• Hey everyone, staff have documented a list of banned content and subject matter that we feel are not consistent with site values, and don't make sense to host discussion of on Famiboards. This list (and the relevant reasoning per item) is viewable here.

StarTopic Future Nintendo Hardware & Technology Speculation & Discussion |ST| (New Staff Post, Please read)

I think studios like Capcom and Square Enix will ramp up their support for the Switch 2, they already released many titles for Switch but for Switch 2 Capcom will bring their RE remakes and new RE games while Square Enix can release new FF titles to Switch 2. Fromsoft can bring Elden Ring to Switch 2.

Red dead redemption 2 will certainly come to Switch 2 as well.
Yeah this is pretty much what I expected, especially with Capcom.

I do think it's odd that Take-Two is so interested in the Switch if you consider their recent interviews. Like... they might genuinely be very invested in getting a lot of games released for the system, including (potentially) GTA6. Very interesting year for those who want to drive over pedestrians during a car journey.
 
What bothers you so much about my post? Is it the confidence?
I'm glad we got to a point of amicably replying to each other but dude it really isn't coming across that you're confident, more arrogant and condescending towards people. Please re-evaluate the way you're posting, surely you can see the common reaction to your posts isn't normal right? An example of confidence would be (my goat) oldpuck.

Anyway I hope we can get back to regular topics cus this shit is grating to read at this point. We need no drama for at least 7 days and the Gods might bless us with a real leak.
 
Yeah this is pretty much what I expected, especially with Capcom.

I do think it's odd that Take-Two is so interested in the Switch if you consider their recent interviews. Like... they might genuinely be very invested in getting a lot of games released for the system, including (potentially) GTA6. Very interesting year for those who want to drive over pedestrians during a car journey.
And from CD projekt red i wonder, is a Cyberpunk release on the Switch 2 feasible? They did manage to port Witcher 3 to the Switch, so they have proven their interest in working with Nintendo. Cyberpunk is technically a last gen title but probably the most difficult last gen title to port over to the Switch 2. But nothing would prove the hardware upgrade Switch 2 has over the Switch if it can get a game like Cyberpunk running on it.
 
I think studios like Capcom and Square Enix will ramp up their support for the Switch 2, they already released many titles for Switch but for Switch 2 Capcom will bring their RE remakes and new RE games while Square Enix can release new FF titles to Switch 2. Fromsoft can bring Elden Ring to Switch 2.
The brief period from 2017-2018 where I would be confused that I didn't see the Nintendo Switch logo at the end of every trailer I watched. I want that ignorance back but for the next 5 years lol.
 
Yeah this is pretty much what I expected, especially with Capcom.

I do think it's odd that Take-Two is so interested in the Switch if you consider their recent interviews. Like... they might genuinely be very invested in getting a lot of games released for the system, including (potentially) GTA6. Very interesting year for those who want to drive over pedestrians during a car journey.
Capcom, Sega/Atlus, Bandai Namco & Square Enix i expect bigger support than they were on switch 1 tbh, we could see previously "modern" games (like KH3, FF7R, RE-engine RE games, SF6, P3R, Yakuza, Tales of Arise, Elden Ring, etc...)

As for T2, yeah it is interesting their sudden interest on switch, Big example is when they chose to port RDR1 there but not on pc at all which is arguably the more requested port lol
 
And from CD projekt red i wonder, is a Cyberpunk release on the Switch 2 feasible? They did manage to port Witcher 3 to the Switch, so they have proven their interest in working with Nintendo. Cyberpunk is technically a last gen title but probably the most difficult last gen title to port over to the Switch 2. But nothing would prove the hardware upgrade Switch 2 has over the Switch if it can get a game like Cyberpunk running on it.
If you can slap CP2077, GTA6 or Elden Ring onto your system for day 1, that's pretty much all you need in order to say "Yeah we can compete".

Idk which specifically will appear, but I have a hard time imagining CP2077 won't appear.
 
