- Pronouns
- He/Him
Hope Nintendo brings in Top Gear 1 and 2 on the SNES.
BrazilFami would lose their minds
Hope Nintendo brings in Top Gear 1 and 2 on the SNES.
I wonder if they can license the game from Kemco. That would be an epic win. Online multiplayer is where it's at.BrazilFami would lose their minds
The 3DS Virtual Console release lacked SGB support, too. I'm still hoping that it'll get patched in somewhere along the line.Dream Land 2 without Super Game Boy support is a misdemeanor. DK ‘94 without SGB is going to be an actual crime.
I think it's more like the other way around where third parties aren't as interested in bringing their titles to NSO, since they can just re-release them on their own and reap all the profits. It would've cost less for them too since Nintendo is the one doing all the works including getting the ROMs (which they have in their archives)Xevious being here is quite notable because Namco currently sell it seperately as part of the NamcoT Collection on Switch/PS4/Xbone/PC... Might that mean that we might now be getting more Namco games on NSO?
Hopefully it's a sign that Nintendo are willing to pay what 3rd parties are asking now with the NSO/Expansion licensing money... Konami and S-E's absence on NSO is criminal.
Here's something more insidious. I think third parties might start uploading their classics to NSO... very, very, very slowly.I think it's more like the other way around where third parties aren't as interested in bringing their titles to NSO, since they can just re-release them on their own and reap all the profits. It would've cost less for them too since Nintendo is the one doing all the works including getting the ROMs (which they have in their archives)
What else can they really add that doesn't need some heavy license fees or third party cooperation? Yes that also goes for Mario RPG.This SNES library really needs work. What are these games they keep adding to it?
Side Pocket is good game thoThis SNES library really needs work. What are these games they keep adding to it?
I'm not sure but it also gets to a point where maybe you gotta start paying those licensing fees. There's soooo much obviously missing. And it's not like they aren't paying third parties for other systems.What else can they really add that doesn't need some heavy license fees or third party cooperation? Yes that also goes for Mario RPG.
What else can they really add that doesn't need some heavy license fees or third party cooperation? Yes that also goes for Mario RPG.
The thing is NSO is so cheap which I'm sure is a point of contention for licensing agreements on any title that actually is worth something. At least in regards to the base package. We don't really know how much the expansion changes that what with the Genesis selections.There are a lot of Konami or Capcom games they could add like Final Fight 2 and 3, Axelay or Sparksters but they just have not, last SNES games from them were on 2020 iirc and that's a shame, and there so far there are 0 games from Square Enix and it's subsidiaries like Taito on the service which is a crime, and instead they have just used games from Natsume, Jaleco (which they ran out of games that didn't have license issues), Data East, Piko and Interplay.
Wirking with the big guys is obviously more expensive but I feel they just should do it, is not impossible since ther eare lots of games from them on Game Pass.
Apparently that was based on an anime or something like that in Japan so there could be issues with it, but is unclear.If they had Jaleco on board this whole time then where the hell is Shatterhand? I love that game.
I do have a feeling we may see a more interesting selection on the handheld front, just because those games have always been devalued in the gaming market. There is a lot of niche titles I could see Capcom, and Konami just dropping just for the sake of it if it doesn't get a definitive collection. Like, I could totally see the GB megaman games joining the service just because they aren't worth a collection.I totally understand why Capcom won't put the mainline Mega Man games on the service when they have like 3 different Mega Man collections, and similarly get Konami not putting Castlevania's early and GBA stuff on there...
But there's also like so much weird stuff that would otherwise not get re-releases that neither company is interested in. Like the Mega Man GB games, like Castlevania Legends. Like Mystical Ninja for both SNES and N64. There's a LOT of more niche titles from major publishers that don't get a lot of love and will probably never otherwise get re-released that they should just throw to Nintendo for a small fee.
While we don't have any idea on the contracts. It seems Nintendo want to have the titles be permanently added to the service (at least until the next Nintendo system) which would make getting other titles more complicated.Do we think Mario RPG isn't coming because Nintendo wants all of these deals in perpetuity and Square doesn't want to go for that? So far not a single game has been delisted for this service which is actually kind of crazy. Some of these have to get delisted eventually right, or do we think this is all ironed out in the contracts with 3rd parties and they won't go away? I mean I have to imagine Goldeneye might be gone eventually right?
If they had Jaleco on board this whole time then where the hell is Shatterhand? I love that game.
Rights disputes between City Connection (Jaleco IP holder, US pub), Bandai Namco (Angel IP holder, JP pub), Toei (Solbrain IP holder) and Natsume (developer). It's unclear exactly who owns the rights overseas.Apparently that was based on an anime or something like that in Japan so there could be issues with it, but is unclear.
To everyone saying Nintendo needs to pony up cash to Capcom/Konami/Square Enix for the "big" third-party games, it's not just a question of paying the third parties what they'd demand. It's not especially great business to give a company like Capcom special treatment when you aren't giving other publishers that already have games on the service the same dues. It doesn't matter if you personally don't care about games like The Ignition Factor.
And for anyone that might cite GoldenEye, the old Rare games are a very special case given that they were once upon a time Nintendo-published/co-owned titles. And GoldenEye is a particularly special case with the simultaneous Xbox release.
Hope Nintendo brings in Top Gear 1 and 2 on the SNES.
I wonder if they can license the game from Kemco. That would be an epic win. Online multiplayer is where it's at.
