There's no way to verify it.So MLID rumour of AMD trying to make a deal with Nintendo isn't true right?
There's no way to verify it.So MLID rumour of AMD trying to make a deal with Nintendo isn't true right?
Not true. 3D was chosen quite early in the development of the machine. Nothing bolted on (Specially because the custom 3D screen solution was quite novel).There were rumours 3D was bolted on relatively late, after SoC had already been selected, and it impacted battery life. My own assumption is it likely also impacted performance, as clearly there is a performance cost to 3D.
The OG SoC was meant to be a Tegra MCM or Tegra 2. But rumors say that it failed due to Nvidia not meeting Nintendo standards for power efficiency.The original selection was apparently nvidia Tegra 2 but the chip was too power hungry so Nintendo went with another custom design, which had an underpowered CPU and a proprietary GPU that while powerful was sort of a turnkey design from 2005 and isn't not like there's a v2 of the DMP PICA, it seemed like a one and done thing so there isn't even a clean roadmap to a 3DS successor BC outside of just including the SoC in the device.
Isn't the whole point of a CPU to do generalist tasks? That doesn't really fit with fixed functionality. And as far as I can tell, the decompression blocks in the PS5 and Xbox Series chips are on the I/O complex, not the CPU complex.
Who knows. Nintendo is free to choose their vendor, but Nvidia pros outweigh the cons. Besides, Nintendo has been wanting to work with Nvidia for the longest time.When do you think realistically AMD will have a shot at getting Nintendo business again?
Nobody knows. Maybe AMD pitched something to Nintendo and was rejected. Soundwave SoC, however, isn't a repurposed Nintendo design but rather another MS custom order, like Van Gogh/Aerith.So MLID rumour of AMD trying to make a deal with Nintendo isn't true right?
3 years from now.When do you think realistically AMD will have a shot at getting Nintendo business again?
It just feels same-ish. The 3DS and Switch 2 are both following up extremely extremely successful paradigm shifting platforms and attempting to iterate off of them. If rumors are to be believed, Switch 2 "could" also have a high price tag just like 3DS did at its time.
I've always felt like the switch 2 is a trap waiting for Nintendo and they should proceed carefully with the lessons learned from the 3DS in mind. There is one big advantage that the switch 2 will have over 3DS.
Unified software development teams. The most underrated, biggest, and best game changer to how Nintendo operates. With time, It will prove to be better than the blue ocean strategy pivot Iwata did /hot take
Thank you for sharing this. Even thought Nintendo had some rough years following the success of the Wii, the long-term effects on what they began to do paid off by the time the Switch was released.It’s not often I can talk with Nintendo employees (When I go to Japan for events) and when I do I have to be careful and they have to be careful but sometimes we can get some interesting tidbits about past events. The 3DS being a gut punch is something they’ve all expressed as if it was a company wide shock.
Another interesting one is apparently back when the Wii-u was winding down. Apparently there was a company wide initiative to allow for more younger developers to take an active role in idea creation and overall game direction. I vaguely remember this maybe being in an Iwata asks segment or something but they took it very seriously and that was viewed as a major success as the years went on. So much so the employees I spoke with were thrilled about it.
He might have. I have no clue who planned it specifically or when but it’s like a big fruit tree that just keeps on giving. I don’t think many will argue with me when I say the switch had some of the highest quality software in Nintendo’s history. Even with a global pandemic. I feel this is a big reason for that and what I mentioned in the above quote about younger developers being allowed to take more of an active role in game direction.
The initial 3DS SoC was more of a Tegra predecessor, the lead designer of which's next project was the first Tegra.Not true. 3D was chosen quite early in the development of the machine. Nothing bolted on (Specially because the custom 3D screen solution was quite novel).
The OG SoC was meant to be a Tegra MCM or Tegra 2. But rumors say that it failed due to Nvidia not meeting Nintendo standards for power efficiency.
The PICA 200 design wasn't the 2005 one but rather the revised 2008 with bigger fillrate and Mpixel/s. The CPU IP, while underpowered, would probably be the same be it Tegra or CTR that was in the device.
There was a roadmap for 3DS successor from DMP. They even had solutions that were BC with 3DS GPU IP and were researching things like real time Global Illumination at low cost with fixed shader for possible future Nintendo Portable contracts.
It's just that, as we now know, Nintendo was thinking of reusing Wii U GPU IP into the 3DS successor and bolting on the 3DS SoC for 3DS BC. Due to the lack of contract wins, DMP downsized and turned their efforts into niche applications. But they were still rumored to be into a contract with Nintendo even at Switch era, before the confirmation of Nvidia Tegra solution being used.
They should turn that into a real game tbheighting made a unreal 5 tech demo
pikmin 5 gonna look amazing lol
Not true. 3D was chosen quite early in the development of the machine. Nothing bolted on (Specially because the custom 3D screen solution was quite novel).
The OG SoC was meant to be a Tegra MCM or Tegra 2. But rumors say that it failed due to Nvidia not meeting Nintendo standards for power efficiency.
