- Pronouns
- He/Him
To be fair that Greggs sausage roll probably would have outlasted her too.I'm only just caught up on the lettuce memes
I'm kinda amazed that her whole legacy is gonna essentially be this memeI'm only just caught up on the lettuce memes
It was all a dream,I'm kinda amazed that her whole legacy is gonna essentially be this meme
something something appleIt's comforting to know as the US circles the toilet our dear dad the United Kingdom isn't far behind us
Like apple, like tree.something something apple
something something tree
Or actually...Like apple, like tree.
Makes sense, because US desperately tries to imitate their parents as well since its infancy, even though it claims to be nothing like them, because ew.Or actually...
Don't parents often go through that awkward phase where they imitate their kids to try and look cool? Maybe that's what's going on..
I guess she couldn't be Truss-ted, huh?
Runs away.
I get your point but the despair and anger that's being felt across the country is largely because nobody has any say in any of this but instead has to watch their lives go to shit while this lot perform rich tosser theatre on the national stage and profit from their suffering. The idea of a masochist electorate allows us to sidestep the fact that we live under a ghoulish political class who despise us. Even a Starmer government would implement harsh austerity, they're already making excuses for it in advance.But there is a point where we should stop the UK from punishing themselves
The FTSE surged because the cryptobros heard the UK is now becoming a Trussless society
runs away
My apologies, sometimes a joke is needed, but I need to be serious about it.I get your point but the despair and anger that's being felt across the country is largely because nobody has any say in any of this but instead has to watch their lives go to shit while this lot perform rich tosser theatre on the national stage and profit from their suffering. The idea of a masochist electorate allows us to sidestep the fact that we live under a ghoulish political class who despise us. Even a Starmer government would implement harsh austerity, they're already making excuses for it in advance.
A Starmer Government would in no way implement harsh austerity. All of their recently announced policies, indicate that they will be spending again on the NHS, welfare and energy, far more than even the most left leaning Tory would ever consider. Heck today even they announced a wide range of new policies that would help workers get fairer benefits and protections (announcements that were understandably overshadowed).I get your point but the despair and anger that's being felt across the country is largely because nobody has any say in any of this but instead has to watch their lives go to shit while this lot perform rich tosser theatre on the national stage and profit from their suffering. The idea of a masochist electorate allows us to sidestep the fact that we live under a ghoulish political class who despise us. Even a Starmer government would implement harsh austerity, they're already making excuses for it in advance.
I get not liking Starmer but I hate this 'what's the point when Labour are just as bad' nonsense because it's a self defeating false equivilence and lets the conservatives keep their grip on power.
My apologies, sometimes a joke is needed, but I need to be serious about it.
We have to be realistic in that Labour, when they get into power, are going to be left with a flaming dumpster fire to deal with and they will spend the entirity of their first term putting them out. They're not going to be able to wave a magic wand and sort this stuff out in six months. We are going to have to be patient, and that includes during this period when they're still in opposition. I mean it'd be carthatic to see Starmer go nuclear on the idiots who did this to us sure, but tactically at this moment I think they're making the right calls; presenting a united front, offering enough of a tangible vision of what the country would like under them, and not interrupting the Tories when they continue to trip over their own shoelaces. And you need only look at the polls for evidence this approach is working.I didn't say they were just as bad - I'm a Labour voter and obviously would rather a Labour government than a Conservative one - but I was disappointed and uninspired by Starmer's speech at the TUC and feel that they currently have carte blanche to focus on clearing the very low bar the Tories have set. My feeling is that they'll continue to leave a lot of people in the lurch or tell people things can't be that much better. I would love for them to inspire more confidence from me, believe me, but there have been big missteps by the party on a lot of fronts over the past couple of years for me that continue today and make me distrustful. I'll still hold my nose and go forward with them if it's the best route to a smidgen of change.
I mean yes, the polls are incredible and I'm sure they'll absolutely run away with the next election, but the Tories are doing a lot of work for them by absolutely shitting the bed on a huge scale. I want the Tories out, but I'm still not exactly jazzed for Starmer's Labour and I don't trust most of them at all. I hope my distrust turns out to be unnecessary and I hope they offer more than not being as shit as their predecessors, that's all.And you need only look at the polls for evidence this approach is working.
There's definitely an issue that the Bank of England has acted sluggishly recently, and the past 12 years of monetary and political policy has largely resulted in the already wealthy either consolidating their riches or getting richer at the expense of everyone else. You can absolutely make the case that this is why our economy is so sluggish and productivity so poor, because despite everything looking fresh on the surface it's all collapsing on the inside.I think the most interesting thing about this whole fiasco is the question of how sovereign democratic governments even are in the face of global markets anymore. The UK's fiscal policy is now largely set out by the central bank (as it controls the interest rates), which is independent from the government. The UK central bank has been raising rates, in an effort to induce recession, in an effort to control inflation. This is because inflation is seen as the greater evil than recession - in part because it hurts the rich far more than the poor over the medium to long term (which I think a lot of people don't understand), while recession almost always benefits those with cash in hand able to scoop up assets at bargain prices.