I think you have to manually set the SNES controller to slot 1 every time unfortunately.Not really sure where to ask, so I'll ask here. I just bought the SNES NSO controller and have been pretty disappointed with it thus far.
I connected it to my Switch and it is slotted as controller 2, so while i was able to navigate with it in the menu screen, I can't select anything in the SNES app. This means when I go into the NSO app, i have to manually desync my pro-controller or the built in joycons and reassign the SNES controller as my P1 controller. Is there a way to may it default to my SNES controller when I'm in the SNES NSO?
Also, is there no way to use this in Switch games? I tried using it for Octopath 2 then realized i have no screenshot or home functionality...
They are actually going be released on the eShop (also on PS and Xbox) this year, with online and a crossover with Horizon Chase
They're clearly paying different amounts for Base NSO versus Expansion Pack already, and they clearly shelled out some more money to get some pretty noteworthy high quality Genesis exclusives from like Konami and Capcom with Castlevania, Contra, and Mega Man all showing up there on the Genesis app.
Castlevania Bloodlines and Contra Hard Corps are part of collections Konami is currently selling, though. So it’s possible to get games from collections but Nintendo is just only willing to do that for Expansion titles.I don't think it's much of a coincidence that they were able to get the games that are unlikely to find a home in a collection but not the main events, so to speak. They're a victim of the success of the collections with some of the Megaman ones passing the million mark, and the benefit of being available everywhere rather than just on Nintendo. I think that last point is a particular distinction between what happens with gamepass (where it's just a developed game that happens to be placed temporarily on a sub service) and can appear everywhere, whereas the choice to go for NSO has to be a Nintendo exclusive by default.
Not really sure where to ask, so I'll ask here. I just bought the SNES NSO controller and have been pretty disappointed with it thus far.
I connected it to my Switch and it is slotted as controller 2, so while i was able to navigate with it in the menu screen, I can't select anything in the SNES app. This means when I go into the NSO app, i have to manually desync my pro-controller or the built in joycons and reassign the SNES controller as my P1 controller. Is there a way to may it default to my SNES controller when I'm in the SNES NSO?
Also, is there no way to use this in Switch games? I tried using it for Octopath 2 then realized i have no screenshot or home functionality...
Could also mean the rights to those two genesis titles are more available for Nintendo to secure. We've seen no sign of the n64 CV games which currently aren't in any collection (and probably never will).Castlevania Bloodlines and Contra Hard Corps are part of collections Konami is currently selling, though. So it’s possible to get games from collections but Nintendo is just only willing to do that for Expansion titles.
I believe Genesis curation is up to Sega, they were the ones who secured Contra, Castlevania, Mega Man, etc and I would guess they might be willing to pay out more than Nintendo given the sizable royalty cut Emily implied they're getting.Could also mean the rights to those two genesis titles are more available for Nintendo to secure. We've seen no sign of the n64 CV games which currently aren't in any collection (and probably never will).
You had one job friendcode, and I'm horribly disappointed you missed the obvious jokeI believe Genesis curation is up to Sega, they were the ones who secured Contra, Castlevania, Mega Man, etc and I would guess they might be willing to pay out more than Nintendo given the sizable royalty cut Emily implied they're getting.
Exceptions exist without Expansion as well. River City Ransom, at least.Castlevania Bloodlines and Contra Hard Corps are part of collections Konami is currently selling, though. So it’s possible to get games from collections but Nintendo is just only willing to do that for Expansion titles.
lol, I only hope the deal also gives Nintendo better access to Sega's games on their own platforms for EP too. I want Snowboard Kids, Puyo Puyo Sun 64 and a shit ton of GBA games from them.You had one job friendcode, and I'm horribly disappointed you missed the obvious joke
"I believe Genesis curation is up to Sega, they were the ones who secured Contra, Castlevania, Mega Man, etc and I would guess they might be willing to pay out more than Nintendo given the sizable royalty cut Emily implied they're getting.
Sega does what Nintendon't"
Sega already has a few titles on non-Genesis services - Super Puyo Puyo Tsuu, SMT 1, SMT 2 SMT if and Vice: Project Doom. I think the only reason we haven't gotten Snowboard Kids 1/2 yet is just due to how slow the N64 rollout has been - and the GB/GBC/GBA lineup just hasn't had time to add Sega stuff yet; not to mention that there's still a huge amount of first-party Mega Drive/Genesis stuff left to add too.lol, I only hope the deal also gives Nintendo better access to Sega's games on their own platforms for EP too. I want Snowboard Kids, Puyo Puyo Sun 64 and a shit ton of GBA games from them.
They need to do the same sweetheart deal for Konami and bring us PCE and more of their stuff on NES/SNES/etc.
There's a couple of Puyo Puyo and Atlus/SMT games on GB/GBC Nintendo could get.Are there any actual Sega-owned games on GB or GBC? They were a first party company back then so I can't imagine there was much.
GBA on the other hand has numerous Sega games, some of which will show up on the service eventually.
There were actually a handful yes, but they were all Japan only. Here's a list.Are there any actual Sega-owned games on GB or GBC? They were a first party company back then so I can't imagine there was much.
Yeah; it's highly unlikely stuff like the Sonic Advance games get a release anywhere else, and with Sega on board for the Expansion Pack, we should hopefully get their GBA games.GBA on the other hand has numerous Sega games, some of which will show up on the service eventually.