The PICA 200 design wasn't the 2005 one but rather the revised 2008 with bigger fillrate and Mpixel/s. The CPU IP, while underpowered, would probably be the same be it Tegra or CTR that was in the device.
There was a roadmap for 3DS successor from DMP. They even had solutions that were BC with 3DS GPU IP and were researching things like real time Global Illumination at low cost with fixed shader for possible future Nintendo Portable contracts.
It's just that, as we now know, Nintendo was thinking of reusing Wii U GPU IP into the 3DS successor and bolting on the 3DS SoC for 3DS BC. Due to the lack of contract wins, DMP downsized and turned their efforts into niche applications. But they were still rumored to be into a contract with Nintendo even at Switch era, before the confirmation of Nvidia Tegra solution being used.
Thank you for sharing this. Even thought Nintendo had some rough years following the success of the Wii, the long-term effects on what they began to do paid off by the time the Switch was released.
Hardware is only one half of the equation. Software is the other half of the equation, which is as important as hardware. Nvidia advertised developing the NVN API after the Nintendo Switch was announced. And I think NVN is one of the key aspects for the Nintendo Switch's third party support being quite good.Probably when they offer to build a soc with so damn good price/ performance ratio that it outweighs all the downsides.
Also helps that competitors probably couldn't offer a hardware and software package comparable to Nvidia's offering when T239 probably started development in 2019.I can't see the future, but Nintendo probably value Nvidia partnership when they were at their lowest point and Nintendo using a cutsom made chip from Nvidia is quite telling.
I'm not sure this is entirely accurate. A lot of the 3DS library from Nintendo is 2D platforming games straddling the line of red and blue ocean. It found its audience in a world on the cusp of throwing out handhelds altogether, and that's a win.3DS did not fail because of its hardware approach. Sure the 3D gimmick may have limited appeal, but the machine was solidly more powerful and that was a good foundation for success. The 3DS launch failed because of software strategy and continued belief in being the casual gaming alternative, when that window was closing and people were hungry for full gaming experiences on the go. The pivot Nintendo did with 3DS was very successful and something we don't see pulled off too often. Focusing on full course gaming experiences, rich 3D games, 3rd party 'hardcore' franchises like Monster Hunter and other RPGs, made it one of Nintendo's better libraries - and sales picked up. The lesson learned was not to avoid similari-ish hardware following up a success, but that Nintendo's core appeal and fanbase should not be forgotten.
That's one of the things I implied with "all the downsides". Currently AMD is no match for Nvidia at the software aspect. But as Oldpuck said, they're catching up.Hardware is only one half of the equation. Software is the other half of the equation, which is as important as hardware. Nvidia advertised developing the NVN API after the Nintendo Switch was announced. And I think NVN is one of the key aspects for the Nintendo Switch's third party support being quite good.
I imagine AMD also has to offer Nintendo a hardware and software package that's comparable to what Nvidia offers to have Nintendo seriously consider going back to AMD. Only time can tell if AMD can do so.
I don't think that's related to Hardware. I just think it's one of the thinks most devs don't prioritize.Anyway, it would be really cool to see dedicated hardware for directed graphs because it feels like NPC AI has stagnated badly.
what is a directed graph? and what does it do for npcs?Anyway, it would be really cool to see dedicated hardware for directed graphs because it feels like NPC AI has stagnated badly.
Didn't Iwata plan this though? I think they were trying to consolidate their business way earlier than the Switch, but the tech just wasn't there yet. They couldn't give up the handheld market due to how successful it is.
I'm not in game dev but directed graphs does not seem like anything you would need dedicated hardware for.Anyway, it would be really cool to see dedicated hardware for directed graphs because it feels like NPC AI has stagnated badly.
what is a directed graph? and what does it do for npcs?
Hardware acceleration of dialogue trees.I'm not in game dev but directed graphs does not seem like anything you would need dedicated hardware for.
Kinda like decision nodes for NPC dialogue in general
How do dialog trees work?
That is, what is connected to what and how to move between lines of speech when a sub-conversation ends? If you have any examples of a basic dialog tree in C#, please post them.gamedev.stackexchange.com
what is a directed graph? and what does it do for npcs?
NPCs isn't something that needs new hardware to improve. It's not even a hardware problem. Devs have to just... make better NPC routinesDoes anyone think there will ever be fixed function CPU cores that only do directed graphs to massively improve gaming NPC performance?
I don't know if there's any fixed function CPU stuff out there at all...
Unless the decompression chips found in modern game consoles are fixed function CPU stuff? I don't think they are, but maybe I'm wrong...
ah ok. intresting, are state machines particularly cpu intensive? how and what kind of dedicated hardware could help with such a thing?NPC behavior is generally controlled by stuff called "finite state machines" or "behavior trees" which are just types of directed graph. Directed graphs have nodes that follow an order. NPC behavior has the NPC's brain following the instructions in the directed graph where it acts as demanded in the certain node until a condition happens that causes it to go to another node.
eg
ah ok. intresting, are state machines particularly cpu intensive? how and what kind of dedicated hardware could help with such a thing?
