Omg it's that guy from Famiboards.
Giving Nintendo less money? Not cool broI'll be paying £40, just like TotK. If it's on next gen as well, I guess I'll be paying more.
Giving Nintendo less money? Not cool bro
Not to brag or anything, but I literally work two jobs despite only needing one just to give Nintendo more moneyI've handed them plenty over the past 40 years, they can take the hit.
Not to brag or anything, but I literally work two jobs despite only needing one just to give Nintendo more money
If you aren't taking similar measures yourself, I can't see you as a true Nintendo fan
That will never not be weird to me. We're in a world where a quality series like Metroid can't command a full price with an amazing remaster and while ordinarily a game being cheaper isn't a bad thing, the fact it states the perception of the franchise to the parent company is a wee bit sucky.No lmao.
Nintendo didn't even think the prime 1 remaster could command full price when almost every other major remaster they've done could do.
Hoping not, but can't really guess. On one hand, Metroid IP isn't big enough for this, but on the other Nintendo might do a RE2-like trick to make the game seem more desireable. Much like Resident Evil 2 came out on two discs basically due to lack of time, but this was spun in the marketing as the game just being SO BIG, which was a success. I can see Nintendo trying higher price to try and get more money while also generating hype by making customers compare this game with ToTK.
Personally, of course, I'd rather not see any 70 dollar game in my life again, but I'm guessing Switch 2 is heading that way anyway.
If Nintendo didn't see thr profitability, I doubt they would have continued to make the game.^^^^^In development for 7 years... This is AAA for Nintendo. ^^^^^
Tears of the Kingdom was $70.
I imagine this game is unlikely to be profitable.
isn't that what happened with ToTK?If it’s $70, that’s gonna make any $60 preorders people already have baked in real interesting.