Why are you acting like you know what EPD's "main focuses" are—and that Donkey Kong can't be one of them—when Nintendo is investing hundreds of millions of dollars into a Donkey Kong theme park and rumored film? They want to turn Donkey Kong into a huge multimedia franchise, and developing a new AAA game is obviously part of that plan. We don't definitively know whether this new game will be 2D or 3D, but your implication is that a 2D game would, by default, have a smaller budget—and would therefore be a "lesser" experience. I don't agree with that mentality in the slightest. EPD's Donkey Kong game is going to be ambitious no matter what they decide to make.
Tbf, Zelda just reached those numbers. Before BotW, it sold just as much as DKC did. A hypothetical 3D DK could, at the very least, reach 10 million+ given recent trends.Because Mario and Zelda are 97 Metacritic, 25m selling games that are massive system sellers and Mario Kart and Animal Crossing just sold 50m units.
These are the four overwhelmingly important Nintendo IPs.
That was 25 years ago!Tbf, Zelda just reached those numbers. Before BotW, it sold just as much as DKC did. A hypothetical 3D DK could, at the very least, reach 10 million+ given recent trends.
These are the four overwhelmingly important Nintendo IPs and all other EPD resources have to be fit around them.
This just feels very rigid/limiting to me. It's basically saying that there can only ever be 4 franchises that get the most attention/resources. I don't think Nintendo's goal is to elevate four franchises as more "important" than all the others.
What was 25 years ago? I'm talking about the average sales of both franchises.That was 25 years ago!
Regardless of the sales potential of Donkey Kong (and this is extremely hard to judge without knowing the scope and type of hypothetical game), Nintendo EPD pretty clearly has four massive IPs it needs to support as much as possible and has several other games it's making as well. This makes a massively ambitious Donkey Kong game far more difficult to slot in.
What was 25 years ago? I'm talking about the average sales of both franchises.
Yeah this. On another note, I swear that ever since the DK rumors started some people are acting like they are EPD experts and are following this topic for years. Either way, I don't care., Tokyo please show up. 3D Mario reserved for next machine, DK probably not.If you think they are building a theme park around the Donkey Kong franchise only to treat it like a second-tier game franchise you can't be helped. Obviously they want Donkey Kong to be a big gaming franchise with that and EPD Tokyo doing their magic on the franchise is a sure-fire way to make that happen.
As for these rumours, it is all so wishy-washy that I have trouble even making real sense of it. Why do all these people have sources on EPD working on Donkey Kong but don't know anything else about Nintendo's software line-up? Doesn't really add up to me.
I just want Tokyo to finally announce their game, it's been almost 6 years. It has to be soon.
You mean three projects. Captain Toad 2.Given NST's work over the last few years, it wouldn't surprise me if they're helping with one or both of EPD 8's projects.
Not believing there's a 3D DK game in development doesn't mean someone is a troll. There's no need to level accusations like that.It’s obvious that this dude is a troll and is jealous that DK is getting any spotlight and this person’s goal is to derail the thread. Don’t pay any attention to them anymore
Never said the game was certainly 3D, but if you come into a DK thread and say that the franchise is trash and unworthy of EPD, then I’m going to call that person a troll.Not believing there's a 3D DK game in development doesn't mean someone is a troll. There's no need to level accusations like that.
Crash Bandicoot, which would be even worse imoreminder that if that's true call of duty directly killed donkey kong
Who said this, and where? This is a crass misrepresentation of what someone said and this kind of attitude only helps this thread go off the rails.Never said the game was certainly 3D, but if you come into a DK thread and say that the franchise is trash and unworthy of EPD, then I’m going to call that person a troll.
It's not unreasonable to say Nintendo might prioritise certain franchises because of limited development resources. It's also not unreasonable to dispute that and suggest that things might be more nuanced. It's not difficult to discuss that in a civil manner, but that won't happen if you misrepresent what people say and take someone else's views as an insult.Disagreeing with the game being in development is fine and welcome but it’s silly to say this franchise is beneath EPD. I don’t want this thread to derail into “my franchise is better than your franchise” debates
I'm also waiting for EPD 9 to have a new Switch game in the works.Tokyo please show up. 3D Mario reserved for next machine, DK probably not.
