 and March 2017 no? So it doesn’t quite align with the Switch if one is to expect a 2023 launch based on this small increase in production, if Nintendo wanted to follow suit they’d actually release it Spring 2024. The slight uptick for that year was probably spurred on by Pokémon Sun/Moon, with Go massively boosting brand popularity for the franchise.
Mind you I’m still very much open to 2023, hell even a May launch. I think Nintendo planned the successor to release 6 years in and is gonna for the most part stick with it.
Well, they are still having a solid run of games, so there is not such a software drop off.So what your saying is that they learned nothing from the end of the Wii? Got it.
the thing is, it is a really risky move. its kind of trying to edge it out as far as they can to maximize profits,If they manage to milk the shit out of it and make a huge margin on hardware due to lower cost of goods instead of artificially killing a successful product by introducing a successor that has an impact on revenue and ROI, they actually are master planners
I want to keep seeing 2022 memes in 2024I want to keep seeing 2023 memes in 2024
Finally, on the matter of that report about Nintendo planning to ramp up production for the Switch this year, it isn't being specific at all about the hardware that is actually concerned.
Nintendo Co. plans to increase production of its six-year-old Switch console in the coming fiscal year after shipping roughly 21 million Switch consoles in the year ending March, according to people familiar with the matter.
It's not that uncommon for CEOs to unlearn from mistakes they commited before. Greed is a hell of a drug.So what your saying is that they learned nothing from the end of the Wii? Got it.
I want to keep seeing 2023 memes in 2024
It’s not the only thing that changed.Saw many people pointing out that the Nintendo leadership is much more conservative since the Furukawa took over. But I mean, the whole board is still the same, only thing that changed is that Furukawa is CEO now.
I was thinking about that too, but... Bloomberg says that vendors have been warned of plans to ramp up production...This.
I think they're about ready to introduce a new member of the "Nintendo Switch Family of Systems".
Depends on which vendors they're talking to and how many components the two models will be sharing.I was thinking about that too, but... Bloomberg says that vendors have been warned of plans to ramp up production...
I don't think this can be interpreted as "we are adding a new model with completely different SoC".
Replacement by Shiota was still done under Kimishima.It’s not the only thing that changed.
- Ko Shiota replaced Genyo Takeda
- Shinya Takahashi replaced Shigeru Miyamoto
- Chris Meledandri added
Why can't it? They plan to ramp up production. They don't say "of existing Nintendo Switch models". They "ramped up production" in 2016 and 2017 for the Switch's launch.I was thinking about that too, but... Bloomberg says that vendors have been warned of plans to ramp up production...
I don't think this can be interpreted as "we are adding a new model with completely different SoC".
Why would that be likely? Nothing factual has so far suggested a delay. In fact some reputable news sites are reporting production for Nintendo is actually accelerating.While it is disappointing that we will have to likely wait longer, I can wait. It is a shame that we wont get a better version of Tears of the Kingdom (though I expect it will be ones of the games that gets a remaster when the Switch 2 comes out) I am sure the game will be fantastic and will look forward to a new successor when it comes. Was dying for the switch pro or whatever it was going to called but now that we are at least a year out, I can wait and just look forward to when it is announced, that is going to be really exciting.
I don’t think it really matters if it was done by Kimishima as that was another inevitable oneReplacement by Shiota was still done under Kimishima.
Takahashi did not replaced Miyamoto, he replaced him only as a leader of all software. Which was inevitable. Takahashi was member of the board even in Iwata's era and Miyamoto is still member to this day. Only thing that changed are their positions to be more up. (f.e. Takahashi's position was switched to Shibata when he was brought up back to Japan in 2018 and Takahashi is now Senior Managing Executive Officer).
But yeah, Meledandri got added too because of their movie initiative.
But I think the main point I want to take from this is that the people that are here don't want Nintendo to became conservative that much or anything. People often brought up that Miyamoto is not that much into spotlight anymore, which is true but he is still right after Furukawa in terms of position.
How long do you think Furukawa has been been CEO for? Lol.It's not that uncommon for CEOs to unlearn from mistakes they commited before. Greed is a hell of a drug.
