The thing is, how many of those 10,000 are already being planned for layoffs?
Have to wonder now this is done who and what will be next for Microsoft.
They're all in now, no getting off the bus at this point.
most interested in what happens with 343 and the Halo franchise with the merger, try and get some COD developers to right the ship, give Halo to the COD devs teams outright or just abandon the franchise for an extended period of time since Microsoft now owns the most popular FPS franchise?
Overwatch has been hilariously mismanaged for how huge of a hit it was. Interested to see what happens with it now.First thing they need to do is remember Overwatch was this huge property and start pumping out (at a reasonable rate) story-focused games in that franchise and leave the MP to wither away.
So what is the rule with COD games on Game Pass? Do they have to wait a certain period before those are allowed on there or can that happen like tomorrow?
First thing they need to do is remember Overwatch was this huge property and start pumping out (at a reasonable rate) story-focused games in that franchise and leave the MP to wither away.
I mean, it’s just Sega left unless they want to buy a bunch of random studios from Embracer
Too damn much.Waiting to see how much Kotick’s parachute is worth.
There was at one point. 2016-2018 was a pretty promising time, they were adding lore events in game where you would play through missions from Overwatch and Blackwatch's past, they announced a full-length book was coming out, they did a WIP of a relationships chart of all the characters. Sadly when the idea of Overwatch 2 started happening, they pulled the breaks hard on everything related to the first game and updates got really sparse the more it went on. The book got cancelled completely.There is no story in Overwatch and nothing interesting to explore.
I don't know how anyone can look at this and not be terrified by consolidation
He is so disgustingly rich already. Personal wealth has a point of diminishing returns and he's well past it.Bobby Kotick being gone starting in 2024 will be huge, good riddance.
Unfortunate part that hes getting a massive payday while he's at it but him being gone is more important.
Xbox would live on as a third party publisher. but the IPs would still be deadI honestly don't have anything against MS... but what happens after they buy everybody and then gamepass fails and the whole industry desolves with MS game division.
Phil said it himself. Failing is a real possibility. He's scared of failing, so they are inviting the entire industry to a drowning party,
Lotta IPs could get swallowed up by this... though I supposed talent can lifeboat to another company.
They won't be using ANYONE's back catalog anytime soon. Not just Activision. $70b is not exactly a pocket change for MS, their first priority will be making that money back. And funding high budget games for series that'll no longer be on platforms where their target audience is on is not the way to do that.? there's a significantly greater chance of MS using their back catalog of IPs. Activision has basically only made COD and the occasional remaster for the last 15 years.
They have (had?) a great roster of characters with backstories that people were invested in. They mishandled it more than almost any company has mishandled any IP ever. I think there's life in those bones.There is no story in Overwatch and nothing interesting to explore.
we're years away from seeing any significant changes from Activision-Blizzard's existing game plans, definitelyThey won't be using ANYONE's back catalog anytime soon. Not just Activision. $70b is not exactly a pocket change for MS, their first priority will be making that money back. And funding high budget games for series that'll no longer be on platforms where their target audience is on is not the way to do that.
I feel we're years away from AB's first non-CoD console game under MS umbrella.
Because 10 euro per month is a pretty damn good deal to play all of that.I don't know how anyone can look at this and not be terrified by consolidation
The benefits of the short term do not outweigh the consequences long term. I do not foresee this being beneficial to anyone right up until this becomes the catalyst for the next video game crash of the 2030sBecause 10 euro per month is a pretty damn good deal to play all of that.
looking at this is like being face to face with an nightmarish eldrich creature i can already feel my sanity slipping
They won't be using ANYONE's back catalog anytime soon. Not just Activision. $70b is not exactly a pocket change for MS, their first priority will be making that money back. And funding high budget games for series that'll no longer be on platforms where their target audience is on is not the way to do that.
I feel we're years away from AB's first non-CoD console game under MS umbrella.
Neither were ATV. They actually recently diverted all (or nearly all) of their resources to work only on COD. So things can only get better...Sad news. Much more franchises to die with this acquisition compared to Bethesda. Microsoft has just spend an astronomical $70 billion, it's gonna be some time before they use what they got. And they'll never use some of the IP's.
this isn't a good thing
No, becauseAm I the only one who looks at that video thumbnail and thinks "all of these games are terrible; why did we care so much?"