Capcom, Sega/Atlus, Bandai Namco & Square Enix i expect bigger support than they were on switch 1 tbh, we could see previously "modern" games (like KH3, FF7R, RE-engine RE games, SF6, P3R, Yakuza, Tales of Arise, Elden Ring, etc...)

As for T2, yeah it is interesting their sudden interest on switch, Big example is when they chose to port RDR1 there but not on pc at all which is arguably the more requested port lol
Frankly the lack of Persona 3 Reload port for Sw1 basically shouted "Yeah Atlus is waiting for the easier port job". There's literally no other reason why they wouldn't. I can also expect a lot of native ports of the games you mentioned... maybe with the exception of Yakuza but that depends on if the series producer has a change of heart.

Also, I genuinely didn't think about the implications of RDR1's port of Switch, that explains a lot. So that basically means "Yeah there's a good chance we're getting an RDR2 port on launch day aren't we?"
 
If you can slap CP2077, GTA6 or Elden Ring onto your system for day 1, that's pretty much all you need in order to say "Yeah we can compete".

Idk which specifically will appear, but I have a hard time imagining CP2077 won't appear.
And we of course already know that the deal between Microsoft and Nintendo regarding CoD starts with the Switch 2. So that is another franchise on Switch 2 that never released on the Switch. So yes Switch 2 will have more third party support, from bigger studios in Japan and the west compared to the Switch.
 
And from CD projekt red i wonder, is a Cyberpunk release on the Switch 2 feasible? They did manage to port Witcher 3 to the Switch, so they have proven their interest in working with Nintendo. Cyberpunk is technically a last gen title but probably the most difficult last gen title to port over to the Switch 2. But nothing would prove the hardware upgrade Switch 2 has over the Switch if it can get a game like Cyberpunk running on it.
Cyberpunk seems to run okay on the SD. I think that should be the benchmark.
 
And we of course already know that the deal between Microsoft and Nintendo regarding CoD starts with the Switch 2. So that is another franchise on Switch 2 that never released on the Switch. So yes Switch 2 will have more third party support, from bigger studios in Japan and the west compared to the Switch.
Random thought: What about Bethesda? I know it's not likely that the big stuff (namely Starfield) will appear on Switch due to exclusivity reasons, but what about stuff like Hi-Fi Rush? That's a game that'd feel right at home on a Nintendo system imo and considering it was very clearly released with the idea of it being a Game Pass title, a second-life on the Switch would work for the title imo.

Idk, probably wishful thinking. Still happy that more stuff will come to Switch 2 from ABK/Microsoft, especially since Microsoft isn't seeing Nintendo as direct competition in the same way that, like, Sony is.
 
To give you a serious answer to this: If I got you right I think you focus there to much on the single quarters. I mean while First Party games always have a bigger effect on the overall Software sales in form of spikes, the overall sales aren‘t really declining that much. Their last FY in Software sales was still way above average and not that far behind from the year before.

This year will have a strong first quarter because of Zelda, but that was always very clear. Though we shouldn‘t underestimate Super Mario Wonder, that game will sell a lot no matter what.

Personally I believe that the Switch would still have an amazing year, regardless if they would announce the next console this year or at least before March 2024.

Though I agree with you that the Bundles don‘t say a lot about the timing of the next console.
The trajectory isn't about the software though, software is of course important but software is usually on a delayed trajectory due to software being more reliant on the entire userbase. The hardware sales are certainly not basically flat and is declining. There are sales trackers that have shown the Switch is declining, we are simply too late in the product cycle for sales to be reversed outside of major, major selling games like Zelda. Mario will be major, major but it's releasing during the holiday season, that is much harder to reverse. Pokemon learned that last year. Switch will have the most amazing year 7 in history but what puts that in jeopardy would be a Switch 2 annoucement and release early next year. No console in history has not been affected by its successor to release, how can you really believe it would still accomplish this goal with a successor early next year? That's just something I can't forsee and tons of past data points to it not happening. That's why Im so confident.
Partially.
It's the absurd lack of self-awareness you exhibit when you show your confidence in the way that you do.

