Retro probably already has Metroid franchise fatigue and Prime 4 isn’t even out yet.Unless part of the reason it took so long is because there were actually more development reboots than are already known about.
Businesses run on fiscal year calendars. So yes, I would say they mean next April when the fiscal for 2025 begins.
- According to his sources, Switch 2 will release during Q1 2025 (Q1 calendar year)
- He has more than 3 people that are working with this date in mind: Q1 2025 (Q1 calendar year)
- Other said that originally it was supposed to be released in 2024 but was delayed to 2025 (Q1 calendar year)
- NEXT FISCAL YEAR and that's Nintendo's goal
- He doesn't know why it was decided to be released in 2025 and not in 2024
- He reiterates that although he will never be 100% sure until Nintendo states officially, he has A LOT OF SOURCES AND A LOT OF TRUSTED SOURCES saying the same thing: Q1 2025 - Q1 calendar year (BUT NEXT FISCAL YEAR)
Little bit of both. They know switch has been on the market for a long time. If this is true than it is what it is. I just don't know what games they can bring to justify another whole year. Isn't COD suppose to come to a Nintendo console this year no matter what per the contract agreement?I mean Nintendo hasn’t said anything lol
This is us fucking with ourselves
Nice of you to be the authority on how this release date information was relayed to developers or the journalist. It is not intuitive whatsoever for a media headline to quote Q1 2025 (not Q1 FY26) and have people assume this means April.
No. Unless I see a report stating otherwise, I’ve assumed this is calendar year.
From the first post of the thread:
Q1 calendar year(Jan-Mar). The next/upcoming fiscal year starts April 1, 2024 and ends March 31, 2025.
No problem.Thank you for pointing that out. Appreciate it.
What’s with the hostility? Not being an authority of anything or trying to refute what anyone said. I don’t know anything and haven’t ever claimed to. I just gave my opinion on what I thought it meant.
I see it more as half a year than a whole year. As for what they could bring...if they could have a Switch 2 lineup that starts with a 3D AAA Platformer (Mario or DK) that is then followed by the next Kirby game, the next Monolith Soft game, the next Mario Party, a Zelda release, a Platinum exclusive, some big third-party exclusive, and perhaps culminates in Mario Kart 10 at the holidays, that seems like a big year. I think some of what I'm proposing doesn't make sense for a first year, but I also think I'm forgetting some stuff and that Nintendo always has surprises. It won't happen, but a reality where GTA VI is a launch game for Switch 2 would also be interesting.Little bit of both. They know switch has been on the market for a long time. If this is true than it is what it is. I just don't know what games they can bring to justify another whole year. Isn't COD suppose to come to a Nintendo console this year no matter what per the contract agreement?
we're gonna get leaks so I would stick aroundI was about to start consuming nintendo direct/switch 2 speculation and discourseand shitpostingagain but maybe I’ll just fade away back into reality and forget about this forum and the switch 2 for a few more months
Take with a grain of salt, because I think we're dealing with some speculation mixed with fact mixed with chinese whispers inside game companies, but worth noting Bloomberg's article seems to have some of its own reporting and are saying "Nintendo has told some publishing executives not to expect the console until March 2025 at the earliest."
Take with a grain of salt, because I think we're dealing with some speculation mixed with fact mixed with chinese whispers inside game companies, but worth noting Bloomberg's article seems to have some of its own reporting and are saying "Nintendo has told some publishing executives not to expect the console until March 2025 at the earliest."
Sure but "at the earliest" if accurate suggests they aren't confident of March and it perhaps going beyond that and into the next FYIt was never going to launch in January or February right after the holidays. So saying it's releasing in March at the earlier is obvious.
Sure but "at the earliest" if accurate suggests they aren't confident of March and it perhaps going beyond that and into the next FY
This is another thing that makes me think this rumor is fallible. They would know by now when it's releasing. Not some "oh hey developers it MAY release March OR LATER now"Sure but "at the earliest" if accurate suggests they aren't confident of March and it perhaps going beyond that and into the next FY
certainly possible but still worth pointing outI think someone is just using their words very selectively to bait people into clicking on their article.
sounds like either a big game or some kind of hardware/logistics aspect to launch missed a milestone and it became clear it just simply will not be ready for 2024. It sounds like the advice is for 'Q1 2025' but I think Bloomberg are muddying the waters between fiscal and calendar here.This is another thing that makes me think this rumor is fallible. They would know by now when it's releasing. Not some "oh hey developers it MAY release March OR LATER now"
Possible evidence against rumor
1) They delayed it but didn't tell these developers when exactly?
2) They state no major games this year.. so they are going to let Switch fall off a cliff?
