D
Deleted member 2
Guest
I think there are lot of assumption being made here about people criticising the graphics.
I don't think the graphics are shit, it just looks lacklustre. Gameplay will obviously always come first and there's less complaints to be made there than the graphics.
However, what does interfere with my enjoyment is the lack of visual variety which is both a gameplay issue and partially an extension of the graphics issue, I'm plenty of hours in the game and every area is looking very similar. That's not good for a game relying on exploration.
I'll repeat myself—what you're referring to is your opinion, which I have no qualms with and I'm not arguing against. I personally feel like the visual variety is just fine, and isn't an issue I would have ever considered. But I'm not going to tell people they should agree with me.
But I think what you're saying has nothing to do with my point. Read the quotes in my post you were responding to—I'm referring to the constant insistance that graphical fidelity makes the game "more bad". And how it clearly isn't a problem almost all reviewers who viewed the game positively.
But for some reason, it's a huge deal to Online Gamers whose eyes start to bleed once a game goes sub-60 fps.