You clearly think that you're touching a nerve because of how "right" you are, but I assure you, nobody gives a fuck about your opinions. You just annoy everybody when you act like you have more facts than anybody else, because that's not true. You're just like everybody else here; speculating on limited information.

People are just annoyed at your self-importance and refusal to take criticism. It's funny and annoying. Trust me, you're not offending anybody.
I can have confidence in the things I say. If I wasn't touching a nerve then you and many others wouldn't be so bothered. It's nothing more than my speculation with Nintendo's data to support it. You talk about self-importance but are in this post speaking for everyone with nonsense like "you just annoy everybody", like seriously this is straight up "karen" behavior. Boo hoo, he said something I don't like and even through in numbers, now im a victim. Nobody gives a fuck, yet it bothered you this much to villainize me. I didn't reply to any of your post, I made my own and some of you got bent out of shape and are now trying to victimize yourselves. I never said you lacked data, I presented mine supplied by Nintendo (its public data) and used to justify why I believe what I believe. That simple. If you weren't offended then you could have moved on. You clearly care and that's not my over confidence, that's your bending over backwards to address me that proves it. If you respond, ill respond via direct message so we no longer derail.
It's probably that you're being an asshole? It's not your opinion that is causing the strong reaction, it's the way it's presented.

I want to give you a little grace here - you're not the only one driven a little nuts by a certain until-recently-banned poster. But don't be surprised when folks match your tone.
I haven't been driven nuts, like seriously you guys are acting like I replied to your post when it was the other way around. Several posters memed, was condescending, and attacked my post yet im the one being the asshole? Like @bellydrum for example claims no one cares yet so many of you bent over backward to address it? Like lets be serious, me and my data wasn't what some of you wanted to see and now some of you are bending over backwards to make yourselves out to be victims. I'm an asshole according to you because my post was direct and against what some of you wanted to here. Im not going to sit here and let some of you paint me as a villiam because you don't like what I said. That's "karen" like behavior. Ill make this my last post on this subject, ill rather participate in real discussion.

PS: @eye0h Im definitely just confident, no arrogance or condescendence, just confident.
 
Last edited:
Are we near certain that the new console will be called ‘Switch X’ or ‘X Switch’? The X being a word, letter or number.

Nobody thinks it would be not feature the Switch name?

I mean I’m not ruling it out, but it would be a wild choice. And by wild I mean baffling, maybe even moronic. It’s such a strong product name - it’s accessible, not overtly “gamer” branded; it describes itself well, but is flexible enough to apply to any future modes (eg. handheld, tabletop); and it’s very well established, with some record breaking sales accords the globe.

But yeah. We’ll see?
 
Random thought: What about Bethesda? I know it's not likely that the big stuff (namely Starfield) will appear on Switch due to exclusivity reasons, but what about stuff like Hi-Fi Rush? That's a game that'd feel right at home on a Nintendo system imo and considering it was very clearly released with the idea of it being a Game Pass title, a second-life on the Switch would work for the title imo.

Idk, probably wishful thinking. Still happy that more stuff will come to Switch 2 from ABK/Microsoft, especially since Microsoft isn't seeing Nintendo as direct competition in the same way that, like, Sony is.
From Bethesda only expect Quake remake type of games just like in Playstation case. Nintendo will get only the same games as Playstation bar situations like 007 or Banjo in NSO.
 
Are we near certain that the new console will be called ‘Switch X’ or ‘X Switch’? The X being a word, letter or number.

Nobody thinks it would be not feature the Switch name?
I hope not friend, Xbox already used X enough. :LOL:

I’m still hoping it will be called Super Nintendo Switch.
 
Not replying to anyone in particular:

Regarding Nintendo’s financial forecast for FY03/2024, it wouldn’t be unusual if Nintendo revise later. During the Switch era, they did it twice in FY23, twice in FY22, once in FY21, once in FY20, and twice in FY18.