With how pinchy Nintendo can be with money its probably that Nintendo does not want to pump more cash into their western studios right now with how weak the yen is compared to the dollar. If they are going to expand their studios soon it will probably just be in Japan.yeah, zelda, 2d mario, fire emblem, splatoon, pikmin, xenoblade, prime 5 must be all in prototype phase while the launch games and last switch games like fe4 remake,mario party and prime 4 are almost done, probably next year they gonna ramp up
not all of nintendo, unless they finishing a launch window this is really weird, above all for the dev of one of switch's graphic showcase
yeh i mean, now im thinkin bout it, if all the ai is just doing the same kinda behavior check loops i dont see why that couldnt be parallelized with a dedicated hardware. itd at least let a lot more npcs work at the same timeYeah, I have no idea which is why I'm asking, just a little disappointed by seeing DD2's NPCs eating up so much CPU and wondering if this will be the same for all games with a lot of NPC-NPC interactions.
not really? when you have to update a fuckload of them, sure. I don't think dedicated hardware could help, mainly because of latency. latency penalties are quite severe with CPU related tasks. you're better off dedicating cores to the task than offloading it to offsite siliconah ok. intresting, are state machines particularly cpu intensive? how and what kind of dedicated hardware could help with such a thing?
That is why classic game design is having NPCs that stand still and only says the same thing over again when interacting with the player. That doesn't put any pressure on the CPU.Yeah, I have no idea which is why I'm asking, just a little disappointed by seeing DD2's NPCs eating up so much CPU and wondering if this will be the same for all games with a lot of NPC-NPC interactions.
I can see Xenoblade (not sure the numbered series, but probably an X remake or sequel) looking like this. Fuck, it's gorgeous.eighting made a unreal 5 tech demo
pikmin 5 gonna look amazing lol
Maybe this could work as a tech-demo for the Switch 2, like Metroid Prime Hunters: First Hunt on the DS, serving as a proof-of-concept for the hardware's capabilities. They could also reskin this as a kind of futuristic Zelda tech-demo, it would satiate people curiosity as to how would a next-gen Zelda game look like.They should turn that into a real game tbh
Am I missing something here? I don’t see any Switch Successor mention on the kickstarter. Pledged though!
We vibin' goodHey Fami! Time for a vibe check. How are the vibes? Are we back, or is it Nintendover?
Hey Fami! Time for a vibe check. How are the vibes? Are we back, or is it Nintendover?
Then A78C at 2.5GHz should take 4W
At this point I feel vendor lock in will be because of BC. Emulation of Switch 2 games will be painfully difficult to achieve in a manner that is transparent for the consumer.3 years from now.
I think Nintendo is likely to genuinely consider AMD anytime they're looking at new hardware. The Nvidia partnership is currently very strong, but Ko Shiota, head of the hardware team, has close relationships with AMD, having worked very closely with the silicon engineers on the Wii and the Wii U (and likely, but less clearly, the GameCube).
AMD might have been able to offer Nintendo better raw performance this time around. But it couldn't deliver DLSS, it couldn't deliver high ray tracing performance, and it would have had a significantly harder time offering backwards compatibility, or the sort of software investment that Nvidia has.
But AMD is actively trying to close the feature/technology gap with Nvidia, they have a much stronger custom chip division (where Nvidia's is essentially Just Nintendo), and they're hungry for it in a way that, by the third generation, Nvidia might not be.
AMD could come in and say, look, we've closed the gap on AI, on upscaling, on frame generation, on RT. But we're ahead of Nvidia on chiplets by a huge margin - we can integrate WiFi, Bluetooth, cartridge readers, your whole motherboard into a single SOC. We've got custom ARM cores we've been building on top of Zen's execution pipeline. We've moved to new process nodes faster than Nvidia, and are willing to give you chips at a razor thin margin.
Maybe it's only a 25% chance they pull that off, but that ain't 0%.
Yeah, TSMC normal 5nm, TSMC 4N should be even better in terms of energy efficiencyPretty good I think considering the recent shipment data discoveries, games coming to Switch 2, and we’re nearing June direct which is supposedly the last Switch 1 only Direct, then floodgates should open?
Which node process are those numbers for? 5nm right?
Tha's true, I seem to remember mentions 1 CPU core would typically be reserved for OS.Also dedicated 1 core for os can be lower clocked
Why wouldn't it be? Anyone would try a deal with Nintendo. They can try. Doesn't mean they'll get it.So MLID rumour of AMD trying to make a deal with Nintendo isn't true right?
As far as I can tell, this slide says that:Then A78C at 2.5GHz should take 4W
2.5GHz as potential clocks for Switch 2 based on slide, i should fully clarify thatAs far as I can tell, this slide says that:
- A78@3GHz and [email protected] = 1W
- [email protected] = half [email protected] consumption
- Since 2.3 is less than 2.6, it means 2.1GHz is less than 0.5W.
But I don't see anything about 2.5GHz. Am I missing something?