BreakAtmo
Bob-omb
- Pronouns
- He/Him
lol how did pablo get banned again?!
Repeatedly posting AI 'art'. If he spends the Switch 2 reveal banned, he'll never live it down.
lol how did pablo get banned again?!
Potentially for multiple breaches or something? When he first joined he would ‘write’ full paragraphs using AI in this very thread.that's so stupid
This thread should come with a motion sickness warning.Saw a reddit comment on gamingleaksandrumours about the trailer being taken down. It turns out the band, White Denim, who made the song actually has been having a lot of trouble when it comes to the rights and licensing their own music. Multiple videos of theirs apparently have been removed from YouTube because of this and some albums were pulled from Spotify temporarily. This is all due to the band not actually owning the masters of their own music, and their publisher got bought out a few months back. The law just doesn't know who owns the rights to the music anymore. So, assuming this is true, I think that settles it. It's not that Nintendo wanted to take down the trailer, it's that the rights issue is so messy that Nintendo couldn't navigate it in time to extend the licensing.
At this rate there's a legitimate chance he spends the reveal banned, such an awesome moment to be excluded from it like that.Repeatedly posting AI 'art'. If he spends the Switch 2 reveal banned, he'll never live it down.
It’s been reiterated not to do it and he knows that. He won’t listenthat's so stupid
the song used for the switch reveal trailer seems to still be available on their youtube page. assuming i’m looking at the right one - Ha Ha Ha Ha (yeah) ?Saw a reddit comment on gamingleaksandrumours about the trailer being taken down. It turns out the band, White Denim, who made the song actually has been having a lot of trouble when it comes to the rights and licensing their own music. Multiple videos of theirs apparently have been removed from YouTube because of this and some albums were pulled from Spotify temporarily. This is all due to the band not actually owning the masters of their own music, and their publisher got bought out a few months back. The law just doesn't know who owns the rights to the music anymore. So, assuming this is true, I think that settles it. It's not that Nintendo wanted to take down the trailer, it's that the rights issue is so messy that Nintendo couldn't navigate it in time to extend the licensing.
Yeah, both music videos is still up on their YouTube channel. I also couldn't find anything online about their music being taken off Spotify or them having legal troubles with the album.the song used for the switch reveal trailer seems to still be available on their youtube page. assuming i’m looking at the right one - Ha Ha Ha Ha (yeah) ?
Yes but the person on Reddit said this has happened in the past and there's still some issues. Their music video staying up doesn't mean there's not licensing problems involving third parties.the song used for the switch reveal trailer seems to still be available on their youtube page. assuming i’m looking at the right one - Ha Ha Ha Ha (yeah) ?
Boy did that kid know how to livelol how did pablo get banned again?!
i don’t understand, how does that make sense? if it’s a licensing issue with the band and nintendo used that music in the reveal trailer, why would nintendo have to remove their video revealing their current console, but the band can keep it up on their page?Yes but the person on Reddit said this has happened in the past and there's still some issues. Their music video staying up doesn't mean there's not licensing problems involving third parties.
Only 99 more pages until reveal.Damn, 1901.
Licensing is weird. This doesn't seem like an outlandish scenario to me.i don’t understand, how does that make sense? if it’s a licensing issue with the band and nintendo used that music in the reveal trailer, why would nintendo have to remove their video revealing their current console, but the band can keep it up on their page?
After all, I doubt this is going to last long unanswered. Give yourselves a day or two to see the endgame, if it's truly intentional then we're literally at the finish line. Win win for everyone IMO.Yeah, both music videos is still up on their YouTube channel. I also couldn't find anything online about their music being taken off Spotify or them having legal troubles with the album.
I think it's best to dismiss what the redditor said until he can prove otherwise.
That was a completely different set of Amiibo we already knew was coming, though. So there's still a question mark about the restock.The fact that they just dropped a trailer for a new amiibo is making it feel less likely that the amiibo restock is related to NG.
Because the band likely still owns the song, so they wouldn't need to remove it off their own channel. It is only Nintendo license that has expired.i don’t understand, how does that make sense? if it’s a licensing issue with the band and nintendo used that music in the reveal trailer, why would nintendo have to remove their video revealing their current console, but the band can keep it up on their page?
Children and families are hardcore gamers, change my mindOff-topic but topical...this question from the October 2017 Financial Results briefing. Maybe it was an understandable concern at the time, but pretty funny now.
I don't think there was ever a trailer for it. They revealed it in the Mario Wonder Direct.Was there ever a trailer for the Mario OLED switch?
I can't find it on their channel... which is weird since there's a trailer for splatoon, totk, and pokemon
Did they delist it?