Regarding the potential impact to stock performance, since Investors have been clamoring for a Switch successor, announcing it will most likely drive up the stock valuation even if it may depress the holiday sales in the short term.

For this FY at least, stock analysts don’t seem to take Nintendo’s guidance seriously, so neither should we. According to a Nikkei survey of analyst forecasts, the average of their FY24 net profit expectations is 422.7BN yen. That’s 82.7BN yen above Nintendo’s official forecast of 340BN yen—a 24% divergence!

4iUJ15T.png
 
I hope not friend, Xbox already used X enough. :LOL:

I’m still hoping it will be called Super Nintendo Switch.
I might as well say it here because it's funny enough, but the Discord I'm in decided to just call it the "Switch REX" in relation to the glow-up between Xenoblade 2's Rex and FR's Rex (in addition to being a reference to the Monado Replica EX or REX) and it kinda caught on. Frankly, there are far worse names for a Switch successor than that if we're talking unironically.

Tbh, a simple "Super Nintendo Switch" would work because it's pretty much the same marketing as, say, the SNES or even something like the GBA. Just slap another word on and that does most of the talking.
 
Random thought: What about Bethesda? I know it's not likely that the big stuff (namely Starfield) will appear on Switch due to exclusivity reasons, but what about stuff like Hi-Fi Rush? That's a game that'd feel right at home on a Nintendo system imo and considering it was very clearly released with the idea of it being a Game Pass title, a second-life on the Switch would work for the title imo.

Idk, probably wishful thinking. Still happy that more stuff will come to Switch 2 from ABK/Microsoft, especially since Microsoft isn't seeing Nintendo as direct competition in the same way that, like, Sony is.
If the word on the street is true about an Oblivion remake, maybe that will come over?
The original is multiplat (though never made it to Nintendo) and Skyrim on Switch did wonders.

If I were Microsoft, I would just keep it exclusive, but who knows
 
From Bethesda only expect Quake remake type of games just like in Playstation case. Nintendo will get only the same games as Playstation bar situations like 007 or Banjo in NSO.
If the word on the street is true about an Oblivion remake, maybe that will come over?
The original is multiplat (though never made it to Nintendo) and Skyrim on Switch did wonders.

If I were Microsoft, I would just keep it exclusive, but who knows

Tbh I kinda expected these reactions, but it was worth asking. A shame, but a man can dream.

Not replying to anyone in particular:

Regarding Nintendo’s financial forecast for FY03/2024, it wouldn’t be unusual if Nintendo revise later. During the Switch era, they did it twice in FY23, twice in FY22, once in FY21, once in FY20, and twice in FY18.

Regarding the potential impact to stock performance, since Investors have been clamoring for a Switch successor, announcing it will most likely drive up the stock valuation even if it may depress the holiday sales in the short term.

For this FY at least, stock analysts don’t seem to take Nintendo’s guidance seriously, so neither should we. According to a Nikkei survey of analyst forecasts, the average of their FY24 net profit expectations is 422.7BN yen. That’s 82.7BN yen above Nintendo’s official forecast of 340BN yen—a 24% divergence!

4iUJ15T.png

I can't claim I fully understand this, but are the investors essentially calling Nintendo's bluff about Nintendo's FY expectations and are saying "Yeah right, so you're going to announce the Switch 2 aren't you?"
That kinda puts Nintendo into the situation where they kinda have to announce/release the Sw2 before the financial year closes out otherwise it'll disappoint investors? Idk, I'd like someone to explain this to me like I'm 5.
 
Are we near certain that the new console will be called ‘Switch X’ or ‘X Switch’? The X being a word, letter or number.

Nobody thinks it would be not feature the Switch name?
No good reason to change it.
 
I can't claim I fully understand this, but are the investors essentially calling Nintendo's bluff about Nintendo's FY expectations and are saying "Yeah right, so you're going to announce the Switch 2 aren't you?"
That kinda puts Nintendo into the situation where they kinda have to announce/release the Sw2 before the financial year closes out otherwise it'll disappoint investors? Idk, I'd like someone to explain this to me like I'm 5.
If Nintendo announces a successor before the end of the fiscal, it is likely to have a short term impact on the current machine's sales. This is a well known economic force called the Osborne Effect.