So the Truss/Kwarteng budget went directly against this fiscal policy - it was designed to spend big and promote growth. Sure, that growth would have been concentrated among the rich and corporations, and they had no idea where the money would come from but that's what it was. Totally contrary to the Bank of England's policy.
And the markets rose up and said "Fuck you, the Bank of England is right, you're wrong - get the fuck out." And now they're out, basically immediately. While it's the right call, that's a little worrying to me.
The real mystery is how a clueless and incompetent political outsider with no allies like Truss ever made it to the top spot in the first place. Makes no sense whatsoever. I did feel bad for her - pure incompetence and idiocy is not malice.
It felt so uncanny the second it became apparent she was going to win the leadership contest. Like surely everyone knew it was a disaster waiting to happen. But as Galgavias says, nothing seems to be rooted in reality for them anymore, and I sort of wonder if they've all been aware of this and so they're just chucking people into the spotlight as kindling while they...I don't know, buy time? Try to make off with everything they can? I don't think they anticipated Truss would do so much damage though and probably believed they could use her to tread water for a while.The real mystery is how a clueless and incompetent political outsider with no allies like Truss ever made it to the top spot in the first place. Makes no sense whatsoever.
I completely agree. I think denial is a natural reaction to negative news, and the reality that the UK has become comparatively impoverished in both the working and middle classes compared to other leading nations, that Brexit can't really work etc - this is news so negative and difficult to actually deal with in practice that denial actually makes sense as a reaction.There's definitely an issue that the Bank of England has acted sluggishly recently, and the past 12 years of monetary and political policy has largely resulted in the already wealthy either consolidating their riches or getting richer at the expense of everyone else. You can absolutely make the case that this is why our economy is so sluggish and productivity so poor, because despite everything looking fresh on the surface it's all collapsing on the inside.
But the issue is really that the conservatives have been operating in La La Land ever since Brexit happened. Economic reality was flung out and replaced with a near religious fervor, anyone pointing out the realities and follies of this project chased out and branded a heathen. Heck the current BoE Governor got the job from Boris by being a Brexit true believer, so it's no wonder they're chasing their tails.
And then in steam Truss and Kwartang with their insane libertarian nonsense, put into power by their mysterious financial backers, keen to turn us into their petri dish for their radical far right ideas. And lo and behold, as happens every time they attempt to implement their nonsense, it runs into a brick wall when it meets reality.
British Politics is no longer based in reality, but in feelings and emotion. And that's why it's unravelling at breakneck speed.
Just waiting for Boris to get back in then get suspended by the Privileges Committee. The bantz will be off the charts.
If he gets back in, it's a certainty he will try every trick to get the committee nullified.Just waiting for Boris to get back in then get suspended by the Privileges Committee. The bantz will be off the charts.
I don’t think it does lead to that, because the people complaining that Starmer isn’t good enough for them aren’t going to go and vote Conservative, they’re going to hold their nose and vote Labour (if they’re in England) or Green or someone else who actually has an appealing platform.I get not liking Starmer but I hate this 'what's the point when Labour are just as bad' nonsense because it's a self defeating false equivilence and lets the conservatives keep their grip on power.
Sounds about right.Daily Star on Boris today: “They’ve tossed aside the lettuce, now they’re serving up the aubergine”
I think my main point wasn't so much that 'we have to vote Labour in no matter what'. Ultimately it's your vote, and what you do with it what you will. But the issue I take is the idea that a Labour government would just be a continuation of the status quo so there's no point voting for them. And a lot of people do think that way. A flawed, warts and all Labour government is still preferable to a conservative one at this stage, and if they did get into power they would bring in some good policies because Labour generally do whenever they're in power. Heck even under Blair we got the minimum wage and improved maternity, for example.I don’t think it does lead to that, because the people complaining that Starmer isn’t good enough for them aren’t going to go and vote Conservative, they’re going to hold their nose and vote Labour (if they’re in England) or Green or someone else who actually has an appealing platform.
It’s very understandable imo why people would not be thrilled at the idea of a Starmer government given the dramatic political makeover he has undergone since 2019, firmly moving towards the center when the Tories are moving in leaps and bounds towards the right. You can argue it has been done to make him more “electable”, but when you consider most politicians underdeliver on what they promise in their campaign or manifesto then it’s hard to be enthusiastic about what he will try and accomplish.
Imo, what the general public sees as the “appeal” of Labour at the moment is that the Tories have immolated themselves and destroyed the economy in a spectacular fashion and they are desperate for change, not desperate for Labour. Boris was ousted in an extremely embarrassing manner and still the polling was nothing like it is now, with many finding Starmer only +20 favourability points above Johnson but still in the negative figures, even as late as June / July when Boris was in the midst of his scandals.
In Scotland particularly Labour have made deals with the Tories, not the SNP, to take minority control of councils in Stirling and North Lanarkshire. It is hard to stomach this behaviour given Labour claim to be ideologically more similar to the SNP yet would rather compromise with the Tories just to keep the SNP out of office than have actual progressive councils.