Sounds pretty specific to me.
TOKYO -- Nintendo will ramp up output of the Switch to about 30 million units this fiscal year, Nikkei has learned, marking an all-time high for the flagship gaming device in a bid to capitalize on continuing stay-at-home demand. The Kyoto-based company approached multiple parts suppliers about accelerating production. People with direct knowledge of the matter verified plans to expand output.
Fiscal Year ending in 3/22 Nintendo Switch hardware forecast: 25.50m
who is in cloud 9? both of them?He is in cloud 9. Those videos are just for the sake of views.
Camp 1 is cringe and realistic, while Camp 2 is based and dumb. Somehow, I'm cringe (no hardware this year) and dumb (#Team2027)so seems there is two camps here:
Camp 1. This thing isn't coming out until 2024/2025 and Nintendo wanting to sell 20 mil this year confirms that
Camp 2. This thing is coming this year and Nintendo wanting to sell 20 mil this year confirms that
Im Camp 2. Lets go bayyyybayyyyy
ok can someone please help me understand this... theres one video from switchforce saying no switch until 2025?!?!?!!?!? then on the4 flipside this spanish youtuber behind the games say the switch 2 is in pre production??!??! what is going on????
ok can someone please help me understand this... theres one video from switchforce saying no switch until 2025?!?!?!!?!? then on the4 flipside this spanish youtuber behind the games say the switch 2 is in pre production??!??! what is going on????
ok can someone please help me understand this... theres one video from switchforce saying no switch until 2025?!?!?!!?!? then on the4 flipside this spanish youtuber behind the games say the switch 2 is in pre production??!??! what is going on????
Option 3 big plans for Switch. Price cuts. New revision perhaps with a new form factorso seems there is two camps here:
Camp 1. This thing isn't coming out until 2024/2025 and Nintendo wanting to sell 20 mil this year confirms that
Camp 2. This thing is coming this year and Nintendo wanting to sell 20 mil this year confirms that
Im Camp 2. Lets go bayyyybayyyyy
Camp 2 makes more logical sense.so seems there is two camps here:
Camp 1. This thing isn't coming out until 2024/2025 and Nintendo wanting to sell 20 mil this year confirms that
Camp 2. This thing is coming this year and Nintendo wanting to sell 20 mil this year confirms that
Im Camp 2. Lets go bayyyybayyyyy
No need for insults, to yourself or anyone. Camp 2 as they put it is definitely the more logical choice, because Camp 1 has to suppose Nintendo will increase demand year on year with no solid reasoning, while Camp 2 has a simple answer backed by facts and factory leaks alike: The increased production is to launch a new console which can produce its own demand.Camp 1 is cringe and realistic, while Camp 2 is based and dumb. Somehow, I'm cringe (no hardware this year) and dumb (#Team2027)
Iwata had nothing to do with the choice of Furukawa. If he knows anyone well, it's Shibata, with whom he worked for a long time in Europe, and indeed his biggest managerial decision to date has been to promote Shibata strongly.I don’t think it really matters if it was done by Kimishima as that was another inevitable one
For Nintendo not to be conservative they would have to have a radical change in thinking. Considering Furukawa is a protégé of Iwata & a numbers guy I don’t see that happening. I mean Kimishima is still there as well just not on the board as an Executive Adviser.
you're so based...Camp 2 makes more logical sense.
No need for insults, to yourself or anyone. Camp 2 as they put it is definitely the more logical choice, because Camp 1 has to suppose Nintendo will increase demand year on year with no solid reasoning, while Camp 2 has a simple answer backed by facts and factory leaks alike: The increased production is to launch a new console which can produce its own demand.
The trick to believing is to make sure you're not emotionally invested enough that you're actually hurt when it doesn't happen.you're so based...
I gotta believe!
this is probably wrong. Furukawa may not have taken his place immediately but like Tim Cook Furukawa was being groomed as a successor while Iwata was sick. Depressingly, the interim probably had to do with Iwata's cancer being so aggressive when it returned.Iwata had nothing to do with the choice of Furukawa.
yeah tbh im just using this hardware speculation as a way to make the days til TotK go faster. That is MY big thing this year. Even if a switch 2 launched this year it still wouldnt over shadow TotK for meThe trick to believing is to make sure you're not emotionally invested enough that you're actually hurt when it doesn't happen.