Nintendo bet on selling 15 million units this fiscal. @fwd-bwd is pointing out that investors are unlikely to punish Nintendo for announcing the successor, even if it seems to cause them to miss their sales target this year.
 
Not replying to anyone in particular:

Regarding Nintendo’s financial forecast for FY03/2024, it wouldn’t be unusual if Nintendo revise later. During the Switch era, they did it twice in FY23, twice in FY22, once in FY21, once in FY20, and twice in FY18.

Regarding the potential impact to stock performance, since Investors have been clamoring for a Switch successor, announcing it will most likely drive up the stock valuation even if it may depress the holiday sales in the short term.

For this FY at least, stock analysts don’t seem to take Nintendo’s guidance seriously, so neither should we. According to a Nikkei survey of analyst forecasts, the average of their FY24 net profit expectations is 422.7BN yen. That’s 82.7BN yen above Nintendo’s official forecast of 340BN yen—a 24% divergence!

4iUJ15T.png
Now this is the type of discussion im into! They certainly can revise but you don't think its weird that Nintendo gives a reason everytime they do? You guys have to stop acting like it's no big deal to adjust their forcast. FY23 wasn't a good look, they overshot it and blamed chip shortages. FY22, FY21, and FY20 were all affected by the pandemics unpredictable demand. FY18 was notorious for Labo underperforming and Smash and Pokemon not being able to make up for that underperformance from Labo. Nintendo predicted 20 million that fiscal year. Nintendo doesn't make forecast just adjust later, they are meant to be accurate and shows a misunderstanding of their own business when they miss their forecast. Look at Sony and how they are bending over backwards with multiple price cuts for the PS5 to make it's lofty goal of 25 million. These forecast are serious, not just goals they are remaining hopeful of. They should be accurate.
 
0
No console in history has not been affected by its successor to release, how can you really believe it would still accomplish this goal with a successor early next year?
Like you said Switch is in its 7th year and hardware sales are at that point usually not a focus anymore of console life cycles. Yes normally the hardware and software sales are always delayed to each other: Usually (if everything goes well) the first few years a console sells a lot to get a big userbase. But then in the later years a console will sell more software because of said big ideally active userbase.

Though while this is true for Switch too, it is a bit a special case because it still exceeds expectations in every possible way. Not even Nintendo can say with absolute certainty how long it will still sell well at this late stage, they were really lucky even this year, but at some point they need new hardware and they also need to plan that years in advance.

So right now I believe that it dosen‘t matter as much anymore to Nintendo if they just get to their projected 15 million units sold because the Switch already achieved so much hardware wise. Most buyers of the Switch right now are likely late adopters who don‘t care that much about new console releases so they will not be affected in their decision making by a new console release anyway.

Important for Nintendo right now is to keep their userbase and sell their software. In order to do that they need to announce the next console at a point where the Switch story isn‘t already completely told to ensure a smooth transition. That‘s why I believe their hardware estimations are no indication when they would tease or announce the next console.
 
Last edited:
I was wondering how well the online only games would be like on the next console
existing ones on switch like Fortnite & Fall Guys as well as possibly upcoming ones like Mihoyo shtick, MMOs, etc...
 
I can't claim I fully understand this, but are the investors essentially calling Nintendo's bluff about Nintendo's FY expectations and are saying "Yeah right, so you're going to announce the Switch 2 aren't you?"
The first part not the second. The analyst consensus is that Nintendo forecast for this FY is an extreme lowball. They seem to believe that the windfall from the Mario movie, TotK, and other titles will substantially surpass Nintendo’s guidance. One well-known analyst (sorry I can’t find the link atm) even thinks that the hardware units will surprise people.