I think the important point to remember is that this was already happening under the current leadership. Microsoft might shuffle around some of these decisions, but the initial Activision acquisitions is what killed the future of these IPs. Even without this new acquisition, we were never going to see some of these games again.Sad news. Much more franchises to die with this acquisition compared to Bethesda. Microsoft has just spend an astronomical $70 billion, it's gonna be some time before they use what they got. And they'll never use some of the IP's.
It's a really good thing for all of you that part A is true given how this forum feels about Pikmin 2.No, because
A ) the taste of the gaming audience doesn't revolve around you
B ) Overwatch used to be pretty damn good, and is honestly probably still fun
Halo also used to be great and is in the thumbnail, but that's not an Activision ip.
Yeah that's exactly what I implied in my post. I said: "first non-CoD console game". I totally expect MS to revive StarCraft sometime soon and I expect it to be the first big "Xbox studios" AB game to be released.I think you're wrong in one sense. Warcraft and Starcraft are huge IP that not really being used properly. I would not be surprised if Starcraft 3 for example is a go and announced next year at MS' urging. If they can make a new Starcraft or Warcraft game that is a hit, it's a huge boon to this buyout.
the deal was only for CoDNintendo must be glad they signed that agreement for ABK games for the next 10 years. Switch 2 is set to have even better 3rd party support than the Switch.
Poor Sony left with only CoD scaps.
the deal was only for CoD
In February this year, Microsoft announced that it had signed binding agreement with Nintendo that would see new Call of Duty games releasing for the Japanese company's platforms for 10 years after the closure of Microsoft's proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard, though as it turns out, it seems the deal will cover more than just Call of Duty games.
Microsoft has stated in recently submitted documents as part of its trial against the FTC that, as per the aforementioned agreement, it is contractually obligated to release all future Activision Blizzard content for Nintendo platforms, not just Call of Duty.
"Nintendo has a contractual right to obtain Activision content post-merger, including Call of Duty," the document reads (pages 74 and 120).
In the same document, Microsoft also restated it's commitment to release Call of Duty for an "in-development" successor to the Nintendo Switch.
Recently, Microsoft announced that it has also entered into 10-year agreement with PlayStation, though that deal will only cover future Call of Duty releases.
Recently, the FTC was denied an in injunction against Microsoft's proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard, while follow-up appeal against the verdict has also been denied. Microsoft is currently also in the process of negotiating terms for the deal with the UK's CMA, though the regulator recently pushed back the deadline for its final decision regarding the acquisition until August 29.
I recall one of the MS people posting an update stating it was only about CoD. I'll see if I can find that updateSony is only getting CoD; Nintendo agreed early and gets ABK content for 10 years.
https://gamingbolt.com/microsofts-10-year-agreement-with-nintendo-covers-all-future-activision-blizzard-releases/
even comes with a spiffy trailer
shitstain Kotick's words
Bobby Kotick: A new chapter for Activision Blizzard
CEO Bobby Kotick writes that combining with Microsoft will enable Activision Blizzard to deliver more fun, more joy, and more connection to more players.newsroom.activisionblizzard.com
Xbox's comments
Welcoming the Legendary Teams at Activision Blizzard King to Team Xbox - Xbox Wire
Today we welcome the teams at Activision Blizzard King to Team Xbox. It's a good day to play.news.xbox.com
games will be coming to Game Pass
and, of course, CoD will be coming to Nintendo. probably next year since they said they'll start work as soon as they sign the deal
I recall one of the MS people posting an update stating it was only about CoD. I'll see if I can find that update
Not only is the Nintendo Switch more popular than the Xbox overall,
see 6/23/23 Tr. (Spencer), at 435:20–22, Nintendo has a contractual right to obtain Activision
content post-merger, including Call of Duty, see 6/23/23 Tr. (Spencer), at 443:23–25.
It's in the legal document linked in the article.
Earlier it was assumed to be just CoD, but it came out that Microsoft would include Activision content for agreeing to the merger in the earlier stages.
I see:Nintendo's gotta pump those numbers up.