Just remember it's all for fun.
you're so based...
I gotta believe!
Skittzo is right. While I'm trying my best to work with the facts and leaks we have to try and make sense of it, I'm just a stranger on the internet.The trick to believing is to make sure you're not emotionally invested enough that you're actually hurt when it doesn't happen.
Just remember it's all for fun.
this is probably wrong. Furukawa may not have taken his place immediately but like Tim Cook Furukawa was being groomed as a successor while Iwata was sick. Depressingly, the interim probably had to do with Iwata's cancer being so aggressive when it returned.
...now I'm sad
You can count on me budI want to keep seeing 2023 memes in 2024
FixedThe trick to believing is to hold on to that feeling
Reggie refers to Furukawa as a "Iwata's right hand man at the time". It's pretty telling to me that they had no plan what so ever on Iwata's successor, since his cancer came back in around of March 2015. And after that it sadly got pretty quick. So I don't believe Furukawa was after positioned as future CEO, that was done when Kimishima took over since they knew he is only temporary.this is probably wrong. Furukawa may not have taken his place immediately but like Tim Cook Furukawa was being groomed as a successor while Iwata was sick. Depressingly, the interim probably had to do with Iwata's cancer being so aggressive when it returned.
...now I'm sad
ok can someone please help me understand this... theres one video from switchforce saying no switch until 2025?!?!?!!?!? then on the4 flipside this spanish youtuber behind the games say the switch 2 is in pre production??!??! what is going on????
That device probably would have been announced at CES, which is why 2023 remains an open question for a new Nintendo system.Can someone give a timeline or explanation for Switch T239 being pushed to early 2024/early 2025, that would lead folks to accept this speculated timeframe at face value. Again, neither yesterday's podcast nor Digital Foundry's article try to reconcile it with NVN2 or Linux data. One explanation could be that the manufacturing would be for some other T239 device slated for this year which hasn't been announced yet. Is that it ?
I'm gonna keep poking and prodding at this.
That device probably would have been announced at CES, which is why 2023 remains an open question for a new Nintendo system.
Analysis of the facts is not copium.Loving all the copium in this thread. Lol.
Now, we just need the Factory Uncle's to weigh in...
Possible? Sure. Likely? No.I'm sure this has been asked before, and is a tiring question, but I don't follow the thread super closely and am not super tech knowledgeable, but how 100% sure are we that the T239 is the chip they're using? I know the whole NVN2 thing ties it to Nintendo because the Switch is NVN, but is there anything other than that? Like is it not possible they're using something we know nothing about that wasn't leaked?
By all accounts Furukawa was being groomed as Iwata’s heir apparent much like Yamauchi did with Iwata. Iwata’s untimely death resulted in the board selecting Kimishima as a steadying hand before handing the reigns over. So no it was not just because they wanted to reassure the markets or have a more corporate profile.Iwata had nothing to do with the choice of Furukawa. If he knows anyone well, it's Shibata, with whom he worked for a long time in Europe, and indeed his biggest managerial decision to date has been to promote Shibata strongly.
Furukawa was appointed in order to reassure the markets and the company with a more coporate and conventional profile. It was this same internal desire for a reassuring consensus that led to the appointment of Kimishima to ensure the transition.
The choice is consensual because we're talking about someone who has spent his entire career at Nintendo and knows the internal culture, but even so it's first and foremost someone who studied Political Science,who knows marketing well and will be open to all sorts of diversifications, who has links with the Polemon Company, and who for the moment has done nothing more than let people work where they were before his arrival, because everything was working well.
We'll see when things aren't going so well how "conservative" he is. My fear is that he won't be conservative enough, i.e. that he won't be able to go against the stupid whims of the financial community like "common, give up your own hardware and make mobile games".
Those who absolutely want Nintendo to be "less conservative" partly forget that this would basically mean denying the corporate culture that makes it special for the best.