I don’t think this analyst survey gives us any insights on the NG timing, but it indicates that the investor community is calling BS on Nintendo’s FY24 forecast. My point is that we probably can’t place too much stock in the Nintendo forecast as a reference.
 
What point exactly are you trying to communicate here, and how exactly does said point contradict the likelihood of an intended H1 release when all behind-the-scenes activity is now indicating towards that timeframe?
Switch holiday sales, anounce the Switch sucessor now, and risk precious holiday sales, specially now Nintendo is heavily marketing Super Mario Bros Wonder
 
If Nintendo announces a successor before the end of the fiscal, it is likely to have a short term impact on the current machine's sales. This is a well known economic force called the Osborne Effect.

Nintendo bet on selling 15 million units this fiscal. @fwd-bwd is pointing out that investors are unlikely to punish Nintendo for announcing the successor, even if it seems to cause them to miss their sales target this year.
Ah, got it, thanks.

So (assuming I understood this right), Investors are very clearly hoping that Nintendo will achieve one of those two goals. If we get to the March fiscal earnings report (or I think March, might be Feb idk) and Nintendo sold 15 million units total, then they're fine. If they announce the successor without those units sold, they'll be okay with it because of that Osborne effect concept.

So it seems like that the investors are kinda offering Nintendo an out just in-case the last part of this fiscal year doesn't work out for them, through the announcement of their new system (which seems like Nintendo will probably do anyway, but we'll see). Good to see that investors are still proud followers of the Xanatos Gambit.
 
The first part not the second. The analyst consensus is that Nintendo forecast for this FY is an extreme lowball. They seem to believe that the windfall from the Mario movie, TotK, and other titles will substantially surpass Nintendo’s guidance. One well-known analyst (sorry I can’t find the link atm) even thinks that the hardware units will surprise people.

I don’t think this analyst survey gives us any insights on the NG timing, but it indicates that the investor community is calling BS on Nintendo’s FY24 forecast. My point is that we probably can’t place too much stock in the Nintendo forecast as a reference.
this analysists dont know the power of 2D Mario, easily capable of selling 25/30 milions units
 
The first part not the second. The analyst consensus is that Nintendo forecast for this FY is an extreme lowball. They seem to believe that the windfall from the Mario movie, TotK, and other titles will substantially surpass Nintendo’s guidance. One well-known analyst (sorry I can’t find the link atm) even thinks that the hardware units will surprise people.

I don’t think this analyst survey gives us any insights on the NG timing, but it indicates that the investor community is calling BS on Nintendo’s FY24 forecast. My point is that we probably can’t place too much stock in the Nintendo forecast as a reference.
This helps a lot too, thanks.
 
Are we near certain that the new console will be called ‘Switch X’ or ‘X Switch’? The X being a word, letter or number.

Nobody thinks it would be not feature the Switch name?
No certainty on my part. That's why I try to use NG or Redacted.
 
0
this analysists dont know the power of 2D Mario, easily capable of selling 25/30 milions units
I think you're reading it backwards. Investors think Nintendo's forecast is almost comically low, their projections have them surpassing the forecast by a lot.

The point of this discussion is that one of the things that could impact sales to get them back on track to match the forecast (rather than greatly exceed it) is announcing a successor.
 
like seriously this is straight up "karen" behavior. Boo hoo, he said something I don't like and even through in numbers, now im a victim. Nobody gives a fuck, yet it bothered you this much to villainize me. I didn't reply to any of your post, I made my own and some of you got bent out of shape and are now trying to victimize yourselves.
Coming into a thread and starting off a post by accusing us of twisting facts to support our own wishes, then digging your heels in and continuing to insist you're simply right and then calling people who call you out on your attitude "karens," is a very karen thing to do ya know

I never said you lacked data, I presented mine supplied by Nintendo (its public data) and used to justify why I believe what I believe.
Again, the very first thing you did was accuse the thread of "spinning" things to fit what we want

Maybe my post bothers you because deep down you know im right and don't even have enough belief in your own speculation to double down on your own speculation. I believe so much in my speculation that I am 100% behind it. If my opinion bothered you this much then it shows a complete lack of belief in your own.
Suggesting the people who are upset about your attitude are covering up some deep understanding that you're actually right about it all is some borderline gaslighty stuff

You could have ignored it but it got under you skin that much because it relied too much on facts to be ignored.
Actually the reason it got under my skin is because you're being an absolute jerk to people who are just trying to have some fun in here.
 