Hmm.. odd that they're not advertising it in the same way as the other editionsI don't think there was ever a trailer for it. They revealed it in the Mario Wonder Direct.
which is contrary to what the reddit comment was saying right? where they suggested a number of the band’s songs had been removed from their page due to licensing issues. so if the song in question had been removed from the band’s page i can see how that could potentially cause an issue for nintendo, but that song hasn’t been removed, which means either the nintendo licence has expired, or there’s something fishy going on.Because the band likely still owns the song, so they wouldn't need to remove it off their own channel. It is only Nintendo license that has expired.
Yes, if there were legal issues regarding ownership of the song, the music video most likely would also be removed. To me, it just looks like Nintendo's license has expired. The trailer wasn't copyright claimed, Nintendo privatised it.which is contrary to what the reddit comment was saying right? where they suggested a number of the band’s songs had been removed from their page due to licensing issues. so if the song in question had been removed from the band’s page i can see how that could potentially cause an issue for nintendo, but that song hasn’t been removed, which means either the nintendo licence has expired, or there’s something fishy going on.
You sly dog, I always had my suspicions that you had exclusive rumorsYou all just need to accept we are getting no official Switch RTX (that's the new name for it now cause Nvidia wants co-branding, it's my newest rumour I am clinging too) until 2024.
Could be to avoid a trailer for an OLED switch console coinciding with another console announcement…perchance (I will never not use this word when and if possible)Hmm.. odd that they're not advertising it in the same way as the other editions
I dont think they would remove the whole switch trailer just for a holiday bundle, unless they are privating it for like a few weeks but then again they dont private any of the other switch trailersA fellow member mentioned it, but it’s possible they’re dropping a trailer for the Mario OLED Switch. The thing did wonders in Japan. Some extra marketing could help keep boosting hardware sales.
Note: I’m on the boat that this could be Swich 2 related, but It’s more confirmation bias than anything objective
That wouldn't line up with previous occurrences, it already got a trailer within Mario Wonder's marketing campaign and they'd take down the other Switch (preferably OLED) trailer rather than the literal reveal. Regardless of it being licensing or legit, this sounds the most unlikely considering what many people have said.A fellow member mentioned it, but it’s possible they’re dropping a trailer for the Mario OLED Switch. The thing did wonders in Japan. Some extra marketing could help keep boosting hardware sales.
Note: I’m on the boat that this could be Swich 2 related, but It’s more confirmation bias than anything objective
it's possible. I think children absolutely can be based on my own childhood lmao.Children and families are hardcore gamers, change my mind
That's what I'm thinking (optimist)Could be to avoid a trailer for an OLED switch console coinciding with another console announcement…perchance (I will never not use this word when and if possible)
I'm not exactly sure where this person got all of this information. Some of this seems to be completely false as well. Their album "Stiff" was specifically the only one removed from Spotify. It was still up on Apple Music, so it clearly wasn't a full-on licensing issue. Otherwise, it should have been taken down on all platforms. No other albums were taken down to my knowledge. I also can't find anything on people removing a bunch of videos using their music "in the past 4 weeks". This same person also didn't know for sure if it was a legal issue. It was only speculation from the person he DM'd, who said himself he had no idea why it was actually taken down.Saw a reddit comment on gamingleaksandrumours about the trailer being taken down. It turns out the band, White Denim, who made the song actually has been having a lot of trouble when it comes to the rights and licensing their own music. Multiple videos of theirs apparently have been removed from YouTube because of this and some albums were pulled from Spotify temporarily. This is all due to the band not actually owning the masters of their own music, and their publisher got bought out a few months back. The law just doesn't know who owns the rights to the music anymore. So, assuming this is true, I think that settles it. It's not that Nintendo wanted to take down the trailer, it's that the rights issue is so messy that Nintendo couldn't navigate it in time to extend the licensing.
can always count on paraspikey to do the research and get the receiptsI'm not exactly sure where this person got all of this information. Some of this seems to be completely false as well. Their album "Stiff" was specifically the only one removed from Spotify. It was still up on Apple Music, so it clearly wasn't a full-on licensing issue. Otherwise, it should have been taken down on all platforms. No other albums were taken down to my knowledge. I also can't find anything on people removing a bunch of videos using videos using their music "in the past 4 weeks". This same person also didn't know for sure if it was a legal issue. It was only speculation from the person he DM'd, who said himself he had no idea why it was actually taken down.
(Source)
The album is back up on Spotify as of 15 days ago. If they took it down due to the rights of the records falling through, then such issues have been resolved. Otherwise, it shouldn't be back up. I can't find anything about a publisher being bought out recently at all. Downtown Records, the record label that handles publishing and licensing, has not been bought out recently, nor has there been any issues with them from what I can find recently. It was bought by its original co-founders in 2013 and was made fully independent. The record label is still owned by them, and nothing has changed in that regard. The distributor of the Stiff album, Sony Red, was folded in 2017, and ever since, they've been working with Universal/Geffen Records, but that was, once again, back in 2017. Nothing has changed since then. The video wasn't taken down in 2017 after this folding.
