D
Deleted member 887
Guest
Occam’s razor says that “entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity” - strictly speaking, supposing that Nintendo intends to make unannounced exclusives is actually a violation of Occam’s razor.You can also use Occam's razor:
I absolutely agree. But that doesn’t definitively answer the “revision/successor/revcessor” discussion, nor does it answer the question of continued support for the classic switch. Which was what was on the table.if Nintendo goes through the trouble of making a device capable of things their current console clearly cannot do, it is likely that they intend to release software that the current console clearly cannot handle. Otherwise, they would just be making a gift to third parties and that's quite a stretch knowing how Nintendo operates.
Without more info, we’re just going to keep going in the same sets of circles.