Like you said Switch is in its 7th year and hardware sales are at that point usually not a focus anymore of console life cycles. Yes normally the hardware and software sales are always delayed to each other: Usually (if everything goes well) the first few years a console sells a lot to get a big userbase. But then in the later years a console will sell more software because of said big ideally active userbase.

Though while this is true for Switch too, it is a bit a special case because it still excites expectations in every possible way. Not even Nintendo can say with absolute certainty how long it will still sell well at this late stage, they were really lucky even this year, but at some point they need new hardware and they also need to plan that years in advance.

So right now I believe that it dosen‘t matter as much anymore to Nintendo if they just get to their projected 15 million units sold because the Switch already achieved so much hardware wise. Most buyers of the Switch right now are likely late adopters who don‘t care that much about new console releases so they will not be affected in their decision making by a new console release anyway.

Important for Nintendo right now is to keep their userbase and sell their software. In order to do that they need to announce the next console at a point where the Switch story isn‘t already completely told to ensure a smooth transition. That‘s why I believe their hardware estimations are no indication when they would tease or announce the next console.
Although I disagree and do think the Switch's trajectory will help determine when the successor is released, I can atleast respect your well thought out reasoning. This is the type of discussion I like, nothing I can really dispute because Switch is a special case. It is aiming to outsell the highest of them all, that right there tells you it's a special case on top of the pandemic sending it through the roof. Nintendo may have always planned on holiday 2023 but the pandemic greatly boosted it's peak to high to even entertain this holiday. Yeah alot of people are late adopters but it doesn't help that the leading selling Switch is a premium model Switch, I would certainly say some of these people would be unhappy with finally upgrading to Oled and then finding out 6 months later a Switch 2 is coming. That's why I don't like the introduction of that red Oled, I also can't imagine what the software would be because a new 2D Mario is releasing in October and then a new 3D Marion in March? I'm sorry but I just don't see it along with the fiscal year goal.
 
Switch holiday sales, anounce the Switch sucessor now, and risk precious holiday sales, specially now Nintendo is heavily marketing Super Mario Bros Wonder

Risk which sales ? Switch bundles will fly either way, and Mario Wonder will sell 15-20m at least.

People that are buying Switches now are not the same kind that will buy a Switch 2 next year.
 
Although I disagree and do think the Switch's trajectory will help determine when the successor is released, I can atleast respect your well thought out reasoning. This is the type of discussion I like, nothing I can really dispute because Switch is a special case. It is aiming to outsell the highest of them all, that right there tells you it's a special case on top of the pandemic sending it through the roof. Nintendo may have always planned on holiday 2023 but the pandemic greatly boosted it's peak to high to even entertain this holiday. Yeah alot of people are late adopters but it doesn't help that the leading selling Switch is a premium model Switch, I would certainly say some of these people would be unhappy with finally upgrading to Oled and then finding out 6 months later a Switch 2 is coming. That's why I don't like the introduction of that red Oled, I also can't imagine what the software would be because a new 2D Mario is releasing in October and then a new 3D Marion in March? I'm sorry but I just don't see it along with the fiscal year goal.


Who said there would be a new Mario in March ? If the console is indeed releasing in H1 we will get the new Mario for holiday 2024 as usual

They don’t need a super strong line up for launch day, unlike Switch 1 there will be two gens on the market, and Nintendo said they wanted a smooth transition, this is how you do it
 
People that are buying Switches now are not the same kind that will buy a Switch 2 next year.
I actually want to bring this up briefly before I actually do the smart thing and get some sleep.