Point taken. Let’s move on.Who said this, and where? This is a crass misrepresentation of what someone said and this kind of attitude only helps this thread go off the rails.
It's not unreasonable to say Nintendo might prioritise certain franchises because of limited development resources. It's also not unreasonable to dispute that and suggest that things might be more nuanced. It's not difficult to discuss that in a civil manner, but that won't happen if you misrepresent what people say and take someone else's views as an insult.
What's going on with this Vicarious Visions DK game that was cancelled? This thread is too dense to actually find the info I'm looking for haha.
What's going on with this Vicarious Visions DK game that was cancelled? This thread is too dense to actually find the info I'm looking for haha.
I think your argument would have landed better if you didn't bring up the sales stuff. I kind of get where you're coming from - Donkey Kong maybe could have been a 15m+ seller IP, but we have no way of knowing, and with resources already going to Mario/Zelda/Splatoon/Animal Crossing, it would take more effort for Nintendo to start cultivating Donkey Kong into that 10m+ IP. But that doesn't change the fact that DK was as consistent a seller if not moreso than Zelda (and I mean, if we're going to lowball and include spin-offs like Jungle Beat, Minish Cap is one of the worst selling Zelda games of all time and that's mainline)Because Mario and Zelda are 97 Metacritic, 25m selling games that are massive system sellers and Mario Kart and Animal Crossing just sold 50m units.
To be fair, it’s a rumor that started both here and there. The thread didn’t blow up Professor Chops made his post. Afaik he’s not a DK Vine forum member, but his post was cross posted on DK Vine, and the regulars of that forum, myself included, agreed that it lines up with a lot of the stuff we’ve heard.It's a rumor from DK Vine that makes no sense.
I agree. I empathize with the people who’ve been waiting for another side scroller, but as someone who loves DK64 unabashedly, it’s a crime they’ve made us wait this long.I wish the 3D DK game from VV leaks. DK really deserved another 3D game………
Frankly even if it's a collectathon with massive sprawling levels, they should have parts of the game that change to a sidescrolling view, almost like Mario Odyssey. In Mario Odyssey, it was cute, but kind of a novelty since almost all the 2D platforming was super easy. In a 3D Donkey Kong game, you could make 2D sections that are more challenging and still present them in 3D just from a sidescrolling perspective, so it's kind of the best of DKC, but in the world of a normal 3D platformer.I agree. I empathize with the people who’ve been waiting for another side scroller, but as someone who loves DK64 unabashedly, it’s a crime they’ve made us wait this long.
The last time we got a 3D DK game was last century. Put that in perspective lol
I was gonna bring up Kirby, but welp....All signs point to Nintendo taking DK series and hopefully a big staple of their IP’s going forward. Knowing this they have to take it 3D at some point. You’re not keeping a staple franchise at 2D the entire time.
Of course; it wasn't a secret that Naughty Dog originally took lots of inspiration of the DKC games Rare made; Down to the HUD showing up only when you collect stuff to get you immersive, to themes that constantly got more evolved as both trilogies went further.Tbh, I feel like Crash comes pretty close to that “DKC in 3D” feel. There’s the nature themed environments, lots of animal characters, obstacle course platforming with I’d even say a pretty similar difficulty level. There’s even the slide jump which I feel like is similar in a lot of ways to DK’s roll jump.
There are def still enough differences between the series that they both feel unique as their own thing, but the way Crash does remind me of “3D DK” in so many ways makes me feel like if the new DK devs wanted to translate DKC gameplay to 3D, it could totally be possible imo.
Of course; it wasn't a secret that Naughty Dog originally took lots of inspiration of the DKC games Rare made; Down to the HUD showing up only when you collect stuff to get you immersive, to themes that constantly got more evolved as both trilogies went further.