(Sony RED Source)
(Downtown Records Source)
(White Denim Source)
These claims seem to be mostly false and not founded by any actual information. The record label is still fine and has not been bought out. That claim came out of nowhere. Unless I'm missing something, if I am, please let me know, and I'll edit this post.
But why? Other than for the YouTube app.Now I'm curious about how much power RTX Video Super Resolution would hypothetically consume on a Arm based SoC such as T239.
Alright I'll edit the original comment, you found more stuff than I did. I appreciate you looking into it more, I was in class and couldn't really do much in that regard. I still think this is some sort of weird licensing thing tho, it being almost exactly 7 years later and all that.I'm not exactly sure where this person got all of this information. Some of this seems to be completely false as well. Their album "Stiff" was specifically the only one removed from Spotify. It was still up on Apple Music, so it clearly wasn't a full-on licensing issue. Otherwise, it should have been taken down on all platforms. No other albums were taken down to my knowledge. I also can't find anything on people removing a bunch of videos using videos using their music "in the past 4 weeks". This same person also didn't know for sure if it was a legal issue. It was only speculation from the person he DM'd, who said himself he had no idea why it was actually taken down.
(Source)
The album is back up on Spotify as of 15 days ago. If they took it down due to the rights of the records falling through, then such issues have been resolved. Otherwise, it shouldn't be back up. I can't find anything about a publisher being bought out recently at all. Downtown Records, the record label that handles publishing and licensing, has not been bought out recently, nor has there been any issues with them from what I can find recently. It was bought by its original co-founders in 2013 and was made fully independent. The record label is still owned by them, and nothing has changed in that regard. The distributor of the Stiff album, Sony Red, was folded in 2017, and ever since, they've been working with Universal/Geffen Records, but that was, once again, back in 2017. Nothing has changed since then. The video wasn't taken down in 2017 after this folding.
(Sony RED Source)
(Downtown Records Source)
(White Denim Source)
These claims seem to be mostly false and not founded by any actual information. The record label is still fine and has not been bought out. That claim came out of nowhere. Unless I'm missing something, if I am, please let me know, and I'll edit this post.
I was really banking on the guy getting back to me quickly because the scenario seemed plausible. But I've been one guy'd and it got 21 Yeah's. People are just gonna take what I said as gospel. My comment is going to pop up on some sort of crappy AI generated gaming news article now and I'll die from cringe.“Random person on the internet” attacks again
Honestly, I think there's a middle ground here. Kit and Krista indicated that yeah, licensing comes into play with these videos. But (IIRC) they also indicated that it's common practice to renew said licenses for a year at a time after the initial expiration.Love ya'll, you're all very smart.
Trying to reverse engineer IP law from first principles, or guess licensing shenanigans in the music industry without having worked in it - fool's errand. It's weirder than you could possibly imagine in your free time.
Not saying it is licensing shenanigans, but you can't dismiss it, because you cannot imagine how insanely complicated it would be. We're talking about an industry where the biggest pop star in the western world had to rerecord her own early albums because a label keeps hard drives in a vault and IP law treats them like artifacts in Final Fantasy game.
Bruh moment if they put a Wii U type name cause of NvidiaYou all just need to accept we are getting no official Switch RTX (that's the new name for it now cause Nvidia wants co-branding, it's my newest rumour I am clinging too) until 2024.
Switch 3.5Bruh moment if they put a Wii U type name cause of Nvidia
I think someone else said it but it's somewhat possible Nintendo doesn't consider it worth it to continue paying a license when they're planning on revealing the next platform early next year (march).Honestly, I think there's a middle ground here. Kit and Krista indicated that yeah, licensing comes into play with these videos. But (IIRC) they also indicated that it's common practice to renew said licenses for a year at a time after the initial expiration.
Why would this year be the year it no longer becomes worth renewing? Draw your own conclusions. Me personally, I'll add it to the smoke pile, but I don't think it says anything one way or the other about a reveal before the end of the year if the decision was to let it expire now or renew it all the way to next October.
"Y'know those concern y'all had with your Xbox One? We decided to make it a feature and monitor you at all times. That's why we added the AR Camera!"Deep Learning Super Switch (DLSS)
That's basically what I'm getting at, yeah. Could this be tied to new hardware? Sure. Will we definitely see it before the holidays if it is? No.I think someone else said it but it's somewhat possible Nintendo doesn't consider it worth it to continue paying a license when they're planning on revealing the next platform early next year (march).
They still have other videos to advertise the current Switch (or could just do a new ad).