Generally the first year of buys for a console are the diehards. Pretty much the people who bought the Switch (and BotW) day one in 2017 will be the same people who buy it at launch because they live-and-die by Nintendo. The semi-informed/casual consumers will only really start buying it maybe... 2-3 years down the line when there's a specific game they want or want to play with a friend who are in the "diehard" crowd.

Hell, there's a good case to be made that a lot of people buying a Switch next year (most likely OLEDs and Lites) will be people who want to own a Switch but can't afford the big, brand-new device. Early adopters and casual consumers are very distant markets.
 
Although I disagree and do think the Switch's trajectory will help determine when the successor is released, I can atleast respect your well thought out reasoning. This is the type of discussion I like, nothing I can really dispute because Switch is a special case. It is aiming to outsell the highest of them all, that right there tells you it's a special case on top of the pandemic sending it through the roof. Nintendo may have always planned on holiday 2023 but the pandemic greatly boosted it's peak to high to even entertain this holiday. Yeah alot of people are late adopters but it doesn't help that the leading selling Switch is a premium model Switch, I would certainly say some of these people would be unhappy with finally upgrading to Oled and then finding out 6 months later a Switch 2 is coming. That's why I don't like the introduction of that red Oled, I also can't imagine what the software would be because a new 2D Mario is releasing in October and then a new 3D Marion in March? I'm sorry but I just don't see it along with the fiscal year goal.
What 3D Mario in March?
 
What 3D Mario in March?
I think he's referring to the 3D Mario title that's acting as a launch-title. Frankly, I have no goddamn clue as to what's going to be the launch title for the Switch 2 and I thought the 3D Mario would be a safe bet, but if y'all are having doubts... idk.
 
Just to be clear personally I don‘t believe in H1 release. I‘m on and off Team Summer 2024 since 2022.
 
Like what the Wii U already did for DS games on TV, this should at least be an option for fans for DS/3DS titles.

And let’s face it, the actual 2DS hardware uses a single screen mounted vertically, so it shouldn’t be an issue for the Switch to do the same, especially since it’s already a touch screen.

Shamelessly dropping my DS flipgrip + joycon concept from a few months back 😇

FmEzzPiaMAAo3lP


The idea was adding a mic function to the the R joy-con since the Switch itself doesn't have one

Haven't made one for the 3DS but I can see a future where DS comes to Switch + Successor and 3DS is exclusive to successor (especially if the new console has a camera built in). Does anyone think 3DS games could be rendered in at least 2x resolution?
 
Coming into a thread and starting off a post by accusing us of twisting facts to support our own wishes, then digging your heels in and continuing to insist you're simply right and then calling people who call you out on your attitude "karens," is a very karen thing to do ya know


Again, the very first thing you did was accuse the thread of "spinning" things to fit what we want


Suggesting the people who are upset about your attitude are covering up some deep understanding that you're actually right about it all is some borderline gaslighty stuff


Actually the reason it got under my skin is because you're being an absolute jerk to people who are just trying to have some fun in here.
Accusing? Lol, that's exactly what several of you did. There were post saying that the same bundles Nintendo as always done is proof of Switch 2 is right around the corner. I have read my post again and seriously don't see what the big deal is. Several of you got bent out of shape about what I said and instead of addressing the things I said, you focused on my "attitude", like any of you say my face or heard my tone but instantly determined I was being malicous. The majority dodged addressing what I said and instead focused on turning me into your villian. You reacted to me with emotion and dodged anything about my post because I used Nintendo's public data to suggest Nintendo probably can't annouce without affecting their goals. Plenty of you could have done that and several of you have including lexony but instead the vast majority became victims. I didn't insist I was simply right, like your post is complete nonsense, I can be confident in my speculation. Notice that not one time have I resorted to name calling but im the jerk? Ill respond to direct messages if you want to continue this, so we don't derail.
 
Please read this new, consolidated staff post before posting.

Furthermore, according to this follow-up post, all off-topic chat will be moderated.
Last edited by a moderator:


Back
Top Bottom