However, there's still the distinctive details that makes both very different of each other; As Crash makes more of an importance the completionism route, whereas DKC not so much (but it's there if you want to, with tangible rewards); -- Crash also plays a lot with the perspective, since back then they were trying to "invent" the 3D platformer, and had no template to base off (development started before Super Mario 64 had its first showing even), so more often than not they pick a "dimension" for a level to work with;
-- I also we've seen some suggestions of 3D DK being more 3D Land/3D World, and give a more top-down perspective.. but how dense the Donkey Kong settings are used to be, I don't know if that's the right way to do it either,..
and it's not even that I doubt EPD will do a great job, no matter what they decide to do.... is simply that is nothing there like a Donkey Kong Country game.. not even the inspired ones like Impossible Lair and Kaze and the Wild Masks scratch that exact same itch.
We’re long past due for Mario Kart 9/10/whatever the hell they’re calling it, I’d be very surprised if it didn’t at least make Switch Redacted.I'm also waiting for EPD 9 to have a new Switch game in the works.
Why can't we have both?If they're going to go back to 3D DK, I'd rather they go as far away from DK64 as possible! Awful game, and an absolutely miserable experience. A new 3D DK with 5 playable Kongs sounds pretty terrible, unless you're going to go the Mario 3D World route where you don't NEED all 5 to advance in different places like you did in DK64. Even then I would be hesitant. I'd much rather the whole game be linear platforming, give it some more focus.
But what would be even better than a 3D DK... is a 2D one! While Nintendo can definitely make a better platformer than DK64, the bar is extremely low. The bar for 2D DK may be high, but I'd love to see modern EPD Tokyo take a crack at it. While it has been a long time since Jungle Beat (an excellent game in its own right), I know they could leave their mark on the series and make something truly special.
Why can't we have both?
I think people need to let go of the idea of any developer holding true to "Rare's vision". DK64 was an awful game that has a cheesy meme rap song. But even that aside, when Retro made two DKC games that were excellent, some DKC fans couldn't accept that they opted for new villains instead of bringing back Kremlings. That's not an invalid desire, but the devs should be allowed to cook with new ideas.My hope is that we get consistent 2D and 3D DK games alternating. Every other major Nintendo franchise has this such as Mario, Zelda and Metroid. Why couldn’t they do this for DK? Tanabe even hinted at this back in 2014: https://www.nintendolife.com/news/2...ghts_potential_return_of_3d_donkey_kong_games
I’m sure there’s plenty of studios capable of making a banger of a 2D platformer. I mean Nintendo let VV work on an open world DK game. I’m sure they’d find a passionate and great studio that could make s 2D DK if this game turns out to be 3D.
Mercury Steam was a studio I’ve never heard of until they started working on Metroid. There’s plenty of great studios out there. Imagine Playtonic making a 2D DK game with a Nintendo budget.
I’d like a 3D DK to follow what Rare’s vision was for DK64, just way better executed and streamlined. Rare had some awesome ideas, but they got carried away with the collectibles and the N64 just wasn’t powerful enough for a large scale DK like it can be made now. I think 5 Kongs is a unique mechanic that could help DK stand out from the crowd. Just make DK, Diddy, Dixie, Cranky and Funky the playable Kongs since they’re the most popular Kongs by far, add the animal buddies in a 3D space, bring the Kremlings back.
You can still have linear platforming as part of challenges. Imagine BotW like shrines but each shrine is a 2D platforming challenge or a linear 3D one. There’s ways you can do things to push the DK franchise forward without it losing its identity
The DK64 is an awful game is an opinion and you're welcome to it. Although Metacritic would disagree with a 90, even though Metacritic isn't the end all be all of delegating which games are quality or not. I also don't understand why a "cheesy" rap song is so offensive. It adds to the game's charm. DK is a goofy series that was never meant to be taken seriously.I think people need to let go of the idea of any developer holding true to "Rare's vision". DK64 was an awful game that has a cheesy meme rap song. But even that aside, when Retro made two DKC games that were excellent, some DKC fans couldn't accept that they opted for new villains instead of bringing back Kremlings. That's not an invalid desire, but the devs should be allowed to cook with new ideas.