3) They will announce this thing a year prior (next month) even though the release date isn't set in stone for March 2025?!
It doesn't add up, people.
I suspect Q1 is very dependant on the issue causing the delay being resolved and they are leaving the door open for it to be beyond that in advice to publishers going by what Bloomberg is saying. I suspect Q1 is not set in stone but currently is the plan. It's not bad english because there is no deadline saying it MUST be out by the end of March.March at the earliest is not correct lingo if it is ALSO the latest lol. It should be "by the end of March at the latest." If it's Q1. Bad english.
Nothing driving, or commercially relevantThe Switch has sold 1.2 billion pieces of software. Not all of that is via Nintendo games.
Unlike in the Wii U's final year, the Switch will be supported by titles like Unicorn Overload, Prince of Persia, Penny's Big Breakaway, Ace Combat 7, Tomb Raider 1-3 etc.
I think that there's a risk that if GTA is March, Nintendo will pivot to May.
The healthy thing to do now is to expect a full blowout in late 24 and the release in first half of 25. Let's see if Nintendo will clarify more in their outlook for next FY. I now don't expect anything in March.
I think it's the higher probability it won't be there for launch. But if it is, then obviously nothing speaks against March, quite the opposite.Why does everyone just assume the Switch 2 won't get GTAVI?
Citation needed.I think what bothers me most about all of this is that we have been disappointed for so many years and Nintendo still won't give us any damn information at all the thing. Like they won't say shit at all for years now. It's just exhausting really. Not even a generic "We hear you" sort of comment. Just a complete "ignore the fans as always" and hey some actual new first party games would certainly soften the blow a little but Nintendo's all like, "Nah" but here is a Partner Direct with games you don't give a shit about lol.
The same behavior as when the Wii successor was supposed to be releasedI think what bothers me most about all of this is that we have been disappointed for so many years and Nintendo still won't give us any damn information at all the thing. Like they won't say shit at all for years now. It's just exhausting really. Not even a generic "We hear you" sort of comment. Just a complete "ignore the fans as always" and hey some actual new first party games would certainly soften the blow a little but Nintendo's all like, "Nah" but here is a Partner Direct with games you don't give a shit about lol.
That‘s a circle proof. Of course they wouldn‘t announce it one year ahead, but we don‘t know if the reports are true, which contradict previous information. So if it launches in 2025 it‘s gonna be announced later, if it launches in 2024 it‘s getting its announcement in march. I‘m not saying one outcome is more likely than the other, even though it was corroborated by multiple outlets I still wouldn’t take it as a fact.Citation needed.
Why would Nintendo want to announce and market their successor early? It would cut into the sales tail of the current Switch. Nintendo has no reason to give you information about their new console until it's ready.
Sure, I don't treat it as fact either. But "disappointed for so many years" implies Nintendo should have been in constant communication with us about the successor when they have no reason to.That‘s a circle proof. Of course they wouldn‘t announce it one year ahead, but we don‘t know if the reports are true, which contradict previous information. So if it launches in 2025 it‘s gonna be announced later, if it launches in 2024 it‘s getting its announcement in march. I‘m not saying one outcome is more likely than the other, even though it was corroborated by multiple outlets I still wouldn’t take it as a fact.
Citation needed.
Why would Nintendo want to announce and market their successor early? It would cut into the sales tail of the current Switch. Nintendo has no reason to give you information about their new console until it's ready.
3. We have been hearing about rumors of a Pro and now Switch 2 for over 5 years now.
Agree. Atleast now they could give a short statement (especially if reports are inaccurate), since the stock has fallen 4%. As I know them they won‘t do it, but there‘s still a slight chance.Sure, I don't treat it as fact either. But "disappointed for so many years" implies Nintendo should have been in constant communication with us about the successor when they have no reason to.
But the new console is coming. You know it, I know it. That isn't in doubt. The hopes of a Pro should have died the moment the OLED was announced and it was only a matter of time before Switch 2 came out. And this rumor is still just that, a rumor. If Nintendo is in fact gonna make it to 2024 with Switch 2, they're not gonna say "hey guys, that rumor going around is bollocks, we're announcing the Switch 2 for the holidays in a few weeks."It's really a combination of the fact that:
1. Switch is really really dated.
2. Switch will be 8+ years old by the time Switch 2 even releases.
3. We have been hearing about rumors of a Pro and now Switch 2 for over 5 years now.
Probably other factors have made this entire wait extremely irritating to me and a lot of folks. I think everyone is really tired with this lengthy lengthy process of moving forward. Whether it makes sense or not from a business perspective is different then what we all want but at the same time I think Nintendo has consistently let a lot of people down.