Now that the game is in the wild, I can 100% see them re-packaging this as a DX version near Switch 2’s launch with a Create mode and online multiplayer, in addition to enhanced performance, resolution, plus whatever DLC they have lined up for the next year.
The building feature is such a significant component of the game and providing a story-less version that people can play with friends guarantees TOTK legs (further) into the future.
A rerelease of a Switch game is not gonna move a ton of Switch 2 units. Zelda isn't the only system seller for Nintendo either.If that would sell some Switch 2's ... I mean maybe it's not such a bad idea.
Not having a new Zelda for the Switch 2 probably for the first 3 years isn't a great situation for Nintendo given how big of a system seller and iconic system defining thing BOTW/ToTK have been for the Switch.
So if you can't have that, maybe it makes sense if the you split the Zelda team in 2, half starts planning work on the next Zelda for Switch 2, but the other half maybe works on an expansion for Tears of the Kingdom.
A rerelease of a Switch game is not gonna move a ton of Switch 2 units. Zelda isn't the only system seller for Nintendo either.
To be fair Nintendo has a history of sitting on games so they can fit them into specific release windows. But you're right in that the Switch 2 isn't coming in this FY and they've seen console sales starting to slow, so this seems like one last breath which should give them enough legs(on top of whatever Q4 surprises we have) to get them over the finish line without limping towards it.Strategically, I think it's because the Switch 2 is at least a year out and the game was ready now.
And they’d rather see a return on investment for the hundreds of millions of Switch owners right now than sit on finished software for a year to sell a new console. It’s not like Switch 2 is gonna launch with some niche game, they will certainly have a flagship title ready to go.Certainly not the only system but it is a big part of Nintendo's A-game staple now that can't really be replaced that easily either ... like even Mario doesn't necessarily hit the same demographics a Zelda can.
They do sit on a lot of games but they rarely ever sit on a new Zelda with how costly those projects are and how frequently they’re delayed.To be fair Nintendo has a history of sitting on games so they can fit them into specific release windows. But you're right in that the Switch 2 isn't coming in this FY and they've seen console sales starting to slow, so this seems like one last breath which should give them enough legs(on top of whatever Q4 surprises we have) to get them over the finish line without limping towards it.
They literally had a patch to bump the performance during the review period. This game released at the first possible date it could.They do sit on a lot of games but they rarely ever sit on a new Zelda with how costly those projects are and how frequently they’re delayed.
And they’d rather see a return on investment for the hundreds of millions of Switch owners right now than sit on finished software for a year to sell a new console. It’s not like Switch 2 is gonna launch with some niche game, they will certainly have a flagship title ready to go.
I’m not talking about launch year, I’m saying launch day. Obviously they will have more games throughout the year. I do think 3D Mario is the most likely candidate for a launch day game though.It will need more than just one flagship title.
It will probably need several in to build good momentum.
Mario Kart Next (day 1 launch)
Zelda: TotK Special Edition + New Story DLC
Metroid Prime 4
New 3D Mario (November game)
That sorta of thing I think.
I’m not talking about launch year, I’m saying launch day. Obviously they will have more games throughout the year. I do think 3D Mario is the most likely candidate for a launch day game though.
Zelda U flashbacksBecause the game is build for a Switch, it's a Switch game no matter what.
This will depend entirely on what their internal figures find out that gives them more money. The three approaches have their pros and cons honestly.I wonder if there will be a free upgrade to Switch 2 version, a $10ish fee for the upgrade, or a completely new full price SKU we'd have to buy.
Yeah exactly. Zelda doesn’t get sat on.They literally had a patch to bump the performance during the review period. This game released at the first possible date it could.
They will never do that, Wii U also got a Champions Ballad. They will never sell a DLC exclusively to new console, especially when they would miss a 120m+ install base and like 30m+ copies sold on Switch alone.If they're smart, they'll release DLC exclusively on Switch 2.
only cos those systems failed to sell thats why.I mean Zelda has had a trend to release on current and next gen consoles with Breath of the Wild and Twilight Princess. I wouldn't be surprised if they are just releasing the game now so they have their big release and don't keep fans waiting. They probably didn't predict Covid when working on this game and developing their next console. I'm sure the factors from the pandemic had them change plans somewhat.
I still think the game is going to be on Nintendo's next hardware.
The GC was a bomb and TP took so long and the Wii was close enough to the GC that it was an "easy" port and hold the game back for a cross gen launch.I mean Zelda has had a trend to release on current and next gen consoles with Breath of the Wild and Twilight Princess. I wouldn't be surprised if they are just releasing the game now so they have their big release and don't keep fans waiting. They probably didn't predict Covid when working on this game and developing their next console. I'm sure the factors from the pandemic had them change plans somewhat.
I still think the game is going to be on Nintendo's next hardware.
I wonder how that impacted other Zelda porjects, because I have the feeling that either remasters or even 2D Zelda where probably thinked for Switch end lifeThis game was very likely originally intended to come out no latter than late 2021. Not delaying a game that's already 1.5 years later than planned another 1.5 years just so that a version of it can run at 60fps isn't "strategic."
Not releasing a mainline Zelda game for nearly 8 years would be insane.
I know it's a bit off topic, but I'd love for that to happen. Monolith has a way better track record than Zelda's EPD group in regards to delays for games. Like when Monolith announces a game, you know it'll come out when they say it does, or even sooner! With Zelda it's like yeah it'll come out in the near future, okay maybe this year, no this year instead.Because Monolith Soft's action game is the next Zelda.
It's a different day where this seems easier to pull off than any previous Nintendo hardware transition.TLOU was an enhanced on the PS4 though. It doesn't feel very Nintendo to merely bump up the resolution and frames and call it a day though.